Created by Fuzzy Cloud

S G CHAPALGAONKAR

411 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400

SARANGDHAR WAMAN DIKEversusSTATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sarangdhar Wawman Dike, challenged an order of the District Co‑operative Election Officer that rejected his objection to the nomination of respondent 5 as the delegate of respondent 3 (a co‑operative society) for the election of the Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank. The …

YOGESH CHINTAMAN DEORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Yogesh Deore and others, filed an application to quash FIR No.599 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC based on a complaint by the wife (respondent No.2). The court observed that the FIR contained only vague, omnibus allegations without any …

SHAIKH HUZAIF SHAIKH FAROKversusSHRI ATUL MORESHWAR SAVE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged the District Cooperative Election Officer's order rejecting his objection to the inclusion of Respondent No.1 in the provisional voters list for the Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank election. He claimed that Respondent No.1, a co‑opted expert director of a …

SHAIKH HUZAIF SHAIKH FAROKversusSHRI KISHOR JAGANNATHRAO SHITOLE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner challenged the order of the District Cooperative Election Officer that rejected his objection to the inclusion of Respondent No. 1 in the provisional voters list for the Aurangabad District Central Cooperative Bank election. He argued that the resolution nominating Respondent No. 1 …

ABDUL SATTAR ABDUL NABIversusDILIP B. BANKAR PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order by the District Co‑operative Election Officer that excluded their names from the provisional voters list for the Aurangabad District Central Co‑operative Bank election. They argued that a resolution passed on 29‑02‑2024 admitted them as members, and that the …

KAUSLYABAI SITARAM ZARWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

In Civil Application No. 8354 of 2023, Kauslyabai Sitara Zarwal sought relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Vitthal B. Wayal, argued for condonation of delay in filing the application. The court noted that in a similar matter, Civil Application No. 10621 …

ASHOK SHIVAJI AWHADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ashok Shivaji Awhad, appealed against his conviction under Sections 436 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani on 8 May 2026, which imposed two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,000. The applicant was on bail during the …

RAKESH ALIAS PRASHANT POPAT MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Rakesh alias Prashant Popat More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 3 of 2019 for attempting murder under Section 307 of the IPC and sentenced to five years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.25,000. He filed a criminal application …

AMOL ALIAS BALU UTTRESHWAR BARGALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Amol alias Balu Uttreshwar Bargal, was convicted by a Special Judge of offences under IPC sections 354, 354(A), 342, 323 and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12, and sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment. The trial court had already suspended the substantive sentence and the …

KALIM BANEMIYA SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The informant, Kalim Banemiya Shaikh, applied to impose an additional condition on the bail granted to accused No.2, seeking to bar him from entering Village Lakhegaon. The Court had earlier granted bail on 26 May 2026 with conditions not to tamper with evidence and to attend trial proceedings. The …

VISHNU NIVRUTTI KOLI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellants, Vishnu Nivrutti Koli and another, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of offences under Sections 353, 354, 364, 294, 323, 504, 506 read with 34, and 511 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment, the sentence being suspended pending appeal. …

VIJAY DIGAMBAR WALSEversusSEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA M., DHANORA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Vijay, a member of Seva Sahakari Society, challenged the inclusion of his society’s delegate in the voters list for the Nanded District Central Co‑operative Bank election, alleging that the society was in default of dues on the eligibility cut‑off date of 03‑04‑2026. The respondent District …

GAJANAN LAXMANRAO GOPEWADversusSEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA NANDED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gajanan, a member of Seva Sahakari Sanstha (Society 1), filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of his Society’s delegate in the voters list for the Nanded District Central Co‑operative Bank election. The petitioner argued that the Society was a defaulter on the eligibility cut‑off date of 3 …

TATYARAO KASHINATH BANSODEversusKAILASH KISAN BANSODE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Tatyarao Kashinath Bansode, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court’s order rejecting his application for appointment of a Court Commissioner in a civil suit for possession of 13 R of land. The trial court had held that the onus of proving ownership lay on the plaintiff and …

BALASAHEB BABAN BALODE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, noting that many petitions required amendment, extended the time for filing such amendments by four weeks from the date of the order, granting …

MADHUKAR UDDHAV BHAGWAT AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Madhukar Uddhav Bhagwat and others, filed R.C.S. No.249 of 2024 seeking a declaration and a temporary injunction against the State of Maharashtra (through the Tahsildar) and private respondents. They submitted an application (Exhibit‑5) for a temporary injunction but failed to join …

DAULAT MADHAV BHAKRE AND OTHERSversusBHASKAR WAMAN BHAKRE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a matter, but the court found that the petition could not proceed because the cause of action had become time-barred. The learned advocate for the petitioners argued that the petition did not survive due to the efflux of time. The court agreed, …

SHRI MOHAN MANGU RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN AT ADMISSION STAGE

Shri Mohan Mangu Rathod applied to the High Court seeking permission to withdraw a portion of the amount deposited by the acquiring body pursuant to an award of the Reference Court that granted compensation for the loss of over 354 lemon trees. The Reference Court had awarded compensation exceeding …

PADMABAI SHAMRAO KARHEversusDISTRICT COLLECTOR BEED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petition challenged an order of the District Collector, Beed, which had validated a no‑confidence motion passed against Padmabai Shamrao Karhe on 16 January 2026 under Section 35(3‑B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The petitioner argued that a prior no‑confidence motion, held on …

NANDKUMAR LAXMAN DAKOREversusTHE RETURNING OFFICER PARBHANI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Nandkumar, challenged the nomination of respondent No.4 as a delegate to the Parbhani District Central Cooperative Bank election, alleging that he was a defaulter of Kawalgaon Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society and therefore disqualified under Section 73CA(1)(i) of the …

SHIVKARSINH NARSINH THAKURversusGANESHSINH GULABSINH THAKUAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Shivkarsinh Narsinh Thakur, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13 June 2025 by the Deputy Director of Land Records, which rejected his application for a stay of a pending appeal (R.O.R. Appeal/S.R./985/2025). The appeal is currently before the Deputy Director, and the …

CHAMPALAL GANGADHAR PATILversusVIJAY RAVINDRANATH KABRA

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a defendant in a 2014 suit for specific performance of a sale agreement, sought a stay of that suit on the ground that a parallel proceeding under the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 was pending before the District Deputy Registrar. The trial court rejected the stay …

PRAVIN SHRIRANG CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Pravin Shrirang Chavan filed a criminal application against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant’s counsel sought leave to amend the application, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra. The High Court examined whether the precedent permitted …

SIDDIQUI IRFANA OWES AHMADversusSOHEIL JAVED KHALILODDIN KAZI

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a purchaser of a one‑third share in a land owned by three brothers, challenged a temporary injunction that barred him from taking possession of the suit property. The respondent claimed possession based on a 1997 lease agreement allegedly executed by a power of attorney holder of one …

APPASAHEB WALMIK KASHID AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, Appasaheb Walmik Kashid and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, asking …

BASWARAJ RAMLING SWAMIversusSHANTVEER RAMLING SWAMI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Baswaraj Ramling Swami, the petitioner, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Deoni, which rejected his application to re‑examine witness PW‑2 (Advocate‑Notary) to produce an extract of the notary register evidencing a will dated 27‑12‑2020. The petitioner argued that the …

JITENDRA YADUNANDAN CHAWADAversusVIMALA SURESH HOUSMANI PATIL AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (including WP 4721/2025, WP 9347/2025, etc.) filed by the petitioners. The petitioners were required to serve spare copies of the petitions on the respondents within a specified time. The Court directed that the spare copies …

RAVINDRA BABURAO KARADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ravindra Baburao Karad, filed a criminal application challenging FIR No. 235/2025 registered for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Notices were issued to the respondents on 14 August 2025. While the application was pending, the investigating agency filed a …

ALKA NAVNATH RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Alka Navnath Rathod and others, filed a criminal application seeking the quashment of FIR No.98/2025 registered on 13 March 2025 for alleged offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Police Act. The FIR was based on information from a Sub‑Inspector that the …

YOGESH GOVINDRAO MEKHE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Yogesh, Venktesh and Sai Mekhe, sought quashment of FIR No. 54/2025 filed for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from a dispute over water spillage that escalated into assault. The parties later reached an amicable settlement, signed a compromise deed …

ANIL GANGARAM MARATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALGAON

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body in a land acquisition proceeding. They relied on a prior order in a sister appeal where the court allowed withdrawal of 50% of the amount upon furnishing an undertaking and …

MACHHINDRA GANGARAM GADEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a plaintiff in a civil suit seeking declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction over 3 acres of land, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC. The petitioner …

AMOL JAGANNATH GAIKWADversusSONALI AMOL GAIKWAD

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Amol Jagannath Gaikwad, filed a writ petition challenging a Family Court order that denied his application to amend the divorce plaint. He sought to insert a new paragraph alleging that the respondent's statements in her written answer were false and amounted to cruelty, which he …

THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER AND ANR.versusREENA NARENDRA RAIKWAR AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Divisional Railway Manager filed a civil application against Reena Narendra Raikw... The court heard the advocate for the applicants and, after considering the submissions, allowed the application in accordance with prayer clause (A). The judge ordered that a review application be placed for …

MAYUR MADHUKAR MORE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, members of the same family, sought to quash FIR No. 506 of 2023 and the accompanying charge‑sheet for alleged assault under Sections 324, 326 and 323 IPC, claiming the dispute had been amicably settled. The incident was reported 19 days after it occurred, and no medical evidence from …

Sachin Raosaheb KendreversusThe State of Maharashtra Through the Collector

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Sachin Raosaheb Kendre, sought permission to withdraw part of the compensation amount deposited by the acquiring body following a 2023 award by the Reference Court in a land‑acquisition matter. The respondent‑state opposed, alleging excess compensation, particularly for five mango …

JAVED KHAN RASHEED KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

Javed Khan Rasheed Khan filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking permission to withdraw the application and to be allowed to file a discharge application before the trial court. The applicant, represented by Mr. Swapnil Patunkar, requested the court's …

SHIVAJI GOVIND SHEJULversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of a village Panchayat, was disqualified under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for allegedly encroaching on Gram Panchayat land. He challenged the disqualification, claiming he was never served with the dispute notice, was denied a …

ANANDRAO SITARAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Anandrao Sitaram Jadhav, appealed a 2016 judgment seeking a higher compensation for land acquired for the Lendi Major Project. The original award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act was Rs.1,71,649, which the reference court had enhanced by 40%. Relying on a recent decision …

MANISHA PADMAKAR BODDAWARversusGANESH DIGAMBARRAO MAHAJAN AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Manisha Padmakar Boddawar filed a writ petition challenging actions of Ganesh Digambarrao Mahajan and others. The petitioner argued that the matter was still pending before the Charity Commissioner. The Court observed that the original proceeding before the Charity Commissioner had been finally …

SAMADHAN BHAGWAN KAKADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought to quash FIR No.118/2025 filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the matrimonial dispute with the respondent had been amicably settled, with the husband agreeing to pay maintenance and filing a mutual consent …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORSversusUTTAM DHANU PAWAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra, represented by Collector Jalna, filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,153‑day delay in filing its appeal. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons, which were detailed in the application. The court examined the explanation and found it satisfactory. …

ANIL BABAN BARATE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Anil Baban Barate and others, filed a criminal application and later sought leave to amend it after the charge sheet was filed and cognizance was taken. The learned advocate for the applicants requested the court’s permission to make the amendment. The bench, relying on the Supreme …

NILESH SUDHAKARRAO PAWAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The husband and his relatives (father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and sister‑in‑law) applied to quash FIR No.313 of 2025 filed by the wife alleging cruelty and illegal dowry demand under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court observed that the FIR and charge …

PRAYAGABAI BANSI NAVTHAR AND ANOTHERversusVASANT SHANKAR JOSHI

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners Prayagabai Bansi Navthar and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later informed the court that, due to the passage of time, their prayers no longer survived for consideration and they wished to withdraw the petition. The petitioners' counsel, …

GOPAL S/O. BHIKCHAND AGRAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Gopal, sought quashment of FIR No.179/2019 filed for alleged fraud and forgery relating to agricultural land, contending that an earlier FIR No.150/2016 covered the same transaction and that a second FIR violated the principle against double prosecution. The respondents argued that …

SAMBHAJI SHIVAPPA DADGHE AND OTHERSversusMAHADABAI GUNWATRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking execution of a decree from Regular Civil Appeal No.134 of 1970. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. B.A. Darak, requested permission to withdraw the petition while urging the court to expedite the execution proceedings. The bench, presided …

VISHWAJIT KISHANLAL SHARMAversusLEELA KISHANLAL SHARMA DIED AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of writ petitions numbered 1468 of 2025 to 14662 of 2025. The court issued practical directions ordering the petitioners to take necessary steps within four weeks, failing which the petitions would be dismissed. It directed that notice be …

AJAY RAJKUMAR SHUKLAversusRUPCHAND BHAGCHAND KASLIWAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged an order of the District Judge, Shrirampur, which allowed the plaintiff in a commercial summary suit to amend the plaint by withdrawing a specific prayer concerning a refund of Rs.2,29,95,660. The plaintiff sought the amendment after the defendant raised an objection to …

AJAY RAJKUMAR SHUKLAversusRUPCHAND BHAGCHAND KASLIWAL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners challenged a district court order that permitted the plaintiff in a commercial summary suit to amend the plaint by withdrawing a specific prayer concerning a refund of Rs.2,29,95,660. The plaintiff sought to remove this prayer after the defendant raised an objection to the suit’s …

PRADEEP PRALHADRAO KADAMversusVARAD MANIKRAO KADAM AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, directed the petitioners to furnish spare copies of the writ petitions for service on the respondents within two weeks of the order. If the spare copies are supplied, the court will issue notice to the respondents, with the matter to be returnable after four …

BALAJI S/O. GOVINDRAO KAKANDIKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, noting that many petitions required amendment, extended the time for filing such amendments by four weeks from the date of the order, granting …

TUKARAM GULABRAO MOREversusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR EDUCATION AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, school teachers, claimed they were harassed and unlawfully terminated by school management and sought condonation of a 374‑day delay in filing appeals before the School Tribunal. The Education Officer and Deputy Director had directed that the teachers continue in service and advised …

BAPU ALIAS SHALIGRAM MAHADAV HAJAREversusSHUBHAM GOVIND BANSUDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioner Fulabai, represented by Mr. Sharad V. Natu, filed a written request to withdraw her writ petition (WP No. 489 of 2025). The court accepted the withdrawal, disposing of the writ petition and the related civil application (No. 13145 of 2025) without addressing the merits. The petitioner’s …

AKSHAY SANTOSH SURYAWANSHI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

AMIT SAHEBARAO BHIVSANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

MADHUKAR NAMDEO PATIL AND ANOTHERversusKRUSHNA MADHUKAR PATIL AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of writ petitions (including WP 4721/2025, WP 9347/2025, etc.) filed by the petitioners. The petitioners were required to serve spare copies of the petitions on the respondents within a specified time. The Court directed that the spare copies …

MANISH SHASHIKANT PATIL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Manish Patil and his sister‑in‑law Shweta Patil applied to quash FIR No.0159 of 2023 filed under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34. The informant, respondent No.2, appeared in court and submitted an affidavit stating that the parties have amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and have …

MOHD. MASIUDDIN MOHD. FASIUDDINversusRAVISHANKAR KISHANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mohd. Masiuddin filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Ravishankar Kishanrao Patil and other respondents. The applicant sought reliefs specified in prayer clauses B and C of the application. The learned counsel for the applicant, S. S. Kazi, presented …

HEMANT GOKULDAS MEHERversusRASHMI MAHENDRA KUMAR PATWAN

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Hemant G. Meher, filed a civil suit seeking declaration of ownership and a perpetual injunction over 40R of land in Survey No. 200. He obtained an order appointing a Court Commissioner to measure the land, whose report was later accepted by the trial court. During trial, the …

YUNUS YUSUF SHAHA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a large number of criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court, noting that many petitions required amendment, extended the time for filing such amendments by four weeks from the date of the order, granting …

SANTOSH GORAKH PUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicant, Santosh Gorakh Punde, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After hearing, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file a separate application for discharge before the trial court. The court …

SAHEBRAO PUNJU PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. Their counsel later applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …

TUKARAM MRUTI MALI AND OTHERSversusSADHU NARSU MALI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, issued an order on 28 April 2026 concerning a large number of writ petitions filed in 2025. The court directed the petitioners to take necessary steps within four weeks from the date of the order, failing which the petitions would be dismissed without further …

SAMIR YASIN PATHAN AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The applicants, Samir Yasin Pathan and another, filed a criminal application and subsequently sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned advocate for the applicants requested that the application be withdrawn. The court considered whether it could grant such a withdrawal. Finding no …

ANUJA SANTOSH REDDYversusASHOK TRIMBAK AJNIKAR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the District Judge that quashed a temporary injunction granted by the trial court in a property dispute concerning the boundaries of Gat Nos. 117 and 118. The trial court had restrained the defendants from constructing on the suit plot …

KRUSHNA VILAS DHEKANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, on 8 January 2026, issued an interim order concerning a large number of pending criminal applications and writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The Court extended the deadline for filing amendments by four weeks, granting a final …

RAMESH LAXMANRAO VAIDYAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, a retired Talathi, challenged the FIR (Crime No.73 of 2022) and charge sheet (R.C.C. No.116 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 406, 409, 202, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to encroachment on government land. He contended that his tenure as Talathi was …

SUBHADRABAI DIGAMBAR GIRIversusNIRANJAN SANTOSH BHARATI AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Subhadrabai, challenged the order of the Civil Judge rejecting her objection to the execution of a decree in a partition suit concerning a family property. She claimed, based on the Supreme Court's decision in Revansiddappa v. Mallikarjun, that as a daughter of the second wife of …

BABUSING DIPLA RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, a retired Talathi, challenged the FIR and charge sheet filed under Sections 406, 409, 202, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code relating to alleged encroachment on government land. The prosecution’s case was based on a complaint by a revenue officer that a number of officers, …

ANANDA BANDU MOKASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, a retired Talathi who served at Tembhurni from 1980 to 1988, challenged the FIR (Crime No.73 of 2022) and related charge sheet alleging offences under Sections 406, 409, 202, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code for encroachment on government land. The FIR was based on a …

NARAYAN VISHWANATH ESHTAKKE AND ANOTHERversusKADU VISHWANATH ESHTAKKE

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, issued procedural directions in a batch of writ petitions. The petitioner(s) were ordered to file the required copies of documents within two weeks, failing which the petitions would be dismissed for lack of service. The matter was stood over to 29 April …

KACHRU SHAMRAO SURASEversusDNYANESHWAR GANPAT UBALE

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Kachru Shamrao Surase, sought to have his name removed from a writ petition on 17 December 2024. He later filed a civil application requesting that the order deleting his name be recalled. The High Court examined the averments in the application and found that no plausible or …

AMBADAS RAJARAM TALANKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Ambadas Rajaram Talankar filed a review application challenging the High Court's order dated 13 June 2025 in his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The court examined the scope of review jurisdiction, emphasizing that it is limited to correcting apparent errors of law that cause …