Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIKAS CHANDRAKANT DALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The sentence is suspended until the final hearing and disposal of the appeal, and bail is granted on a personal bond.

Summary

Vikas was convicted by a Special Court under the POCSO Act and sentenced to a term of up to three years. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 350 of 2026). The State opposed, arguing that the conviction was final and the maximum punishment had been imposed. The court observed that the appeal would likely take time, the applicant had been on bail during trial, and the trial court had already suspended the sentence. Consequently, the application was allowed, the sentence was suspended until the appeal is finally heard, and bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000.

Issues considered

  • Whether a sentence imposed under the POCSO Act can be suspended pending the final disposal of an appeal
  • Whether bail can be granted to a convicted person after sentencing but before the appeal is heard

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • suspension of sentence
  • bail
  • POCSO Act
  • appeal pending
  • criminal application
  • special court
  • conviction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:21911
                                                                           36-CRIAPLN-1882-26.odt
                                                   1

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                            CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1882 OF 2026
                                            IN
                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 350 OF 2026

          Vikas S/o. Chandrakant Dalvi,
          Age: 26 years, Occu.: Labour,
          R/o.Baradgaon Sudrik,
          Taluka Karjat, Dist. Ahilyanagar.                          … Applicant
                                                                     (Orig. Accused)
                VERSUS

          The State of Maharashtra
          Through: The Police Station Officer,
          Karjat Police Station,
          Taluka Karjat, Dist. Ahilyanagar.                          … Respondent

                                              ......
          Mr. Yuvraj S. Choudhari, Advocate for Petitioner
          Mr. B.v. Virdhe, APP for Respondent-State

                                                 ......

                                           CORAM          : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                                            [VACATION COURT]
                                           DATE           : 18 MAY, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.     Heard.


          2.         Issue notice to respondent – State. Learned APP waives service of

          notice for respondent – State.


          3.     Instant application is for suspension of sentence and grant of bail on

          account of conviction recorded by learned Judge, Special Court (POCSO Act)

          Shrigonda dated 18.04.2026 in Special (POCSO) Case No. 49 of 2025.
                                                                  36-CRIAPLN-1882-26.odt
                                         2

2.      Learned counsel pointed out that present applicant was held guilty by

the learned Judge, Special Court (POCSO Act), Shrigonda vide judgment dated

18.04.2026 passed in Special (POCSO) Case No. 49 of 2025 under Sections 78

Bharatiya Naya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 12 of the POCSO Act and

under Section 79 of Bharatiya Naya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 8 of the

the POCSO Act. That, maximum punishment inflicted upon the applicant is of

three years only. That, applicant has preferred appeal and the same is of the

year 2026. According to him, as appeal against conviction would take long time

to be heard, he urged for relief of suspension as well as grant of bail.


3.       Opposing the above application, learned APP pointed out that

maximum sentence awarded is imprisonment for three years. He submitted

that, on full fledged trial guilt has been recorded.


4.      Heard. Perused the papers including the judgment under challenge by

way of appeal. Apparently, applicant was held guilty under the aforesaid

provisions. Said judgment is challenged by way of appeal and the same appears

to be numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 350 of 2026. Consequently, appeal

being recent, may not be heard early. Applicant was reported to be on bail

during trial and he has been granted suspension by the Trial Court. Therefore,

in the light of above discussion, relief of suspension of sentence deserves to be

granted. Hence, following order is passed.

                                     ORDER

(I)     Criminal Application stands allowed.
                                                                36-CRIAPLN-1882-26.odt
                                          3

(II)       The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant in Special (POCSO)
Case No. 49 of 20259 by the learned Judge, Special Court (POCSO Act),
Shrigonda on 18.04.2026, stands suspended till the final hearing and disposal
of Criminal Appeal No. 350 of 2026.


(III)      The applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen
Thousand Only) with one solvent surety each, in the like amount.


(IV)       Bail before the trial court.




                                              [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                        JUDGE
S P Rane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.