Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANJAY KALAPPA MHETREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's non‑appearance.

Summary

The applicant, Sanjay Kalappa Mhetre, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant failed to appear on the scheduled dates of 11 November 2025 and 30 January 2026, and again did not appear when the matter was called out. The court observed that the applicant appeared uninterested in pursuing the bail relief. Consequently, the court held that the bail application could not proceed in the absence of the applicant. The application was therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application can be entertained when the applicant fails to appear before the court?

Subjects

  • bail
  • non‑appearance
  • want of prosecution
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

Shivgan                                          25-BA-3041-2025.doc




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                BAIL APPLICATION NO.3041 OF 2025


Sanjay Kalappa Mhetre                                   …Applicant
      Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr.                             …Respondents


None for the Applicant.
Ms. Gauri S. Rao, APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Kharat, PSI attached to Talegaon MIDC Police Station,
     Pimpri Chinchwad, present.


                       CORAM            DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
                       DATED:           27th FEBRUARY 2026
PC:-


1.        On 11th November, 2025, none appeared for the

Applicant. On 30th January 2026 also, none appeared for the

Applicant.



2.        Even today, when the matter is called out, none appears

for the Applicant.




                                   Page 1 of 2
                              th
                            27 February 2026
Shivgan                                                25-BA-3041-2025.doc



3.          It appears that the Applicant is not interested in

pursuing the present Bail Application.



4.          Hence, the Bail Application stands dismissed for want of

prosecution.


                                                   (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)


          Digitally
          signed by
          SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH    SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN   Date:
          2026.03.06
          12:57:01
          +0530




                                     Page 2 of 2
                                th
                              27 February 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.