Bombay High Court
LOGANATHAN MUTHUKUMARANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
- Bench
- NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE
Holding
The Court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application, disposing of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Loganathan Muthukumaran, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Mr. Karthik Rajasekhar (with Arif Sayed), sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after one year if the trial does not progress substantially. The Court, after hearing arguments, was not inclined to grant bail at that stage but allowed the withdrawal of the present application with the specified liberty. No substantive discussion on the merits of bail was undertaken. Consequently, the bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application pending before the Court can be withdrawn at the request of the applicant's counsel.
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
Prasad Rajput
(P.A.) 10_BA_65_2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2026
Loganathan Muthukumaran …Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Karthik Rajasekhar a/w Arif Sayed, for the Applicant.
Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent - State.
PSI – Prashant Tayde, Pantnagar Police Station, Mumbai,
present.
CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
DATED: 17TH JANUARY 2026
PC:-
1. After arguing the matter for some time, when I was not
inclined to grant relief, Mr. Rajashekhar, learned counsel for
the Applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present Bail
Application with liberty to file a fresh bail application after
one year if the trial does not progress substantially. Permission
to withdraw is granted with the aforesaid liberty.
2. Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)
Page 1 of 1
th
17 January 2026
Checking your session…