Bombay High Court
SAMBHAJI BALAJI TIDKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The bail application is allowed and the applicant is released on bail subject to conditions.
Summary
The High Court considered the bail application of Sambhaji Balaji Tidke, who was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged child marriage, sexual offences, and other crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, and the Child Marriage Restraint Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim, a minor, was married off and subsequently committed suicide, implicating the applicant as the husband. The defence argued lack of concrete evidence of the victim’s minority, absence of physical injuries, and that the applicant had been in custody without charges being framed. The court noted that the post‑mortem report showed no injuries, no specific allegations of cruelty, and that the co‑accused had already been granted bail. Considering the completed investigation, the filed charge‑sheet, and the unlikelihood of a speedy trial, the court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant and granted bail with conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant, Sambhaji Balaji Tidke, is entitled to bail despite the seriousness of the offences alleged under the BNSS, POCSO Act and Child Marriage Restraint Act.
- Whether the evidence on record, including the victim’s age and alleged cruelty, justifies continued detention of the accused.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 107, 212, 64(1), 65(1)
- Child Marriage Restraint Act — s. 10, 11, 9
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 12, 17, 21, 4, 6, 8
Subjects
- bail
- child marriage
- POCSO
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- under‑trial detention
- minor
- suicide
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:4636
1 52-BA-61-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2026
SAMBHAJI BALAJI TIDKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Prashant M. Nagargoje
APP for Respondent : Mr. B. B. Bhise
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 02-02-2026
PER COURT:-
1. The applicant seeks bail in connection with Crime No.386 of
2024 dated 13.11.2024 registered with Loha Police Station, District
Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 65(1),
107, 212 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6,
8, 12, 17 and 21 of the Protection of Children From Sexual
Offences Act, 2012 with Sections 9, 10, 11 of the Child Marriage
Restraint Act. In the said crime, the applicant was arrested on
11.01.2025. After completion of the investigation, the chargesheet
is filed.
2. The prosecution case is that on 07.11.2024, an Accidental
Death case was registered under Section 194 of the BNSS, 2023.
Although the victim’s father initially claimed she was happily
married, later alleged that she committed suicide on 05.11.2024
due to frustration caused by her husband’s frequent absences as a
truck driver. During the inquiry, the Investigating Officer secured a
2 52-BA-61-26.odt
School Leaving Certificate on 11.11.2024, which recorded the
victim's Date of Birth as 06.05.2010. Further evidence from a
marriage invitation card confirmed the wedding took place on
12.05.2023, revealing the victim was barely 13 years old at the
time. The investigation alleges that the husband, parents, and in-
laws knowingly performed the marriage of a minor and provided
false information to the police regarding her age. Consequently,
the first information report is lodged.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
applicant has been in custody since 11.01.2025 without charges
being framed, and with no conclusive evidence, such as primary
school records, to prove the deceased's minority or his
involvement in document fabrication. There are no specific
allegations of instigation, cruelty, or overt acts under Section 107
of the BNS, and the postmortem report confirms an absence of
physical injuries. Furthermore, the proximity between the applicant
and the incident is severed as the suicide occurred at the
deceased's parental home, and the unexplained delay in filing the
FIR suggests that the same is afterthought. It is submitted that
the investigation is complete and the chargesheet is filed. The
alleged compromise document is unsigned and inadmissible. The
applicant is the sole breadwinner of his family submits that
continued incarceration of the applicant serves no purpose.
Hence, prayed to release the applicant on bail.
3 52-BA-61-26.odt
4. The learned A.P.P. has opposed the application, submitting
that the applicant, despite being fully aware of the victim’s
minority, entered into an illegal marriage and subjected her to
non-consensual physical relations against her will. This continuous
exploitation directly drove the minor to commit suicide, satisfying
the ingredients of a grave and heinous offence. The offence is
serious in nature. The role of the applicant is direct the
circumstances leading to the victim's death, his release would
undermine the gravity of the act; therefore, prayed to reject the
application.
5. Having heard the respective counsel from both the sides and
upon perusal of the material on record, including the charge sheet
indicates that the applicant was the husband of the deceased
victim and is behind bar since 11.01.2025.
6. Further, prima facie there is no specific material on record
indicating harassment, cruelty or illtreatment to the deceased
victim at the hands of the applicant. The postmortem report does
not confirm any injury on the body of the deceased victim. As
such, further incarceration of the applicant would be unjustified.
Further, the co-accused has been granted bail by the Court.
7. The investigation is complete for all intent and purpose,
resultantly, the chargesheet is filed. Having regard to the number
of the accused and the witnesses which the prosecution proposes
to examine, it is very unlikely that the trial can be commenced and
4 52-BA-61-26.odt
concluded within a reasonable period. In any case the report is
lodged after an unexplained delay. As such, further detention of
the applicant as an under-trial prisoner, in the circumstances of
the case does not seem to be either warranted or justifiable. I am,
therefore, persuaded to exercise the discretion in favour of the
applicant.
8. Hence, the order:-
ORDER
(i) The bail application is allowed.
(ii) Applicant, Sambhaji Balaji Tidke, be released on bail, upon
furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs.ifty
Thousand) with one or two local solvent sureties, in the like
amount, in connection with Crime No.386 of 2024 dated
13.11.2024 registered with Loha Police Station, District
Nanded, for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1),
65(1), 107, 212 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and
Sections 4, 6, 8, 12, 17 and 21 of the Protection of Children
From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Sections 9, 10, 11 of the
Child Marriage Restraint Act, on the following conditions:-
(a) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution
witnesses and tamper with the prosecution evidence,
in any manner.
(b) The applicant shall attend the trial on each and every
date unless exempted by the trial Court and shall not
leave the area of jurisdiction of the concerned Police
Station till conclusion of the trial.
(c) The applicant shall submit Aadhar and Pan Cards to the
Investigating Officer and detailed address and phone
numbers and two of the near relatives.
5 52-BA-61-26.odt
(d) In case of breach of any of the conditions by the
applicant, it is open for the Prosecution to move this
Court seeking cancellation of bail.
(iii) Needless to state that the observations rendered herein are
to the extent of this application and the trial Court shall not
be influenced by the same.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.]
rrd
Checking your session…