Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
773 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Sandeep Bhanudas Kotkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined this …
The petitioner, Sandip Namdeorao Tayade, filed writ petition No. 81 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Collector and others. The petitioner later instructed his counsel to seek the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered …
The appellant, originally the defendant, claimed ownership of a parcel of land based on an unregistered partition deed, which led to her name being entered in the 7/12 revenue record. The respondent, the original plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration and possession of the land. The appellant …
In a writ petition (12 WRIT PETITION NO. 2217 OF 2019) filed by Suryakant Bansilal Karwa against Varsha Tukaram Kalshetti, the petitioner moved a motion to speak to the minutes of the order dated 04.05.2026. The petitioner sought to have the appearance of the respondent's counsel, Mr. P. R. Tandale, …
The petitioners challenged the order dated 07‑09‑2018 of the Tahsildar, which allowed an application by Respondent No.3 under section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars Courts Act, 1906, alleging that the panchanama conflicted with the village map and that no customary road existed. They further contended that …
The petitioner, Pralhad Narayanrao Naik, filed a writ petition challenging mutation entries in revenue records. The petitioner submitted a decree in his favor from a Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli, while the respondents presented a dismissal order from another judge in a related suit. Both …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the award of compensation in a land acquisition proceeding for the Raibhar Medium Project in Osmanabad, where the original award of Rs.6,649.60 per acre was enhanced by the reference court to Rs.1,71,500 per acre. The claimants had sought Rs.40,000 per acre, while …
The State of Maharashtra appealed judgments awarding compensation for lands acquired for the Ruibhar Medium Project. The appellants contended that the reference court improperly relied on a sale deed dated 02‑07‑1982, which concerned land within Osmanabad municipal limits, as a comparable sale for …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against judgments that awarded compensation for lands acquired for the Ruibhar Medium Project, contending that the lower court had improperly relied on a sale deed dated 02‑07‑1982 for determining market value. The sale deed concerned land within Osmanabad municipal …
The petitioners, Sopan Janardhan Gore and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging actions of the Gram Panchayat of Village Shirur. While the petition was pending, the civil suit that formed the factual basis of the petition was finally decided by …
The petitioner, Vinayak Sadashivrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive …
A writ petition (No. 4618 of 2018) was filed by Deelip Namdeorao Nade and others against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners sought relief against the respondents, though the specific grounds are not detailed in the judgment. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel …
The State acquired land for the ash‑bund of the Parli‑Vaijnath Thermal Power Station under a Section 4 notification of the Special Land Acquisition Act. Original compensation of Rs 50‑70 per R was paid, which the claimants accepted under protest and challenged through Land Acquisition References …
The Executive Engineer, Kukadi Left Bank Canal, appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay against a judgment and award dated 11 February 2011 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos. 516‑519 of 2003, contending that the compensation awarded, which was up to four times the …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 12‑Nov‑2018 by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Latur, which had allowed condonation of delay in filing an appeal. Respondents 3‑7 argued that the petitioners could instead seek relief under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. …
The Executive Engineer, Kukadi Left Bank Canal, appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay against a judgment and award dated 11 February 2011 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.516‑519 of 2003, contending that the compensation awarded was excessive. The State of …
Janardan Vitthal Mukke filed a writ petition (No. 2592 of 2020) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Meera Baburao Buddhe and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Yashkumar S. Kothale, with Mr. Avinash S. Khedkar as his head of firm. During the hearing, counsel for the …
The petitioner, Suprabha Prakash Salvi, filed a writ petition seeking appointment as guardian of her disabled brother Sagar Prakash Salvi after the District Judge rejected her application. The petitioner asserted that the father (respondent No.1) owned no immovable or inheritable property, and she …
The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL) issued an assessment bill to Navjeevan Tyres Pvt. Ltd for differential charges, alleging the consumer had been billed under an Industrial tariff instead of the correct Commercial tariff for its tyre re‑treading business. The …
The petitioners, Laxman Sonsabapu Sansare & Others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court, after considering the submission, held that the …
The appellant, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed a civil application seeking the withdrawal of the entire amount it had deposited, together with accrued interest. The respondent, Vijaymala Munjaji Karhale & Ors., opposed the application. The court examined the averments made in the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30 September 2016 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik. The court observed that the petitioners have an alternate and equally efficacious remedy by filing a second revision before the State Government, a principle previously …
The petitioners challenged the orders dated 20‑06‑2013 and 14‑07‑2015 whereby the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, and the State Minister recorded the names of respondents No. 6 and 7 in the revenue records on the basis of a disputed 1986 partition deed. The respondents had sought to have their …
Balasaheb Wamanrao Sathe filed a writ petition (No. 1388 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Ramabai Kondiba Dhondge and others. Both parties' counsel argued that, because of the passage of time, no cause of action or relevant facts remained, rendering the …
The petitioner, Gulab Jethanand Chawala, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the petition and instead pursue a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners argued that a revision would …
The petitioner, Bhagwan Dattu Telange, filed a writ petition seeking relief. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh application after having led evidence. The sole issue before the court was whether …
The petitioners, Waman Kisan Tale and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition and to be allowed to file an appeal before the District Court. The petitioners’ counsel, Mr. Tapse …
The petitioner challenged a 15 November 2019 order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, via a writ petition. The court noted that the petitioner had an alternate and equally efficacious remedy – a revision before the State Government – which had already been considered by the Supreme Court in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2020 challenging the actions of the Kanifnath Devasthan. The petition remained unattended, with no petitioner appearing in both the morning and afternoon sessions on the hearing date. The court observed that the petition had been pending for several years …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Charity Commissioner. The petition remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioners. On 9 April 2026, the Court noted the petitioners' non‑appearance …
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first appeals challenging a common judgment and award dated 26 October 2010 that increased compensation for land acquired from various respondents. The reference court had enhanced the compensation from Rs.47,000 per hectare, as determined by the Land …
The petitioner challenged two orders of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Shrigonda in a boundary suit: one allowing the respondent to deposit the court commissioner fee and another appointing a Court Commissioner to measure the suit land. The petitioner argued that the trial court should have …
The petitioner, Asoda Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Limited, filed writ petition No. 8057 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petition remained unattended, with no appearance from the petitioner even …
The petitioners challenged a District Judge's order allowing an amendment to the plaint at the appellate stage in a suit concerning the validity of a sale deed. They argued that the original plaintiff (respondent) had ample opportunity to amend earlier and that the amendment was an attempt to fill a …
The petitioner, Dagadu Yadav Dalal, challenged a 2009 judgment and award of a land acquisition reference that had been dismissed because he failed to appear or present evidence. He filed a writ petition in 2020, invoking a precedent (Walmik Trimbak Tupe v. State) to seek restoration of the reference …
The petitioners Mahendra Nathuram Pandya and another filed a writ petition (19 WRIT PETITION NO. 3703 OF 2022) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the National Highway Authority of PIU and others. The petition was listed before Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre on 16 February 2026. …
The petitioners, Devidas Dagdu Jadhav and another, filed a writ petition challenging two orders: one dated 22‑12‑2016 passed by the Principal District Judge, Osmanabad in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.18 of 2015, and another dated 30‑01‑2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tuljapur …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh Akole, filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that rejected its application for a Jangam warrant against the respondent and dismissed the execution proceedings. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be present at the execution site, …
Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh (Akole) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon dated 28 September 2015, which dismissed its application for a Jangam warrant and execution proceedings against the respondents. The lower court had directed the decree holder …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh, challenged a lower court order that rejected its application for a Jangam warrant against the respondent and dismissed the execution proceedings. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be present at the execution site, but the decree holder failed …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh Akole, challenged the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon, which rejected its application for a Jangam warrant and dismissed execution proceedings against the respondent. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be present at the …
Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh Akole, through its manager, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon, which rejected its application for a Jangam warrant against Appa Ganpat Rathod (Judgment Debtor No.1) and dismissed the execution proceedings. The lower …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh, challenged a order dated 28 September 2015 in which the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon dismissed its application for a Jangam warrant and the execution proceedings against the judgment debtor. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh, sought a Jangam warrant against the respondent judgment debtor, but the execution petition was dismissed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon. The court had directed the decree holder to be present at the spot during execution, a condition the …
The petitioner, Agasti Sarva Seva Sangh Akole, challenged the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon, which rejected its application for a Jangam warrant against the judgment debtor and dismissed the execution proceedings. The lower court had directed the decree holder to be present …
The petitioners challenged notices dated 29‑12‑2018 and 10‑01‑2019 issued by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Kallam, under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. They alleged that the notices were served without affording them an opportunity of hearing, …
The petitioners challenged notices dated 29‑12‑2018 and 10‑01‑2019 issued by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Kallam, under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. They contended that the notices were served without affording them a prior opportunity of …
The petitioners Suresh Dhondiba Hople (deceased) represented by Sangita and others filed a civil application against Sultanbin Alibin Gahwesh and others. The application sought relief under prayer clause (B). The Court, after considering the reasons stated, allowed the application in terms of prayer …
The writ petition filed by Nalini Punamchand Joshi in 2020 remained unprosecuted as the petitioner failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions of the hearing. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioners, Bhaskar Namdeo Gawkare and others, challenged an order dated 27 December 2016 passed by the District Judge‑2, Osmanabad in MCA No.16 of 2016. They sought the High Court’s intervention to curb the prolonged pendency of Regular Civil Suit No.474 of 2015, which had been pending since …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for land acquired in 1993 for the Sarvadi Medium Project. The original award fixed compensation at Rs 6,800 per acre, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 40,000 per acre, also …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the award of compensation for land acquired in 1993 for the Sarvadi Medium Project. The reference court had fixed compensation at Rs.6,800 per acre, later enhanced to Rs.40,000 per acre, and granted additional amounts for fruit‑bearing trees and structures …
Vishwanath Martandrao Gavli filed a writ petition (907 WRIT PETITION NO. 1101 OF 2016) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Additional Commissioner for Cooperation and Special Registrar, Pune, among others. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the petition …
The petitioners, Mangalabai Bapurao Lokhande and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking permission to delete the name of respondent No.3 and to set aside an order dated 06.12.2021 of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad, which had rejected their amendment …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge‑2, Sangamner, which had rejected their application for condonation of a 1,703‑day delay in filing an appeal against a scheme order dated 02‑07‑2002 under Section 50A(1) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioner, Purushottam Ratanlal Tapade, challenged an order dated 31.12.2018 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur, in Appeal No. 102/2018. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternate and equally efficacious remedy by filing a revision before …
The petitioners, Ambrushi Laxman Sonawane and others, filed writ petitions No. 8120 and 8121 of 2017 against the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad and other respondents. The matters were listed before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench, and were heard by the Court. The Court referred to its earlier …
The appellant, Laxman Deorao Sakalkar, appealed the award of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge concerning compensation for land acquired for the Dhudhana Minor Irrigation Project. He argued that the land was irrigated, citing the Special Land Acquisition Officer's separate compensation for a well and …
The petitioner, Murlidhar Pannalal Bhutada, challenged a December 30, 2019 order of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Georai, which proceeded with Civil Suit No. 594 of 2017 ex‑parte on the ground that no written statement was on record. In reality, a written statement had already been filed, and the …
The petitioner filed an RTI application seeking detailed contracts and agreements of a university from 2005 onward, covering education, research, and procurement. The State Information Commission, invoking Section 8(1)(d) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, ordered the university to disclose only …
The petitioners, Sanjay Madhavrao Kakade and another, filed a writ petition challenging a 9 October 2019 order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Aurangabad, which dismissed their revision on the ground that they had not deposited the 50% amount required under Section …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered multiple bail applications filed by accused persons alleged to have participated in an organized syndicate trafficking codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused procured, transported and distributed the …
The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications filed by accused persons in a case involving the illegal sale and distribution of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of an organized syndicate that procured, transported and supplied …
The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications arising from Crime No.279 of 2025 involving the alleged organized trafficking of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The applicants argued that they were not identified by witnesses, …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple writ petitions filed in 2017-2021. The Court directed the petitioners to submit copies of the required documents within two weeks of the order. It warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petitions without further …
The petitioner, whose land was acquired, challenged the judgment and award dated 1 October 2019 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded, which dismissed his reference (L.A.R. No.26 of 2010) for failure to prosecute. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court …
Petitioner Maruti Namdeo Bagal filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 20.08.2018 and 14.12.2018 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shirdi and the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar respectively, which were based on a revenue mutation dated 30.11.2014. The High Court had earlier stayed the …
Petitioners Bharti Kashinath Thopte, Rupali Bhanudas Pawar, Sachin Vitthal Ghodke and Sampat Bhagwan Ekshinge filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. An order dated 12 February 2026 listed the counsel for the respondents incorrectly, conflating the names of Mr. Laxman H. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the delay in the trial of Regular Civil Suit No.110 of 2017, which was pending for several years. The petition arose from an order dated 11.12.2019 of the District Judge and sought a direction for the trial court to decide the suit …
Amol Chandrakant Ambade filed a writ petition (No. 2647 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Kirti Amol Ambade. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had become infructuous and there was nothing left for the Court to consider. The Court …
The Sarpanch Grampanchayat Office Bavachi and another filed a writ petition challenging orders of the Labour Court and the Industrial Court relating to a labour complaint. They argued that once the Industrial Court set aside the Labour Court's order, the Labour Court could not restore it. The …
The petitioner, Shankarsinh Chandsinh Thakur, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Hamzakhan I. Pathan, informed the Court that the underlying civil suit (R.C.S. No.242 of 216) had been withdrawn. The Court considered whether …
Petitioners Khajabi Ishaq Sayyed and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the underlying matter, identified as M.A.C.P. No.101 of 2016, was fully disposed by the appropriate authority. …
The petitioner, Rashidabee Ahmad Sayyed, filed a writ petition challenging an injunction order dated 25‑11‑2019 and its confirmation on 01‑01‑2020, which restrained him in RCS No. 36 of 2018. He contended that the suit, originally filed in 2018, should be decided within the stipulated time and …
The petitioner, Ashok Mishrilalji Agrawal, filed a writ petition (924 WRIT PETITION NO. 11641 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a civil suit (R.C.S. No.153 of 2012). The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the civil suit had already been decreed with costs on 5 May …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by UPSANCHALAK SAMAJIK WANIKARAN BEED, filed writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders that reinstated four watchmen who had been terminated orally without notice, notice pay or retrenchment compensation. The employees had completed over 240 days of …
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the UPSANCHALAK SAMAJIK WANIKARAN BEED, filed four writ petitions challenging Labour Court judgments that reinstated four watchmen and awarded them 25% back‑wages after they were terminated orally without notice or compensation. The petitioners contended that …
The petitioner, Samta Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Kopargaon, filed writ petition No. 28 of 2016 challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from a notice dated 8 December 2015 requiring the petitioner to submit the audit report for the year 2014 to the Special Auditor, Class‑II. …
The High Court of Bombay dismissed a first appeal filed by GMIDC (through its Executive Engineer) against Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand concerning compensation under a minor irrigation project. The court noted a 57‑day delay in filing the appeal but allowed the civil application. It held that the issues …
The Gujarat Minor Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several civil applications and a first appeal against Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand concerning compensation for land acquisition. The appeal was filed 57 days after the prescribed period, raising a question of delay. Both parties agreed …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard First Appeal No. 3929 of 2011 filed by GMIDC against Tulsiram Vyankoba Jogdand concerning pending civil applications. The appeal was filed 57 days after the prescribed period, but the court allowed the civil application despite the delay. Both …
The Bombay High Court heard several bail applications filed by accused persons alleged to be part of an organised syndicate trafficking codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution presented evidence of procurement, financial transactions and coordination among the accused, while …
Smt. Chandana Kisan Valvi, whose fair‑price‑shop licence was cancelled in 2007 after a criminal case under the Essential Commodities Act, was acquitted and subsequently sought restoration of the licence. After her applications and a revision were dismissed, the Minister, exercising powers under …
The petitioner, Shankar Bhagaji Bangar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, in 2020. The petitioner failed to appear before the court in both the morning and afternoon sessions on the scheduled date. The court observed that the petition had been pending since 2020 …
The appellants, Mohan Rajaram Karale and another, appealed against a judgment and award dated 29 November 2011 passed by a Reference Court in a land acquisition matter. They claimed that the expert valuation of trees on the acquired land contained an inadvertent mistake regarding the age of the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, listed several writ petitions (Nos. 5374 of 2019, 1039 of 2020, 2398 of 2020, 4319 of 2020, 4331 of 2020, 4479 of 2020) involving various petitioners against Mahindra, the State of Maharashtra and a district cooperative bank. The petitioners were directed …
Ramdas Tukaram Dhokane filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the substantive suit related to the same matter was closed for evidence and posted for arguments. The respondent State's counsel informed the court …
Sahebrao Shankar Bhojane filed Writ Petition No. 2511 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition raised the question of whether the petitioner was entitled to an interim order pending final determination of the …
The petitioner, Soniya Vishal Vishwakarma, filed writ petition No. 3001 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matrimonial proceeding (H.M.P. No. A-118/2020) that had been concluded on 29 December 2021. The petition sought relief despite the earlier disposal of the …
The petitioners, The Secretary Shivshankar Sevabhavi Sanstha Jamthi BK and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the School Tribunal that had condoned a delay. The Tribunal's order was appealed as Appeal No. 33 of 2019, which was subsequently disposed of on 12 April 2022. The …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 28 April 1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for a Benetura Medium Project. The acquisition was notified under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 21 April …
Petitioner Panjabrao Nathuji Gawande filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Superintendent of State Excise, Ratnagiri. The petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition and re‑file it before the appropriate bench of the High Court. The respondent State of …
The petitioners, Konika Flat Owners Co-op Society Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the liquidator. The petitioners' counsel later submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether the petition could be dismissed on that ground. No substantive …
The State of Maharashtra appealed three separate land acquisition awards where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs.13,000‑14,000 per hectare and the reference court enhanced it to Rs.33,000 per acre, also adding compensation for fruit‑bearing trees and a well. The …
The petitioner challenged a review order dated 7 January 2017 issued by the Secretary and Special Work Officer, Maharashtra State, which set aside an earlier order of 19 September 2015. The petitioner argued that the earlier order had already been affirmed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 11386 of …
The petitioner, Raju Shankar Mahesuni, filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning suit premises. The petitioner expressed willingness to vacate the premises and offered an undertaking to do so within one year. The Court directed the petitioner to file a written undertaking within a week. Upon …
The petitioner, Rafiq Yusuf Sayyed, filed a writ petition (No. 1871 of 2019) against Bhimsingh Gulabsingh Thakur in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for several years. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that, due to the passage of time, the petition had become …
The Peersaha Shirbli Chieti Trust, a Waqf trust, owned 2.59 hectares of land that was acquired for a national highway. Initial compensation was paid to the trust, and after an arbitrator enhanced the amount, the Sub‑Divisional Officer, acting on guidance from the Maharashtra State Waqf Board, …
The petitioner, Dattatraya Kale, filed a civil application seeking to record the legal heirs of the petitioner in a writ petition pending before the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court. The application was filed after a delay, and the petitioner requested amendment of the pleadings. The court …
The petitioner, Dattatraya Kale, filed a civil application seeking to record the legal heirs of the petitioner in a writ petition originally filed in 2019. The application was filed after a delay, and the petitioner requested amendment of the pleadings. The respondents informed the court that the …
The petitioners challenged notices dated 29‑12‑2018 and 10‑01‑2019 issued by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Kallam, under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. They alleged that the notices were served without affording them a chance to be heard, …
The petitioners, Manohar Nagnath Sangewar and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later instructed their counsel, Mr. Surekha G. Chincholkar, to seek leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave to withdraw. …
The liquidator of Samarth Sahakari Patsanstha filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5 April 2021 by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, which dismissed the society's revision in default. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of filing a second …
The petitioners Sunil Jaykisan Totala and another filed a writ petition challenging mutation entries related to their property. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, argued that mutation entries are merely fiscal records and do not determine ownership rights. The petitioner's counsel …
Sadashiv Ambadas Gaike filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the passage of time had rendered the relief sought unattainable. The Court examined whether any substantive issue remained for adjudication after the …
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for lands acquired for the Dongargaon Barrage on the Manjra river, contending that the reference court incorrectly classified portions of the land as dry rather than irrigated. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had recorded the lands as …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nilanga in three land acquisition references concerning lands acquired for the Dongargaon Barrage. The award differentiated between irrigated and dry lands, granting a lower rate for portions the court held to be …
The case concerned the acquisition of land in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank, Lohara, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands respectively. The …
The State of Maharashtra filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay of 567 and 496 days for two first‑appeal (stamp) proceedings, which the court allowed. The State then appealed a judgment and award dated 29 April 2015 that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Nagar Bypass …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2007 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from Baliram Girdhar Nemade, alleging the enhancement lacked material support and that statutory benefits such as solatium, additional component and interest were improperly granted. The respondent did not …
Yashwant Bhagwan Mundhe filed writ petition No. 12968 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a clerical error in the operative part of an order dated 09.03.2026. The petitioner sought a correction of the word "Omerga" to "Osmanabad" in the second line of the operative …
The petitioner, Pramod Bhaichand Raisoni, filed writ petition No. 11833 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the Central Registrar of Co‑operative Societies. The petition remained pending since 2016 and 2021 without any appearance by the petitioner’s …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (903 WRIT PETITION NO. 3432 OF 2016) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through Advocate Yogesh K. Bobade, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned Judge, Sidheshwar S. Thombre, considered the request and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2011 award of compensation in a land acquisition case involving Popat Nanabhau Ughade and others, challenging the enhancement of compensation and certain statutory benefits. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in raising the market value and in …
The landlord Gajanan Madanlal filed a civil revision challenging the District Judge's order that remanded the execution of a decree granting him possession of shop CTS No.1888. The trial court had decreed eviction on the ground of bona‑fide requirement, a decision affirmed by the appellate court, …
The petitioner, Kanif Maroti Mane, filed writ petition No. 2974 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether leave to withdraw the writ petition could be …
The petitioner, Shashikant Dattoant Deole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the Chief Officer Municipal Council. The petitioner sought relief and the court considered whether to grant a procedural liberty to file a subsequent application …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The order was …
The petition was filed by the Chief Executive Officer challenging an order of the Industrial Court (Latur Bench) that had granted regularisation to a watchman employed on daily wages since 1990, finding that he had completed 240 days of service in a year. The petitioner argued that the employee was …
The petitioners challenged a September 9, 2019 order of the Revenue Minister that allowed a revision of land measurement proceedings despite the absence of any reasons and without confirming that notice of measurement had been served. The petitioners argued that the measurement was carried out …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 2322 of 2016) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against the respondent. After a ten-year lapse, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered whether …
The petitioner, Nitin Bhandare, filed Writ Petition No.4248 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against HDB Financial Services Ltd. and others. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing scheduled on 21 April 2026, and despite the Court granting another …
Petitioner Prakash Hiralal Nahar filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's handling of a pending civil suit, arguing that only a civil court can determine the substantive rights between the parties. The petitioner contended that mutation entries are merely fiscal records and do not confer …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 1996 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, which had enhanced compensation for land acquired for an air‑strip at Latur. The acquisition was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 28 April 1988 and possession was taken earlier. …
Tushar Kashinath Shisode filed a writ petition (No. 12330 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi, later submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to amend its order dated 18 April 2026. The petitioner sought insertion of the words “except in Writ Petition No.10800/2021 and Petitioner in Writ Petition No.10800/2021” after the term “Respondents” in paragraph five of that order. …
The applicant, Sanjay Shivaji Bansode, a manager of a hotel, was charged under Sections 143, 144 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956 for allegedly procuring girls from Bengal and Bangladesh for prostitution. The …
Ganpat Ambadas Muntode filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined the claim of infructuity. Since no …
The petitioner, Gorakh Gangaram Dham, filed a writ petition challenging an order. The petitioner claimed that the arrears in question had already been paid and the order had been implemented. The court examined the claim and found that the arrears were indeed cleared. Consequently, the court held …
The appellant, Rajaram Sukhdeo Vaidya, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a sale deed dated 21 September 1999 was null and void for being executed without consideration. The trial court and the first appellate court dismissed the suit, holding that the appellant failed to prove the deed’s …
The petitioner challenged the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal’s order of 20 January 2020 which remanded a land revenue dispute to the District Collector of Latur, on the ground that the Tribunal had based its decision on a 1958 order that was not originally on record. The High Court examined whether …
Petitioners Avinash Prakash Jadhav and Ganesh Swarupchand Jadhav filed writ petitions challenging the rejection of their applications for arms licences on the basis of crop protection. The High Court initially disposed of both petitions as withdrawn on 4 March 2026, but the petitioners contended …
Petitioners Avinash Prakash Jadhav and Ganesh Swarupchand Jadhav filed writ petitions challenging the rejection of their applications for arms licenses on the basis of crop protection. The High Court initially disposed of both petitions as withdrawn on 4 March 2026, but the petitioners argued that …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment of the Reference Court which had enhanced compensation for six ropani of land acquired for a water tank, adding a Rs.3,550 per ropani amount and a 10% escalation. The State argued that the original award of Rs.9,267 by the Land Acquisition Officer was …
The petitioners challenged a judgment dated 31‑August‑2019 in which a Junior Division Civil Judge set aside an ex‑parte decree in a partition suit (Civil Suit No.141/2002). The original suit had proceeded ex‑parte against 27 defendants, some of whom were not properly served. The respondents filed …
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a five‑day delay in filing a review application challenging an amendment to the defendants' written statement. The amendment altered the defendants' earlier admission that the disputed property was ancestral, introducing a contradictory …
The petitioners challenged the Tahsildar's order dated 30.03.2016 that rejected an application filed by respondents under section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906, a decision later affirmed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer. The petitioners argued that the Tahsildar’s finding of a road between …
The petitioners, who were employed as cleaners by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), filed writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their complaints alleging unfair labour practice and seeking permanent employee status, wages and benefits. The High Court …
The Zilla Parishad, as the acquiring authority, challenged several ex parte orders of the reference court relating to land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2002. The appellant argued that it had been served but the reference court proceeded without its participation, violating principles of …
Kiran applied for bail before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging his detention by the State of Maharashtra. The court appeared reluctant to grant bail, prompting the applicant's counsel to seek permission to withdraw the application while reserving the right to file a fresh bail …
The petitioners challenged the order of the Tahsildar, Georai, which confirmed the existence of a customary cartway and its obstruction, alleging that the supporting panchanama did not mention any such way. They contended that the Tahsildar’s finding was not based on the material on record. …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2015 award in a land acquisition case concerning the heirs of the deceased Arjun Bhanudas Khune, challenging the reference court's enhancement of compensation and the grant of interest and statutory benefits. The State argued that the compensation enhancement, …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2004 award by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aurangabad, which enhanced compensation for several land‑acquisition claimants and granted statutory benefits. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material, that the comparable sale …
The petitioners, Shaikh Noor Shaikh Bashu and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Dharur, which rejected their application to amend their written statement in a suit concerning ownership of land in Thetegavhan, Beed. After the evidence was …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in a series of land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in fixing a higher market value and in granting …
The petitioners, a large group of heirs and tenants, sought enforcement of a partition decree dated 1974 concerning 86 acres of land in Wasangaon, Khopegaon and Peth, Latur. They argued that the Collector, Latur had repeatedly delayed execution despite earlier High Court orders (Writ Petitions 1738 …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2004 award that enhanced compensation for several land‑acquisition claimants, arguing that the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported by evidence and imposed an undue burden on the exchequer. The claimants had produced oral and documentary …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the Civil Judge's award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to several land‑acquisition claimants. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material and that the solatium, additional component and interest were improperly …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in multiple land acquisition cases. The State argued that the reference court erred in fixing a higher market value based on comparable sales and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in a series of land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court erred in inflating compensation without adequate material and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Civil Judge's award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to several land acquisition claimants. The State argued that the enhancement was unsupported by material and that the statutory solatium, additional component, and interest …
The petitioners challenged the orders dated 20 June 2013 and 14 July 2015 whereby the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, and the State Minister recorded the names of respondents No.6 and 7 in the revenue records based on a disputed 1986 partition deed. The respondents had sought to have their …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against awards of enhanced compensation and statutory benefits granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, in multiple land acquisition cases. The State argued that the Reference Court erred in fixing a higher market value and in awarding solatium, …
The petitioners, Swapnesh Shyam Rajulwar and others, filed writ petition No. 4188 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. …
Manisha Manesh Rathod filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of her application for leave to appeal in a 2022 order, arguing that her pending Special Civil Suit No.125 of 2021 seeking a declaration of her status as the adopted daughter of the deceased gave her a direct interest in the …
The petitioner, Prakash Bhosale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a matter that had already been decided in a Change Report. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the Change Report decision rendered the petition moot. The Court examined whether any issue remained for …
The petitioners, Prakash Eknath Rane, challenged an order dated 29‑11‑2017 issued by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik. They filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against that order. The Court observed that the petitioners have an alternate and equally …
The petitioner, Shama Laxman Pardeshi, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 18‑02‑2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad in MARJI Application No. 222/2019. The petitioner relied on a settlement reached in a contempt petition (No. 450 of 2017) whereby the …
Sainath Kondiba Gavte, who has been in custody since 1 October 2025, filed Bail Application No. 408 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant’s counsel sought bail and also requested that the trial be disposed of expeditiously. The Court expressed its disinclination to …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The State of Maharashtra acquired land for the Benetura Project Murum under the Land Acquisition Act, taking possession in 1987 and awarding compensation in 1992. Claimants appealed the award and the reference court enhanced compensation in several land acquisition references. The State appealed, …
The State of Maharashtra acquired land for the Benetura Project Murum under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, taking possession in 1987 and awarding compensation in 1992. Claimants appealed the award and the reference court enhanced compensation in several land acquisition references. The State …
The petitioner filed a consumer complaint alleging that the respondent banks forcibly repossessed and sold his financed vehicle without consent or a court order, despite having paid installments up to June 2012 and missing only the July 2012 payment. The District Consumer Forum ordered the …
The petitioners challenged notices dated 29‑12‑2018 and 10‑01‑2019 issued by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Kallam, under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, alleging that they were served without any opportunity of being heard. The petitioners …
The petitioner, Priyanka Yogesh Dixit, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain matters arising from her matrimonial dispute with the respondent, Yogesh Prakash Dixit. The petition sought relief on the basis that the family court proceedings were either pending or …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation appealed against several respondents challenging the compensation awarded by a reference court. The State Government had issued a resolution stating it would not contest the reference court’s award if the compensation was …
The Municipal Commissioner, Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation, filed a batch of First Appeals challenging the Reference Court's orders awarding enhanced compensation. The learned AGP submitted that the compensation granted by the Reference Court was within four times the compensation granted …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghela City Municipal Corporation appealed against several respondents challenging the compensation awarded by a reference court. The State Government, through a resolution dated 03‑11‑2016 (with later corrigenda), stated it would not contest the reference …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghela City Municipal Corporation filed a series of first appeals challenging compensation awards granted by a reference court in favor of various respondents. The State Government, through a resolution and its corrigenda, had declared that it would not contest …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation appealed against several civil judgments in which the reference court had awarded compensation to various respondents. The State Government, through a resolution dated 03.11.2016 (with subsequent corrigenda), stated it would not …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghela City Municipal Corporation appealed against several civil suits filed by various respondents challenging the compensation awarded by a reference court. The State Government had issued a resolution stating that it would not contest the reference court’s …
The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghela City Municipal Corporation filed fourteen first appeals challenging compensation awards granted by a reference court to various respondents. The State Government, through a resolution and its corrigenda, stated it would not contest the reference court's …
The petition challenged the 2018 order that disqualified a member of a municipal council in Maharashtra. The petitioner argued that the disqualification was improper. The court observed that fresh elections had already been conducted, rendering the issue moot. Consequently, there was no substantive …
The petitioners, Laxmibai Maroti Gaikwad and another, filed a writ petition challenging aspects of the Gram Panchayat elections in Aurangabad. They argued that the election process was flawed and sought relief from the High Court. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, contended that …
Vijay GOPICHAND JADHAV filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the court that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any relief to be sought. The court examined the submission …
The petitioner, Nileash Manikrao Kale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through counsel Ms. A.D. Rakh, later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petition could be withdrawn at the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Balasaheb Shinde, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 07/02/2017 passed by the 5th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Dhule, which rejected his application to dismiss Regular Darkhast No.31/2016 on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner contended that …
The petitioner, Vyankatesh Kerba Gadade, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner, through Advocate Shantaram R. Dheple, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted leave for withdrawal. …
The petitioners, Dagadu Tukaram Aade and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioners' counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the …
The petitioners, Machindra Maruti Parkhe and others, filed Civil Application No. 6101 of 2026 to bring the legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record, seek condonation of delay and set aside an abatement. The court, noting no objection from the respondents' counsel, allowed the application …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple writ petitions filed in 2017-2021. The Court directed the petitioners to submit copies of the required documents within two weeks of the order. It warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petitions without further …
The petitioner, Vasant Mahadeo Boravake, filed a writ petition seeking relief that had previously been adjudicated by the same court in Writ Petition Nos. 3974/2020 and 3978/2020. The petitioner’s counsel submitted the order dated 08‑04‑2022 from those earlier cases, urging that the same order be …
The petitioner, Dinesh Babulal Mali, challenged an order dated 06‑01‑2021 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Dhule, by filing a writ petition. The respondent’s Additional Government Pleader raised a preliminary objection that an alternate and equally efficacious remedy is available under Section …
The petitioner, Dinesh Babulal Mali, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06.01.2021 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dhule under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The respondent, the Sub Divisional Officer, raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an …
The petitioners, members of a tribal community, claimed that land transferred to a respondent in 1967 should be restored to them under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. A Tribunal in 1977 had held that the lands were not liable for restoration and dismissed the …
The applicants, Sunil Shivajirao Biradar (Yenkikar) and others, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, they sought the court's permission to withdraw it and to file a fresh application before the trial court. The …
The petitioner, Sudhakar Ramrao Patil, filed a writ petition challenging two notices dated 29-12-2018 issued by the Chief Officer of the Municipal Council, Kallam, under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. He contended that the notices were served without affording …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation issued tax bills for the period 1995-2012 to the Ahmednagar Education Society, which appealed claiming exemption under Section 132(1)(b) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. The appeals were allowed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, and …
Petitioner Sambhaji Venkatrao Jadhav filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 16‑02‑2023 of the Presiding Officer, Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re‑Settlement Authority, Aurangabad, which rejected his objection. The respondent State, through its AGP, raised a preliminary objection …
The petitioner, Narhari Bhagwan Udhane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any cause of action to be adjudicated. The Court examined this submission …
The Zilla Parishad Jalna challenged several ex parte judgments of the reference court concerning land acquisition proceedings dating back to 2002. The appellant argued that it had been served but the reference court proceeded without its participation, rendering the orders void. The High Court …
The applicant, Vikas Sakharam Sonwane, filed a bail application. An interim order dated 30 April 2026 granted him relief, subject to certain conditions, and he deposited the required amount, which was accepted by the State and the informant's counsel. The applicant sought confirmation of that …
Anita Dasa Kasture filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Mohammed Azeem Moh Hakeem and others. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the dispute had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any substantive issue to …
Mahananda Gangadharappa Buranade filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous application (No. 18 of 2019) filed by Vaishali Vijay Buranade. The court noted that the underlying civil application had already been disposed of on 28 April 2023, leaving no substantive matter for the petition …
The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications arising from Crime No.279 of 2025 involving the alleged organised trafficking of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The applicants argued that they were not identified by witnesses, …
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking to bring on record the legal heirs of petitioner No.2, requesting condonation of delay. The respondents opposed the amendment, arguing procedural impropriety. The court examined the averments made in the application and found them sufficient to …
The petitioner, a college employee, was appointed in July 2015, tendered resignation in December 2015, and was later asked to rejoin in February 2016 but was prevented from signing the muster roll from May 2016. He filed representations seeking reinstatement, which were allegedly delayed by the …
The petitioners, including Abhijeet Uttamrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 January 2021 issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur, in Appeal No.129/2018. Both parties agreed that the matter required remand to the Commissioner for further consideration. The High …
