Created by Fuzzy Cloud

S G CHAPALGAONKAR

411 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

BHAVESH LAKHICHAND SALUNKHEversusTHE TAHSILDAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Bhavesh Lakhichand Salunkhe challenged a notice/order dated 17‑12‑2025 issued by the S.D.O. Faijpur under section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The High Court observed that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the appropriate appellate authority, …

SARJERAO VISHWANATH CHAVANversusSUNDERLAL DADARAO KHARE

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and noted that service of notice to certain respondents was incomplete or unserved due to time constraints or respondents being out of station. The Court directed the petitioners to complete the necessary steps, …

ASHROBA BHAURAO MOREversusBHAGWANRAO RAMRAO DESHMUKH

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the District Judge’s order that set aside a temporary injunction previously granted by the Civil Judge restraining the respondent from obstructing the petitioner’s possession of a house property and an adjoining 17‑ft strip. The civil suit alleged …

SARFAROZ KHAN NAUSHAD KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Sarfaroz Khan Naushad Khan, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 for alleged forced sexual relations, stalking, and threats against a divorced woman who had previously been in a consensual …

SANJAY KACHARU NIMBALKAR AND OTHERSversusRAJENDRA BABURAO KHAIRE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in a civil suit concerning land measurement, obtained a decree from the trial court directing the Taluka Inspector of Land Records to demarcate their land. The defendants appealed the decree and successfully obtained a stay of execution from the District Judge. …

BHIM HANMANT LADADE AND ANOTHERversusQURASHI MUNEER BASHIR AHMED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Bhim Hanmant Ladade and another filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, which rejected their application for rejection of the plaint. Their counsel argued that the proper remedy was a civil revision application, not a writ, and …

NATHURAM APPARAO UBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nathuram Appar... Uba​le, filed a writ petition and, through his advocate, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The learned advocate for the petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. The court granted the request and dismissed the writ petition as …

JISHA NIKHIL KATARIYA PRATAP GOPALDAS TALREJAversusNIKHIL PREM KATARIYA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner‑mother filed a writ petition challenging a Family Court order dated 9‑December‑2025 that, under section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directed her to allow supervisory visitation for the father‑respondent on the first and third Saturdays of each month. The parties were involved in …

DIPAK PRABHAKAR KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Dipak Prabhakar Kadam applied for bail before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the bail application, the prosecution filed a charge-sheet. The court held that the bail application could be treated as withdrawn and dismissed, …

Ramling So Rachotii SwamiversusShantveer S/o Ramling Swami and others

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Ramling, challenged a trial court order dated 15‑12‑2025 that refused his application to lead evidence in a suit filed by Respondent No.4 seeking declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction based on a 27‑12‑2020 will. The petitioner, an attesting witness to the will, was added …

FIROJ ISMAIL SHAIKH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Firoj Ismail Shaikh and others, filed a criminal application seeking the quashment of the FIR and related proceedings against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the trial in Sessions Case No. 212 of 2022 was substantially progressed, with four of five witnesses …

SHUBHAM MADHUKAR KAJALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, comprising the husband, his parents and sisters‑in‑law, sought quashment of FIR No.992/2024 filed on a complaint by the wife alleging dowry demands, assault and cruelty under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 and 406 IPC. The court examined the FIR and found the allegations …

ABDUL GAFFAR ABDUL RAHMANversusSAYED NAWAZALI NIZAMALI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Abdul Gaffar Abdul Rahman, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After some time, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request for withdrawal. The bench, presided over by Justice S. …

PARMESHWAR NAGORAO MORE AND OTHERSversusSAROJA SUDHAKARRAO ARSUDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Parmeshwar Nagorao More and others, filed a civil application (No. 1727 of 2026) against the respondents, Saroja Sudhakar Rao ArsuDe and others, seeking relief under prayer clauses B and C. The respondents raised office objections to the application. Both parties presented their …

PRADNYA MAHESH KARDILEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Pradnya Mahesh Kardile, sought regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the alleged murder of Sharada. The investigation, based on a family informant’s report, led to a charge sheet that named the applicant as a …

NANA SANDU SONONEversusKACHRU SANDU SONONE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Nana Sandu Sonone, challenged an order dated 24‑11‑2025 by the Adhoc District Judge‑1, Jalna, which stayed the execution of a partition decree dated 09‑05‑2025. The decree arose from a partition suit filed in 2015 and was finally decided in 2025. Several original defendants have …

ASHOK PRABHAKAR KULKARNI AND OTHERSversusNITIN TUKARAM BAHEKAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging two separate orders in a single composite petition. The Court examined whether such a composite filing was maintainable. It held that the petition, in its present form, was not maintainable because it combined two distinct proceedings. Consequently, …

GULAM YAZDANI GULAM SAMDANIversusIRAM AFREEN ABDUL SAMAD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Family Court, Nanded, which had refused his application to amend his reply and to record his relocation to Hyderabad. The underlying family court case (Petition D‑10 of 2021) concerned custody of minor children under section 25 of the …

DATTATRAYA UTTAM PAVBAKE AND ANOTHERversusKARBHARI GOPALA PAVBAKE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a civil court order that rejected their application for a witness summons to cross‑examine the Technical Inspection and Land Surveyor (TILR) appointed as Court Commissioner, and that allowed the respondents to appoint a bailiff for execution of a decree dated 25‑01‑2011 in …

SIDDHESHWAR GANESH JAYBHAYEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Siddheshwar Ganesh Jaybhaye, was arrested in connection with a rape and related offences alleged to have been committed by another accused who allegedly abducted a minor girl. The FIR does not name the applicant; the charge sheet identifies him only as the driver of the vehicle used …

DHARYABHU @ DAREBHAU RAMBHAU KAKADE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH L.RS. LIMBABAI DHARYBHU KAKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, comprising several landowners, filed applications seeking just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra. They alleged that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge prevented them from filing appeals within the prescribed time. The Court examined the delay …

SAHIL SACHIN CHANDAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sahil Sachin Chandak, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge sheet against the applicant. The applicant’s counsel then sought permission to withdraw the …

RAJENDRA VIRBHA MISTRI AND ORSversusSUBHASH TRAMBAK PATIL AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, parents of the deceased five‑year‑old Master Chetan, appealed against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of Rs.75,000 in a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act arising from a bus‑truck collision on 24‑04‑2005 that caused the child’s death. They …

RAJENDRA S/O. ANANDRAO DESAIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

Dagaduba Jijaram NirmaleversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, who lost land in 2008 due to compulsory acquisition, sought enhanced compensation as determined by a Reference Court and applied to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body. The acquiring body contested, arguing that interest should accrue from the date of possession and …

Mahaling Dharmaraj RajmaneversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, led by Mahaling Dharmaraj Rajmane, sought condonation of delay in filing several civil applications and permission to withdraw a portion of compensation deposited by the acquiring body, MSPGCL, following a reference court award for land acquired in 2008. The respondents argued that …

RUKHMINIBAI VISHWANATH DUDHATEversusPIRAJI DIGAMBAR DUDHATE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rukhminibai Vishwanath Dudhate, filed a regular civil suit seeking to quash an order granting a way through Gut Nos. 309 and 310 and to obtain a permanent injunction against any road from her land in Gut No. 316. The Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) later remanded the matter to the …

Rajesh Umakantappa MendkudaleversusThe Executive Enginee

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant sought condonation of a 344‑day delay in filing an appeal, citing administrative reasons, and the court found the case made out and condoned the delay. The applicant also applied to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body following a reference court award, …

Bhaskar Kondiba MundeversusThe Executive Engineer

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Bhaskar Kondiba Munde, sought condonation of a 371‑day delay in filing an appeal, arguing administrative reasons for the lapse. The court found the explanation satisfactory and condoned the delay. The applicant also applied to withdraw part of the compensation amount deposited by the …

ASHOK FAKIRRAO BAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quashment of FIR No.580/2018, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, and a related regular criminal case. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, executed a joint affidavit of …

ANIL VILASRAO CHOUDHARI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants filed a criminal application (Criminal Application No. 733 of 2025) while a regular criminal trial (Case No. 300 of 2021) was pending. During the pendency of the application, the trial court acquitted the applicants on 2 May 2026. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the …

BHAGWAN GOWARDHAN KALHAPUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Bhagwan Gowardhan Kalhapure, filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Shrirampur, alleging that his JCB machine, seized on 19‑June‑2025, had not been released or adjudicated upon despite his filing a reply and producing …

SHUBHANGI DILIP GIRIBA AND ORSversusOSMANABAD JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Shubhangi Dilip Giriba and others, filed a writ petition challenging a district court order dated 29 January 2025 that issued a warrant for execution of an award. They argued that they had deposited Rs. 50 lakhs before the Debt Recovery Tribunal but were not given an opportunity to …

GOVIND NARAYAN SHINDEversusTHE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Govind Narayan Shinde challenged an order passed under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code that allowed respondents to construct a road to access their land, claiming it would destroy his dwelling and mango trees. He filed a regular civil suit seeking a perpetual injunction …

BALASAHEB VENKATI DOKE AND OTHERSversusThe State of Maharashtra

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, a group of Zilla Parishad teachers, challenged an order dated 01‑01‑2026 that withdrew their inclusion in the Special Category Teachers, Cadre‑I and transferred them, on the ground that they had only undergone angioplasty, not the "heart surgery" defined by a 2025 government …

ABARAO HARIBA MADJEversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Abarao Hariba Madje, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Additional Commissioner and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, stating an intention to pursue an …

NAMDEO S/O PRALHAD HADOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Turab, the applicant, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector of Latur and other respondents. The Court …

ANNASAHEB S/O KISHAN HADOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Turab, the applicant, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The applications were filed under the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court examined the explanations provided in …

ANIL POPAT RAUT AND ORSversusTHE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Anil Popat Raut and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Sub Divisional Officer and other respondents. The petition was presented by Mr. Abhijit S. More. The respondents were represented by Ms. R. R. Tandale (AGP …

MAHADEV PRATAP KHEDKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Mahadev Pratap Khedkar filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a fresh one after a charge-sheet is filed, if necessary. The learned counsel for the applicant made this request. The …

PRAMOD REVCHAND AMRAO AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Pramod and his in‑laws, sought quashment of FIR No. 0008/2025 filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a matrimonial dispute with respondent Diksha. Both parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …

ARJUN VITHOBA SHINDEversusRAJENDRA BABASAHEB SURUANKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Arjun Vithoba Shinde, challenged a trial court order dated 04.03.2026 that rejected his application to amend the plaint in Special Civil Suit No.212 of 2015. The amendment request was filed after the trial had commenced and the case was posted for final argument. The trial court held …

SANTOSH DANIAL GHARWADHVE AND ANRversusPRIYANKA VINAYAK PAWAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order dated 25 September 2025 by the District Judge, Ahmednagar, which allowed the respondent to withdraw Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 310/2024. The petitioners, who had intervened in the original proceedings, feared that the respondent might later initiate a …

PADMABAI BABASAHEB WANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Padmabai Balasaheb Wani applied to quash FIR No.385/2023 and the related Sessions case, alleging that the allegations of abetment of suicide, intimidation and insult were unsupported. The deceased, Pravin Jore, died by strangulation on 4 January 2023, and the FIR was lodged six months later, based …

RAMESH AJINATH WANVE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

DNYANESHWAR JAGANNATH PAWAR (PATIL) AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants, Dnyaneshwar Jagannath Pawar (Patil) and others, filed a bail application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. Their counsel, Mr. Bhushan Mahajan, sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by …

MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS REGIONAL OFFICERversusSUBHASH LAKSHMAN PATRADHAN DIED THR HIS SOLE LR HARSHAL S PATRADHAN THR SUNIL S BHENDALE AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19‑02‑2026 that issued a notice under Section 28‑A of the Land Acquisition Act against it. The petitioner relied on earlier judgments (First Appeal Nos. 10 of 2003 and 1109 of 2002) which held …

PRAVIN VITTHALRAO JADHAV AND ANRversusRUKHMINIBAI VITTHALRAO JADHAV AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order of the Senior Citizen Maintenance Appellate Tribunal that directed them to hand over possession of a house to respondent No.1, who had purchased the property under a registered sale deed. The Tribunal, and subsequently the Appellate Authority under Section 16 of …

MAHESH SATISH TODKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Mahesh Satish Todkar filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the investigating agency filed a charge sheet against the applicant. The applicant, through his counsel, sought permission to withdraw the bail application, stating that he …

SHAIKH FARIDA ANWAR SHAIKHversusGORIBEE KARIM KHAN AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued a procedural order in a batch of writ petitions (Nos. 8910, 10011, 13170 of 2025 and 281, 283, 289, 1400 of 2026). The petitioners were directed to furnish spare copies of the petitions for service on the respondents within three weeks. If the spare …

AMER KALEEM BAGWANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Amer Kaleem Bagwan, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to re‑approach the Court if needed. The Court considered whether it could grant such …

SHRIRAM DHANAJI KORADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Shriram Dhanaji Korade, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The …

THE CHIEF OFFICER MUNCIPAL COUNCIL DHARASHIVversusPRASAD RANGNATH PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The Chief Officer of the Municipal Council of Dharashiv filed a writ petition challenging the Civil Judge’s order rejecting the defendant’s application to amend his written statement in suit RCS No. 161/2023. The suit sought a declaration that a notice issued by the Municipal Council was void and an …

SANTOSH BADRANARAYANJI BHANDARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

Santosh Badranarayanji Bhandari filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a fresh …

PRATAPSING BHAGCHAND BHOPLWATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, a 65‑year‑old agriculturist, was arrested for the death of Jamil, who was electrocuted after contacting an electric fence installed on the applicant's field. The FIR charged the applicant under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which deals with culpable homicide not …

DEVIDAS MADHUKAR SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

SANDIP SAHEBRAO GADADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicant, Sandip Sahebrao Gadade, filed a bail application before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant's counsel, S. B. Solanke, sought permission to withdraw the bail application and to approach the Sessions Court instead. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by …

NANASAHEB BHANUDAS BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Bhanudas Bhosale, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the application and requested liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial …

SANDIP RAJABHAU WHATKAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Sandip Rajabhau Whatkar and others, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application while retaining the right to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The learned …

GOPAL DADA SONAWANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

The applicants, Gopal Dada Sonawane and others, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the application, the prosecution filed a charge sheet against the accused. The applicants, through their counsel, sought permission to withdraw the bail …

RUSHABH DATTRAO SOLANKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rushabh Dattrao Solanke, was arrested on 15 April 2026 for alleged stalking and harassment of a woman, based on complaints that he repeatedly called, messaged, and pursued her since March 2024. He was detained for over one and a half months and his bail application was initially …

DILIP KACHRU WADEKARversusBABAN ARJUN WADEKAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dilip Kachru Wadekar, filed a civil application seeking an interim order to prevent the respondents from obstructing a cart road that traverses land belonging to the respondents. He argued that a standing crop in his field was ready for harvest and any obstruction would cause serious …

The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division LaturversusVithal Ram Kote and ors.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against awards passed by the Reference Court in land acquisition matters. The applications were heard before Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar of the Bombay High Court, …

RAJESH VASANTRAO JOSHIversusRAHULL DYANDEO SUKTE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Rajesh Vasantrao Joshi, challenged a order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad, which had rejected his application to be impleaded as a defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 346 of 2025 filed by Rahull Dyandeo Sukte. The respondent‑plaintiff sought a declaration that the …

VIDYA KRISHNARAO PANSARE AND ANRversusBAPUSAHEB BAYAJI WALUNJ AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged the validity of a registered agreement to sale dated 10 April 1991 and sought a declaration that it was void ab initio, along with a perpetual injunction against the defendants. They also contested a subsequent unregistered agreement to sale of 1996, arguing that the …

SADHNA PRAMOD KUMAR SANCHETIversusRAMLAL KESHARCHAND LODHA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, three women, filed a regular civil suit (No. 103 of 2013) seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral property against their parents, brothers and sisters‑in‑law. During trial they applied for an adjournment to cross‑examine Defendant 5 and later sought to amend the …

DADARAO SONAJI SONNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioner, Dadarao Sonaji Sonne, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the application. The court noted that in a similar matter (Civil Application No.10621 of 2019) it had previously condoned delay. Relying on that precedent, …