Bombay High Court
RAHUL DEVIDAS KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The bail application was disposed of, i.e., not granted.
Summary
The applicant Rahul s/o Devidas Kale filed a bail application in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The court noted that the trial had substantially progressed, with only two witnesses remaining to be examined, as per the report from the District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner. The respondent's counsel argued that the remaining witnesses were few and the matter did not warrant further consideration of bail at this stage. Consequently, the court disposed of the bail application without granting relief. The decision reflects the court's view that the trial's advancement precludes the necessity of bail at this point.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the applicant given the advanced stage of the trial
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- trial progress
- application disposed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1709 OF 2025
Rahul s/o Devidas Kale … APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra … RESPONDENT
.......
Mr. K.N. Shermale, Advocate for applicant
Mr. A.R. Kale, A.P.P. for respondent – State
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :
In the light of the report from the District Judge-2 &
Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, District Ahmednagar, the
trial has substantially progressed. Mr. Kale, learned A.P.P., on
instructions, submits that, only two witnesses are remained to be
examined. In that view of the matter, further consideration of the
application does not warrant at this stage. As such, the application
stands disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…