Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAHID SHARIFF BAGWANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The bail application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Shahid Shariff Bagwan, filed Bail Application No. 232 of 2026 in a criminal case pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Tejas Kamble, informed the court that a change in circumstances warranted filing a fresh bail application within a week, and sought the court's direction to expedite that application. The State's counsel, Mr. Ameet Palkar, did not oppose the request and indicated cooperation for early disposal. The applicant then sought leave to withdraw the present bail application and file a new one, promising not to seek adjournments. The court, noting the parties' agreement, disposed of the present bail application as withdrawn, directing the trial court to consider any fresh application promptly. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated beyond the procedural withdrawal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail application may be withdrawn and a fresh application filed on the ground of change in circumstances

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • change in circumstances
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                          28-BA-232-2026.doc



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                   BAIL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2026
Shahid Shariff Bagwan                                   … Applicant
      Versus
State of Maharashtra                         … Respondent
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Tejas Kamble a/w Sushant Tayade, Pallavi Valvi, Sujit Padvi,
Akshay Ade, for the Applicant.
Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
__________________________________________________________

                                CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                 DATE : 27th July, 2026.
P.C. :


1.       By the present Bail Application, the Applicant is seeking Bail

in Crime No. 736 of 2023 which is registered as Sessions Case No.

652 of 2026, which is pending before the District Judge-1 and

Additional Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi, Shirur.



2.       Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant,

submits that subsequent to the order dated 09.07.2025, there has

been change in circumstances. He submits that the Applicant, on

the grounds of change in circumstances and other legal grounds

available to the Applicant, in regards of his detention, on



Arjun                            1
                                                         28-BA-232-2026.doc



instructions from the Applicant, intends to file a fresh Bail

Application before the Trial Court. He submits that such Bail

Application would be filed within a period of one (1) week from

today. He therefore requests that a direction be issued to the Trial

Court to consider such Bail Application expeditiously.



3.      Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent – State,

does not oppose the request made by Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned

Advocate for the Applicant.



4.      In view of the above, Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate

for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave

to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh

Bail Application before the Trial Court on the grounds of change in

circumstances and other legal grounds available to him.



5.      If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court

within a period of 10 days from today, then, the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Ghodnadi, is requested to make an endeavor to

decide the said Bail Application expeditiously on its own merits

and in accordance with law and at any rate within a period of 2



Arjun                          2
                                                                               28-BA-232-2026.doc



                       months from the first date of hearing in the matter.



                       6.      Mr. Tejas Kamble, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states

                       that the Applicant shall not seek adjournments on the dates when

                       the Bail Application is fixed before the Trial Court.



                       7.      Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP, states that prosecution

                       would co-operate with the early disposal of the Bail Application.



                       8.      In view of the above, the Bail Application No. 232 of 2026

                       is disposed of as withdrawn.



                                                                   (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




          Digitally
          signed by
          ARJUN
ARJUN     KRISHNA
KRISHNA   RODGE
RODGE     Date:
          2026.07.28
          21:32:38
          +0530




                       Arjun                           3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.