Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
773 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
Petitioners Satyabhama Eknath Narwade and another filed a writ petition against Deubai Bansi Narwade and others. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous and that there was nothing left for the Court to consider. The Court examined the submission and found no …
The appellants, members of the Thorat family, challenged a judgment that awarded them Rs.1,050 per R as compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They argued that the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court erred by averaging the market values from two sale …
The appellants, heirs of the Thorat family, challenged a judgment that had enhanced their compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra to Rs.1,050 per R, whereas they claimed Rs.2,000 per R. They relied on three prior sale deeds (Exhibits 14, 15, 16) showing market values of Rs.2,142, …
The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, appealed against a judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Beed, which had enhanced their compensation for land acquired by the State to Rs.1,050 per R based on an average of two sale values. They argued that the Reference Court erred by averaging the …
The Thorat family members appealed against a judgment that awarded them Rs.1,050 per R as compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They argued that the reference court erred by averaging the market values of three pre‑notification sale deeds, instead of considering the higher …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division (the acquiring body) appealed against awards of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and subsequently enhanced by reference courts for lands acquired for the Wadala Minor Irrigation Tank project. The original awards paid …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division (the acquiring body) appealed against awards of compensation granted by a Special Land Acquisition Officer and subsequently enhanced by reference courts for lands acquired for the Wadala Minor Irrigation Tank project. The claimants argued that the …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, appealed against awards of compensation granted by a Special Land Acquisition Officer (Rs. 17,000 per hectare) which were later enhanced by reference courts to Rs. 50,000 per acre for seasonally irrigated lands. The claimants argued that the …
The GMIDC, represented by the Executive Engineer, appealed against a compensation award in a land acquisition matter, alleging that the Reference Court improperly relied on a sale of a small 8‑R plot to determine market value, resulting in an excessive enhancement of compensation. The appellants …
The Sakri Taluka Education Society, through its secretary, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 February 2017 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Sakri in Regular Civil Suit No.44 of 2016. The petitioner sought relief against that order, alleging it was erroneous. The Court …
The petitioner, Bashir Mohdinsab Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the respondent, Umakant Shivram Dange. The petitioner sought relief despite the existence of a pending suit. The respondent contended that the trial court had already decided …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2009 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from the Kadam family, alleging the enhancement and statutory benefits were unsupported and imposed an undue burden on the exchequer. The respondents produced sale deeds from 1995‑1998 as comparable market …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2009 award that enhanced compensation for land acquired from the Kadam family, arguing the increase was unsupported and that statutory benefits were improperly granted. The High Court examined whether the enhancement could be quashed and whether the solatium, …
The appellant, Laxman Deorao Sakalkar, appealed the award of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge concerning compensation for land acquired for the Dhudhana Minor Irrigation Project. He argued that the land was irrigated, citing the Special Land Acquisition Officer's separate compensation for a well and …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation appealed a judgment dated 5 April 2007 that had enhanced compensation awarded to the claimants in a land acquisition matter. The appellants argued that the reference court’s enhancement should not exceed four times the amount awarded by the …
Petitioner Prakash Murlidhar Mate filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Ashok Sahakari Karkhana Ltd. and others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the dispute had already been settled between the parties. Consequently, there was …
The appellants, original claimants in a 2008 land acquisition for the Karkheli Storage Tank, challenged the compensation awarded by the Learned Additional Officer (LAO) as inadequate. They argued that the Reference Court had improperly deducted 50% from the sale consideration of a comparable sale …
The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to compel the sub‑registrar to register a sale deed of tenancy land that she had purchased from the defendant under an oral agreement, having paid part of the consideration by cheque. The sub‑registrar refused registration citing revenue record …
The petitioner, Shri Ramshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., challenged an order dated 06‑02‑2021 appointing an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi‑State Co‑operative Societies Act. The dispute centered on whether the Central Registrar could appoint an arbitrator unilaterally, without a …
The Maharashtra Regional Rural Bank Employees Association filed a writ petition challenging actions against Balasaheb Maruti Dhas and another. Both the petitioner’s representative and respondent No.1 had been dismissed from service, and the petitioner had filed an appeal before the Central …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 5372 of 2019) arising from Regular Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2011. The court noted that the underlying appeal had been withdrawn on 18 October 2019, leaving no surviving cause of action. Consequently, the writ petition could not proceed. The court therefore …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner died and no legal representatives were filed on record. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be abated. The court examined whether a writ petition can continue …
The petitioners challenged the order dated 18‑03‑2021 of the Tahsildar, Pachora, made under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906, which was later confirmed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer on 24‑05‑2022. They alleged denial of natural justice because no proper notice was served and they …
The State of Maharashtra filed a batch of first‑appeal stamp cases challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the vicinity of the …
The State of Maharashtra filed a batch of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court improperly relied on distant comparable sale transactions and …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar district. The State argued that the Reference Court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to overturn compensation awards made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court in numerous land‑acquisition cases. The State argued that the lands were remote from the Nagar‑Manmad …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, concerning compensation for lands acquired under the land acquisition proceedings. The State contended that the Special Land Acquisition Officer had correctly fixed …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had upheld compensation determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for several parcels of land. …
Vikas Pandit Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The Court examined the submission and found no merit in …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the compensation awards granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, in numerous land‑acquisition cases. The State argued that …
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had upheld compensation determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for various parcels of …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first appeals under the Stamp Act challenging the compensation awarded by a Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the reference court erred by considering sale comparables that were not in the vicinity of …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications seeking to set aside the judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, which had determined compensation for lands acquired under the land‑acquisition process. The State …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging the compensation awarded by a Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by a Reference Court for numerous land acquisition cases in Ahmednagar. The State argued that the lands were remote from the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and award dated 19 May 2016 of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, concerning compensation for lands acquired under a special land acquisition proceeding. The State argued that the lands were remote from Nagar‑Manmad Road and …
The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions No. 7544 of 2016 and No. 7499 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Fulabai Padnurang Kolte and another. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petitions should be entertained. The Court examined the …
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple first appeals challenging awards dated 23 February 2007 in land acquisition proceedings of 1996. The trial court had awarded compensation, which the reference court enhanced, but the State argued the enhancement exceeded four times the amount awarded by the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a judgment and award dated 23 February 2007 issued by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur, concerning land acquisition proceedings from 1996. The appellants contended that the compensation enhanced by the reference court should not exceed four …
The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions (909 WRIT PETITION NO. 7544 of 2016 and WRIT PETITION NO. 7499 of 2016) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pravin D. Biradar, appearing on behalf of …
The petitioner, Rameshwar Fakirchand Totala, filed writ petition No. 11158 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shankarlal Gangadhar Shankarpali. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Ganesh S. Yadav (through V.C.). During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed …
Laxman Dhondiba Fartade filed a writ petition (No. 8069 of 2016) before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Collector, Beed and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Bhavthankar Vivek Vasantrao. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the …
Petitioners Yusuf Gulab Jakate and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the request and, after taking it on record, ordered the petition to stand disposed of …
The applicants filed an application to have the legal heirs of appellant No.4, Arjun Laxmanrao Jaher Patil, brought on record and to condone a delay of 1,951 days in filing their first appeal. The court examined the averments and grounds set out in the application. Finding no impediment, the judge …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2018 but failed to appear before the court for any hearing. The respondent's counsel, V.V. Bhavthankar, appeared, while the petitioner remained absent. On 24 February 2026, the court noted the petition's prolonged pendency and placed it under the 'For …
The applicant sought to bring the legal representative of the deceased Vivek Gurushantappa Lature into a cross objection and filed a related civil application. The court noted a delay of 202 days in filing the application. It considered whether such delay could be condoned under procedural law. The …
The petitioners challenged the dismissal of their appeal by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) Hadgaon and the confirmation of the Tehsildar's order, alleging procedural irregularity. They argued that under the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906, the Tehsildar was required to conduct a site inspection and …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against orders of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga that granted enhanced compensation to three claimants in LAR Nos. 722, 693 and 711 of 2005. The State relied on Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3 November 2016, as …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against three orders of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Omerga, which had granted enhanced compensation to the claimants in LAR Nos. 722, 693 and 711 of 2005. The State relied on Government Resolution No. Sankirna‑2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham‑1/A‑4 dated 3 November …
The petitioner, Sushila Badhu Patil, challenged an order dated 31 January 2014 issued by the Additional Collector, Nandurbar, which allowed an appeal filed by a respondent, and a subsequent revision order dated 10 January 2017 from the Additional Commissioner, Nashik, which rejected the petitioner's …
The petitioner, Laxman Devidas Doiphode, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to lead secondary evidence of sale deeds that were lost during house construction. The trial court held that the petitioner failed to provide details or evidence of a diligent …
The petitioners Yakubkha Aliyarkha Pathan and others filed a writ petition (No. 7592 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision of the Municipal Council Sakri. The petitioners submitted a copy of the order dated 09.11.2022 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 29 May 2023 issued by the Registrar General of Money Lenders & Special Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Maharashtra, arguing that it was passed more than eight weeks after the matter was reserved for decision on 7 December 2022, contrary to the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a 2012 award in a land acquisition case against Ganpat Sakharm Deshmukh, challenging the compensation and interest awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court. The SLAO had fixed compensation at Rs.600 per unit, which the Reference Court …
The petitioners, Takai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's refusal to frame additional issues in a partnership dispute with Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. They sought to raise five new issues, including jurisdiction, statutory notice, validity of …
The case concerns a land acquisition proceeding initiated in 1999 for a public purpose in Chinchkhede village, where the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation ranging from Rs.67,500 to Rs.83,000 per hectare, while claimants sought higher amounts. The appellants filed Civil …
The appellants challenged a 2010 award that valued their acquired land as dry land, seeking a higher compensation by arguing that the presence of a well made the land irrigated. The reference court had relied on a 1999 sale transaction of dry land from the same village and awarded Rs 1,95,000 per …
Manoj Sopanrao Tonde filed writ petition No. 8436 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Ashwini P. Patil on behalf of Mr. S. J. Salunke. The respondent, Rechna Manoj Tonde, was represented by Mr. R. B. Dhaware. The learned counsel for the …
Bhau Saheb LimbaJi Thorat filed a writ petition alleging that after the implementation of a land consolidation scheme, his land area was incorrectly reduced from 32‑R to 26‑R in the records. He sought the court’s intervention to rectify the error. The court observed that the petitioner intends to …
Khaaja Abdul Rehman Abdul Sattar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra's actions concerning a particular property. During the pendency of the petition, on 7 October 2025, the Joint Secretary of the Revenue and Forest Department issued an order …
The petitioners, Bhikan Kesu Tundiwale and another, filed a writ petition challenging a Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 123 of 2015. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Y. P. Pokale, appearing on behalf of Advocate Mr. Sohel E. Siddiqui, submitted that the underlying civil application had already been …
Petitioner Bhagubai Namdeo Shinde filed writ petition No. 8043 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order. The petition was presented by Advocate V. M. Mane. The Court observed that the main civil proceeding, R.C.S. No. 19 of 2016, had already been settled by …
The petitioner, Sunita Gangadhar Suryawanshi, challenged an order dated 03 May 2016 issued by the Tahsildar, Dharmabad, which rejected her application on the ground that the State Government had already decided the matter. The High Court had earlier, by order dated 04 September 2014 in Writ Petition …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, appealed against awards of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and subsequently enhanced by reference courts for lands acquired for the Wadala Minor Irrigation Tank project. The acquiring body argued that the reference …
Shankarrao Sambhajirao Kharate and several other petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 8766 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of The Parbhani District Central Co‑Operative Bank Ltd. The petition sought relief against the bank, but no specific relief or grounds are …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (12 WRIT PETITION NO. 9197 OF 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court, after considering the submission, held that the petition was indeed infructuous. …
The petitioner, Deochand Shamlal Bhurewal, filed writ petition No. 8035 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent, Ghasiram Bhojaram Bhurewal. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined the claim of …
Vilas Nilkantha Patil filed a writ petition alleging that he was omitted from the benefit of an earlier order dated 26 July 2018, which reduced the punishment of certain convicts by limiting the stoppage of one salary increment for one year. The petitioner argued that the benefit should extend to …
Santosh Kisan Tilekar and others filed a writ petition (6 WRIT PETITION NO. 8827 OF 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, represented by Advocate Deshmukh H. D., later informed the court that the petition had become …
Machindra Baburao Pawar filed a writ petition against the Chief Officer of Pathardi Nagar Parishad, Ahmednagar. During the pendency of the petition, the related regular civil suit (No. 308 of 2016) was dismissed in default. The petitioner’s counsel argued that with the dismissal of the civil suit, …
The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 1686‑1689 of 2008) challenging decisions in a land acquisition proceeding dating back to 1982. The respondents were represented by counsel Omkar Patil on behalf of S. S. Shinde. The court observed that the same acquisition proceeding had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The respondents contended that the regular civil suit concerning the same matter had been finally decided, leaving no issue for the court to consider. The …
The petitioners, a cooperative housing society, challenged an order of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court that directed the society to allot a plot to Respondent No.1. They argued that Respondent No.1 had not proved membership and that the sale and membership documents were …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioners, owners of land in Ahmednagar, alleged that after a consolidation scheme the recorded area of their property was reduced for certain survey numbers. They filed an application for correction of the area and for condonation of delay, which was rejected by the District Superintendent of …
The petitioner, Prabhu Prabhakar Kundlik Jadhav, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner was reported to be dead. No application was made to record the legal heirs of the deceased within the statutory time …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to amend an order dated 18 April 2026. The petitioner sought insertion of the words “except in Writ Petition No.10800/2021 and Petitioner in Writ Petition No.10800/2021” after the term “Respondents” in paragraph five of the order. The …
Concentrix Services India Private Limited filed a writ petition (No. 8562 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Rahul Bapurao Magare and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined the status of the petition and found …
Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil filed Writ Petition No. 12321 of 2021 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Counsel for the petitioner submitted a …
The petitioner, Smt. Nanda Balaji Thombre, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against the State Minister of Rural Development Department and other respondents. The petition sought relief concerning matters not specified in the brief judgment. Counsel for the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. …
The Municipal Council of Vaijapur promoted Dadasaheb Daguji Dale (respondent No.1) to the post of Assistant Librarian, a position that under the 1965 Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act must be filled by direct recruitment. The promotion was initially temporary and later made permanent by a council …
The petitioner, Kavita Kiran Kathade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and ordered the petition to be disposed of as infructuous. No substantive merits …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioner, Arjun Pundlik Pawar, filed a writ petition which, according to his counsel, became infructuous. The court accepted that there was nothing left for consideration. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous. The judge also ordered that any pending civil …
The Executive Engineer (Medium Project Division) appealed against the reference court's award of compensation in several land acquisition cases, contending that the enhanced compensation exceeded four times the amount fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. The State Government's policy, as reflected …
The applicants, Panditrao Wamanrao Pawar and others, filed civil applications seeking relief in pending execution proceedings arising from a decree of the Civil Court. A precept under Section 54 of the Code of Civil Procedure had been issued to the District Collector, and the applicants intended to …
The petitioner, Ashok Vishwanathrao Jagtap, challenged a 2015 order of the Additional Registrar and a 2019 order of the Minister for Cooperation, seeking recovery of Rs.16,000 incurred as cost of an inquiry under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. He argued that Section …
The petitioner, Adat Vyapari Education Society, filed a writ petition challenging a matter that had already been decided in a suit. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the suit's decision rendered the petition moot. The court examined whether any issues remained for adjudication in the writ …
Janabai Gangaram Kendre filed a writ petition challenging the civil judge's order that rejected her application to allow each of the four defendants to cross‑examine her witnesses independently, on the ground that they had filed a common written statement. The petitioner argued that Section 136 of …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard multiple writ petitions filed in 2017-2021. The Court directed the petitioners to submit copies of the required documents within two weeks of the order. It warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petitions without further …
On 10th February 2026, the petitioner failed to appear before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, and the matter was kept for dismissal. The petitioner again failed to appear on the subsequent date. The writ petition, filed in 2022, had remained at the admission stage without any …
The Court heard multiple appeals challenging the compensation awards for lands acquired for the Wadala Tank project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially awarded Rs 150‑225 per R, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 940 per R. The acquiring body argued that the reference court …
The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation filed two writ petitions (Nos. 10111 and 10119 of 2016) against Avtarsingh Indersingh Sodhi and Kewalsingh Indersingh Sodhi respectively. The petitions were initially not taken on board, but were later admitted. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the …
Shaikh Irshad Abdul Razzaque filed writ petition No. 3048 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against Rubina Begam Mohammad Gouss. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Siddharth B. Paikrao. While the petition was pending, the regular civil suit No. 47 of 2018, which formed the …
The petitioner, Sonali Samarth Kadam, filed writ petition No. 8776 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petition was initially listed and arguments were made by the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S. During the …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Jayakwadi Project, arguing that the reference court wrongly discarded a pre‑notification sale (Exh. 17) and a post‑notification sale (Exh. 18) and incorrectly calculated compensation from the date of possession. The court …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Jayakwadi Project, arguing that the reference court wrongly discarded a pre‑notification sale deed and failed to consider post‑notification sales. The court examined whether sale instances before and after the Section 4 …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Jayakwadi Project, arguing that the reference court wrongly discarded a pre‑notification sale deed and failed to consider post‑notification sales, and that compensation was calculated from the date of possession contrary …
The Gujarat Minor Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed a first appeal against orders in several civil applications concerning compensation for land acquisition. The appeal was filed 57 days after the prescribed period. Both parties agreed that the matter was already governed by the …
Tapi Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd, through its counsel, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later requested permission to withdraw the petition and to approach the Co-operative Court for the dispute. The Court considered the petitioner's request …
The Zilla Parishad challenged several ex parte judgments of the reference court concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2002. The appellant argued that it had been served but the reference court proceeded without its participation, rendering the orders void. The High Court observed that …
The Zilla Parishad Jalna appealed against several ex parte orders of the reference court relating to land acquisition proceedings dating back to 2002. The appellant argued that it had been served but the reference court proceeded without hearing it, violating principles of natural justice. The High …
The petitioner, Mukhtar Khan Babakhan Pathan, filed a writ petition but was reported to be dead. No steps were taken to bring his legal heirs on record within the prescribed period. The court examined whether the petition could continue in the absence of the petitioner and without representation by …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdars’ Courts Act, 1906, seeking an injunction to protect a customary road providing access to their land. After a third party sought to be added, the petitioners applied to withdraw the proceedings, but the Tahsildar proceeded to …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of writ petitions (WP 418-2016 to WP 1080-2017) before it. The judge issued a procedural order directing all petitioners to take appropriate steps within two weeks of the order, failing which the petitions would be dismissed without …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, concerning revenue entries. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner had an alternate and equally efficacious remedy of filing a second revision before the State …
Nandabai Walmik Surase filed a writ petition (No. 11418 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Janardan Bala Surashe and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was nothing left to be adjudicated. The Court examined the …
The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Latur, which had entertained a complaint filed by Babruwan (the respondent) beyond the prescribed 90‑day limitation period and set aside a punishment of stopping increments for two years. The …
The petitioners, Jagannath RamBhau Askand and others, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21‑07‑2023 of the District Judge‑2, Ambad, which dismissed their appeal in MCA No. 17 of 2021. The substantive civil suit is at the evidentiary stage, with plaintiff’s evidence already being …
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Jayakwadi Project, arguing that the reference court wrongly discarded a pre‑notification sale (Exh. 17) and a post‑notification sale (Exh. 18) and incorrectly calculated compensation from the date of possession. The court …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) entertained motions to correct an order dated 10 July 2026 concerning numerous first appeals related to land‑acquisition compensation. The appellants contended that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed and should be removed from the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2017 challenging actions of the Municipal Corporation. No counsel appeared for the petitioners on the scheduled hearing dates of 22.01.2026 and 23.01.2026. The Court, noting the lapse of several years and the petitioners' failure to prosecute, granted them a …
The petitioners challenged orders rejecting their temporary injunction application and granting police aid to respondents, seeking a direction that the trial courts decide the pending suits within a fixed period while maintaining the status‑quo. The High Court noted that the parties had agreed that …
Petitioners Bhausaheb Baburao Labhade and another filed writ petitions challenging orders that rejected their application for a temporary injunction and granted police aid to the respondents. They sought a direction that the trial courts handling the underlying suits (R.C.S. No.186 of 2021 and …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
The petitioners, five Shinde brothers, purchased 57.8 acres of land under a certificate issued pursuant to Section 32M of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent Somnath Shinde sought forfeiture of the land, and the Tenancy Avval Karkun ordered forfeiture under Section …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a series of first appeals (including No. 699/2017) relating to compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeals 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions. The court deleted First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 from the title clause, as they were wrongly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017. It also directed that the claimants be awarded …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 from the title clause as urged by the appellants. The court affirmed that the appeals of both the claimants and the acquiring body are partly allowed and …
The High Court corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 from the title clause as they were wrongly clubbed with Appeal No. 699. The court affirmed that the claimants' appeals are partly allowed and that the acquiring body's appeals are also partly …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions to delete two improperly clubbed appeals (Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017) from the title clause. The court affirmed that the claimants are entitled to compensation of Rs.10,48,000 per hectare for …
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) entertained a motion to correct the minutes of an order dated 10 July 2026 concerning numerous first appeals arising from land‑acquisition proceedings in Latur. The appellants contended that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 after hearing motions filed by the appellants and the acquiring body. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be …
Ashok Ishwarappa Dongre filed a writ petition challenging a July 21, 2018 order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jamkhed, which rejected his application for the appointment of a Court Commissioner in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 20 of 2013. The petitioner argued that the suit was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out that the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) entertained motions to correct a previously dated order. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body pointed out …
The petitioners, Mangal Pandurang Patil and others, filed writ petition No. 11820 of 2021 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. They were represented by Advocate Mr. Kailas Hande on behalf of Mr. Avinash D. Hande. The petitioners subsequently sought leave of the Court to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (12 WRIT PETITION NO. 10936 OF 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, held that there was no longer any cause of action to be …
The petitioners, Syeda Imamunnisa Begum Nahri Syed and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against respondent Yusuf Khan Sajjad Khan. The petition was presented by counsel Ms Fatema Kazi. During the hearing, the petitioners, through their …
The Dhule and Nandurbar District Central Co‑Op Bank Ltd filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 7 April 2017 issued by the Maharashtra Minister for Co‑operation, which dismissed its revision application under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act. The petitioner relied …
The State acquired land from Narayan Daulatrao More for extending the Gaothan of Bhopani village, issuing a Section 4 notification in 1996 and awarding compensation at Rs 451 per R. More appealed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, arguing that comparable sale transactions justified a rate …
Laximen B. Purekar filed a writ petition challenging an order that confirmed a Tahsildar's decision based on a spot inspection conducted without his presence. The court examined the panchnama and found that the inspection was carried out behind the petitioner's back, violating the Mamlatdar’s Courts …
The petitioners, a large group of landowners and tenants, sought enforcement of a partition decree dated 13 September 1982 in Regular Civil Suit No. 236 of 1974 concerning 86 acres of land in Wasangaon, Khopegaon and Peth, Latur. They contended that the Collector, Latur, and the State Minister were …
The writ petition (No. 5940 of 2020) was filed by Prasad Panditrao Kapile against Shruti Prasad Kapile in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner sought relief, but later informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Babasaheb V. Dhage, …
The petitioner, Rangnath Gopinath Dhonde, challenged a district court order dated 11 July 2019 that disqualified him from serving as Councilor of Ward No.16, Ashti Nagar Panchayat, following an election petition filed by respondent No.3. The High Court noted that the election in question was held on …
The petitioner, Rajshri Rajkumar Deshmukh, filed Writ Petition No. 1436 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners Janardhan Jagannath Satpute and another filed Writ Petition No. 6173 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Pandit Baburao Sonawane. The petitioners' counsel argued that the matter had already been decided in RCS No.463/2015, and therefore no …
The petitioners sought relief concerning mutation entries in land records, alleging that the entries conferred ownership rights. The respondents contended that mutation entries are merely fiscal records and do not establish title. The High Court reiterated settled law that mutation entries serve …
The petitioner, Thimmaya Himmaya Gunjalkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the substantive suit that formed the basis of the petition was disposed of by the trial court. The …
The petitioner, Ravindra Rajaram Wagh, filed a writ petition in 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over the years, the petitioner failed to appear for any hearing, including on 7 April 2026 when the court noted his absence. The court observed that the petition had been pending for …
The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Gagare, filed a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP No.11/2008) for compensation, but it was dismissed for non‑prosecution after he could not attend proceedings due to his appointment as a legal officer. He later obtained a certified copy of the dismissal order …
The petition was filed by the liquidator of Osmanabad Zilla Sahakari Krushi Gramin Bahu-uddeshiya Vikas Bank Ltd seeking relief against the Collector Osmanabad and other respondents. The petitioner alleged that the matter before the court had become moot. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The applicant, Venunath alias Dada Dagdu Surse, filed a civil application seeking permission to bring the legal heirs of the petitioner onto the court record. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra and others, opposed the amendment. The court examined the averments made in the application …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring authority) appealed against judgments that enhanced compensation for land acquired in 2004 for the Shekhapur Water Reservoir project. Claimants had been paid Rs 650 per R and sought a higher amount, leading the Reference Court to award Rs 8,000 per R, relying on an …
The Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a water reservoir project. The claimants had sought higher compensation, and the reference court relied on a prior award (LAR No.610 of 2008) from a …
The petitioners, who purchased the entire 6‑9‑R land in two halves, sought to overturn an order that allowed the respondents to restrain excavation for a water tank despite an earlier temporary injunction in the petitioners' favor. The petitioners argued that their registered sale deeds gave them …
Ashok Nana Ravate filed a writ petition (No. 12315 of 2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of Gorakhnath Sonaji Sonaba Ravate and others. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Nitin T. Tribhuwan. The respondents were represented by Advocates Sudarshana …
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division (Osmanabad) appealed against a judgment of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge that enhanced compensation for land acquired for a tank project. The land, acquired under the Land Acquisition Act with notification in 2000, was initially compensated at Rs 47,480 …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit, alleging that the suit had not been settled. The respondent argued that the parties had already compromised the suit before the Lok Adalat, rendering the petition moot. The court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. …
The petitioners, Vranda... and others, filed a writ petition (953 WRIT PETITION NO. 669 of 2016) challenging the proceedings in Special Civil Suit No.2 of 2015. The petition argued that the suit was still pending before the trial court. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that …
The petitioners, Polachand Ambarsingh Rajput and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Nattu Sandu Landage. Both sides were represented by counsel, with the petitioners' advocates being S. D. Tele and Shivprasad G. Jadhavar, and the respondent's …
The appellant, original defendant No.2, appealed against the District Judge's order rejecting his application to condone a 244‑day delay in filing an appeal against a 2019 decree. He claimed the delay was due to a heart attack and bypass surgery on 12 June 2019, followed by prolonged …
The petitioners, Ramesh Uttam Hinge and others, filed writ petitions seeking liberty to file fresh applications in two execution proceedings that had been stayed because a first appeal by the State Government was pending. The State Government’s first appeal was subsequently dismissed. The …
The petitioners, Amol Sunil Kshirsagar and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge confirming a stay order in Special Civil Suit No. 25 of 2021. They sought a direction that the trial court should not allow any third‑party interest and should decide the suit within …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking direction for the trial court to expedite the pending civil suit R.C.S. No. 971 of 2018, which had been in litigation since 2021. Both parties acknowledged that the suit had reached the evidence stage. The High Court, noting the prolonged pendency, …
The petitioners, Appasaheb Karbhari Kasar (through his attorney) and Changdeo s/o Karbhari Kasar, filed writ petitions (Nos. 673 of 2016 and 12497 of 2015) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court issued an order on 02‑04‑2026. The petitioners sought a correction to the cause title …
The petitioners, Satish Rupchand Jain and another, filed a writ petition which, according to their counsel, became infructuous. The learned advocate informed the court of this development. The bench, after noting the petition's infructuous status, ordered its disposal. No substantive merits of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against an award of compensation for land acquired for the construction of a ring road at Ambajogai. The acquisition was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1992, with the award passed in 1994, while possession had been taken earlier. …
The petitioners, Rukminbai Govindrao Bhatte and others, filed a writ petition (No. 3039 of 2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondent, Govindrao Madhavrao Mahadu Bhatte. The petition was filed in 2017 but was only heard on 2 February 2026. During the …
The appellants, agricultural landowners in Siregaon, challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired in 1995 for the Shillegaon Minor Irrigation Project, arguing that the land and fruit‑bearing trees were undervalued. The Civil Judge had partially enhanced compensation under Section 18 of the …
The petitioners, a farmers' cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an interim order dated 31.08.2015 of the Latur Labour Court and a subsequent judgment dated 16.08.2017 of the Industrial Court in a labour dispute. They sought a direction that the Labour Court decide the main …
The petitioners, an education society, challenged a School Tribunal order that allowed the termination of Respondent No.1, a teacher appointed on a temporary basis in 2006, after he had served continuously until 2014. The petitioners argued that the employee, who held only a B.P.Ed. qualification …
The petitioners, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 25‑July‑2018 which directed that the respondent, Santosh, be given the designation of Tracer with retrospective benefits from his date of joining in 1985. The respondent, originally appointed as a …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.08.2016 of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, which rejected their application under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioners argued that the civil suit (RCS No. 579 of 2014, now SCS No. 64 of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the Civil Judge Junior Division, Dharur's order rejecting their application to frame a preliminary issue in a suit for declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction. The trial court held that the suit, valued at Rs.1,000 with a court fee of …
The petitioners, Shri Krishna Kachardas Somani and others, challenged an order dated 19.03.2016 of the Civil Judge Junior Division, Shevgaon, which dismissed their execution petition on the ground that the decree holder had alienated the suit property during the pendency of the proceedings. The …
The petitioner, Kalyan Dhondiram Dhapate, filed writ petition No. 10402 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. The petition remained pending for ten years without any appearance by the petitioner. On 26 March 2026, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Parbhani, which allowed the respondent's application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure to appoint a commissioner. The civil suit involved a claim for declaration and …
The petitioners sought to set aside the District Judge's order allowing an amendment of the plaint at the appellate stage in RCA No. 53 of 2017. They argued that the original plaintiff had ample opportunity to amend earlier and that the amendment was a belated attempt to fill a lacuna, thus …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgment of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar which had enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Nagar Bypass Road, treating the lands as non‑agricultural. The State argued that the lands, shown in the Urban Development Plan’s Green …
Kantabai Bansilal Biyani filed two writ petitions challenging letters dated 07‑08‑2023 issued by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, which directed the Collector of Jalgaon to review earlier orders under Section 258 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petitioner alleged that …
The Bombay High Court examined a series of writ petitions concerning the jurisdiction of the Additional Registrar/Commissioner of the Fisheries Department to entertain revisions under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The State Government clarified, via affidavit, that the …
Kausalyabai Babasaheb Kale and others filed a writ petition (No. 3762 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Yashwant Babasaheb Kale and another. The petitioners, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the Court was …
The appellants, agricultural landowners from Siregaon, challenged the compensation awarded for lands acquired in 1995 for the Shillegaon Minor Irrigation Project, arguing that the award undervalued both the agricultural land and the fruit‑bearing trees on it. The Civil Judge had partially enhanced …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a letter indicating that the disputes had been resolved in a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The court examined …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitions sought relief concerning matters that were later resolved through a settlement at a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. On 24 January …
Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retails Private Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a letter indicating that the disputes were settled in a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The court, noting the …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitions sought relief concerning matters not detailed in the judgment. The corporation’s counsel submitted a letter indicating that the dispute had been …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a letter indicating that the disputes had been settled in a Lok Adalat on 9 December 2023. The court examined the settlement and …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitions alleged various grievances, but the parties reached a settlement at a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The corporation’s counsel …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitions sought relief concerning disputes that were later resolved through a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The corporation’s counsel …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745‑2021 to 6140‑2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a letter indicating that the disputes had been settled in a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The court, after …
Patbandhare Karmachari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit filed writ petitions (Nos. 2210 and 2209 of 2020) challenging the appearance of counsel for respondent No.1 in an order dated 30 April 2026. Respondent No.1, through counsel Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, moved a motion seeking clarification (speaking to the …
The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation filed a series of writ petitions (numbers 3745-2021 to 6140-2021) against Sargam Retailes Private Ltd. The petitioner submitted a letter dated 24 January 2026 indicating that the dispute had been settled at a National Lok Adalat held on 9 December 2023. The court …
Petitioner Sushila Bhimrao Gadade challenged an order dated 01‑06‑2016 of the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar, which dismissed her appeal in RTS Appeal No. 324 of 2016. She filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against that order. The Court observed that the petitioner …
The Maharashtra State Co‑operative Bank filed a series of writ petitions against various respondents concerning a loan secured by a sugar factory. During the pendency of the petitions, the parties reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, resulting in full repayment of the …
The Maharashtra State Co‑operative Bank Ltd filed a series of writ petitions against several respondents concerning a loan secured by a sugar factory. During the pendency of the petitions, the parties reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, resulting in full repayment of the …
The Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd filed a writ petition seeking relief concerning a loan and possession of a sugar factory. During the pendency of the petition, the parties reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, clearing the entire loan amount. The bank handed …
The Maharashtra State Co‑Operative Bank Ltd filed a series of writ petitions against several borrowers alleging default on loans taken for a sugar factory. During the pendency of the petitions, the parties reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, resulting in full repayment …
The Maharashtra State Co‑Operative Bank Ltd filed a series of writ petitions against several borrowers alleging default on loans taken for a sugar factory. During the pendency of the petitions, the parties reached a settlement under the One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme, resulting in full repayment …
Bhagwat Vitthal Wanve filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28 August 2017 issued by the Revenue Minister in Appeal‑2/2016/C.No.122/J‑7(A). The petitioner argued that the order was invalid due to undue delay. The learned Minister had already set aside the order on the ground of delay, and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the conduct of Gram Panchayat elections. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The petitioners argued that the delay rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined whether the passage of time had extinguished the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed the judgments of the reference court that awarded compensation to the respondents. The State contended that the compensation was within the four‑times limit prescribed under the State Liability Act (SLAO) and that a Government Resolution dated 03‑Nov‑2016, with …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgments and awards dated 03.05.2014 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.R. Nos.618 and 574 of 2002, contending that the compensation awarded to the victims was excessive. The learned Advocate General for the State argued that the compensation was …
The petitioners sought to have the trial court recast the issues in their 2012 suit for removal of encroachment to include a tenancy question, alleging that the defendants claimed protected tenant status under the Hyderabad Tenancy Act. The trial court had rejected this application, holding that the …
The petitioner, Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the matter infructuous. The court considered whether any relief could still be granted. Finding that the petition was no longer …
