Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ROHIT KISHOR NIKALJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application and granted liberty to file a fresh bail application if circumstances change.

Summary

The applicant, Rohit Kishor Nikalje, filed a bail application in connection with FIR No. 76/2018 alleging offences under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, Section 4(25) of the Arms Act and Section 37(1) read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Vivek Arote, sought leave to withdraw the bail application, stating a desire to file a fresh application if circumstances changed. The State's counsel, Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted leave to withdraw the bail application and allowed the applicant liberty to file a fresh bail application later, to be considered on its own merits. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application may be withdrawn at the applicant's request and whether the applicant may be granted liberty to file a fresh bail application upon change of circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • change in circumstances
  • IPC
  • Arms Act
  • Bombay Police Act

Judgment

                                                                                                    8-BA-3107-2026.doc



GAYATRI
             Digitally signed
         by GAYATRI
         RAJENDRA
                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAJENDRA SHIMPI
SHIMPI   Date: 2026.08.06
             18:39:36 +0530
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3107 OF 2026

                                Rohit Kishor Nikalje                                      … Applicant
                                      Versus
                                The State of Maharashtra                                  … Respondent
                                                                          ---

                                Mr. Vivek Arote, Advocate for Applicant.
                                Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for the Respondent – State.
                                Mr. Ganesh Jagdale – API, Chandannagar Road Police Station,
                                Pune, present in Court.
                                                            ---

                                                                     CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                                                      DATE      : 6th AUGUST, 2026

                                P.C. :

                                1.               Heard Mr. Vivek Arote, learned Advocate for the

                                Applicant and Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, learned APP for the State.


                                2.               By the present Application, the Applicant has sought

                                for the following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a) :

                                                  “a) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly enlarge the
                                                  Applicant on bail in connection with FIR bearing C.R.
                                                  No. 76/2018 dated 12/03/2018 registered with
                                                  Chandannagar Road Police Station, Dist Pune for
                                                  allegedly having committed the offence punishable
                                                  under section 307 r/w s 34 of the IPC and u/s. 4(25)
                                                  of the Arms Act and u/s.37(1) r/w.s 135 of the
                                                  Bombay Police Act.”



                                Gayatri shimpi                        1
                                                           8-BA-3107-2026.doc



3.               Mr. Vivek Arote, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on

instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the

present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application

before the Trial Court in the event of change in circumstances. This

request is not opposed by Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, learned APP for the

State.



4.               In view of the statement made by Mr. Vivek Arote,

learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw

this Bail Application with liberty as prayed. If a fresh Bail

Application is filed on the ground of change in circumstances, the

same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.



5.               Criminal Bail Application No. 3107 of 2026 is disposed

of as withdrawn.



                                               (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




Gayatri shimpi                     2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.