Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
773 judgments · newest first · showing 601–773
The petitioners, who were co‑owners of certain lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, alleged that they received no compensation for Survey Nos. 240 and 241 and that the compensation for Survey Nos. 4 and 169 was improperly allotted to the respondents. They applied to the Deputy …
The petitioner, originally a defendant in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 5 August 2019 that appointed a court commissioner before any oral evidence was taken. The High Court noted its consistent jurisprudence that a court commissioner should normally be appointed only after the recording of …
The State of Maharashtra acquired 30 R of land in Takle Pokhari village for a percolation tank, issuing a Section 4 notification in 2005. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 710 per R for dry land, but the reference court enhanced the compensation to Rs 3,000 per R, treating …
The applicant, Ravindra Siddharth Kale, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested. The applicant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court which had re‑classified land acquired for Percolation Tank No. 4 as irrigated and enhanced compensation from Rs 710 per R to Rs 4,000 per R, also awarding interest under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act. The State …
The High Court heard multiple appeals challenging the compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Wadala Tank project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed compensation at Rs 150‑225 per R, which the reference court enhanced to Rs 940 per R. The acquiring body argued that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that refused to allow the exhibition of a lease deed and an agreement to sale, both over 30 years old, in a suit for specific performance and perpetual injunction. The trial court rejected the petitioners' application on the …
The petitioners, original defendants in a 2017 suit for declaration, possession and perpetual injunction, were unable to attend a scheduled cross‑examination of the plaintiff on 9 October 2019 because their counsel was engaged elsewhere. Consequently, the trial court issued a ‘no cross’ order on …
Two writ petitions were filed against the Nanded Zilla Dehkrekh Sahakari Sanstha Marya, Nanded challenging Labour Court orders that directed the respondent to pay Rs.1,79,072 to the petitioners. In petition 5126/2020, the petitioner argued that the respondent had admitted a higher liability of …
The petitioners, Dnyandeo Ramabhau Mokate and others, filed writ petitions (Nos. 8368 and 8369 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Vijay Chandrabhanu Mokate. The petitioners sought relief, but during the proceedings the parties reached an amicable settlement. The learned …
A writ petition (916 WRIT PETITION NO. 8367 OF 2017) was filed by Aiyodhyabai Jaijairam Kasab and another against Dashrath Govinda Parihar and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Doke Kishor R and Doke S K, while the respondents (nos. 2 to 12) were represented by Ms. Ashwini P Shinde. …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 2833-2842 of 2017) filed by various petitioners against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar. The petitioners were represented by Advocate Vinayak Sudhakar Bedre, while the respondent was …
Petitioner Shaikh Rauphodin Gayasodin filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel C.V. Thombre, sought permission to withdraw the petitions and to be allowed to file a review before Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Sangh as per the bye‑laws. The …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 2833-2841 of 2017) against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar, challenging certain actions of the Board. The respondent filed a motion seeking that the order dated 02.02.2026 be "spoken to minutes" and that separate corrected …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 2833‑2841 of 2017) filed by various petitioners against the Estate Officer of the Cantonment Board, Ahmednagar. The petitioners sought relief, while the respondent’s counsel requested that a separate order be issued for …
The landlord filed a suit for eviction of a tenant on the ground of bona fide requirement and obtained a decree for possession of shop No. NMC 3-6-525 (CTS 1888). The decree was affirmed by the High Court, but the District Judge remanded the execution proceedings without giving reasons, allowing the …
The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against a judgment dated 20 June 2015 that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Nagar Bypass Road, arguing that the land should have been treated as agricultural because it was shown in the Green Zone of the Urban Development Plan. The State sought …
The Executive Engineer (the acquiring body) filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that allowed the original claimants to amend their compensation claim to include additional trees and related assets. The claimants sought to increase the number of trees and associated compensation …
The appellants challenged the award of Rs. 2,400 per are for land acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project, contending that the land is irrigated and should attract Rs. 5,500 per are with escalation. They also disputed the compensation awarded for various fruit‑bearing trees, arguing that the private …
The petitioner, Jayashri Vijaykumar Tekale, filed a writ petition against Vaijinath Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions, including the scheduled hearing on 6 January 2026 and the adjourned hearing on the same day, as well as on 8 …
The petitioners, Govind Gangaptrao Ganapure and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled hearing dates of 06.01.2026 and 08.01.2026, despite the court granting an additional opportunity in the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2021 which remained pending for several years. On 14 January 2026, the court ordered the matter to be listed for dismissal, giving the petitioners another opportunity to appear. The petitioners failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions on …
The petitioner, Ulka Pradeep Jain, filed a writ petition seeking relief against M/s Tarkheda Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. J. M. Murkute, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Vandanabai BhauSaheb Desale and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Balu Namdev Patil and another. During the proceedings, the parties reached a compromise settlement. The petitioners' counsel submitted that, in view of the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a motion to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning multiple first appeals relating to land acquisition compensation. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed and should be …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a motion to correct the minutes of its order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants contended that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of first appeals related to land acquisition in Latur. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were improperly clubbed with First …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, corrected an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 by deleting First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 from the title clause as urged by the appellants. The court partially allowed the appeals of both the claimants and the acquiring body and affirmed compensation of …
The case concerns the acquisition of land for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation based on a pre‑notification sale (Exhibit 21) and the reference court enhanced the award to Rs.1,40,000 per …
The GMIDC, as the acquiring authority, appealed a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank. The land was taken under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with possession taken in 1994 and the award declared later. The …
The petitioners filed writ petitions (WP No. 10959/2016 and WP No. 10961/2016) challenging certain orders in civil suits. Respondents submitted that the original plaintiff was ready to add the Wakf Board as a party‑defendant in both suits. The court accepted this statement as an undertaking. On that …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief in two suits. The respondents informed the court that the original plaintiff intended to implead the Wakf Board as a party-defendant in both suits. The court treated this statement as a formal undertaking. Accepting the undertaking, the court …
Hanmant Raju Jabde applied for regular bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant had previously been granted bail for an earlier FIR involving sections of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The present FIR, registered …
Manohar Govindrao Gajare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the right to pursue any appropriate remedy …
The petitioner, Madhusudan Babulal Bhartiya, challenged an order dated 17 July 2019 issued by the learned Arbitrator and District Collector, Aurangabad, which rejected his arbitration application concerning land acquired under the National Highways Authority. The respondent argued that the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. All petitions sought relief …
The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Over the course of the …
Several writ petitions (Nos. 11636/2022, 11654/2022, 11652/2022, 11651/2022, 11650/2022, 11649/2022, 11648/2022, 11645/2022, 11637/2022, 11643/2022) were filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel, sought relief but did not advance the matters for …
Shakuntala Baban Garje filed a writ petition (No. 11065 of 2016) against Grampanchayat Nahuli and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that, because of the passage of time, no cause of action remained and the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no …
Manikchand Madanlal Gangwal filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gevrai, which had rejected his application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC in suit No. 927 of 2021. The petitioner argued that the order …
The petitioner, a farmer, challenged the dismissal of his land acquisition reference (L.A.R. No.05 of 2015) by the Civil Judge, who had set aside the reference because the petitioner failed to appear or present evidence. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the judgment and award …
The petitioner, Vikas Eknath Bhagwat, filed a writ petition (No. 3469 of 2017) arising out of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be entertained despite the earlier proceedings. The court examined the status of H.M.P. No.65 of 2016 and found that it had …
The petitioner, Superintending Engineer MSEDCL Latur, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Latur dated 04‑04‑2016 which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent, Prabhakar Rangnath Awade, and directed payment of salary for his suspension period (02‑04‑2004 to 18‑05‑2006). The respondent …
The Latour City Municipal Corporation filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 25‑02‑2022 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) Nos. 69 and 70 of 2021. The High Court observed that the substantive industrial‑court proceedings were still pending and therefore declined to …
The applicant filed a motion seeking correction of the minutes of an order dated 28 April 2026, alleging errors in the case number, party names, and the operative clause regarding withdrawal of deposited amount. The respondent agreed that Clause 2 of the operative part should be deleted. The Court …
Petitioner Dhanaji Ganpat Khomane filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his suit for default by the Trial Court. The petitioner had also filed an application (Civil M.A. No.943/2025) seeking restoration of the suit before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Beed. The respondent argued …
The petition arose from an order of the Tahsildar, Rahuri, confirming the existence of a 2‑3 foot customary pathway on the boundary of Gats 224 and 225 and directing the removal of an obstruction allegedly caused by the petitioners. The petitioners contended that the panchnama produced under Section …
The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition seeking direction to grant benefits to 52 daily‑wage labourers employed under the Agriculture Department. The State’s affidavit‑in‑reply asserted that all labourers had been paid the applicable minimum wages and that only 11 of them, who had worked at …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioners challenged a common order dated 21.08.2023 in which the trial court allowed a second application for a fresh Court Commissioner report in a boundary dispute suit (RCS No.237/2015). They argued that once an earlier application had been allowed and a report submitted, the court should …
The petitioners, Suresh Bansi Labade and another, filed a writ petition asserting ownership of a property based on a registered sale deed dated 31.01.1989 and a registered correction deed dated 02.03.1992. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the court's order dated 04.03.2026 …
The GMIDC and the Executive Engineer, Latur filed appeals against a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank. The land was taken under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in 1996, with possession taken in 1994 through …
The Gujarat Minor Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) appealed the award of compensation granted to the original claimants whose lands were acquired for the Narwatwadi Storage Tank under a Section 4 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The reference court had enhanced the …
The Executive Engineer filed a writ petition challenging a 06‑10‑2023 order of the CJSD, Paranda that issued a warrant against the judgment debtor. The petitioner had deposited the entire award amount except for interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the interest component …
The petitioner, Arjun Bhimrao Mandve, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition (WP No. 10804 of 2022) and to file a fresh petition challenging the same orders. The learned senior counsel, Rajendra Deshmukh, appeared on behalf of the petitioner and requested the court's leave to withdraw. The …
The petitioner, Ahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshan Sahakari Bank Ltd (through its director), challenged the order dated 12 September 2018 of the Divisional Joint Registrar Co‑Societies, Nashik, which dismissed its revision of an inquiry conducted under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co‑operative …
The petitioners, Kundlik Krushna Ghobale and another, filed Writ Petition No. 13296 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondent Minakshi Nandkishor Kale. The petitioners argued that the regular civil suit No. 165 of 2015, which was the subject of the …
The petitioner, Ravi Namdeorao Jadhav, challenged an order dated 24 November 2022 that demoted him from Assistant Accountant Officer to Junior Accountant Officer. He argued that the order was passed without a prior show‑cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct an earlier order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of land‑acquisition appeals. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been improperly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and …
The petitioners challenged a judgment dated 31‑08‑2019 in which a Junior Division Civil Judge set aside an ex‑parte decree in a partition suit (Civil Suit No.141/2002). They argued that the decree should not have been vacated because the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC was filed 85 days …
The Gram Panchayat Usmanpur filed writ petition No. 13303 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear at the scheduled hearing on 06.01.2026, and despite the court’s adjournment to the afternoon …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the continuation of proceedings in suit R.C.S. No.173/2007. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the suit had already been disposed of, leaving no operative relief to be claimed. The respondent's counsel was present but made no substantive …
The petitioners challenged a common order dated 9 November 2022 in which the Civil Judge, Junior Division Jamkhed, rejected their applications for enhancement of share on the sole ground that the issue was pending before a Division Bench of the Apex Court in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma. The …
The petitioners challenged an order dated 01.11.2022 of the District Superintendent of Land Records, Osmanabad, which allowed an appeal filed by respondents 4 and 5. They filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against that order. The respondents argued …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 320 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 328 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that, owing to the passage of time, the matters had become infructuous. The Court considered the submissions and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed under WRIT PETITION NO. 13078 of 2017. During the proceedings, the petitioners informed the Court that they had settled the dispute with the respondents. The …
The petitioners, who are leaseholders of premises under a 30‑year lease dated 18 May 2005 executed by the erstwhile Latur Municipal Council, challenged demand notices issued by the Latur City Municipal Corporation under a resolution dated 7 September 2018 that increased rent based on market rates. …
The petitioners, who are leaseholders of premises under a 30‑year lease dated 18 May 2005 executed by the erstwhile Latur Municipal Council, challenged demand notices issued by Latur City Municipal Corporation on 19 January 2019 for increased rent. The corporation relied on a resolution dated 7 …
The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Bapurao Almaji, filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of his civil suit (RCS No.176 of 2015) for want of prosecution. The respondent, Dilip Veerbhadra Usturge and others, produced the order of dismissal from the Civil Judge Junior Division, Chakur. The …
The petitioners, Bhagwat Namdeo Pawse and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive …
The Latur Municipal Corporation filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the respondents. While the petition was pending, the related regular civil suit (No. 543 of 2014) was settled by compromise on 12 December 2020. The court noted that the …
The petitioner, Prashant Raosaheb Mohite, filed a writ petition (No. 3766 of 2017) against Kalpana Prashant Mohite. After a long lapse of time, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that no cause of action or relief remained, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and …
Mukhtar Ali Mohammad Ali filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State Bank of India, Parbhani branch. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. Vijay R. Aatade, while the respondent was represented by Advocate Mr. Prakash B. Paithankar. …
A group of shop leaseholders filed writ petitions challenging demand notices issued by Latur City Municipal Corporation that sought to increase rent based on a 2018 resolution and Section 79(d) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The petitioners argued that their 2005 lease deeds, still in …
Balasaheb Changanrao Dorale & Anr. filed writ petition No. 5394 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against the Personnel Manager of Bajaj Auto Ltd. The petitioners failed to appear for the scheduled hearing on 22 January 2026. The Court, after granting a final opportunity, listed …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The writ petition (34 WRIT PETITION NO. 14176 OF 2019) was filed by Chandkjhan Imamkhan Pathan against Sanjay Vishwanath Shevale and another. The petition arose from an order dated 19 August 2019 in Regular Civil Suit No.69/2016, which had been dismissed for want of evidence and prosecution. The …
The appellants' land was acquired for the Lower Terna Right Canal, with possession taken in 1998 before the Section 4 notification in December 1999. The Civil Judge awarded compensation at Rs 1,050 per R treating the land as dry, while the claimants sought Rs 1,45,303 alleging the land was …
The petitioner, Bhanudas Shamrao Hiwarale, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dismissing his 2015 complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement, which he failed to produce, was required for locus standi. The High Court examined whether the Industrial …
The petitioner, Suresh Shrihari Kawade, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09 June 2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kalam, Osmanabad, which recorded a compromise filed as Exhibit‑55 and led to the disposal of the underlying suit. The petitioner contended that the …
Ramprasad Tukaram Dabhade filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads, District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The petitioner sought relief despite the existence of a statutory …
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Shankar Hiraji Darade, claimed ownership of 83 R of land purchased in 1983, which was entered in the revenue records in their name. In 2011 the respondent applied to correct the mutation, asserting that only 30 R was sold to the petitioners, 23 R remained with …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 14351 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the claim of lapse of time rendering the petition ineffective. No …
The petitioners, B. Pramod Kumar Reddy Gangareddy and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a suit. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the suit had already been dismissed, leaving no substantive relief to be granted. The court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 3785 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil suit No. 312 of 2012, which dealt with the same subject matter, was decided on 9 January 2024. The petitioners argued that the decision of …
The petitioner, Prakash Munnalal Kande, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. He sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition and to be allowed to file a fresh application for restoration before the appropriate court. The sole issue before the Court was …
The Samaki Mata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal filed writ petitions (Nos. 3565 and 3619 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioners argued that the matters were still pending and required adjudication. The respondents contended that a …
The petitioner, Kushivarta Bhausaheb Nannavare, filed a writ petition (No. 14099 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an aspect of the 2015 elections. The petition was filed after the elections had concluded and the petitioner had neither contested nor been elected in …
Sangitabai Vasudeo Rajput filed a writ petition (No. 13817 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner or his counsel. On 18 March 2026, …
Petitioners Sakhubai Machindra Gungule and another filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11204 OF 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was accompanied by two civil applications (Nos. 17052 and 17053 of 2022). Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the …
Petitioners Sakhubai Machindra Gungule and another filed a writ petition (904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11204 OF 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Tarabai Ganpat Gahire and others. The petition was accompanied by two civil applications (Nos. 17052 and 17053 of 2022). …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) petitions challenging awards of compensation granted by the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad in several reference cases. The State contended that the compensation awarded exceeded the ceiling of four times the amount fixed by …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of stamp duty appeals challenging awards of compensation granted by a reference court in various civil matters. The State argued that the compensation awarded exceeded four times the amount previously granted by the State Legal Aid Office (SLAO). The State …
The State of Maharashtra filed several first‑appeal (stamp) petitions challenging the judgment and award dated 23‑04‑2014 of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Osmanabad, which had granted compensation in a series of stamp duty cases. The State contended that the reference court’s compensation was …
The petitioner, Haaris Mamu Shaikh, filed a writ petition (No. 13349 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. The matter remained pending for several years without any prosecution by the petitioner. On 8 January 2026, the petitioner failed to …
Giridhari Deepa Rathod filed a writ petition (924/2017) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the respondents Mulchand Pema Rathod and others. The petitioners argued that the matter had already been resolved in an earlier case, R.C.S. No.53 of 2013, which was settled before the …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first appeals challenging judgments of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad that awarded compensation in stamp duty matters. The State argued that the reference court's compensation exceeded the permissible limit, claiming it was more than four …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of first‑appeal (stamp) applications challenging judgments dated 23 April 2014 of the Civil Judge Senior Division at Osmanabad, which awarded compensation in several stamp duty cases. The State contended that the reference court’s compensation exceeded the …
The petitioner, Sachin Ajayabsing Adbalwar, challenged an order dated 12 July 2018 issued by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, in Appeal No.150 of 2014, which was made under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The petitioner sought …
The petitioner, represented by senior counsel Rajendra Deshmukh, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh petition challenging the same orders. The Court granted the request, disposing of the writ petition as withdrawn while keeping all points open for future litigation. …
Petitioner Rukmibai Chandrabhai Ghume filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, leaving no substantive relief to be granted. The court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication. …
The petitioner, Suwalal Mankchand Nabriya, filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit. The court observed that the underlying suit had already been disposed of. Consequently, the court found no remaining matter for adjudication in the writ petition. It ordered that the petition stand disposed. …
The petitioners, Kisan Kachru Tupe (deceased) and others, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 03‑09‑2019 that dismissed their 2015 complaint (ULP No.141) on the ground of a purported separate factory‑level agreement. The petitioners failed to produce the alleged …
The petitioners, Merabai Buddhar Patel and others, filed a writ petition (No. 290 of 2020) challenging an order dated 1 October 2019 passed by the Ad‑hoc District Judge‑1, Shahada, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 16 of 2019. The petition had been pending since 2020 with no interim relief granted. The …
The petitioner, Vitthal Rama Wagmare, challenged a 2016 order of the Superintendent of Land Records, Osmanabad, which had been confirmed by a 2019 order of the State Minister. The petitioner alleged that the Minister’s confirmation was issued without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating …
Kavita Prakash Lakare filed a writ petition challenging an attachment order issued by Shri Balasaheb Satbhai Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. The petitioner claimed that the land in dispute was transferred to her before the bank obtained an order under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative …
The petitioner, Vivekanand Ramkrishna Gundewar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the President of Nanded Town Market Area Housing Building Co‑operative Society Ltd. The petitioner relied on an order dated 04‑12‑2023 passed by the Joint Charity …
Petitioner Laxman Bholaram Bundele filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.04.2017 of the 21st Joint CJJD, Aurangabad, which rejected his application for a temporary injunction in RCS No. 654 of 2016. The order was subsequently affirmed by the District Judge, Aurangabad, on 25.08.2023. …
Jilani Vali Sayyed filed Writ Petition No. 818 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the manager of M/s B G Construction Technology Ltd. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions, including on 23 February 2026 and 4 March 2026. The …
The appellants' land was acquired in 1986 for a percolation tank, with compensation of Rs.3,600 per acre awarded by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO). The claimants contended that the compensation was inadequate, arguing that the SLAO relied on average sale values rather than the highest …
The petitioner, Munjabhau Bhagwanrao Thite, challenged a temporary injunction granted by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jintur, Parbhani, which was affirmed by the District Judge in a civil appeal. The petition, filed in 2017, sought to set aside the injunction order dated 22 April 2016. The High …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The petitioner, Dilip Laxmanrao Aher, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Parwati Sahakari Gruh Nirman Sanstha Ltd. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard a motion to correct the minutes of an order dated 10 July 2026 concerning a large number of land‑acquisition appeals. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 had been mistakenly clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The petitioners challenged the trial court’s order rejecting their application to frame two additional issues in suits for specific performance of a contract. They argued that the document in question was a security for a loan, not an agreement to sell, and that the market value of the agricultural …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. Counsel for the appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The …
The petitioners sought to set aside the trial court's order rejecting their application to frame two additional issues in suits for specific performance of a purported agreement to sell dated 4 January 2010. They argued that the document was merely a security for a loan and that the market value of …
The case concerned land acquisition proceedings initiated in 2008 for the Karkheli Storage Tank project, where the original award dated 4 August 2015 granted compensation based on rates of Rs.2,20,000, Rs.3,30,000 and Rs.4,40,000 per hectare for dry, seasonally irrigated and irrigated lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained motions to correct a prior order dated 10 July 2026. The appellants argued that First Appeal Nos. 576 and 577 of 2017 were erroneously clubbed with First Appeal No. 699 of 2017 and should be removed from the title clause. The acquiring body …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioner, Sayed Nasir Sayed Sultan, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21‑01‑2017 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ashti, which had been affirmed by the District Judge in a miscellaneous civil appeal. The petitioner sought a direction that the trial court should decide the …
Petitioners Prashant Lachhiram Dasarwar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioners' counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, held that the petition was indeed …
Kisan Baburao Kumbhar filed a writ petition challenging a civil suit involving Pooja Kisan Kumbhar, a minor, and another party. The respondents argued that the underlying civil suit had already been disposed of, leaving no operative relief to be granted. The Court examined the submissions and found …
The petitioner, Sheshrao Ramrao Mirge, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's order dated 06‑11‑2019 that dismissed his 2015 complaint on the ground that a separate factory‑level agreement existed. The High Court noted that the petitioner had not produced the alleged agreement …
The petitioner, Balkrishna Yeshwantrao Bansod, filed a complaint (ULP No. 218 of 2015) before the Industrial Court, Aurangabad, alleging a grievance against MS Siddheshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Maryadit. The Industrial Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that a separate agreement existed …
Petitioner Babubee Gorekha Pathan filed a writ petition but failed to appear before the Court on multiple occasions. The Court noted the petitioner's absence during the morning and afternoon sessions on 06.01.2026 and again on 08.01.2026. Despite being given an additional opportunity, the petitioner …
The applicants filed several civil applications and revision applications seeking the deletion of certain respondents from the suit and the re‑issuance of notice to other respondents. The court examined the applicants' averments and considered whether such deletions and re‑issuance of notices could …
The applicants filed several civil applications and revision applications seeking the deletion of certain respondents from the suit and the re‑issuance of notice to other respondents. The court examined the applicants' averments and considered whether such deletions and re‑issuance of notices could …
The petitioners, Kajal Hemant Vispute and another, filed writ petition No. 14641 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondent Hemant Sudhakar Vispute. The petition was listed for hearing on 18 April 2026, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the District Judge, Jalgaon, to decide a pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal (No. 85 of 2015) concerning possession of land (Gat No. 708, 90 R) within a specific time. The petition arose from an order dated 28‑Nov‑2016 that had allowed an application preventing …
The petitioner, Farida Begum Afsar Khan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no further cause of action. Consequently, the Court disposed of the …
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, which had awarded compensation to Sadu Baliram Lale. The State contended that the compensation exceeded four times the amount granted by the State Legal Aid Office (SLAO) and therefore should be reduced. The …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the issuance of a mutation entry for a property, arguing it would establish their right. The Court held that a mutation entry is merely a fiscal record and does not confer any right, title, or interest in the land; such substantive rights must be determined by …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28‑02‑2019 that recalled arrest warrants issued against the judgment debtors in a civil execution proceeding. The decree in the original suit was undisputed, and the execution court had attached the debtors' immovable property and later …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 507 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioners instituted a fresh suit (RCS No.1083/2023) concerning the same subject matter. The respondents argued that the …
The petitioner, Laximan Digambar Randive, filed a writ petition (933/2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered whether the petition could still be entertained …
Dilip Tatyabhau Korade filed a bail application (No. 2336 of 2025) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Z.H. Farroqui, informed the court that the bail application had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and held that there was nothing left …
The petitioner, Shravank Damodhar Amrutkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the petition, subsequent developments occurred that rendered the relief sought no longer necessary. Both parties agreed that there was nothing left for the Court …
The labour union Marathwada Samarth Kamgar Sanghatna filed a writ petition in 2020 against the manager of Tejas Press Metal Works seeking relief (the specific relief is not stated). The petition remained pending for several years without any further action by the petitioner. On both the morning and …
In a writ petition filed by Kamlakar Mallikarjunappa Yenagure against Lohara Taluka Shikshak and SevaKanshi Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement wherein the petitioner agreed to pay Rs.1,99,024 to the respondent society, which the society accepted as full and …
The High Court at Aurangabad listed a large number of writ petitions (WP Nos. 418 of 2016 to 12966 of 2017 and others) before it. The court noted the presence of counsel for the respondents, namely D.R. Korde, R.B. Dhaware, D.S. Jape, M.L. Sangit, A.D. Wange and B.A. Shinde. It issued a procedural …
The petitioner, Sabir Noor Ahmed Patel, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.2018 of the State Information Commissioner, Nashik Region, which dismissed his second appeal without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The petitioner alleged a violation of the principles of natural …
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's orders rejecting their applications for adjournment and for production of a panchanama document in a civil suit for damages. They argued that the panchanama, which records delivery of possession under a …
A writ petition was filed by Rukminbai Gunwantrao Chewale Died Lrs and others against Vinayak Gundaji Pinate and others. The petition sought relief, the specifics of which are not detailed in the judgment. Counsel for the petitioners later informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. …
The petitioners filed three writ petitions challenging orders dated 7 November 2017 and 22 September 2017 issued by the Chief Officer of Nagar Panchayat Mahur. They contended that they were not afforded any opportunity of hearing and no notice was served before the adverse orders were passed. The …
Jayant Govindrao Kulkarni filed a complaint before the Industrial Court, Latur, seeking payment for 4,760 shares under an Employee Stock Option Scheme (ESOS) at prevailing market price and other monetary benefits. The Industrial Court dismissed the complaint, holding that ESOS options do not …
The petitioner, Raju Dashrath Pawar, filed a writ petition (3 WRIT PETITION NO. 4509 OF 2018) arising out of civil suit R.C.S. No.439 of 2014. The court examined the record and found that the civil suit had already been disposed of. Consequently, the petitioner had no surviving cause of action to …
The petitioner, Prakash Pandharinath Thombre, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 16‑04‑2018 of the State Information Commission, which had rejected his second appeal for information on the grounds that the requested data pertained to the property of his real brother and was therefore …
The petitioner, Arjun Bhimrao Mandve, filed a writ petition (WP No. 10804 of 2022) challenging certain orders, and accompanying civil applications were also filed. The petitioner, through senior counsel Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition and to file a …
The petitioner, Akole Taluka Education Society’s Private Industrial Training Institute, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioner’s counsel argued that due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The …
The petitioner challenged a September 16, 2015 order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik, which dismissed a revision application along with a condonation of delay request. The petitioner argued that the Registrar decided the merits of the revision without first ruling …
The petitioner, Dudhku Sandu Jadhav, filed Writ Petition No. 943 of 2019 in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition sought relief (the specific relief is not detailed in the judgment). During the pendency of the proceedings, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief, but the court noted that the underlying civil suit had already been decreed, leaving no matter for the writ petition to address. The petitioners argued that the decree did not preclude further relief, while the respondent contended that the …
The petitioner, Tarabai Ramdas Shinde, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Circle Officer Salabatpur and others. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The Court examined the record and observed that the delay had …
The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased landowner, challenged a compromise decree dated 13‑02‑2016 passed in Lok Adalat in R.C.S. No.47 of 2016, alleging that the decree was obtained by fraud. The High Court found that summons were never served, the illiterate and 82 % disabled petitioner was …
The petitioners, Adarsh Education Society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 10 November 2017 of the Latur School Tribunal that granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal, after condoning the delay, proceeded to hear the appeal on its merits and allowed it. The …
The petitioners challenged an order of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge that allowed the respondent bank’s application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC to appoint a fresh Court Commissioner for investigation of the suit property. The bank had filed a suit for declaration of ownership, possession and a …
The Chief Officer Municipal Council Tuljapur filed a writ petition challenging the respondents. In the order dated 24th March 2026, paragraph 1 mistakenly referred to a Government Resolution dated 08 February 2024 instead of the correct order passed in LAR No.214 of 2016 decided on 08 January 2019. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging Mutation Entry No.3136 concerning their property. They contended that the entry was erroneous and sought its reversal. The petitioners also disclosed that they have a pending civil suit, R.C.S. No.152 of 2015, relating to the same property. The court …
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their land proposal by the District Level Committee and the Collector, who dismissed it on the ground that a record for gat no. 44 was not placed, even though the petitioners had specifically referred to survey no. 52 and submitted the relevant Pik Pera …
The Bombay High Court heard multiple bail applications filed by accused persons in a case involving the organized trafficking of codeine‑based cough syrup under the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused procured, transported and distributed the contraband through a syndicate, with …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Hingoli, which rejected their application for the appointment of a Court Commissioner in Civil Suit No.143 of 2017. The trial court had dismissed the application on the ground that it was filed …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. While the petition was pending, the substantive civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 4 of 2017) between the same parties was finally disposed. The court observed that with the …
The petitioners, Madavrao Hanmantrao Patil Takalikar and another, filed Writ Petition No. 15722 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, sought leave of the Court to …
Manikrao Sampat Jadhav and others filed a writ petition (6 WRIT PETITION NO. 6142 OF 2021) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Maroti Mandir Vavna through its Managing Trustee. The petition was argued by Ms. Sharaya Dhanture, holding out Mr. R. V. Gore as her …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order. The respondent informed the court that the order had already been implemented. The court, relying on the respondent's statement, considered the petition to have become infructuous. Consequently, the court found no further relief could be …
The applicants filed a civil application seeking the court's permission to bring on record the legal heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant, Balaji Bhagwan Parsewar, as identified in the title clause. The court examined the averments made in the application and found merit in …
The petitioners sought confirmation that they were tenants of land covered by a Bataipatra dated 01‑06‑2001, invoking Section 99‑A of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. They argued that the Bataipatra created a contractual tenancy under Section 4‑A and that they were entitled to …
