Bombay High Court
OMKAR SATISH DAKURWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
Bail was not granted and the application was disposed of.
Summary
The applicant, Omkar Satish Dakurwar, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The trial is ongoing with five to seven witnesses yet to be examined, and the court noted that the trial is likely to conclude soon. The court held that there was no need to examine the merits of the case for the purpose of bail. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of without granting bail, and the court directed the presiding officer to expedite the trial. Additionally, counsel Ms. Pooja K. Apache was appointed to represent respondent No. 2 on legal aid, with fees fixed at Rs. 5,000.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the applicant pending the conclusion of the trial
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- trial expeditiousness
- legal aid
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:15019
30 BA 253 OF 2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
30 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2026
OMKAR SATISH DAKURWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S.
Addl.P.P. for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. A. R. Kale
Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Pooja K. Apache
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 08.04.2026
PER COURT :
It is reported by learned A.P.P. that trial is underway and further five
to seven witnesses are to be examined in the matter.
2. There is no need to examine merits of the matter because trial is likely
to be concluded soon.
3. Bail Application is disposed of. Presiding Officer is requested to
expedite the trial.
4. Learned counsel Ms. Apache is appointed to represent respondent
no. 2-informant through Legal Aid. Her fees is quantified to Rs. 5000/- (Rs.
Five Thousand only).
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Checking your session…