Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

773 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

MANISHA MUKUND NAIK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Manisha Mukund Naik and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 January 2020 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad in RCS No. 23 of 2018. They contended that the civil suit (RCS No. 23 of 2018) had already been decreed, rendering the order moot. …

VIJAY RAJAYYA DUBBAversusANUSUYA CHANDRAKANT DUBBA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vijay Rajayya Dubba filed writ petition No. 6111 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Anusuya Chandrakant Dubba and others. The petition was listed for urgent orders on 27 January 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court again listed the matter on 2 …

BHAUSAHEB RANGNATH SHELARversusTHE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KARJAT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bhausaheb Rangnath Shelar, challenged a revision order dated 12‑12‑2022 that upheld a Tahsildar’s decision in an easementary suit concerning an 18‑foot road to Dhaman Vasti. Respondents 3‑8 had applied under section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906 seeking removal of an …

SANJAY DATTATRAY SARODEversusASHWANI AMOL THORAVE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sanjay Dattatray Sarode, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31 January 2020 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge, Sangamner, in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 22 of 2019. The petitioner sought a direction that the trial court should decide the pending suit, R.C.S. No. …

NARAYAN DAULATRAO MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The State acquired land in 1996 for extending the Gaothan of Bhopani village. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs.4 per square foot, which the claimant, Narayan Daulatrao More, challenged, seeking a higher rate based on various sale transactions. The claimant argued that …

REKHA VIJAY BHAVAREversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …

TARABAI SOPAN BORAWAKE AND ORSversusARVIND BABURAO BOAWAKE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, represented by Advocates A. M. Lavharale and Milind M. Patil, sought the Court's permission to withdraw their writ petition while retaining the liberty to file a review application before the Executing Court. The Court, after considering the request, ordered the writ petition to be …

BAMANYA GUJARYA VALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a bail application filed by Bamanya Gujarya Valvi, aged 65, who was charged under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act for alleged penetrative sexual assault and resulting …

MANGALABAI BHARAT WADJEversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSINOR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mangalabai Bharat Wadje filed a writ petition (No.12465 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Additional Commissioner and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Anurag V. Sakolkar, h/f Mr. V. G. Sakolkar. The respondent State was represented by Mr. A. …

NISAR BASHIRBHAI SHAIKHversusBHASKAR BHAUSAHEB THORAT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nisar Bashirbhai Shaikh, challenged a 30 April 2012 order of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and the First Labour Court, Ahmednagar, which denied a penalty and 12% interest from the date of accident in WC Application No.38/2009. He argued, relying on the Supreme Court’s …

SANDEEP SURESH PATIL AND ANOTHERversusLAXMIKANT GORAKH PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Sandeep Suresh Patil and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the parties informed the Court that Appeal No. 25 of 2019 before the School Tribunal, Nashik …

SANDEEP SURESH PATIL AND ANOTHERversusNARENDRA PURUSHOTTAM VISPUTE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioners informed the Court that Appeal No. 29 of 2019 before the School Tribunal, Nashik Division, had been disposed of. The learned …

SHOBA SURESH KADLAGversusARUNA JAGANNATH KADLAG AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged a February 2023 order of the 4th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sangamner, which appointed a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit for simpliciter injunction. The petitioner argued that such appointment should not be entertained …

CHANDRAKANT NARAYAN DUKRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive issues were adjudicated. The order …

PRAKASH ALIAS DHANYA NANA PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Prakash alias Dhanya Nana Pawar, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, the court expressed reluctance to grant bail. The applicant's counsel, on instructions, sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The bench, presided …

JAYESH SHIVAJI THORATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Jayesh Shivaji Thorat, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the petition was …

THE EX ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT LATURversusOMPRAKASH SHANKARRAO PIND AND ANR

DISMISSED

The Exe Engineer Medium Project Latur appealed against several judgments and awards dated 27 March 2008 that granted compensation in land acquisition cases. The State Government, through its Attorney General, argued that the compensation awarded by the reference court was within the statutory …

MAHANANDA GANESH MENKUDLE AND OTHERSversusFAKIR MAHEMEUD SHAIKH AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Osmanabad, which had rejected their application under Order XXI Rule 97 of the Civil Procedure Code. They argued that Defendant No.3 had died before the decree was passed, making the decree a …

SAHEBRAO BHIMRAO NALAWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) and the claimant appealed a 2012 judgment that awarded compensation for land acquired in 1994 for the Sina‑Kolegaon project. The claimant owned 3 H 59 R and 1 H 79 R of land with fruit‑bearing trees and sought higher compensation, alleging the reference court …

THE EXE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECTversusANNARAO DIGAMBER PATIL AND ANR

DISMISSED

The Exe Engineer Medium Project Latur appealed several civil judgments and awards dated 27 March 2008 that granted compensation in reference court cases. The State Government, through a resolution dated 3 November 2016 (with subsequent corrigenda), had decided not to challenge any reference court …

THE EXE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECTversusANNARAO DIGAMBER PATIL AND ANR

DISMISSED

The Exe Engineer Medium Project Latur appealed against several judgments and awards dated 27 March 2008 that granted compensation in land acquisition cases. The State Government, through its Attorney General, argued that the compensation awarded by the reference court was within four times the …

THE EXE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT LATURversusVENKAT BHIMRAO RUEKAR AND ANR

DISMISSED

The Exe Engineer Medium Project Latur appealed against several judgments and awards dated 27 March 2008 that granted compensation in land acquisition cases. The State Government had issued a resolution stating it would not challenge any reference court award that increased compensation only up to …

VITTHAL NARAYAN SURYAWANSHI AND ANOTHERversusSATISH KISHAN KHATAWKAR

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, owners of Elevators Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Latur, which had allowed a complaint by a former technician seeking Rs.1,77,200 as unpaid wages. The petitioners argued that no employer‑employee relationship existed and that they were denied proper legal …

DATTATRAYA RAMBHAJI RAUTversusTHE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Dattatraya R. Raut, challenged an order dated 30 January 2013 issued by the Tahsildar, Rahata, which allowed an application filed by the respondent (Up‑Sarpanch of Bhagwatipur) under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Court Act, 1906, and was later confirmed by the SDO, Shirdi on 6 May …

AKSHAY PHULCHAND INGOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Akshay Phulchand Ingole, filed a bail application which he later sought to withdraw after the charge-sheet was filed. He requested the court's permission to withdraw the application and to be allowed to file a fresh bail application before the trial court. The learned counsel argued …

SITARAM LAXMAN AUTIversusSURESH GANPAT ABALE

DISPOSED OFF

Sitaram Laxman Auti filed a writ petition against Suresh Ganpat Abale. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the dispute underlying the petition had already been settled between the parties. Consequently, the petitioner argued that there was nothing left for the court to consider. The …

MANISHA HEMANT SALIversusHEMANT CHUNNILAL SALI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Manisha Hemant Sali, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Adhoc District Judge, Shahada, which dismissed her civil appeal (No. 22 of 2009) for want of prosecution after her counsel was absent. The appeal concerned a decree of divorce previously granted by the Civil …

BHIMRAO SURESH BHANDWALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Bhimrao Suresh Bhandwalkar, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case was filed. The applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application, requesting …

BALAJI MARUTI PAVIKAR ALIAS TENGETOL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellants, Balaji and Dnyaneshwar Ravikar, were arrested in December 2025 for assaulting the informant's father with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries. They filed a bail application after the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusJAYSING CHANGDEO KAMBLE AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a reference court’s enhancement of compensation for land acquired in 1994 for a percolation tank at Bhavanwadi. The original award by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) granted Rs.15,000 per hectare, which the claimants sought at Rs.40,000 per acre, …

SUHAS UTTAMRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a member of a cooperative society, challenged an interim order dated 22 February 2019 issued by the Assistant Registrar under Section 102(i)(c)(ii) and (iv) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, which directed the winding up of the society and appointment of a …

MADHAV VISHWANATH BENDRIKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Madhav Vishwanath Bendrikar, sought bail in a case involving alleged arson and murder under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with co‑accused, poured petrol on an informant and set him on fire, with two dying declarations attributing …

PRADIP ALIAS BALU VISHWAS GARJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered a bail application filed by Pradip alias Balu Vishwas Garje, who was in custody for offences under Sections 103(1), 140(1), 115(2), 352, 315(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 relating to an alleged abduction, suicide and homicide …

SOMNATH GOARAKH PANDITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Somnath Goarakh Pandit, a cashier of Maheshwari Multipurpose Credit Co-operative Society, was charged with embezzlement of approximately Rs 8 crore, alleged to have benefited Rs 8.5 lakh. He sought bail, offering to deposit the amount he allegedly gained within three weeks. The State …

DEVENDRAKUMAR SOHANLAL SONIversusMOHANLAL SOHANLAL SONI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Devendrakumar Sohanlal Soni, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, upon noting the petition was no longer viable, disposed of it as infructuous. No …

VISHWANATH KONDIBA GOJEWADversusMAROTI VENKATI GOJEWAD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Vishwanath Kondiba Gojewad, filed a writ petition in 2018 but failed to appear before the court for several years. On 25 February 2026, the court noted that the petitioner had not appeared and placed the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ in the urgent orders category. The …

MANISHA NITIN KABRAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appeal concerned land acquired in 2006 from a village for a public purpose, the same acquisition as in a prior case decided by this Court. The appellant claimed the land was dry and sought compensation for fruit‑bearing trees, while the State argued it was irrigated. Relying on the earlier …

MADHURI RAMCHANDRA PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered bail application No.825 of 2026 filed by Madhuri Ramchandra Pawar, accused of conspiring with three co‑accused to murder her husband. The prosecution alleged that Pawar had an illicit relationship with accused No.1, transferred Rs 10,000 to him, …

RUSTUMRAO RAMJI VANJEversusBALAJI NAGOBA WAGHMARE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging alleged encroachments by certain individuals in the context of Gram Panchayat elections. The court noted that the term of the concerned Gram Panchayat had already expired, rendering the petitions moot. Consequently, the petitions were declared …

KANHIAYALAL CHANDULAL RATHODversusASHOK BABULAL RATHOD AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, in Civil Application No. 5648 of 2017, directed the applicant to furnish a copy of the present applications within two weeks of the order. The court warned that failure to comply would result in the applications being dismissed without further reference. …

ANITA HANMANT MAMADGE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Anita and Uddhav Mamadge, directors of Manjara Seeds Pvt. Ltd., applied for bail in a case alleging fraud involving soybean processing and non-payment to farmers. The prosecution alleged that the company, managed by Hanmant Mamadge (the accused who is now absconding), accepted soybean, processed it …

Trambak Govind ChewaleversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Court was approached to correct errors in its earlier order dated 28 April 2026, where the case number, party names, and a clause concerning the withdrawal of deposited money were incorrectly recorded. The applicant argued that Clause 2 mistakenly limited withdrawal to 50 % of the amount, …

Udhav Pandurang EkambeversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals and permission to withdraw compensation amounts deposited by the acquiring body in land‑acquisition matters. The applicants contended that the delay was caused by …

VINOD PREMCHAND MAHATOLEversusRAMCHANDRA BAGANLAL MAHATOLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vinod Premchand Mahatole filed writ petition No. 2715 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Ramchandra Baganlal Mahatole and others. The petition remained pending for admission as the petitioner failed to appear in both morning and afternoon sessions. On 23 April 2026 the court …

DHARMA KRUSHNA PHANDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 04.04.2016 of the Secretary, Respondent No.1, which dismissed the petitioner's revision concerning a mutation entry. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was erroneous. The Court examined the nature of mutation entries and …

JITENDRA PUNAMCHAND SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Jitendra Punamchand Soni, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, his counsel sought permission to withdraw it so that a fresh application could be filed. The sole issue before the court was whether the bail …

SUDHIR DAGADU GATKALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sudhir Dagadu Gatkal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner …

KASHIBAI RAMBHAU NALAWADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Kashibai R. Nalawade and others, filed Writ Petition No. 8319 of 2018 before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court observed that a regular civil suit (No. 199 of 2014) concerning the same dispute …

RAMA SUSHIL KANOJIYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered bail applications filed by Rama Sushil Kanojiya and Meena Suresh Jain, who were charged in Crime No.0247 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused were part of an …

BHAGWAN LIMBAJI SURWASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Bhagwan Limbaji Surwase filed a writ petition in 2020 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition remained pending for several years, and the petitioner failed to appear at multiple hearings in March 2026. The Court, noting the petitioner's lack of interest and repeated …

VIKAS NAVNATH MOTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Vikas Navnath Mote challenged a 20 April 2021 order of the Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, which rejected his objection in the Jaikwadi Project, Beed. Respondents withdrew the disputed amount, but only on the condition that they file an undertaking to refund the sum with interest if …

NAWAZODDIN EJAJODDIN PIRJADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Nawazoddin Ejaajoddin Pirzade, an agriculturist, applied for an arms licence to protect his fields from damage caused by wild animals. The police inspector’s report and a panchanama indicated crop damage and recommended the licence, but the District Magistrate rejected the application and …

AMJAD ALIAS PAPPU AJMAL KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Amjad @ Pappu was arrested for alleged assault with a sword under several offences of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint by a relative of the victim, but the medical report classified the injuries as simple. The charge‑sheet has been filed and the investigation is …

NILESH VITTHAL WAHULE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Nilesh Vitthal Wahule and Swatej Vitthal Wahule, were arrested for assaulting an informant and his father with an axe and a spade, causing serious injuries, under Sections 109, 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The incident arose from a …

NANASAHEB KADUBAL MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Nanasaheb was arrested in connection with Crime No. 376 of 2025 for offences under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant sought bail after the charge‑sheet was filed, arguing that the prosecution case rested solely on circumstantial evidence and that no further custodial …

HANUMANT VITTALRAO PATILversusDHANRAJ GANPATI JADHAV AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Hanumant Vittalrao Patil, challenged a decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal that was rendered on 22 February 2017 without any prior notice to the parties, despite the matter being kept in abeyance after a revision was called on 23 November 2016. The petitioner argued that the …

NIVRUTI LAXMAN ALAPUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Nivruti Laxman Alapure, a Munim (accountant) of Manjara Seeds Pvt. Ltd., sought bail in a case involving alleged misappropriation of soybean deposits under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the company failed to pay …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORSversusVENKAT JAYWANTA PAWAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2010 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from Venkat Jaywanta Pawar, alleging the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported by material and imposed an illegal burden on the public exchequer. The State argued that the reference court erred …

RAMRAO BABARAO MANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants' agricultural lands in Kalgaon village were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for flood rehabilitation, and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.1,110 per rupee. The appellants protested and sought a reference under Section 18, where …

VITHALRAO BABARAO MANE (LRS) SUBHASH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants' agricultural lands in Kalgaon village were acquired in 2006 for flood rehabilitation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.1110 per rupee, which the claimants accepted under protest and then sought a reference …

AMBADAS VISHWANATH JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAH and ANR.

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants' lands were acquired by the State for the Upper Manjra Project and initially awarded compensation of Rs.250‑330 per R under the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The reference court later enhanced the award to Rs.642 per R, which the appellants contested, arguing that a prior order …

GANESH TUKARAM WAGHMAREversusMINA ALIAS RANI GANESH WAGHMARE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ganesh Tukaram Waghmare, challenged an interim maintenance order of Rs.4,000 per month granted by the Family Court, Jalgaon, on the ground that he had been suspended from his Zilla Parishad job and was unemployed. He argued that he could not afford the payment, had to support his …

LAXMAN SOMNATH HINGMIREversusBALAJI MARUTI RAVIKAR ALIAS TENGETOL

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Balaji Maruti Ravikar and Dnyaneshwar Maruti Ravikar were arrested in December 2025 for assaulting the informant's father with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries. The FIR (Crime No. 737 of 2025) led to charges under Sections 109, 308(4), 308(5), 190 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. …

MOHD JAVEED GULAM MOHIUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Amjad @ Pappu was arrested for assaulting a relative with a sword, an offence under Sections 109, 324(4), 115(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution highlighted the use of a deadly weapon, recovery of the sword and the accused's prior conviction, arguing that bail …

VIKAS CHANDRAKANT DALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Vikas was convicted by a Special Court under the POCSO Act and sentenced to a term of up to three years. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 350 of 2026). The State opposed, arguing that the conviction was final and the …

SHIVAJI NARAYAN KASALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shivaji Narayan Kasal was convicted under IPC sections 324, 341, 504 r/w 149, 143, 148 and fined by the trial court on 24 March 2022, a conviction that was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed on 7 May 2026. Kasal had been on bail throughout the trial and the appeal, but was later arrested …

TEJRAO SAKHARAM MIRGEversusM/S. SIDDHESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA MARYADIT

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Tejrao Sakharam Mirge, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 03‑04‑2019 that dismissed his 2015 unfair labour practice complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement existed. The petitioner failed to produce the alleged agreement …

GITA VAIBHAV SABLE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, a police constable and a driver, were charged with offences arising from a road‑side quarrel on 11 April 2026 that resulted in injuries to the complainant. They filed an anticipatory bail application, arguing that the incident was spontaneous, there was no pre‑meditation, the …

RATNAMALA ALIAS GAURI BHAGWAN WADGHULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ratnamala @ Gauri Bhagwan Waghule, filed a bail application and subsequently sought modification of clause ‘F’ of the court's earlier order dated 07.05.2026, which required the production of an Aadhar card and PAN card as identity proof. Counsel highlighted that the applicant is a …

KISAN DEVRAM GAFALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Kisan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the quashing of FIR No.0250/2025 and the pending Sessions Case No.69 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 64, 329(1), 329(3), 352 and 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, respondent No.2, filed an …

DINESH BHAUSAHEB GALHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Dinesh Bhausaheb Galhate, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, claiming custody since 13 January 2022. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed reluctance to grant bail and the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, which the …

RAHUL GANPAT JAWAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Rahul Ganpat Jaware filed a writ petition challenging an order and sought to contest it by filing a revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner’s counsel, Satyajit S. Bora, argued that the order was amenable to revision. The Court observed that the …

KOMALSING HARISING PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Komalsing was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.21,281. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of his appeal …

RAVI SHRIVIAS MAIDEWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Ravi Shrivias Maidewad filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court was not inclined to grant bail, and the applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail …

KALYAN BHAUSAHEB BARHATE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, convicted in Sessions Case No. 367 of 2025 for offences under Sections 332, 323 and 353 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a criminal application seeking suspension of their substantive sentence and release on bail pending the hearing of their appeal. The Additional …

HEMANT KESHAV SAPKALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Hemant Keshav Sapkale filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody pending trial. The learned counsel for the applicant argued for some time, after which the court indicated a reluctance to entertain the application. On the court’s indication, …

BABURAO ALIAS GURU MAROTRAO SAVLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Baburao alias Guru Marotrao Savle, was convicted under Sections 177 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, and sentenced to a term of up to three years in Sessions Trial No. 74/2014. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the …

GULAB HABIBKHA PATHANversusMURLIDHAR SHRIKRUSHNA KULKARNI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gulab Habibkha Pathan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Murlidhar Shrikrishna Kulkarni and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had become infructuous and there was nothing left for the court to …

KUNDAN RATAN SURYAWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition was filed by Kundan Ratan Suryawanshi seeking relief concerning a girl who was alleged to be in his custody. The girl, who is a major, appeared before the High Court and gave a statement that she does not wish to accompany the petitioner. The court recorded her statement and also noted …

SOPAN VITTHAL KANADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were convicted by a Judicial Magistrate First Class in 2022 for offences under IPC Sections 324, 341, 504 read with 149, and Sections 143, 148, as well as Section 144 for two of them. The conviction was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge on appeal. Although they were on bail …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORSversusVIKAS RAMLING CHAVAN AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Reference Court that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Surdi‑Begda Percolation Tank from Rs.80 per R to Rs.846 per R, relying on sale instances from an adjacent village. The State contended that the Special Land Acquisition Officer’s …

ABASAHEB GALAS KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Abasaheb Galas Kale applied to the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an order dated 11 May 2026 that rejected his bail application and forfeited his bail bonds due to his absence before the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur. He contended that his absence was not intentional and offered to …

PRAVIN SHRIDHAR DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Pravin Shridhar Deshmukh was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kaij, on 10 April 2026 under Sections 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year imprisonment. He filed Criminal Appeal No.386 of 2026, and pending the appeal he applied to the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad …

SATISH BHANUDAS WANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Satish Bhanudas Wani was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for offences under Sections 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, receiving two years' simple imprisonment and a fine. He filed an appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 385 of 2026) and applied for suspension of the sentence and …

ARCHANA MOHAN JAISWALversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged the District Collector's order dismissing her application under Section 35(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, alleging improper service of notice for a No‑Confidence Motion. The Collector held that the notice was affixed at a conspicuous part of the …

GANESH RUPCHAND GANGURDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Ganesh Rupchand Gangurde, convicted by a lower court, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 33‑day delay in preferring an appeal against his conviction. The State opposed the application, arguing that the delay was not properly explained. The court examined the reasons …

GANESH RUPCHAND GANGURDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ganesh Rupchand Gangurde was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two months' rigorous imprisonment. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail pending the hearing of his appeal (Criminal Appeal No. …

SHANTILAL MANGILAL RATHODversusLOBHA KALURAM RATHOD AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Shantilal Mangilal Rathod, filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence imposed in S.C.C. No.5392/2022, which was passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, on 04 July 2023 and confirmed by the Sessions Court in Criminal Appeal No.252/2024. The …

SUNIL LIMABAJIRAO SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sunil Sonawane, the applicant, was initially acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parbhani, but was later convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1 in Criminal Appeal No.40/2022 for offences under Sections 304A, 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that …

VIKAS DADARAO DONGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, Vikas Dadarao Dongare, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 1746 of 2024) which was later withdrawn after the Court expressed reluctance to entertain it. He subsequently filed a fresh anticipatory bail application (No. 861 of 2026) during the Court's vacation period. The …

MOHAMAD HABIB MOHAMAD ISAQ AND OTHERSversusMOHAMAD SK KALIM SK ISAQ

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18.04.2017 passed by the District Judge in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2017. The petition remained pending since 2017 without any interim orders. Both parties agreed that, given the delay, the interests of justice required the …

MADHAV GOPALA MATEversusGANGUBAI YADAVRAO MATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Madhav Gopala Mate, challenged an order dated 02.05.2018 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik. They sought relief through a writ petition, despite having an alternate and equally efficacious remedy of filing a revision before the State Government, a point previously …

SUNIL ASHRUBA SANAP AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sunil Ashruba Sanap and Akshya Ashruma Gaikwad, filed a criminal revision seeking suspension of the sentence imposed on Sanap and bail. Sanap has been incarcerated since the appellate court's order, while Gaikwad has not yet surrendered. The court noted that the revision is recent …

SUDHAKAR ALIAS SUDAM BABURAO PADULE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, members of a rival political group, were arrested for assaulting an informant during a clash, causing grievous injuries. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The prosecution argued that the …

SAMADHAN PRAKASH KOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Samadhan Prakash Koli, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, which the Court initially declined to grant. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Bhargav Bhushan Kulkarni, then sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to be allowed to file a …

RIZWAN KHAN SUBHAN KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Rizwan Khan Subhan Khan filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody in a criminal case instituted by the State of Maharashtra. The applicant was represented by Mr. Parvezhasnath Kagzi, while the State was represented by Mr. S. A. Gaikwad. …

SANDIPAN GOVIND MALAGE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Sandipan Govind Malage and others filed writ petition No. 7671 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel, later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined the claim of …

SANJEEV KRUSHNACHANDRA SHAHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …

RAJESHWAR SHAMRAO DHOBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged two orders – one dated 16/11/2015 by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Hingoli and another dated 15/5/2016 by the Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jawala Bazar – alleging lack of jurisdiction. The Court examined the delegation of …

BALU KISANAO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Balu Kisanao Deshmukh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing counsel for the applicant, the court expressed reluctance to entertain the application. Consequently, the applicant's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the …

PARDES DAGDU BHOSLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Pardes Dagdu Bhosle, was arrested for alleged penetrative sexual assault and related offences against his daughter, as alleged in Crime No. 0275 of 2026. The victim testified that she filed the FIR under pressure from her mother, claiming the father had been abusive towards the …

BUNTY GULAB RAHASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Bunty Gulab Rahase, sought bail in a murder case under Sections 103(1), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging that the prosecution’s case rests solely on circumstantial evidence and lacks any direct link to him. He argued that co‑accused Mahada Thakare and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERSversusPUNDALIK DHONDIBA SHINDE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the common Judgment and Award of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Udgir, which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for a Ring Road project based on sale deeds presented by the claimants. The State argued that the Reference Court erred by …

PANDITRAO WAMANRAO PAWAR AND OTHERSversusSAYABAI NAMDEO AGLAVE AND ORS.

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Panditrao Wamanrao Pawar and others, filed civil applications seeking to raise objections before the Revenue Authority against a precept issued to the District Collector under Section 54 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was issued to enforce a decree from the Civil Court. The …

GITA SUBHASH PRADHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Gita Subhash Pradhan filed writ petition No. 7427 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was pleaded by Advocate Kulkarni M. A. and the respondents were represented by D. R. Korde. The Court examined the …

KASTURABAI VINAYAK PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The writ petition filed by Kasturabai Vinayak Pawar against the State of Maharashtra was dismissed because the underlying dispute application (No.38 of 2017) had already been disposed of, leaving nothing for consideration. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition.

KERBA BHUJANGA GADHAVE AND ANTOHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners sought to amend a land reference filed under the Land Acquisition Act, claiming that a clerical error had listed 19 mango trees instead of the actual 300. The amendment was sought under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but the trial court rejected the application, …

TARABAI NANASAHEB PAWAR AND ANOTHERversusSEEMA BHAURAO SHINDE AND OTHRS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed writ petitions in 2020 concerning matters that had been pending since 2016 and 2021. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Bhagwan A. Husale, was absent and no representative appeared for the petitioners in both the morning and afternoon sessions on 16 April 2026. The court noted the …

GANPAT RAOJI SALVE AND OTHERSversusDHANAJI BHAVANI SALVE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged the orders of the Additional Collector and the Tahsildar that allowed respondents to file an application under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906 for completing a road. The petitioners argued that the application was not for removal of an obstruction of a …

DNYANESHWAR MADHAV WANKHEDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Madhav Wankhede, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of this application, the charge-sheet in the underlying criminal case was filed. The applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application so that a …

RAMRAO WAMANRAO DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Ramrao Wamanrao Deshmukh appealed the 2012 award of the Joint Civil Judge concerning the acquisition of 2 ha 41 R of land for a village tank. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 854 per R, but the reference court, using a sale of 47 R from a neighboring village at Rs 3213 per R, …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusBABURAO PANDURANG PAWAR AND ANR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2008 award that enhanced compensation and granted statutory benefits to Baburao Pandurang Pawar under the Land Acquisition Act. The State argued that the enhancement lacked material support, the comparable sale used was inappropriate, and the statutory benefits …

YASHVANT HARIKURSHANARAO KULKARNIversusSUNIL SHRIKISHAN BIYANI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Yashvant Harikurshanarao Kulkarni, filed writ petition No. 8172 of 2017 arising out of civil suit R.C.S. No.20 of 2010. The court noted that the civil suit had already been disposed on 16 August 2017. Since the underlying suit was concluded, the petition had no surviving cause of …

RAJESH RAMESHWAR SOMANIversusNAVEENCHANDRA MURARJI ASHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajesh Rameshwar Somani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent. The petition was filed while a related original suit was still pending. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the original suit had …

NIRMALABAI SUNIL BHANGAREversusTHE COLLECTOR LATUR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Nirmalabai Sunil Bhangare filed a writ petition (No. 6608 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Latur and others. The petitioner sought relief but the court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the cause of action …

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, XYZ, filed an application seeking cancellation of bail granted to Respondent No.2, who was charged with offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(3) and 506 of the IPC and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The bail order imposed a condition that the accused not contact the victim …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPOPAT NANABHAU UGHADE DIED THR HIS LRS LATA AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2011 award of compensation in a land acquisition matter involving Popat Nanabhau Ughade and others, challenging the enhancement of compensation and certain statutory benefits. The State argued that the Reference Court had erred in raising the market value and in …