Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ICICI Home Finance Company LimitedversusKiran Brijendra Killawala

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The interim relief shall continue to operate during the pendency of the arbitral proceedings or until the hearing and disposal of the Section 17 application, whichever is earlier.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay entertained an arbitration petition filed by ICICI Home Finance Company Limited against Kiran Brijendra Killawala. Earlier, on 10 June 2025, the Court had granted ad‑interim relief under prayer clauses (c) and (d) of the petition. The present order considered whether that interim relief should remain in force pending the arbitral proceedings or the filing of an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that the interim relief would continue to operate until either the arbitral proceedings conclude or the Section 17 application is heard and disposed of, whichever occurs first. Accordingly, the arbitration petition was disposed of subject to the continuation of the interim relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether the ad‑interim relief granted earlier should continue to operate during the pendency of the arbitral proceedings or until the hearing and disposal of an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Interim relief
  • Section 17
  • High Court
  • Arbitration petition

Judgment

                                                                            26-ARBP-424-2025.doc


                       Shabnoor
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally
          signed by
                                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SHABNOOR SHABNOOR
         AYUB PATHAN
AYUB     Date:
PATHAN   2026.09.30
          18:02:45
          +0530


                                     ARBITRATION PETITION NO.424 OF 2025

                       ICICI Home Finance Company Limited          … Petitioner
                                   V/s.
                       Kiran Brijendra Killawala                   … Respondent

                       Mr. Ajay Deshmane i/b V. Deshpande & Co., for the
                       Applicant/Petitioner.
                       Mr. Abhijit Aher i/b Suyash N. Khose, for Respondent.


                                                   CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                   DATED      : SEPTEMBER 30, 2026
                       P.C.:

                       1.      Since this Court, by its order dated 10 June 2025, had
                       granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (c) and (d), the
                       said relief shall continue to operate during the pendency of the
                       arbitral proceedings or until the hearing and disposal of an
                       application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
                       Act, 1996, whichever is earlier.

                       2.      The Arbitration Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid
                       terms.



                                                                    (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                          1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.