Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

REYAN NOMAN @ JUMAN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court held that a clerical error in the bail order may be corrected upon request and without opposition.

Summary

In a criminal bail application, the applicant's counsel sought correction of a clerical error in the order dated 22 July 2026, where the police station was incorrectly named as Deola instead of Chichwad. The respondent's counsel did not oppose the correction. The court examined the request and, finding no objection, ordered that the error be rectified by substituting the correct police station name. The corrected order was to be uploaded on the official website. The praecipe for speaking to the minutes was consequently disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a clerical error in a bail order can be corrected without opposition
  • Whether the corrected order must be re‑uploaded on the court website

Subjects

  • criminal bail
  • clerical error
  • order correction
  • procedural remedy
  • court administration

Judgment

                                                          P-1 in BA-2874-2026.doc



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

              CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2874 OF 2026


Reyan Noman @ Juman Khan                                 … Applicant
          Versus
State of Maharashtra                                    … Respondent
__________________________________________________________

Mr. Amey Prakash Sheth, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. R. V. Newton, APP for the State/Respondent.
_______________________________________________________________
                            CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                 DATE    :   24th JULY, 2026

P.C. :

1.             By the present Praecipe dated 24th July, 2026,

Mr. Amey Prakash Sheth, learned Advocate for the Applicant

requests for speaking to the minutes in the order dated 22 nd July,

2026 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 2874 of 2026, and

same is marked as “X” for identification

2.             Mr. Amey Prakash Sheth, learned Advocate for the

Applicant states that in paragraph No. 10 (a) at line No. 3, the

police station is mentioned as “Deola Police Station” instead of

“Chichwad Police Station”.

3.             This request for correction is not opposed by Ms. R. V.


Bharati              1
                                                     P-1 in BA-2874-2026.doc



Newton, learned APP for the State.

4.          In view of the same corrections be carried out in

paragraph No. 10 (a) of the order dated 22nd July, 2026 by

substituting “Deola Police Station” by “Chichwad Police Station”.

5.          Upon corrections in the order dated 22 nd July, 2026

passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 2874 of 2026, corrected

order be uploaded on the official website.


6.          Praecipe for speaking to the minutes of the order dated

22nd July, 2026 is disposed of.


7.          Corrected order be uploaded.



                                      (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Bharati            2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.