Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought condonation of a 1,062‑day delay in setting aside an abatement and bringing the legal heirs of the deceased Gorakh Tukaram Deshmukh on record. The Court found the delay was not intentional and allowed the abatement to be set aside, permitting the heirs to be recorded. In a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought the Court’s permission to condone a delay of 1,062 days in setting aside an abatement order and to bring the legal heirs of the deceased Gorakh Tukaram Deshmukh on record. The Court also considered a separate request to condone an 822‑day delay in preferring an appeal, and a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,867‑day delay in preferring an appeal. The respondents opposed, alleging the applicants deliberately delayed knowing the decision. The court found no evidence of malafide intent and noted the applicants were willing to forgo …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Kinhi village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 1210‑1310 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs 3500 per R and granted statutory benefits under Section …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications seeking a stay against various respondents in multiple first appeals. All the first appeals (Nos. 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629 of 2026) were subsequently disposed of by the High Court. …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Kinhi village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 1210‑1310 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs 3500 per R and …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications seeking a stay against various respondents. These applications were pending alongside first appeals. The High Court noted that the first appeals had been disposed of, and consequently there …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, representing the estate of the deceased Kaushalyabai Shivaji Hatote, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 3347‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a decree of the State of Maharashtra. They offered to forgo any interest and statutory benefits accrued during …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Jalnyachiwadi for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 770‑880 per R. The Reference Court, hearing a group of reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Jalnyachiwadi village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs. 770‑880 per R. Claimants challenged this in reference petitions, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 3,244 per R, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer through Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 3,946‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The respondents, though served, did not appear, and the State’s Advocate General appeared on behalf of one respondent. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer through Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 3,946‑day delay in preferring its first appeal. The respondents, though served, did not appear, and the State’s Additional Government Pleader appeared on behalf of …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, owners of houses acquired for the Wadi‑Shevadi Medium Project, challenged the Reference Court's award which granted them 85% of the valuer's report but arbitrarily deducted 10% without justification. They sought parity with a prior judgment (First Appeal No. 2525 of 2022, dated 12 …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, considered six civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The applicants admitted substantial delays ranging from 859 to 2,183 days and offered to forgo interest and statutory benefits …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered six separate civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The applicants admitted that the delays, ranging from 859 to 2,183 days, were attributable to their own lapses but …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd., Aurangabad, filed an application seeking condonation of delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent Bhavadu Bhagaji Vidhate. The court observed that the cause of action survived …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation filed two civil applications (Nos. 12536/2024 and 12542/2024) before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay, seeking confirmation of an earlier ad‑interim order relating to a compensation award in a land‑acquisition dispute with the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Namdeo B. Survase, challenged a 2017 award concerning land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana project in Jalna district, seeking higher compensation based on the parity principle. The land, classified as dry and semi‑irrigated, had been originally awarded at Rs.554 per are for dry land …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Laxman Mittu Pawar filed applications seeking condonation of a 3,202‑day delay in preferring first appeals against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the applicant offered to forgo interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The Court examined …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 860‑1000 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 2,047 per R, treating the land as dry land, and also …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Gulab Abdul Sayyad, sought withdrawal of Rs.7,95,079 deposited by the respondent/acquiring body, claiming entitlement to the amount with accrued interest. The respondent contested, arguing the enhancement exceeded nine times the original amount. The court, referring to similar cases …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, representing the estate of the deceased Radhakishan Bhaulrao Karhale, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,007‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a decree of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, the State and its authorities, did not contest the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Balaji Maroti Banbare, challenged the award dated 13 June 2019 of the Reference Court in L.A.R. No. 225/2012, seeking full compensation for his house property acquired for the Lendi project. The Reference Court had granted only a 40% enhancement over the basic award, rejecting the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant challenged a 2019 award that enhanced compensation for a house acquired for the Lendi project only by 40% of the private valuer's assessment. The private valuer’s report valued the property at Rs. 2,76,356, but the Reference Court had granted only Rs. 34,930 in addition to the original …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a 2019 award by the Reference Court that granted compensation of Rs 68,928 with only a 40% enhancement for their house acquired for the Lendi project, arguing that the court should have accepted the private valuer’s report of Rs 2,29,916 in full. The respondents contended …
DISPOSED OFF
Ganesh Maruti Yemulvad filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing a review application against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that there was no contest to the averments in the application and that condonation was appropriate. The respondents did not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) had deposited Rs.1,18,70,800 as directed by the Court, but only 70% of that amount was to be released to the claimants upon furnishing an undertaking, with the balance contingent on a solvent surety. The Acquiring Body filed a civil application seeking …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Administrator CIDCO (Acquiring Body) deposited Rs.1,18,70,800/- as directed by the Bombay High Court and sought to withdraw the amount. The Court noted that the Respondent, Radhabai Prabhulal Jaiswal, had only deposited 70% of the amount as per earlier orders, and the Court’s established …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, legal heirs of the deceased sole claimant Madhukar Shripat Gadhve, sought condonation of a 1,228‑day delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the heirs on record. The court examined whether the cause of action survived against the heirs and whether the delay was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The State opposed the applications, but the court found no malafide intent and held that the delay was not intentional. The court conditioned condonation on …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The State opposed the applications, but the court found no malafide intent and held that the delay was not intentional. The court conditioned condonation on …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Raghapur village, Beed district, for a new railway line and paid a compensation rate of Rs 1,200 per R. The civil court enhanced the rate to Rs 2,065 per R for Jirayat land and Rs 2,900 per R for seasonally irrigated land. The …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, original claimants whose dry land in Mapegaon village was acquired for the Nimna Dudhna Project, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court of Rs.2500 per Are, contending that they should receive the escalated rate of Rs.4800 per Are applied in a similar acquisition. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Yankaji Rangnath Ghadge, filed a civil application against the State of Maharashtra and the Collector, Jalna, seeking relief under a land‑acquisition matter. The court noted that the petitioners' averments were not contested and that the delay in filing was …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant, a former Office Superintendent, was terminated on 6 April 2022, appealed, and was reinstated on 16 November 2022 with salary as per the 6th Pay Commission. The High Court had earlier stayed payment of back wages from the date of termination to reinstatement. The applicant filed two …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of consolidated civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals and a modification of the interest clause in an arbitral award. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a paragraph of the impugned award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not contest the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a clause in the impugned award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not contest the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division and others (applicants) filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals against the award made to Maruti Ambu Mastud and another (respondents). The applicants argued that there was no …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals against an arbitral award. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the Court noted that the delay had implications for the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a specific paragraph of an arbitral award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division and others filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and rectification of an award of interest dated 13‑09‑2017. The applicants argued that the award of interest was contrary to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals against an award of a reference court. The applicants also contested a clause awarding interest that they alleged was inconsistent with the law …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed first appeals after a delay of 3,984 days and sought condonation of that delay. The State opposed, arguing lack of cogent evidence and that the applications were not traversed. The Court noted the applicants' willingness to forgo interest and statutory benefits and found no …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing first appeals against orders of the Collector, Jalna. The State opposed the applications, but the court found no malafide intent and held that the delay was not intentional. The court conditioned condonation on …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 13430, 13435, 13521, 13699, 13528, 13523, 13531 of 2024) against various respondents. All the applications were linked to first appeals (Nos. 687‑700 of 2026) that had already been …
DISMISSED
The Union of India (Central Railway) acquired lands in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation rate from Rs. 860/1000 per R to Rs. 2,047 per R, treating the land as dry land, and awarded statutory benefits under Section 23(1‑A). The acquiring …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired lands in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.860‑Rs.1,000 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2,047 per R, classifying the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications against various respondents. Each of these applications was linked to a first appeal that had already been disposed of. The Court observed that with the disposal of the first appeals, there …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, filed applications seeking condonation of delay for over six hundred first appeals filed beyond the limitation period against judgments and awards of the Reference Court. The court examined the applications, noting no serious challenge to the averments and no …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed multiple civil applications (Nos. 13430‑24, 13435, 13521, 13699, 13528, 13523, 13531 of 2024) against various respondents. The same disputes were concurrently pending as first appeals (Nos. 687‑700 of 2026). The Court …
DISMISSED
The Union of India (Central Railway) acquired land in Raghapur village, Beed district, for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 1,200 per R. The civil court enhanced the rate to Rs 2,065 per R for Jirayat land and Rs 2,900 per R for seasonally …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Raghapur village, Beed district, for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at Rs 1,200 per R. The civil court enhanced the rate to Rs 2,065 per R for Jirayat land and Rs 2,900 per R …
DISMISSED
The Union of India (Central Railway) acquired land in Raghapur village, Beed district for a new railway line and fixed a compensation rate of Rs 1,200 per R. The Civil Court enhanced the rate to Rs 2,065 per R for Jirayat land and Rs 2,900 per R for seasonally irrigated land. The acquiring body …
DISMISSED
The applicants filed a civil revision (No. 202 of 2018) challenging an order of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, which on 9 August 2019 rejected an objection petition and disposed of an execution petition. When the revision was called before the Bombay High Court, no party appeared. The …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and paid rates of Rs. 860‑890 per R. The Reference Court, hearing grouped reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs. 2,407 per R, treating the land as dry land and …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 13641, 13637, 13643, 13645, 13639 of 2024) against various respondents. These applications were linked to first appeals (Nos. 811, 810, 814, 813, 812 of 2026) that had already been …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, appealed against the rates of compensation fixed by a Reference Court for lands acquired for a new railway line in Beed district. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation from Rs. 700 per R to Rs. 2,680 per R for Jirayat land and from …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications (Nos. 13422, 13412, 13419, 13416, 13425 of 2024) against various respondents. These applications were pending because the corresponding first appeals (Nos. 668, 615, 666, 616, 667 of 2026) …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications and first appeals against various respondents. The High Court disposed of the first appeals, and the judge held that the pending civil applications could not survive the disposal of those …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a civil revision before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order of the trial court. Subsequently, the applicants, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The Court considered whether it could grant leave to …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed against a reference court award that enhanced compensation for land acquired in Raimoha village for a new railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially offered Rs 2,110‑2,410 per R, but the …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, appealed multiple first appeals challenging a common judgment and award dated 9 September 2019 that fixed compensation for lands acquired for a new railway line in Beed district. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation rate from Rs …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, appealed multiple first appeals challenging the compensation rates fixed by a Reference Court for lands acquired for a new railway line in Beed district. The Reference Court had enhanced the rate from Rs.850 per R to Rs.2,161 per R for dry land …
DISMISSED
The appellants, original defendants in a partition suit (Regular Civil Suit No.113 of 2012), challenged the appellate court's order remanding the case for impleading necessary parties and including a left‑out ancestral property. The trial court had dismissed the suit for non‑joinder of necessary …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Shridhar Sonu Patil filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,317‑day delay in filing his first appeal against the Land Acquisition Officer, Upper Tapi Prakalp, Hatnoor Jalgaon and another. The applicant argued that the reasons for the delay were uncontroverted and offered to forgo any …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants, who are the original defendants, filed a civil revision against the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint in a 2025 partition suit filed by their siblings. The suit sought partition, separate possession, and rendition of accounts of family properties, alleging that a 1986 …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of several civil applications filed by various respondents against the Union of India (Central Railway) after the corresponding first appeals were already disposed. The court held that with the disposal of the first appeals, nothing remained pending …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Desur village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 800‑900 per R. The Reference Court, hearing grouped reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs 2,181 per R for Jirayat …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed four civil applications (Nos. 13626, 13628, 13630 and 13632 of 2024) in first appeals numbered 770 to 773 of 2026 against various respondents. Each application sought relief in respect of separate disputes. The High …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, ChandraKant Govindrao Indrale, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,126‑day delay in preferring an appeal against a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The court found no objection to the contents of the application, no evidence of any oblique motive, and noted that the …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Vishnu L. Kanse and Sumanbai D. Kanse, challenged a 2009 judgment and award concerning land acquired for the Kasura Bruhat Project, seeking a compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. Their land, classified as dry, had previously been awarded Rs.399.50 and Rs.600 …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants, Vishnu L. Kanse and Sumanbai D. Kanse, challenged a 2009 compensation award for land acquired for the Kasura Bruhat Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Jalna and the acquiring body, …
DISPOSED OFF
The case concerned a civil application (Civil Application No. 13405 of 2024) filed in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, together with a first appeal (First Appeal No. 298 of 2026). The appellants were the Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, and the respondents were …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer, Central Railway, Pune and others (Applicants) sought condonation of delay in filing over six hundred first appeals against judgments of the Reference Court. The Appeals were filed beyond the limitation period, and the Applicants submitted applications explaining the reasons …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of three civil applications filed by respondents against the Union of India (Central Railway) after the corresponding first appeals were already disposed. The Court held that once the first appeals are concluded, the pending civil applications do not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer sought condonation of a 165‑day delay in filing an appeal, arguing there were no malafides. The State authorities waived service of notice, and the court was asked to call for records and dispense with printing. An interim stay was sought, but since the amount had already been …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed three civil applications (Nos. 725, 727, 729 of 2025) which were linked to first appeals (Nos. 802, 803, 804 of 2026). The High Court observed that the first appeals had been disposed of, and consequently the pending …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs.2000‑2250 per R. Claimants filed reference petitions, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.6875 per R for Jirayat land and …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, as the acquiring body for a new railway line, appealed against the Reference Court’s award that enhanced compensation for Jirayat lands in Rajuri Navgan village from the rates fixed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer to Rs 6875 per R. The claimants had produced oral and …
DISPOSED OFF
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, disposed of three civil applications filed by the Union of India (Central Railway) against various respondents because the corresponding first appeals had already been decided. The court held that once the first appeals are disposed, the pending civil …
DISPOSED OFF
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, filed several civil applications in the Bombay High Court relating to three separate respondents. These applications were pending alongside first appeals (Nos. 795, 796, and 797 of 2026). The Court observed that once the …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 1,800‑2,250 per R, but the claimants obtained a higher rate of Rs 6,875 per R from the Reference Court. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicants filed a writ petition seeking condonation of a 2,496‑day delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4 on record. The respondents, through counsel, indicated they would appear on behalf of the legal heirs and argued that the …
Withdrawn
Balaji Rajebhau Chavan filed two bail applications (Nos. 2320/2025 and 2179/2025) against the State of Maharashtra. The first application was filed through a private counsel, while the second was filed by a lawyer appointed under legal aid. The applicant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of a first appeal that had been dismissed for failure to remove office objections. The respondents were Sambhu Wajya Gavit (deceased). The primary …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, dealt with a series of land‑acquisition disputes where the Executive Engineer (acquiring body) appealed against several landowners who claimed compensation. The appellants sought to introduce additional evidence, particularly concerning the presence of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant's land in Rohina village was acquired under a Section 4 notification on 27‑04‑2000 for the Nimna Dudhana Project, with an award dated 10‑04‑2003 fixing compensation at Rs 800 per R. The appellant sought the benefit of escalation on the ground of parity, arguing that similar lands had …
DISMISSED
The Central Railway (appellant) challenged a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line at Rs 4,762 per R, alleging the rate was excessive and the reference court exceeded its jurisdiction. The respondents, a group of landowners from …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, appealed a common judgment and award dated 09‑10‑2023 that fixed compensation for land acquired for a new railway line in Beed district at Rs. 4,762 per R. The appellants argued that the Reference Court exceeded its …
DISPOSED OFF
The co-operative society filed a suit under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to evict Usman Sayyed Dastgir, which the trial court dismissed. The society appealed, and the appellate court remanded the case back to the trial court to implead a "necessary party" (Dr. Popatlal Kothari) and rehear …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, Laxmi Ramchandra Dongre and Vitthal Ramchandra Dongre, challenged the award of Rs 2,000 per R by the Reference Court for dry land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project in Salgaon village. They sought a higher rate, invoking escalation benefits recognized in a prior common order …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, Laxmi Ramchandra Dongre and Vitthal Ramchandra Dongre, challenged the compensation award of Rs 2,000 per R made by the Reference Court for dry land acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project in Salgaon village. They relied on a common order dated 18 December 2025 in FA No. 241 of 2022, …
DISMISSED
The Union of India, through the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially awarded compensation of Rs.1180 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs.4000 per R for Jirayat lands, also granting statutory …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, Krishna Deoram Mali Mahajan and others, who are elderly and unable to travel to Sambhajinagar, sought permission to receive a monetary award. The court noted that the award had already been sanctioned subject to certain conditions. It directed that the amount be transferred to the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for the acquisition of house properties in Divi village, Dhule, arguing that the Reference Court had arbitrarily accepted only 75% of the private valuer's report. They relied on earlier decisions of the Court, including a common order dated …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Kashinath Sonji Patil, Bhagwat Janrao Patil and Ramesh Laxman Padol, filed applications seeking condonation of a 90‑day delay in filing applications for restoration of their first appeals and accompanying civil applications against the State of Maharashtra. The primary issue was …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for the acquisition of house properties in Divi village, Dhule, arguing that the Reference Court had arbitrarily accepted only 75% of the private valuer's report. They relied on earlier decisions of this Court, particularly a common order dated …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners Harishchandra Khuba Jadav (deceased) and others filed civil applications against the State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Osmanabad. The applications were listed before the Hon’ble Justice Shailesh P. Brahme. The sole question before the court was the period within which the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, owner of land acquired for the expansion of Vazirabad Chowk, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, seeking a higher rate for the constructed portion and compensation for an adjoining open space not mentioned in the acquisition notification. The High Court …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered a batch of first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings where the Executive Engineer (acquiring body) challenged awards made by the Reference Court. The claimants sought to introduce additional evidence concerning the presence of trees on the land and requested …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Govindrao Baburao Katare and others, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of Rs. 16,74,787 deposited by the acquiring body. They relied on a common order dated 18 December 2024 in First Appeal Stamp No. 14599 of 2023, which allowed similarly situated applicants to receive 75% …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants’ lands in Hatwan village were acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation rates for dry and Pot Kharab land but refused to grant escalation interest. The appellants argued that, based on a prior decision (First Appeal No. 1956 of 2021), they …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Kailash Baliram Mahajan filed a civil application seeking the withdrawal of Rs.13,16,242 deposited by the acquiring body. The court examined whether the applicant was entitled to the full amount or a portion thereof. It held that justice would be served by allowing the applicant to receive 75% of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, whose lands in Hatwan village were acquired for the Nimna Dudhana Project, challenged the Reference Court's award that enhanced compensation rates but denied escalation benefits. They argued that, based on prior judgments, they were entitled to a 10% per annum escalation for four …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, comprising several individuals and heirs, filed civil applications seeking permission to withdraw amounts that had been deposited by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of Central Railway, as part of an acquiring body. The respondents opposed the withdrawal, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners, heirs of deceased claimants, sought condonation of delay in setting aside an abatement order and to be allowed to bring the legal heirs of the deceased onto the record. The respondents, the Executive Engineer of Central Railway, opposed the relief. The Court examined the …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered a series of first appeals filed by the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Jalna (the acquiring body) against several landowners concerning land acquisition proceedings. The appellants sought to introduce additional evidence, particularly regarding the presence …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer (Minor Irrigation Division, Jalna) appealed against awards of the Reference Court in several land‑acquisition matters where claimants sought compensation. The claimants filed applications for additional evidence, alleging the presence of trees on the land, and the acquiring …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, a group of landowners, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a delay of 6,589 days in preferring their appeals against orders of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined the applications and found that the factual averments were not contested and there was no …
Allowed
The petitioners, Kashinath Sadashiv Kamble and others, filed interim applications seeking to bring the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner and the deceased respondent No.1B onto the court record. The court examined whether the cause of action survived against these legal heirs and whether the …
Disposed Off
The petitioner filed a Hindu Marriage Petition seeking dissolution of his marriage and applied for a direction that the respondent undergo a medical examination. The Family Court ordered the respondent to submit to the examination and a medical report was later filed. The petitioner challenged the …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their application for appointment of a commissioner to measure certain city survey plots in a civil suit for mandatory and perpetual injunction. They argued that Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) could be invoked …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust, had its bank accounts attached by a notice dated 18 March 2026. The Trust undertook to pay the interest due, seeking defreezing of the attached accounts. The respondent, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, raised no serious objection to removing the …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, M/s Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust, filed two writ petitions challenging orders made under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The petitioner had already filed appeals (EPFA No.8 of 2026 and EPFA No.2 of 2026) before the appropriate …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Sanjeevan Vidyalaya Trust, had its bank accounts attached by a notice dated 18 March 2026. The Trust undertook to pay the interest due, seeking defreezing of the attached accounts. The respondent, the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, raised no serious objection to removing the …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Chandrashekhar Vishnu Walkar, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Devgad, alleging that the court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a summary suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act because of an improper valuation of the subject matter. The …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Avinash Pramodkumar Magdum, filed an interim application (No. 742 of 2026) seeking the deletion of respondents Nos. 2, 4 and 5 from the writ petition record. The High Court, after granting leave at the risk of the applicant, ordered that the said respondents be deleted. The court …
Rejected
Madhukar Mahadev Patil, a former bank employee, sought an extension of time to file a civil suit after his case in the Cooperative Court was dismissed and he was directed to approach the Civil Court within six weeks to avail the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. He claimed his old age and …
Disposed Off
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Yashwant Education Society, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. During the hearing, the Court expressed reluctance to entertain the petition. The petitioner’s counsel then applied for permission to withdraw the petition, requesting …
Dismissed
The petitioner, Rajesh Arjun Gawali, challenged a common order dated 06.02.2025 that was based on a settlement document (Exhibit 73) which he alleged was fraudulently obtained by suppressing paragraph 9. He claimed the order imposed an arbitrary liability and threatened action against the lawyer who …
Disposed Off
The petitioners filed several writ petitions challenging interim orders. The lower appellate court had already decided the appeals and remanded the matters to the trial court for fresh consideration on merits. The High Court observed that, in view of the appellate court's final decision, the interim …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, a cooperative dairy society and others, challenged a communication dated 29‑06‑2026 issued by the Divisional Deputy Registrar under Section 79(1) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, which directed the Federation (respondent No. 6) to consider terminating the membership of …
Rejected
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their nominations by the Election Decision Officer on the ground that they could not satisfy bye‑law 40(a) of the cooperative bank, which required maintaining a minimum deposit of Rs 50,000 for a continuous year, because the Reserve Bank of India had …
Rejected
The petitioners challenged the rejection of their nominations by the Election Decision Officer on the ground that they could not satisfy bye‑law 40(a) of the cooperative bank, which required maintaining a minimum deposit of Rs 50,000 for a continuous year, because the Reserve Bank of India had …
Allowed
In First Appeal (ST) No. 7596 of 2025, the applicants Shamrao Keshav Kumbhar and an associate filed Interim Application No. 9897 of 2025 against respondents Suresh Jamatraj Oswal and others. The matter was heard by Justice Shivkumar Dige of the Bombay High Court on 18 July 2025. The court considered …
Allowed
The Kolhapur Central District Co-operative Bank filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of Shri Lok Sevak V.K.S. (Vikas) Seva Sanstha Maryadit and others. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, and the petitioner's counsel submitted the settlement terms as Exhibit‑X. On …
Dismissed
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No parties appeared before the court on the scheduled date. The court noted its earlier order to stand over the matter to 13/09/2024. Since the petitioners again failed to appear, the court dismissed the writ petition for …
Dismissed
The petitioner, R.D. Desai & Co., filed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of RCS No.879 of 2015 by the trial court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the previous or current hearing dates. The respondent, Kolhapur Municipal Corporation, argued that the petitioner had not diligently …
Disposed Off
The petitioner, Prakash Shankarrao Wavare, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 28/2015 pending before the School Tribunal, Kolhapur. The petition was filed on 11 June 2025, and the School Tribunal rendered its final decision on 7 August 2025. The …
Allowed
The Regional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 133‑day delay in filing a petition to restore a first appeal to its original position. The court examined whether such a delay could be justified under the principles of …
Disposed Off
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a District Judge's order directing it to deposit 50% of an enhanced compensation amount awarded by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023. The compensation related to land acquired under awards dated 5 and 14 …
Disposed Off
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a district judge's order that required it to deposit 50% of the enhanced compensation awarded to landowners after an arbitration award. The land had been acquired under awards dated August 2019, and the …
Disposed Off
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) acquired land and paid compensation to claimants, which was later enhanced by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023. The District Judge, Malshiras, directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the enhanced amount, prompting NHAI to file multiple writ petitions under …
Disposed Off
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a district judge's order directing it to deposit 50% of the enhanced compensation awarded by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023 to landowners whose lands were acquired for a highway project. The landowners had …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Vasant More, sought restoration of possession of a suit property after a decree of possession in favour of the respondent Ishwara More was being executed. They filed an application (Exhibit 99) alleging improper measurement and execution, invoking Section 47 of …
Dismissed
The petitioner, Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, sought to be impleaded in an injunction suit (RCS No.798 of 2016) filed by respondent No.1 concerning land that had been acquired by the government and later sold to the plaintiff. He alleged that respondents 5 and 6 had fraudulently obtained the land despite …
Disposed Off
The petitioners, permanent teachers in an aided school, challenged a School Tribunal order that denied them back wages for the period 01‑06‑2015 to 31‑08‑2017 and only gave a notional promotion to headmaster on the date of superannuation. Both parties later agreed that the petitioner would forego …