Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVAJI NARAYAN KASALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The sentence imposed on the applicant is suspended until the final hearing and disposal of the criminal revision petition.

Summary

Shivaji Narayan Kasal was convicted under IPC sections 324, 341, 504 r/w 149, 143, 148 and fined by the trial court on 24 March 2022, a conviction that was upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed on 7 May 2026. Kasal had been on bail throughout the trial and the appeal, but was later arrested for non‑appearance and began serving his sentence. He filed a criminal revision seeking suspension of the sentence pending final disposal of the revision petition. The court noted that Kasal had made a prima facie case for suspension, given his bail status and the pending nature of the revision. Accordingly, the court allowed the revision application, suspended the substantive sentence until the final hearing, and ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs.15,000 with a surety.

Issues considered

  • Whether a sentence imposed on an accused who was on bail during trial and appeal can be suspended pending the final disposal of a criminal revision petition.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • sentence suspension
  • criminal revision
  • IPC sections 324, 341, 504, 143, 148, 149
  • conviction
  • appeal
  • release on bond

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:21963
                                                1 of 3               praecipe-Cri.Revn.147.2026



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1886 OF 2026
                                             IN
                        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2026

                                       SHIVAJI NARAYAN KASAL
                                               VERSUS
                                   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                 …
               Mr. N. B. Narwade, Advocate for the Applicant.
               Mr. B. V. Virdhe, APP for Respondent-State.
                                                 ...
                                         CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                                     (VACATION COURT)
                                        DATE     :       21st MAY, 2026

               P.C.:-

               1.        Heard.

               2.        Issue notice to respondent – State. Learned APP waives

               service of notice on behalf of the respondent – State.

               3.        The learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that, the

               Applicant was on bail during the trial as well as during the Appeal

               period. The Applicant has not misused the liberty granted by the Trial

               Court as well as the Appellate Court. The learned Trial Court convicted

               the Applicant by the Judgment and Order dated 24.03.2022 passed in

               R.C.C. No.56/2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 324,

               341, 504, 143, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, ‘I.P.C.’)

               with fine. The conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court was

               upheld by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed (Appellate
                                 2 of 3            praecipe-Cri.Revn.147.2026



Court) in Criminal Appeal No.30/2022 by the Judgment and order

dated 07.05.2026.

4.         Considering the fact that, the Applicant was on bail during

the Trial as well as during the pendency of Appeal, however, due to his

absence, he was arrested on NBW and sent to the jail. Since then, he

his behind the bars. The Applicant has undergone considerable part of

his sentence. The present revision application is recent one and it

would take considerable time to be decided finally. The Applicant has

made out prima-facie case for suspension of his sentence during the

pendency of this revision petition. Therefore, I am inclined to suspend

the sentence awarded by the learned Trial Court and further upheld by

the Appellate Court. Hence, the following order is passed.

                               ORDER

     (I)   Criminal Application stands allowed.

     (II) The substantive sentence imposed on the Applicant-

           Shivaji Narayan Kasal by the learned Trial Court by the

           Judgment and Order dated 24.03.2022 passed in

           Regular Criminal Case No.56/2013 for the offences

           punishable under Sections 324, 341, 504 r/w. Sec. 149

           and Sections 143, 148 of the Indian Penal Code (in

           short, ‘I.P.C.’) with fine which has been upheld by the

           learned Appellate Court, stands suspended till the final
                                       3 of 3         praecipe-Cri.Revn.147.2026



               hearing and disposal of Criminal Revision Petition

               No.147 of 2026.

          (III) The Applicant be released on P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/-

               (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with one solvent surety

               in the like amount.

          (IV) Bail before the trial court.

                                         (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.