Bombay High Court
RAVINDRA BABURAO KARADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was not charge‑sheeted.
Summary
The applicant, Ravindra Baburao Karad, filed a criminal application challenging FIR No. 235/2025 registered for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Notices were issued to the respondents on 14 August 2025. While the application was pending, the investigating agency filed a charge‑sheet, and the applicant’s name was omitted from the list of accused. The court observed that since the applicant was not charge‑sheeted, the relief sought in the application could no longer arise. Consequently, the application was held to be infructuous and was disposed of without any further order.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a criminal application seeking to quash an FIR when the applicant is not named in the charge‑sheet?
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 115(2), 117(2), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- FIR
- quash application
- infructuous
- charge‑sheet
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:16745-DB
973-APPLN-2566-2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2566 OF 2025
Ravindra Baburao Karad
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. A. N. Sabnis, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, APP for Respondents
Mr. S. V. Jadhawar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3
***
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J
DATE : APRIL 18, 2026
PC :
1. The present Application takes exception to FIR No. 235/2025
registered with Police Station, Kaij, District Beed for offences punishable under
Sections 115(2), 117(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
2. On 14.08.2025, notices were issued to Respondents. Today, learned
Counsel appearing for Applicant informs that during pendency of Application,
charge-sheet is filed and Applicant’s name is shown in list of persons who are not
charge-sheeted.
3. In that view of matter, prayers in Application does not survives.
4. In result, Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
Umesh
PAGE 1 OF 1
Checking your session…