DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Bhavesh Lakhichand Salunkhe challenged a notice/order dated 17‑12‑2025 issued by the S.D.O. Faijpur under section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the appropriate appellate authority, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Sarala Ramesh Gosavi and others, sought condonation of a 2,203‑day delay in filing an appeal against a judgment and award of the Reference Court concerning just compensation for land acquired by the State. The High Court examined the reasons for the delay and the nature of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Ravindra Pratapsing Patil, sought condonation of a 2,166‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court concerning just compensation for land acquisition. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and the nature of the dispute, noting that the …
DISPOSED OFF
Mayur Ravindra Chaudhary filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions against the State of Maharashtra’s Excise Department. The petitioner had earlier filed a revision petition on 2 November 2025 which remained pending. The Court examined whether it could compel the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II. The petitioners, through their advocate N. D. Sonavane, submitted a written request on 17 March 2026 to withdraw the petition. The court recorded …
DISPOSED OFF
The Jalna District Central Co‑Operative Bank petitioned the High Court to set aside an Industrial Court order directing it to pay Dearness Allowance (DA) to several retired employees up to their retirement dates with interest. The Bank argued that it had frozen DA in 2010, that the employees had not …
DISPOSED OFF
The Jalna District Central Co‑Operative Bank filed several writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court order that directed it to pay Dearness Allowance (DA) to retired employees up to their retirement date with interest. The bank argued that it had frozen DA payments in 2010, that the employees …
DISPOSED OFF
The Jalna District Central Co‑Operative Bank challenged an Industrial Court order directing it to pay Dearness Allowance (DA) with interest to several retired employees. The bank argued that it had frozen DA in 2010, that the employees had not challenged this earlier, and that a post‑retirement …
DISPOSED OFF
The Jalna District Central Co‑Operative Bank filed several writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court order that directed it to pay Dearness Allowance (DA) to retired employees up to their retirement date with interest. The Bank argued that it had frozen DA payments in 2010, that the freeze was …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and noted that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete or unserved due to time constraints or respondents being out of station. The Court directed the petitioners to complete the necessary steps, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a practicing advocate, was appointed as a panel lawyer by the Ahmednagar District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) to handle a legal aid case (PA/114/2021). In June 2025, the DLSA, without notice or a hearing, replaced him with another advocate after the litigant complained about the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the District Judge’s order that set aside a temporary injunction previously granted by the Civil Judge restraining the respondent from obstructing the petitioner’s possession of a house property and an adjoining 17‑ft strip. The civil suit alleged …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, land owners seeking just compensation for acquired land, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,304‑day delay in filing an appeal against the judgment and award of the Reference Court. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, considering the nature of the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, Sarfaroz Khan Naushad Khan, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for alleged forced sexual relations, stalking, and threats against a divorced woman who had previously been in a consensual …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Khaza Shakiroddin Javsoddin Inamdar, filed an application to quash FIR No.448 of 2021 and the related criminal proceedings for alleged offences under the Copyright Act, Indian Penal Code and Trade Marks Act. The investigation was initiated by a police sub‑inspector based on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged two orders dated 26‑08‑2025 and 14‑11‑2025 of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) in a regular civil suit (No. 5/2020) where a ‘no cross’ order had been passed against them for failing to cross‑examine the plaintiff’s witness. They had earlier obtained a temporary setting …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in a civil suit concerning land measurement, obtained a decree from the trial court directing the Taluka Inspector of Land Records to demarcate their land. The defendants appealed the decree and successfully obtained a stay of execution from the District Judge. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to set aside the election of respondent No.3 held on 4 January 2026, alleging multiple irregularities, malpractice, and presenting photographs and CCTV footage of fraudulent practices. The petitioners did not appear before the court despite being called …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, a defendant in a civil suit, sought to set aside a "no written statement" order that had been passed in 2013 after he failed to file a written statement within the statutory period. He filed a fresh application in December 2025, claiming continuous ill health as the reason for the …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued a procedural order concerning a large number of pending writ petitions. The court observed that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete due to time constraints or the respondents being out of station. It directed the petitioners to take …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and noted that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete or unserved due to time constraints or respondents being out of station. The Court directed the petitioners to complete the necessary steps, …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and noted that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete or unserved due to time constraints or respondents being out of station. The Court directed the petitioners to complete the necessary steps, …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued a procedural order concerning a large number of pending writ petitions. The court observed that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete due to time constraints or the respondents being out of station. It directed the petitioners to take …
DISPOSED OFF
Janabai, the elected Sarpanch of Badnapur Gram Panchayat, was disqualified under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act for allegedly failing to hold the required monthly meetings between March and July 2023. Respondents 3‑7 filed a dispute under Sections 7 and 36, and the District …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions. The Court observed that many of these matters required amendment of pleadings. To give the parties a final opportunity, the Court extended the time for amendment by an additional …
Withdrawn
The applicants filed a criminal application and later sought the Court’s permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicants requested that the application be withdrawn. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the criminal application was …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Bhim Hanmant Ladade and another filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, which rejected their application for rejection of the plaint. Their counsel argued that the proper remedy was a civil revision application, not a writ, and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Arun Ganeshrao Vairagar, filed a special civil suit claiming he was induced to invest Rs.34,44,400 based on a brochure of the defendant that displayed the names of State Bank of India and HDFC Bank as banking partners. HDFC Bank (respondent no.3) moved an application (Exhibit‑27) to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nathuram Appar... Ubale, filed a writ petition and, through his advocate, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The learned advocate for the petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court granted the request and dismissed the writ petition as …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner‑mother filed a writ petition challenging a Family Court order dated 9‑December‑2025 that, under section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directed her to allow supervisory visitation for the father‑respondent on the first and third Saturdays of each month. The parties were involved in …
Withdrawn
Dipak Prabhakar Kadam applied for bail before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the bail application, the prosecution filed a charge-sheet. The court held that the bail application could be treated as withdrawn and dismissed, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jalgaon filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,350‑day delay in filing an appeal against the judgment and award of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No.231/2012. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons and was not intentional. …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land for a percolation tank and, after issuing a Section 4(1) notification in 2005, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs 665 per R in 2006. The respondents filed a reference under Section 18 seeking enhanced compensation; the …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land from the respondents to construct a percolation tank, issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in 2005 and awarding compensation of Rs.665 per R under Section 11 in 2006. The respondents filed a reference under Section …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land for a percolation tank, issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in 2005 and awarding Rs.665 per R in 2006. The respondents filed a reference under Section 18 seeking enhanced compensation, and the Reference Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra acquired agricultural land in Jalna district for a public project and initially offered compensation of Rs.665 per rupee. The landowners filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, and the Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.14,688 per rupee for …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Jaganath and others, filed a criminal application and sought leave to amend it, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined whether the amendment could be permitted under the precedent. The Court granted leave …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Ramling, challenged a trial court order dated 15‑12‑2025 that refused his application to lead evidence in a suit filed by Respondent No.4 seeking declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction based on a 27‑12‑2020 will. The petitioner, an attesting witness to the will, was added …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Firoj Ismail Shaikh and others, filed a criminal application seeking the quashment of the FIR and related proceedings against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the trial in Sessions Case No. 212 of 2022 was substantially progressed, with four of five witnesses …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Sanjay Tukaram Dhavare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking direction to the State of Maharashtra to decide a pending revision application before the Hon’ble Minister. The respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the revision …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Bhakti Door Parts and its proprietor Anita Swapnil Pilaji, filed two writ petitions (Nos. 1348 and 1349 of 2025) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioners, through their counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petitions. …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Bhakti Door Parts and its proprietor Anita Swapnil Pilaji filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petitions. The Court considered whether such withdrawal could be …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Durgesh Bandudas Gosavi and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned advocate for the applicants, Mr. D. R. Kale, made the request on their …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad filed an application seeking condonation of a 289‑day delay in filing an appeal. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons, which were detailed in the application. The court examined the reasons and found them satisfactory. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a order dated 06.01.2026 appointing a Court Commissioner for the execution of a decree of partition in a civil suit concerning a house and three shops. They argued that the decree was passed against deceased parties and that the execution court should determine the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a civil suit seeking a perpetual injunction and described the property boundaries, including the eastern side referencing land of Mr. Tarvindersingh Dhillan. The respondents, in their written statement and counter‑claim, contested the eastern boundary, later discovering that …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, comprising the husband, his parents and sisters‑in‑law, sought quashment of FIR No.992/2024 filed on a complaint by the wife alleging dowry demands, assault and cruelty under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 and 406 IPC. The court examined the FIR and found the allegations …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking execution of a decree from Regular Civil Appeal No.134 of 1970. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. B.A. Darak, requested permission to withdraw the petition while urging the court to expedite the execution proceedings. The court granted …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Abdul Gaffar Abdul Rahman, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After some time, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The bench, presided over by Justice S. …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Parmeshwar Nagorao More and others, filed a civil application (No. 1727 of 2026) against the respondents, Saroja Sudhakar Rao ArsuDe and others, seeking relief under prayer clauses B and C. The respondents raised office objections to the application. Both parties presented their …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Takdis Salim Kokani and others, filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra. The matter was heard before Justice S.G. Chapalgaonkar of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court examined the applicants' request as set out in the application. Justice …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Pradnya Mahesh Kardile, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the alleged murder of Sharada. The investigation, based on a family informant’s report, led to a charge sheet that named the applicant as a …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The husband and his father-in-law applied to quash an FIR (Crime No.355 of 2024) and a pending criminal proceeding (RCC No.228 of 2025) that alleged offences under sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Both parties submitted that the matrimonial dispute between the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the Nimnna Dudhana Project, challenged a district court award that treated their entire parcel as dry land and paid compensation at Rs.655 per R. They argued that the land was partially dry and partially seasonally irrigated, warranting higher rates. …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Nana Sandu Sonone, challenged an order dated 24‑11‑2025 by the Adhoc District Judge‑1, Jalna, which stayed the execution of a partition decree dated 09‑05‑2025. The decree arose from a partition suit filed in 2015 and was finally decided in 2025. Several original defendants have …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Sahebrao Arjun Mali, Motilal Arun Mali and Kailas Bhaskar Patil, sought condonation of a 4,943‑day delay in filing appeals against judgments and awards of a reference court concerning compensation for acquired land. They claimed the delay was unintentional, arising from reliance on …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging two separate orders in a single composite petition. The Court examined whether such a composite filing was maintainable. It held that the petition, in its present form, was not maintainable because it combined two distinct proceedings. Consequently, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, the wife and son of a deceased defendant, challenged an order dated 18 November 2025 that brought them onto the record as legal representatives in an execution proceeding. They argued that they were not representing the estate of the deceased and therefore should not be deemed legal …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Jalna, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a delay of 866 days in filing an appeal against a decree. The respondents, Thakubai Bhujangrao Huse and others, opposed the application. The applicant argued that the delay was due to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a trial court order that allowed the plaintiffs to amend their suit to include a declaration of title and a challenge to a sale deed dated 14-12-2025. The plaintiffs, who sought a perpetual injunction, claimed possession of the suit property and alleged that they only …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Family Court, Nanded, which had refused his application to amend his reply and to record his relocation to Hyderabad. The underlying family court case (Petition D‑10 of 2021) concerned custody of minor children under section 25 of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several landowners, sought just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They alleged that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge caused delays in filing their appeals. The Court examined whether such delay could be condoned and whether the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged a civil court order that rejected their application for a witness summons to cross‑examine the Technical Inspection and Land Surveyor (TILR) appointed as Court Commissioner, and that allowed the respondents to appoint a bailiff for execution of a decree dated 25‑01‑2011 in …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed an application under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act before the Tahsildar, Newasa, which remained pending at the stage of issuing notice. He invoked a Government Resolution dated 22 May 2025, which mandates that proceedings under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several landowners, sought just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra and filed applications for condonation of delay in filing their appeals. They argued that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge prevented timely filing. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several landowners, filed civil applications seeking just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They alleged that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge prevented them from filing timely appeals against the compensation awarded. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, represented by the legal heirs of the deceased Babu Jaysing Limbhore, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,381‑day delay in filing their appeal against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined the reasons for the delay as set out in the petition. While …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Siddheshwar Ganesh Jaybhaye, was arrested in connection with a rape and related offences alleged to have been committed by another accused who allegedly abducted a minor girl. The FIR does not name the applicant; the charge sheet identifies him only as the driver of the vehicle used …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several landowners, filed applications seeking just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They alleged that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge prevented them from filing appeals within the prescribed time. The Court examined the delay …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, who are claimants in land‑acquisition proceedings, applied to the High Court for permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an award of the Reference Court. They sought to withdraw 75% of the deposited sum on furnishing a standard undertaking and …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Sahil Sachin Chandak, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge sheet against the applicant. The applicant’s counsel then sought permission to withdraw the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, parents of the deceased five‑year‑old Master Chetan, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.75,000 in a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act arising from a bus‑truck collision on 24‑04‑2005 that caused the child’s death. They …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, who are claimants in land‑acquisition proceedings, applied to the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an award of the Reference Court. They argued that, in similar sister appeals, the Court had allowed withdrawal of 75% of …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged an order dated 28.01.2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Dhule, which imposed a penalty under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and seized their vehicles. Their counsel acknowledged that an appeal was available but sought immediate release of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Sahebrao Borade, sought condonation of a 3,745‑day delay in filing an appeal for enhancement of compensation relating to acquired land. The Court examined the reasons provided in the application and considered whether the delay could be excused without prejudice to the State. It …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Rama Gajmal Koli, filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,353‑day delay in filing their appeal against the order of the District Collector, Jalgaon. The Court examined the reasons for the delay as set out in the petition. While acknowledging the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Waghur Dam Division, filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters concerning the estates of two deceased individuals. The applicants argued that the delay was justified and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Waghur Dam Division filed two civil applications seeking a stay of a judgment and award dated 11 December 2020 in a land acquisition reference, against the legal heirs of the deceased. The applicants contended that they had deposited 80% of the amount ordered by the court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the District Collector of Latur, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 267‑day delay in filing appeals, citing administrative reasons. The court examined the applications and, finding the explanation satisfactory, ordered that the delay be …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged orders dated 14.01.2026 and 17.02.2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Dhule under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which imposed a penalty and seized their vehicles. Their counsel acknowledged that an appeal is available and proposed that the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, through the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 420‑day delay in filing appeals, citing administrative reasons. The applications also requested a short accommodation to instruct why a court‑ordered amount had not been …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, through the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 420‑day delay in filing appeals, citing administrative reasons. The applications also requested a short accommodation to instruct why a court‑ordered amount had not been …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged orders dated 14‑01‑2026 and 17‑02‑2026 issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Dhule under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which imposed penalties and detained their vehicles. Their counsel acknowledged that an appeal under the Code was available and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, through the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay of 267 and 270 days in filing appeals, citing administrative reasons. The applications were heard before Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar, who examined the explanations …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, through the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay of 267 and 270 days in filing appeals, citing administrative reasons. The applications were heard before Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar, who examined the explanations …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals. The applications, numbered 2707 to 2718, alleged delays of 282 and 287 days, which were explained in the accompanying affidavits. The learned …
DISPOSED OFF
Atul Rajendra Deore and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Arbitrator and the District Collector of Dhule. The petitioners, through Advocate V. B. Patil, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition, citing the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, who lost land in 2008 due to compulsory acquisition, sought enhanced compensation as determined by a Reference Court and applied to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body. The acquiring body contested, arguing that interest should accrue from the date of possession and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, led by Mahaling Dharmaraj Rajmane, sought condonation of delay in filing several civil applications and permission to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the acquiring body, MSPGCL, following a reference court award for land acquired in 2008. The respondents argued that …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rukhminibai Vishwanath Dudhate, filed a regular civil suit seeking to quash an order granting a way through Gut Nos. 309 and 310 and to obtain a permanent injunction against any road from her land in Gut No. 316. The Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) later remanded the matter to the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner sought a stay of a mutation entry in land records, arguing that the entry should remain pending the outcome of a civil suit. The civil suit (R.C.S. No.409 of 2001) had already concluded with a finding that the petitioner could not prove title or possession, and the suit’s decree was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Work, District Jalgaon filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 1,431‑day delay in filing an appeal and a short stay to deposit a required amount. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons, which the applicant explained in the …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Shyamrao Kisanrao Salunke and another, filed an application to quash FIR No.38 of 2025 registered under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, with the respondents receiving Rs.7 lakh as full and final …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought condonation of a 274‑day delay in filing an appeal, arguing administrative reasons, and the Court found the case made out for condonation. The applicant also applied to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body following a Reference Court award, claiming …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought condonation of a 344‑day delay in filing an appeal, citing administrative reasons, and the court found the case made out and condoned the delay. The applicant also applied to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body following a reference court award, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Bhaskar Kondiba Munde, sought condonation of a 371‑day delay in filing an appeal, arguing administrative reasons for the lapse. The court found the explanation satisfactory and condoned the delay. The applicant also applied to withdraw part of the compensation amount deposited by the …
DISPOSED OFF
Ramesh Gulabchand Agarwal filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23 June 2025 by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kannad, which condoned the delay in filing an appeal against a mutation entry concerning land survey no.34/1/2/2/AA/126. The petitioner argued that the order violated his …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, a group of land owners, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to a land acquisition award. They requested to withdraw 75% of the deposited sum upon furnishing a standard undertaking and the remaining 25% upon …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quashment of FIR No.580/2018, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, and a related regular criminal case. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, executed a joint affidavit of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Kukadi Vitaran Vibha) filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing appeals. The applications were filed on behalf of numerous respondents in various matters. The respondents contended that the delay was justified and sought the Court’s …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Chandramani (brother‑in‑law) and Ashweeni (co‑sister), filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 83/2025 registered against them under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was based on a complaint by Pallavi alleging domestic harassment, dowry demands and a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition and, after hearing, their counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Kukadi Vitaran VibhaG filed multiple civil applications seeking to condone a 294‑day delay in filing appeals. The respondents, represented by the State and other parties, opposed the condonation. The High Court examined the reasons provided in the applications and, applying …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer Kukadi Vitaran Vibha (and related parties) filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing their appeals. The respondents, represented by the State and other parties, opposed the condonation. The High Court, after hearing counsel, examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Kukadi Vitaran Vibhag filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing appeals. The applications were filed collectively before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, and were opposed by the respondents represented by the Attorney …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Kukadi Vitaran VibhaG filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing appeals. The applications were supported by reasons detailed in the respective petitions. The respondents, represented by the State and private parties, opposed the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer Kukadi Vitaran Vibha and related officials filed numerous civil applications seeking to condone a 294‑day delay in filing their appeals. The respondents, including the State and various private parties, opposed the condonation. The Court examined the reasons provided in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Kukadi Vitaran Vibhag filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing appeals against various respondents. The applications were collectively heard before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The primary issue was whether the court …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a criminal application (Criminal Application No. 733 of 2025) while a regular criminal trial (Case No. 300 of 2021) was pending. During the pendency of the application, the trial court acquitted the applicants on 2 May 2026. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, including Asaram, filed a writ petition challenging the termination of an interim order that barred them from obstructing a way, which had been granted by the Sub‑Divisional Officer under Section 23 of the Mamlatdar’s Court Act. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, had earlier …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer Kukadi Vitaran Vibha (and related parties) filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing their appeals. The respondents, represented by the State, opposed the condonation. The High Court examined the reasons set out in the applications …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer Kukadi Vitaran Vibha (and related officials) filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing their appeals. The respondents, represented by the State and other parties, opposed the condonation. The sole issue before the court was whether …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer (Kukadi Vitaran Vibhag) and related parties filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing their appeals. The applications were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The primary issue was whether the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of Kukadi Vitaran VibhaG filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 294‑day delay in filing appeals. The applications were filed under the procedural rules governing appeals in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The primary issue was whether the court …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicants, Vikram Anilkumar Patel and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief as specified in prayer clause B. The respondents, Savitaben Pravinchandra Patel and others, were represented and opposed the application. The court heard the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The deceased Balasaheb's heirs filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,311‑day delay in filing an appeal against a judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No 220/2018. The applicants argued that extraordinary circumstances justified the delay, while the State, represented by the …
DISPOSED OFF
Paras Babulal Barelikar, a long‑serving employee of Nagaon Education Society, was terminated after being absent without leave from 5 March 2019. He appealed the termination before the School Tribunal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Bhagwan Gowardhan Kalhapure, filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Shrirampur, alleging that his JCB machine, seized on 19‑June‑2025, had not been released or adjudicated upon despite his filing a reply and producing …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions. The Court observed that many of these matters required amendment of pleadings. To give the parties a final opportunity, the Court extended the time for amendment by an additional …
DISPOSED OFF
Jaiprakash Shankarlal Mundada filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12‑12‑2024 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Basmath, in appeal no. 2023/CR‑6 concerning a mutation entry under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that the S.D.O.'s order was erroneous and sought …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Satyprem alias Balu Prakash Ghumre, filed a criminal application and, through his counsel, sought the court's permission to withdraw the application. The learned advocate for the applicant requested the withdrawal on behalf of his client. The Court, after considering the request, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Shubhangi Dilip Giriba and others, filed a writ petition challenging a district court order dated 29 January 2025 that issued a warrant for execution of an award. They argued that they had deposited Rs. 50 lakhs before the Debt Recovery Tribunal but were not given an opportunity to …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioner Govind Narayan Shinde challenged an order passed under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code that allowed respondents to construct a road to access their land, claiming it would destroy his dwelling and mango trees. He filed a regular civil suit seeking a perpetual injunction …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, a group of Zilla Parishad teachers, challenged an order dated 01‑01‑2026 that withdrew their inclusion in the Special Category Teachers, Cadre‑I and transferred them, on the ground that they had only undergone angioplasty, not the "heart surgery" defined by a 2025 government …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Abarao Hariba Madje, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Additional Commissioner and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, stating an intention to pursue an …
DISPOSED OFF
The Zilla Parishad Nanded filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Jalna, which directed the appointment of respondent No.2 on compassionate grounds by substituting her name in the waiting list, despite a Government Resolution dated 20‑May‑2015 that purportedly forbids …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 1126, 4288, 4430, 4569, 4659, 4681, 4687, 4688, 5307 of 2026) wherein the petitioners had not completed service of notice on the respondents. The court noted that the service was either incomplete due to lack of time or …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Latur and other respondents. The Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Latur and other respondents. The court examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed under the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court examined the explanations provided in …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The respondent State of Maharashtra and others were served, but one respondent did not appear. The Court examined the explanations …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Latur and other respondents. The court examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Latur and other respondents. The court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Turab, the applicant, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Latur and others, was the respondent. Notice was served on a third …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Vilas Neminath Kanode and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12.03.2025 passed by the District Judge in Bhokar. They relied on an earlier order dated 19.03.2025 of this Court which directed the parties to maintain the status quo concerning possession. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (TIDC) filed applications seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a judgment and award of the Reference Court, citing administrative exigencies. The Court examined the reasons provided and found them satisfactory, thereby allowing the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation (TIDC) filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The corporation argued that the delay was due to administrative exigencies. The court examined the reasons and, finding them …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Dharmaraj Baliram Bhatlawande, challenged a 1985 mutation entry (No. 94) that purportedly recorded a partition of his land among his brothers, alleging it was fraudulent. He filed an appeal to the Sub‑Divisional Officer in 2017 to condone the delay in contesting the mutation, but the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Anil Popat Raut and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Sub Divisional Officer and other respondents. The petition was presented by Mr. Abhijit S. More. The respondents were represented by Ms. R. R. Tandale (AGP …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased defendant, challenged an order dated 12.03.2026 that granted police protection to enforce a temporary injunction on suit property without giving them notice or bringing them on record in the underlying partition suit. The trial court had earlier granted a …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants sought condonation of a 22‑year delay in filing an appeal under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act against a compensation award made under Section 11 for land acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The reference on the award was decided in 2004; the applicants only obtained …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Shivaji Gundiba Khopade and others, sought compensation for land acquired by the Union of India and filed a civil application to condone a delay of 2,253 days in filing an appeal against the award of the Reference Court. They explained that financial hardship and lack of procedural …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Ramdas Baliram Salunke and others filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their nomination in the election of a trust. They argued that the rejection was illegal and sought relief from the High Court. The respondents submitted that after the election a change report had been …
Withdrawn
Mahadev Pratap Khedkar filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a fresh one after a charge-sheet is filed, if necessary. The learned counsel for the applicant made this request. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Pramod and his in‑laws, sought quashment of FIR No. 0008/2025 filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a matrimonial dispute with respondent Diksha. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Arjun Vithoba Shinde, challenged a trial court order dated 04.03.2026 that rejected his application to amend the plaint in Special Civil Suit No.212 of 2015. The amendment request was filed after the trial had commenced and the case was posted for final argument. The trial court held …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged orders passed under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, arguing that two panchanamas showing construction rendered the orders illegal. The trial court held that the construction of trees, houses, and cattle sheds adjacent to the customary way did not obstruct it, and …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged an order dated 25 September 2025 by the District Judge, Ahmednagar, which allowed the respondent to withdraw Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 310/2024. The petitioners, who had intervened in the original proceedings, feared that the respondent might later initiate a …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Prakash, sought permission to amend the prayer clause in his criminal application after the underlying case (R.C.C. No.123/2025) was transferred from the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ambad to the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Ghansavangi and re‑numbered as R.C.C. …
DISPOSED OFF
Padmabai Balasaheb Wani applied to quash FIR No.385/2023 and the related Sessions case, alleging that the allegations of abetment of suicide, intimidation and insult were unsupported. The deceased, Pravin Jore, died by strangulation on 4 January 2023, and the FIR was lodged six months later, based …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 1126, 4288, 4430, 4569, 4659, 4681, 4687, 4688, 5307 of 2026) wherein the petitioners had not completed service of notice on the respondents. The court noted that the service was either incomplete due to lack of time or …
DISPOSED OFF
The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Shrignoda challenged an order dated 23 March 2026 by the Director of Marketing, Maharashtra, directing a re‑audit of its accounts for FY 2023‑24 and 2024‑25 under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 116 of the APMC Rules, 1967. The petitioners argued that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Ms Pride Constro Ventures Ltd., sought the Court's permission to withdraw their writ petition and instead file a fresh application before the Principal District Judge seeking a direction to club pending suits for simultaneous hearing. The petition raised the question of whether such …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Dnyaneshwar Jagannath Pawar (Patil) and others, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. Bhushan Mahajan, sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by …
DISPOSED OFF
The Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19‑02‑2026 that issued a notice under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act against it. The petitioner relied on earlier judgments (First Appeal Nos. 10 of 2003 and 1109 of 2002) which held …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Superintending Engineer, Regional Electricity Circle Construction, filed a civil application seeking the court's permission to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent, Ramshetti, who died on 24 June 2025. The applicant argued that the representation was necessary for …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged an order of the Senior Citizen Maintenance Appellate Tribunal that directed them to hand over possession of a house to respondent No.1, who had purchased the property under a registered sale deed. The Tribunal, and subsequently the Appellate Authority under Section 16 of …
Withdrawn
Mahesh Satish Todkar filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge sheet against the applicant. The applicant, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the bail application, stating that he …
DISMISSED
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued a procedural order in a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 8910, 10011, 13170 of 2025 and 281, 283, 289, 1400 of 2026). The petitioners were directed to furnish spare copies of the petitions for service on the respondents within three weeks. If the spare …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Amer Kaleem Bagwan, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to re‑approach the Court if needed. The Court considered whether it could grant such …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies Latur and others. Their senior advocate argued that the nature of the dispute and the relief sought required consideration by a Division …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Shriram Dhanaji Korade, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The Chief Officer of the Municipal Council of Dharashiv filed a writ petition challenging the Civil Judge’s order rejecting the defendant’s application to amend his written statement in suit RCS No. 161/2023. The suit sought a declaration that a notice issued by the Municipal Council was void and an …
Withdrawn
Santosh Badranarayanji Bhandari filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
The applicant, a 65‑year‑old agriculturist, was arrested for the death of Jamil, who was electrocuted after contacting an electric fence installed on the applicant's field. The FIR charged the applicant under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which deals with culpable homicide not …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Harish @ Nandu Sitaram Lahamage and another, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the charge sheet was filed against them. The applicants, through counsel Mr. G.R. Syed, sought permission to approach the Sessions …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Vitthal Namdevrao Dhamnne and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later sought permission to withdraw the bail application while retaining the liberty to approach the Sessions Court for relief. The learned Advocate for the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Director of Tapi Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon and other applicants filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land‑acquisition matters. The applications were filed under various Fast Track …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Director Tapi Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon and others filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards of the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were heard before Justice S.G. Chapalgaokar, who examined …
Withdrawn
The applicant, Sandip Sahebrao Gadade, filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, S. B. Solanke, sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to approach the Sessions Court instead. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by …
Withdrawn
The petitioner, Nanasaheb Bhanudas Bhosale, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Sandip Rajabhau Whatkar and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The learned …
Withdrawn
The applicants, Gopal Dada Sonawane and others, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution filed a charge sheet against the accused. The applicants, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the bail …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner challenged a civil‑court order that had refused to reject an agreement to sell dated 01‑04‑2022 on the ground that it was executed on a Rs 100 stamp paper, was not registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 and was insufficiently stamped. The trial court had admitted …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Changdeo Bhivrao Bhandwalkar, sought permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an award of a reference court. Relying on a prior order dated 09.08.2023 in Civil Application No. 5737 of 2023 (First Appeal No. 2776 of 2021), the applicant argued that …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought permission to withdraw a portion of the compensation amount that the acquiring body had fully deposited following an award of a reference court in a land acquisition matter (Seena Kolegaon Project). The acquiring body had already deposited the entire awarded sum as ordered in …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners Abhimanyu Sadashiv Bikkad and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the Union of India. During the pendency of the petition, supervening events rendered the purpose of the petition moot. The petitioners, through their …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Rushabh Dattrao Solanke, was arrested on 15 April 2026 for alleged stalking and harassment of a woman, based on complaints that he repeatedly called, messaged, and pursued her since March 2024. He was detained for over one and a half months and his bail application was initially …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, Dilip Kachru Wadekar, filed a civil application seeking an interim order to prevent the respondents from obstructing a cart road that traverses land belonging to the respondents. He argued that a standing crop in his field was ready for harvest and any obstruction would cause serious …
DISPOSED OFF
Shahik Aziz Shahik Karim filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking an order for the registration of his birth. After filing, the petitioner, through his counsel, requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. He also sought liberty to approach the Judicial Magistrate First Class …
DISPOSED OFF
Ashutosh Dattatray Dahale filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitioner submitted a communication dated 16 June 2026 from the Deputy Superintendent of State Excise, Pune, indicating that his …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications (Nos. 6057, 6059, 6061, 6063, 6065, 6067, 6069, 6071, 6074, 6076, 6078, 6080, 6082, 6084, 6086) seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in a land …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in a land acquisition matter. The applications argued that the delay was justified and that the appeals should be …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were filed on behalf of the Division against multiple respondents. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were heard before Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar of the Bombay High Court, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications argued that the delay was justified and requested the court to allow …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged orders dated 27‑04‑2026 issued by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co‑operative Societies, which stayed their applications (Nos. 8/2025 and 9/2025). The High Court, on 08‑05‑2026, issued an interim order restraining the respondent APMC from allotting a suit plot to any …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Rajesh Vasantrao Joshi, challenged a order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, which had rejected his application to be impleaded as a defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 346 of 2025 filed by Rahull Dyandeo Sukte. The respondent‑plaintiff sought a declaration that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners challenged the validity of a registered agreement to sale dated 10 April 1991 and sought a declaration that it was void ab initio, along with a perpetual injunction against the defendants. They also contested a subsequent unregistered agreement to sale of 1996, arguing that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, Kamalbai Waman Dahiphale and others, filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking an order for publication of a notice. The respondents, including Kachru Pandurang and others, opposed the application. The sole question before the court was whether …
DISPOSED OFF
Petitioners married on 23 March 2025 but separated within a week and lived apart thereafter, having made unsuccessful attempts at reconciliation. They filed a petition under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking a decree of divorce by mutual consent and applied for a waiver of the …
DISPOSED OFF
Hanuman and Satish, labourers who helped load rice bags onto a truck seized by police, sought quashment of an FIR dated 12‑02‑2022 and related proceedings under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The FIR alleged that the grains were intended for illegal sale in the black …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, three women, filed a regular civil suit (No. 103 of 2013) seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral property against their parents, brothers and sisters‑in‑law. During trial they applied for an adjournment to cross‑examine Defendant 5 and later sought to amend the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner, Dadarao Sonaji Sonne, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The court noted that in a similar matter (Civil Application No.10621 of 2019) it had previously condoned delay. Relying on that precedent, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Lokhit Ma. Grahak Sahakari Sanstha, a member society of the Central Co-operative Bank (ADCC Bank), filed a writ petition challenging the exclusion of its name from the provisional voters list for the bank's board elections. The exclusion resulted from the society's manager failing to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Nrb Bearing Ltd. Employees Co-operative Credit Societies Ltd., a member of the Central Co-operative Bank (ADCC Bank), was omitted from the provisional voters list for the bank's board elections because its manager failed to submit a resolution appointing a delegate. The society …