Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SHAILESH P BRAHME

348 judgments · newest first · showing 201–348

CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., AURANGABAD THR ITS ADMINISTRATORversusBHAUDU @ SHESHRAO S/O BHAGAJI VIDHATE DIED THROUGH LRS SMT. RADHA AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd., Aurangabad, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent Bhavadu Bhagaji Vidhate. The court observed that the cause of action survived …

NAMDEO BAPURAO SURVASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Namdeo B. Survase, challenged a 2017 award concerning land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana project in Jalna district, seeking higher compensation based on the parity principle. The land, classified as dry and semi‑irrigated, had been originally awarded at Rs.554 per are for dry land …

GULAB ABDUL SAYYADversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Gulab Abdul Sayyad, sought withdrawal of Rs.7,95,079 deposited by the respondent/acquiring body, claiming entitlement to the amount with accrued interest. The respondent contested, arguing the enhancement exceeded nine times the original amount. The court, referring to similar cases …

RUKHMININAI RADHAKISAN SHELKE DIED THROUGH HIS LRS PURUSHOTTAM RADHAKISAN SHELKEversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI TERMINUS ADMINISTRAT

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …

BALAJI MAROTI BANBAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Balaji Maroti Banbare, challenged the award dated 13 June 2019 of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No. 225/2012, seeking full compensation for his house property acquired for the Lendi project. The Reference Court had granted only a 40% enhancement over the basic award, rejecting the …

HANMANT RAJARAM BANBAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant challenged a 2019 award that enhanced compensation for a house acquired for the Lendi project only by 40% of the private valuer's assessment. The private valuer’s report valued the property at Rs. 2,76,356, but the Reference Court had granted only Rs. 34,930 in addition to the original …

BALAJI NAMDEV DAPKE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged a 2019 award by the Reference Court that granted compensation of Rs 68,928 with only a 40% enhancement for their house acquired for the Lendi project, arguing that the court should have accepted the private valuer’s report of Rs 2,29,916 in full. The respondents contended …

THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCOversusRADHABAI PRABHULAL JAISWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) had deposited Rs.1,18,70,800 as directed by the Court, but only 70% of that amount was to be released to the claimants upon furnishing an undertaking, with the balance contingent on a solvent surety. The Acquiring Body filed a civil application seeking …

THE ADMINISTRATOR CIDCOversusRADHABAI PRABHULAL JAISWAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) deposited Rs.1,18,70,800/- as directed by the Bombay High Court and sought to withdraw the amount. The Court noted that the Respondent, Radhabai Prabhulal Jaiswal, had only deposited 70% of the amount as per earlier orders, and the Court’s established …

MOHAMMAD HARUN A. HUSAIN DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, original claimants whose dry land in Mapegaon village was acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court of Rs.2500 per Are, contending that they should receive the escalated rate of Rs.4800 per Are applied in a similar acquisition. …

Prasanna Bhalchandra VaidyaversusPresident

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, a former Office Superintendent, was terminated on 6 April 2022, appealed, and was reinstated on 16 November 2022 with salary as per the 6th Pay Commission. The High Court had earlier stayed payment of back wages from the date of termination to reinstatement. The applicant filed two …

SANDEEP S/O AMBAR SHGINDE AND OTHERS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed first appeals after a delay of 3,984 days and sought condonation of that delay. The State opposed, arguing lack of cogent evidence and that the applications were not traversed. The Court noted the applicants' willingness to forgo interest and statutory benefits and found no …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusSumanbai Shankar Raut

DISPOSED OFF

The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 13430, 13435, 13521, 13699, 13528, 13523, 13531 of 2024) against various respondents. All the applications were linked to first appeals (Nos. 687‑700 of 2026) that had already been …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusBabu Maruti Jadhav

DISMISSED

The Union of India (Central Railway) acquired lands in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation rate from Rs. 860/1000 per R to Rs. 2,047 per R, treating the land as dry land, and awarded statutory benefits under Section 23(1‑A). The acquiring …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusBabu Maruti Jadhav

DISPOSED OFF

The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusHaribhau Ranu Walake

DISPOSED OFF

The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusHaribhau Ranu Walake

DISPOSED OFF

The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications against various respondents. Each of these applications was linked to a first appeal that had already been disposed of. The Court observed that with the disposal of the first appeals, there …

KRISHNA RAMESH PATIL AND OTHERSversusTEJASWITA SUDHAKAR PANDIT AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants filed a civil revision before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the trial court. Subsequently, the applicants, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered whether it could grant leave to …

SHASHIKANT NAGNATH KERALE AND ANOTHERversusUMAKANT NAGNATH KERALE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, who are the original defendants, filed a civil revision against the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint in a 2025 partition suit filed by their siblings. The suit sought partition, separate possession, and rendition of accounts of family properties, alleging that a 1986 …

India through The General Manager Central RailwayversusBabasaheb Lahanu Kale

DISPOSED OFF

The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs.2000‑2250 per R. Claimants filed reference petitions, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.6875 per R for Jirayat land and …

BALAJI RAJEBHAU CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Withdrawn

Balaji Rajebhau Chavan filed two bail applications (Nos. 2320/2025 and 2179/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The first application was filed through a private counsel, while the second was filed by a lawyer appointed under legal aid. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw …

TULSHIDAS PRABHAKARRAO ROHINKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant's land in Rohina village was acquired under a Section 4 notification on 27‑04‑2000 for the Nimna Dudhana Project, with an award dated 10‑04‑2003 fixing compensation at Rs 800 per R. The appellant sought the benefit of escalation on the ground of parity, arguing that similar lands had …

RAMSING SHAMSING GIRASEversusCOLLECTOR DHULE AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for the acquisition of house properties in Divi village, Dhule, arguing that the Reference Court had arbitrarily accepted only 75% of the private valuer's report. They relied on earlier decisions of the Court, including a common order dated …

NATHESINGH ONKAR GIRASEversusTHE COLLECTOR, DHULE AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for the acquisition of house properties in Divi village, Dhule, arguing that the Reference Court had arbitrarily accepted only 75% of the private valuer's report. They relied on earlier decisions of this Court, particularly a common order dated …

KUNAL SUBHASH KSHIRSAGARversusJAYASHRI KUNAL KSHIRSAGAR

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a Hindu Marriage Petition seeking dissolution of his marriage and applied for a direction that the respondent undergo a medical examination. The Family Court ordered the respondent to submit to the examination and a medical report was later filed. The petitioner challenged the …

Ravindra Pandurang JadhavversusLaxman Maruti Kashid

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their application for appointment of a commissioner to measure certain city survey plots in a civil suit for mandatory and perpetual injunction. They argued that Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) could be invoked …

M/S SANJEEVAN VIDYALAYA TRUSTversusTHE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust, had its bank accounts attached by a notice dated 18 March 2026. The Trust undertook to pay the interest due, seeking defreezing of the attached accounts. The respondent, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, raised no serious objection to removing the …

M/S SANJEEVAN VIDYALAYA TRUSTversusTHE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust, had its bank accounts attached by a notice dated 18 March 2026. The Trust undertook to pay the interest due, seeking defreezing of the attached accounts. The respondent, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, raised no serious objection to removing the …

CHANDRASHEKHAR VISHNU WALKARversusVILAS DINAKAR PADHYE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Vishnu Walkar, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Devgad, alleging that the court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a summary suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act because of an improper valuation of the subject matter. The …

AVINASH PRAMODKUMAR MAGDUMversusVIJAY SAMBHAJI WAINGADE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Avinash Pramodkumar Magdum, filed an interim application (No. 742 of 2026) seeking the deletion of respondents Nos. 2, 4 and 5 from the writ petition record. The High Court, after granting leave at the risk of the applicant, ordered that the said respondents be deleted. The court …

MADHUKAR MAHADEV PATILversusSANGLI ZILLA MADHYAWARTI SAHAKARI BANK LTD.

Rejected

Madhukar Mahadev Patil, a former bank employee, sought an extension of time to file a civil suit after his case in the Cooperative Court was dismissed and he was directed to approach the Civil Court within six weeks to avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. He claimed his old age and …

RAJESH ARJUN GAWALIversusJYOTI RAJESH GAWALI

Dismissed

The petitioner, Rajesh Arjun Gawali, challenged a common order dated 06.02.2025 that was based on a settlement document (Exhibit 73) which he alleged was fraudulently obtained by suppressing paragraph 9. He claimed the order imposed an arbitrary liability and threatened action against the lawyer who …

SHAMRAO KESHAV KUMBHAR AND ANR.versusSURESH JAMATRAJ OSWAL AND ORS.

Allowed

In First Appeal (ST) No. 7596 of 2025, the applicants Shamrao Keshav Kumbhar and an associate filed Interim Application No. 9897 of 2025 against respondents Suresh Jamatraj Oswal and others. The matter was heard by Justice Shivkumar Dige of the Bombay High Court on 18 July 2025. The court considered …

M/S. R.D. DESAI AND COMPANYversusKOLHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.

Dismissed

The petitioner, R.D. Desai & Co., filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of RCS No.879 of 2015 by the trial court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the previous or current hearing dates. The respondent, Kolhapur Municipal Corporation, argued that the petitioner had not diligently …

VASANT MARUTI MORE (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL LRS )versusISHWARA JOTI MORE

Disposed Off

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Vasant More, sought restoration of possession of a suit property after a decree of possession in favour of the respondent Ishwara More was being executed. They filed an application (Exhibit 99) alleging improper measurement and execution, invoking Section 47 of …

DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKHversusPUNIT AVINASH SONAWANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, sought to be impleaded in an injunction suit (RCS No.798 of 2016) filed by respondent No.1 concerning land that had been acquired by the government and later sold to the plaintiff. He alleged that respondents 5 and 6 had fraudulently obtained the land despite …