Bombay High Court
GAURAV ALIAS SHAM RAMNATH BHAVARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court held that there was no necessity to continue the custody of the applicants and allowed their bail applications.
Summary
The applicants were arrested on 12 June 2026 for alleged assault on an informant, involving injuries to the informant's head and forearm, and were charged under multiple offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The applicants argued that the injuries were simple and continued custody was unnecessary, while the State contended that they were habitual offenders prepared with deadly weapons. The court examined the nature and gravity of the offences, the simplicity of the injuries, and the fact that the investigation was concluded. Finding no justification for further detention, the court granted bail to all applicants with stringent conditions. The order also disposed of any pending criminal applications related to the matter.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicants should be kept in custody despite the completion of investigation and the nature of the injuries.
- Whether bail can be granted for offences punishable under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 given the alleged seriousness and the State's claim of habitual offending.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 183
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 125(a), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 324(4), 351(2), 3513), 352
Subjects
- bail
- assault
- habitual offender
- investigation complete
- simple injuries
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- criminal procedure
Judgment
1 3ba1490.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
3 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1490 OF 2026
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1476 OF 2026
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1402 OF 2026
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1479 OF 2026
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3418 OF 2026
IN BA/1476/2026
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3419 OF 2026
IN BA/1479/2026
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3423 OF 2026
IN BA/1402/2026
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3424 OF 2026
IN BA/1490/2026
YOGESH RAMESH DOIFODE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Satej S. Jadhav h/f Mr. Gore Ravindra
Vitthal and Mr. S. R. Shinde (in BA/1490/2026), Mr.J.S. Jain (in
Cri.Appln./3424/2026, Cri.Appln./3423/2026), Mr. Mahesh L. Muthai
and Mr. Suraj Govind Dhormare (in BA/1402/2026, in BA/1479/2026
& Cri. Appln./3418/2026, in BA/1476/2026 & Cri. Appln./3419/2026),
APP for Respondents/State: Mr. K.K. Naik
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Jitendra Jain h/f Mr. Riyaz Latif
pathan
...
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATE : 07.09.2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant/s, the learned
APP for Respondent No. 1/State, respectively and the learned Advocate
2 3ba1490.26
appears for respondent No. 2.
2. The present applications are for regular bail filed by the
applicant/s in connection with Crime No. 402 of 2026, registered with
Bidkin Police Station, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for offences
punishable under Sections 109, 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352,
351(2), 3513), 324(4), 125(a) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The present applicants are arraigned as an accused persons
and have been arrested in connection with the alleged offences on
12.06.2026. Since then they are in custody. The investigation is
complete and the charge-sheet has been filed.
4. The prosecution story in brief is that on the date of incident
i.e. on 11.06.2026, at about 10.00 p.m. in the night, when the informant
was shutting his hotel, at that relevant time, the present applicants
along with other co-accused persons came near the hotel and quarreled
with the informant as to why he is shutting the hotel and they want to
consume the liquor. The informant told them that it is a time of closing
hotel, and therefore, now no liquor can be served. Getting angry of this,
it is alleged that the applicant Pratim assaulted the informant with steel
rod on his head and thereafter accused Aditya assaulted him with fist
and blows, accused Vishal assaulted the informant with stone and
accused Sachin assaulted the informant with stick. It is the allegation
against the Yogesh that in order to prevent the informant from
3 3ba1490.26
contacting any other, he broke his Cell Phone. Due to the assault caused
by the applicants, the informant sustained injury to his head and
forearm and it is alleged that the eye witness, who came to rescue the
informant, was also assaulted on his forearm. The informant was then
carried to the hospital and in the hospital, while taking treatment his
statement came to be recorded, which came to be culminated into
lodging of the FIR against the accused persons for the alleged offences.
5. The investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has
already been filed. All the learned Advocates for the applicants submit
that the injuries that have been caused are simple in nature and now
that the investigation is complete, the further custody of the applicants
is unwarranted.
6. The learned APP for the State argues that the applicants are
habitual offenders and have criminal antecedents. The learned APP
further submits that the applicants are always prepared with deadly
weapons, and therefore, they can be bracketed as harden criminals.
7. Taking into consideration the manner of assault levelled
against the informant the injuries caused to him, and the threats issued
to him not to disclose the incident to police, the same are in themselves,
sufficient to reject the present bail applications.
4 3ba1490.26
8. The learned Advocate appearing for the Original Informant
submits that even on triable issue the applicants become so aggressive
and commits the criminal offences. He further submits that the
applicants do not deserve to continue to reside in the society, and
therefore, their bail applications should be rejected.
9. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, gravity of
the offences, as well as the nature of the injuries that have been caused
to the informant coupled with the fact that the investigation is complete
and charge sheet has already been filed.
10, The record further indicates that the applicants were
arrested on 12.06.2026 and since then they are in custody till date.
Though the investigation specifically reveals that the assault has been
caused on the informant and the injuries have been sustained at the
hands of the present applicants, still it is important to note that the
injuries that are caused are simple in nature. The eye witness’s
statement that has been recorded and there is a slight discrepancy
between the statement given to the police and the statement recorded
under Section 183 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for
short “B.N.S.S.”). However, without going into the merits of these
statements, at this stage, the Court is required to consider the fact
whether the continued custody of the applicants is necessary. Taking
into consideration that the injuries are simple in nature and the
5 3ba1490.26
investigation is already complete, I do not find any reason to continue
the custody of the present applicants.
11. In the above circumstances the applications stands allowed.
Hence the following order :
ORDER
(i) All the applicants are released on bail.
ii) The applicants shall be released on bail in Crime No. 402 of 2026,
registered with Bidkin Police Station, District Chhatrapati
Sambhajinagar, for offences punishable under Sections 109, 189(2),
191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3513), 324(4), 125(a) of the
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing their personal bonds of Rs.
50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with one solvent surety each
in the like amount, subject to the following conditions :
a) The applicants shall attend the Bidkin Police Station
on every First Monday of the month, till framing the charge
as and attend the said Police Station, as and when called by
the Investigating Officer, unless his attendance is
specifically exempted.
b) The applicants are directed to stay outside of the
Paithan Taluka, till the evidence of the informant is recorded
before the trial Court.
c) Any breach of the condition shall entitle the
respondent/informant as well as the prosecution to prefer
the application for cancellation of the bail.
d) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, contact,
threaten, induce or influence the informant or any
prosecution witness and shall not tamper with the
prosecution evidence.
e) The applicant shall furnish his current residential
addresses and mobile numbers to the Investigating Officer
6 3ba1490.26
and the trial Court within seven days of release, intimate
any change forthwith, and attend the Investigating Officer
upon prior written notice if further investigation is required.
f) The applicant shall not leave India without prior
permission of the trial Court and, if he possess passports,
shall deposit the same with the trial Court within seven days
of their release.
g) The applicant shall not involve himself in any offence
of a similar nature while on bail.
h) Breach of any of the above conditions shall entitle the
prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail.
i) All observations in this order are prima facie and
confined to the decision of this bail application. The trial
Court shall decide the case independently on the evidence
led before it. The Bail Application is disposed of in the above
terms.
j) All the pending Criminal Applications, if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.)
mahajansb/
Checking your session…