Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SHAILESH P BRAHME

348 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

RUKHAMINBAI UDDHAVRAO MHASKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The original award fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, which the appellants argued was …

YUNUS BABAMIYA MOMINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The Reference Court had fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, which the appellants argued …

Bhaskar Shrirang Bhojane Died Through LRs Sangita Bhaskar Bhojane Thr Lrs Avinash Bhaskar BhojaneversusThe State of Maharashtra Through the Collector Osmanabad

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased Bhaskar Shrirang Bhojane, filed a civil application seeking to bring additional heirs on record and to withdraw Rs.15,79,772 deposited by the State of Maharashtra. The court condoned a 610‑day delay in adding the heirs, finding it unintentional, and held …

SOPAN NIVRUTTI VIGHEversusISHWAR NIVRUTTI VIGHE AND OTHERS

Rejected at Admission stage

The applicant, Sopan Nivrutti Vighe, filed a civil revision challenging the lower court's order that rejected his application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, which sought dismissal of a partition suit filed by the respondent, Ishwar Nivrutti Vighe. The respondent's suit alleged that a gift deed …

SUNIL CHANGDEO GALHE AND OTHERSversusSATISH SUDHAKAR DESHPANDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered a civil revision filed by the purchasers (defendant Nos.18‑24) challenging the trial court's order refusing to reject a suit filed by the original plaintiffs for pre‑emption, declaration and injunction over an undivided joint Hindu family property. The plaintiffs claimed a …

THE EX. ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT OSMANABAD AND ORSversusARUNA NARAYAN KALE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants sought to withdraw amounts deposited by the acquiring body as compensation in several civil applications. The court considered a coordinate bench precedent allowing partial withdrawal upon furnishing an undertaking and a solvent surety. It ordered that 50% of each deposited sum, with …

AVDHUT MACHINDRA THOMBREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Avdhut Machindra Thombre applied for enlargement of bail in a case (Cr. No. 428/2025) alleging sexual assault of a neighbour on 11‑Nov‑2025, charged under Sections 333, 75 and 65 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution highlighted a statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bhartiya …

India through the General Manager Central RailwayversusShrihari Shahaji Bade

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a civil application filed by the Union of India (through the Central Railway) against Shrihari Shahaji Bade. The application was pending because a first appeal (No. 645 of 2026) was still before the court. The court observed that since the first appeal …

SHAIKH RAHIM SHAIKH LALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Shaikh Rahim Shaikh Lal, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After a co-accused was released on bail, the applicant sought to withdraw his own bail application and approach the Sessions Court for further relief. The Court considered the request in …

MOHD NAJAM S/O MOHD AZAMversusCHANDRAKALABAI W/O HIRA SWAMI B. CHOUDHARI

DISMISSED

The appellant, Mohd. Najan, filed a special civil suit for specific performance of a sale agreement. The respondent, ChandraKalabai, failed to file a written statement despite multiple adjournments and later applied to set aside the order allowing the suit to proceed without her statement, which the …

OMKAR SATISH DAKURWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Omkar Satish Dakurwar, filed a bail application in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The trial is ongoing with five to seven witnesses yet to be examined, and the court noted that the trial is likely to conclude soon. The …

RAM ALIAS SATISH SANTOSH SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ram Sonawane was arrested for a violent clash that occurred during a Ganpati festival in Patonda village, which resulted in the death of Vishnu Ratan Gavit. The FIR alleged that Sonawane struck the deceased with a wooden stick, leading to fatal head injuries, and he was charged under multiple …

JAMILABAI NASARU PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Court considered bail applications filed by Jamilabai Pathan, Amol Sonawane, Roshan Dhangar Bhil and Ajay Devde in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act arising from alleged kidnapping by enticement and sexual relations with minor girls aged 16 and above. …

PUNDLIK JAYRAM SURWADE DIED THR LRS CHANDRABHAGABI PUNDLIK SURWADE AND ORSversusTHE COLLECTOR, JALGAON, THR. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, A.T.P.H. AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, heirs of the deceased Pundlik Jayram Surwade, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 269‑day delay in preferring their first appeal against the Collector, Jalgaon and other officials. The respondent state authority did not appear despite being served. The court found the …

VIJAY RAMKRUSHNA GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Vijay Gaikwad applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged abduction, assault, and robbery of a jeweller, with charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act. The prosecution presented dash‑camera footage and a supplementary police statement implicating …

SARDAR MOHAMMAD PATHANversusSYED NASHIR SHAMSHER ALI AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The case concerns a civil revision application filed by Sardar Mohammad Pathan against Syed Nashir Shamshar Ali and others. The underlying Special Civil Suit No. 89 of 2020 was finally decided on 16 January 2026. The court examined whether the revision could proceed after the original suit had been …

PRADIP BABASAHEB SUKASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Pradip, a 19‑year‑old labourer, applied for bail in a case (Cr. No. 296/2025) alleging offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He was said to have accompanied the main accused, Ritesh, and fled the scene. The defence argued that statements recorded under Sections …

LOKYABAI SAMBHAJI PAWARversusMEERABAI SHRIRAM PAWAR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Lokyabai Pawar filed a civil suit seeking possession and injunction over land, alleging encroachment by defendants Meerabai and others. The husband of defendant Meerabai, Shriram, applied under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC to be impleaded as a necessary party, claiming possession of the land, and the …

JAVED IKBAL A. MANNAN DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, original claimants whose lands in Mapegaon village were acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, alleging it was inadequate. They sought parity by applying a 10% per annum escalation for six years and ten months, contending …

RADHABAI PRABHULAL JAISWALversusTHE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCO CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Administrator CIDCO deposited Rs.1,18,70,800 and sought to withdraw the amount. The Court noted that the Respondent had previously deposited only 70% of the amount as ordered, and followed its established practice of allowing claimants to receive 70% of the deposited sum with interest upon …

AASARAM JEENAJI BOBADE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of landowners from Padali village, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Nimna Dudhna Project. The original award fixed a rate of Rs 2,500 per R for dry land, whereas the appellants sought a …

MADHUKAR YADAJI UNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant Madhukar S/o Yadaji Unde filed a bail application (Criminal Application No. 854 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The application sought his release from custody pending trial. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, opposed the bail. The Court …

DATTATRAYA DIGAMBARRAO CHIMANSHETTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dattatraya, was charged with penetrative sexual assault on a nine‑year‑old girl under Sections 64(1) and 64(2)(i) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s mother reported the incident, and a medico‑legal report documented a torn hymen …

GINYANDEO CHAPLA RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Ginyandeo Chapla Rathod, challenged the award dated 15‑02‑2012 fixing the market value of his acquired dry land at Rs 1400 per R, arguing that higher sale exemplars should have been considered. He relied on three sale instances, the highest being Rs 3618 per R for a small parcel, and …

RAJU BABURAO VARADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Raki Babirap Varade filed bail application No. 434 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking release from custody pending trial. The State of Maharashtra opposed the bail, and the Court expressed its disinclination to grant it. Counsel for the applicant, upon the Court's …

VISHWANATH EKNATH YAMGARversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, represented by Mr. Shahaji C. Nadare and Ramesh Vitthal, sought to withdraw portions of compensation amounts deposited by the respondent acquiring body, totaling several crores of rupees, based on a prior order allowing 75% disbursement subject to conditions. The respondents …

ATMARAM RANGNATH TONDEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Atmaram Rangnath Tonde, filed a civil application which was linked to a first appeal (No. 398 of 2026). The first appeal was disposed of, and the court held that no issues remained pending in the civil application. Consequently, the court ordered the civil application to be disposed. …

PATHAN SHAKER KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Idris Pathan and his wife Rukhaiyya were arrested in connection with the death of Fatima, alleged to be a homicide rather than suicide, under sections 103, 61(2), 238, 80, 85 and 115 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The bail application sought release for both, but the applicant withdrew the …

VITTHAL BABASAHEB WAGHMARE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, landowners from Nagapur village, challenged the compensation award and notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act for land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project. They sought a 10% per annum escalation of compensation for ten years, relying on earlier judgments …

UDHAMSINGH JAYWANTSINGH DIED THR LRS GOKULSINGH UDHAMSINGH DIED THR LRS JAYA G. RAJPUT AND ORSversusTHE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER VAIJAPUR AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants filed a motion before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking correction of a typographical error in the court's judgment dated 27.02.2026. The error involved an incorrect appeal number recorded as First Appeal No. 1337/2024 in paragraph 37, which should have been First …

MAHESH ALIAS OM KANTILAL CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Mahesh @ Om Kantilal Chaudhari was arrested on 30 November 2025 in connection with a murder‑related case (Cr. No. 673/2025) and a charge sheet was filed on 27 February 2026 alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant contended that there was no …

HANUMANT RAM BHALERAO AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Hanumant Ram Bhalerao and Jayashri Hanumant Bhalerao, were arrested in March 2026 for alleged involvement in the suicide of Muskan, who was said to have been harassed and physically assaulted by them and co‑accused, with a demand of Rs.25,00,000 for a house and vehicle. The …

BALAJI VIJAYKUMAR MANGRULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Balaji, a 42‑year‑old farmer, was arrested on 18‑Dec‑2025 in connection with Crime No. 656/2025 for alleged sexual exploitation, stalking and threats against a married woman, alleged to have occurred over several incidents between March 2024 and April 2025. The charges were under Sections 64(2)(f), …

DIPAK ANKUSH MHASKEversusSUBHASH NARAYAN SOMDHANE AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Subhash Somdhane was arrested in connection with the murder of Babasaheb Somdhane, an offence alleged under Sections 103(1), 61(1), 3(5), 49 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The FIR did not name him or describe his role, and the prosecution relied mainly …

MOHAN LUVARYA PAWARAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, members of a tribal family from Telkhadi, were arrested in connection with the murder of Podya Pawara during a mob assault that followed a revenge motive for a rape accusation against a relative. They were charged under multiple sections of the Bombay Penal Code, including offences …

DEHLYA LOTYA PAWARA AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered ten bail applications filed by members of the Pawara family who were accused in Crime No. 167 of 2025 for the death of Podya Pawara. The prosecution alleged that the applicants participated in a mob assault that resulted in Podya's death, …

MONALI RAHUL BARHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Monali, the wife of co-accused Rahul Barhate, was arrested for allegedly supplying a pistol that Rahul used to fire at an informant and a deceased person during a dispute with employees of Vijeta Company. She is charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and …

PRAMOD SUDAM GHOLAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Pramod Sudam Gholap, was arrested in connection with a case of alleged harassment, dowry demand and the suicide of his wife, registered as Crime No.426 of 2025 under Sections 80, 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that there was no direct or indirect …

RAMESHWAR SITARAM KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) considered a bail application filed by Rameshwar Kale, who was arrested in connection with an alleged abduction and robbery under Sections 140(3), 309(6), 124(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR named four accused, but the applicant …

NEMULAL MARUTI BHANDWALE AND ANRversusTHE DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, long‑time tenants of Gut No.115 in Beed, relied on a 1979 civil suit that was decreed in 1982 protecting their possession. The Wakf Board and Wakf Tribunal later ordered their eviction under Section 54 of the Wakf Act, a decision affirmed by a judgment dated 02‑08‑2011. The …

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER AND ORSversusBALU RANGNATH BHAGAT

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, filed applications seeking condonation of delay for over six hundred first appeals filed beyond the limitation period against judgments and awards of the Reference Court. The court examined the applications, noting no serious challenge to the averments and no …

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER AND ORSversusUSHABAI DATTU JADHAV

DISPOSED OFF

The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 7058, 7061, 7065, 7067, 7069 of 2024) against various respondents. These applications were pending alongside first appeals (Nos. 11501 of 2024, 192 of 2025, 196 of 2025, 798 of 2026, 805 …

NAMDEO YADAV BORDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant challenged a 2016 judgment and award in a land acquisition case, alleging that he was not served notice after the reference was transferred from Aurangabad to Vaijapur and therefore could not present evidence. The court noted that the appellant and his lawyer were absent after the …

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAYversusBHAU BABU WAGHMARE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …

SACHIN NARSU CHAUGHULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The accused, Sachin Narsu Chaughule, was previously released on bail for offences under Sections 354-A, 354-B, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 8, 12 of the POCSO Act, but failed to appear, leading to a non‑bailable warrant. He applied for bail again, claiming the need to earn a livelihood and …

DEEPAK LAXMAN DAWKHAR AND OTHERSversusVAISHALI SHIVRAM SATHE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered two civil applications filed under Civil Application Nos. 5199 of 2025 and 5288 of 2025. Both applications arose out of parallel proceedings where the parties had earlier filed appeals against Orders 19 and 21 dated 2025. The Court examined whether any relief could survive …

SUDAM EKNATH KHANDAGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Sudam Eknath Khandagale was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur, under Section 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, attracting a maximum imprisonment of three years. He filed a criminal application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail, arguing that his appeal …

ASHOK VITHOBA KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, heirs of persons whose lands were acquired for earthquake‑rehabilitation in Salegaon, challenged the reference court’s award of Rs 4 per square foot compensation, arguing that they should receive Rs 20 per square foot on the ground of parity with other acquisitions for the same …

MADHAVI BABU KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, heirs of persons whose lands were acquired for earthquake rehabilitation in Salegaon, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court at Rs.4 per square foot, seeking the higher rate of Rs.20 per square foot on the ground of parity with other similar acquisitions. The …

NARSING MAHADEO DEOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, whose lands were acquired for the rehabilitation of earthquake‑affected persons in Salegaon, sought to increase the compensation awarded by the Reference Court from Rs 4 per square foot to Rs 20 per square foot, invoking the principle of parity with other similar acquisitions (LAR …

SUDAM SAMPATRAO WAGHversusYADAV DEVJI BHAVALE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Sudam Sampatrao Wagh, appealed against Order No. 48 of 2023 which involved a remand. After the impugned order, the underlying suit was decided on 13 January 2026, as evidenced by a copy of the judgment tendered. Because the suit had been finally decided, the appeal became …

RAOSAHEB BHIMRAJ PAGAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raosaheb Pagare, who was charged under IPC sections 395 and 397 and MCOCA sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4) for assault and rioting. The applicant argued that there was no direct evidence against him, that the test identification parade was the …

CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. (CIDCO), THR. IT S ADMINISTRATOR, CIDCO, AURANGABAversusHMT LTD., FOOD PROCESSING AND MACHINERY UNIT, MIDC, CHIKALTHANA, A.BAD, THR. ITS OFFICER AND ANOTHE

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, CIDCO, filed a civil revision challenging the trial court’s order that rejected its application to dismiss a suit filed by the respondent on the ground of res judicata and alleged suppression of material facts. The petitioner argued that the earlier suit (Special Civil Suit No. …

SUBHASHSING SHAMSING THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of landowners, challenged a common judgment dated 27.01.2003 (upheld by a coordinate bench on 08.01.2018) that fixed compensation for acquired lands at Rs.700 per R, arguing that the rate was inadequate and that certain lands classified as dry should be treated as irrigated, …

ASHOK NAGO CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, whose lands in Khadgaon village were acquired for the Waghoor project, challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court at Rs.1,80,000 per hectare, contending that the rate for dry land should be Rs.3,00,000 per hectare as upheld in earlier judgments. The respondents argued …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, BEED AND ORSversusMAHADEO WAMAN KARDILE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …

PRALHAD ASARAM KAKDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Pralhad Asaram Kakde, sought enhancement of compensation for semi‑irrigated land acquired for the Jaipur Percolation Tank, arguing that a settlement reached in a related Lok‑Adalat case (First Appeal No.2834 of 2024) should apply by parity. The original award under Section 4 of the …

SANDU SAKHARAM BHUJANGversusCHANDRAMUNI BHIKAJI MULE AND OTHERS

Withdrawn

The appellant, Sandu Sakharm Bhujang, filed an appeal against Order No. 4 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant informed the court that the appellant wished to withdraw the appeal. The court examined whether a pending appeal could be …

SUNIL BALAJI ATNUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

This first appeal challenged the Reference Court's judgment and award dated 03.05.2019 in L.A.R. No. 385 of 2012, seeking enhancement of compensation for an acquired house property in village Itgyal, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded, acquired for the Lendi project. The notification under Section 4 was …

PANDHARI KONDIBA KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Pandhari Kondiba Kamble, challenged the compensation awarded in 2017 for dry land acquired for the ‘Lendi’ project in Marajwadi village, Nanded, seeking a higher rate of Rs 1,25,000 per hectare based on the court’s consistent awards in similar acquisitions. The State of Maharashtra …

DATTA BANSI PRADHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged a 2017 common judgment fixing compensation for dry land acquired in Devgaon Khavne, seeking a higher rate by relying on earlier awards: Rs.7586 per R from LAR No.457/2013, Rs.6000 per R from a National Lok Adalat settlement (First Appeal No.43/2023), and Rs.3700 per R from …