Bombay High Court
NILESH VITTHAL WAHULE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The Court allowed bail to the applicants subject to specified conditions.
Summary
The applicants, Nilesh Vitthal Wahule and Swatej Vitthal Wahule, were arrested for assaulting an informant and his father with an axe and a spade, causing serious injuries, under Sections 109, 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The incident arose from a quarrel over wood disposal and there are cross‑cases registered against both parties. The investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed, with the applicants detained since 22 February 2026. The applicants sought regular bail, arguing that further detention was unwarranted given the completed investigation and the existence of cross‑cases. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the use of deadly weapons and serious injuries. The Court, after considering the submissions and the completed investigation, held that continued detention was unnecessary and granted bail subject to monetary and reporting conditions, warning that breach would lead to cancellation.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicants are entitled to bail despite being charged with offences under Sections 109, 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether the existence of cross‑cases and the completion of investigation affect the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 118(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- bail
- assault
- deadly weapons
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- cross cases
- investigation completed
- conditions of bail
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:23803
Dilwale 1 949-BA-904-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
949 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 904 OF 2026
Nilesh Vitthal Wahule And Another
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J
APP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. D. Ghayal
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 17.06.2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for the
respondent – State.
2. The applicants seek release on bail in connection with Crime No.
0062 of 2026 registered with Pachod Police Station, District Chhatrapati
Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 118(2),
115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution’s case is that the applicant no.1 assaulted the
informant on head and neck by means of an axe whereas the applicant
no.1 assaulted the father of informant by means of spade thereby causing
him fracture. The said incident occurred out of small quarrel which took
place between informant and present applicants over disposing woods in
the vicinity of house of applicants.
4. Mr. Salunke, the learned counsel for the applicants submits that
Dilwale 2 949-BA-904-26.odt
there are cross cases registered against both groups arising out of the
same incident. The applicants and the informant are closely related. The
investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed. The
applicants are behind bars since 22.02.2026. It is further submitted that,
in view of the cross cases and completion of investigation, further
detention of the applicants is not warranted.
5. Per contra, the learned APP opposes the application. It is submitted
that the applicants had assaulted the informant with deadly weapons and
caused serious injuries. According to the prosecution, there is sufficient
material against the applicants and, therefore, they do not deserve to be
enlarged on bail.
6. Considering the rival submissions and the papers of investigation, it
appears that the investigation is completed and charge-sheet has already
been filed. The applicants are behind bars since 22.02.2026. The record
indicates that the incident occurred on account of a sudden quarrel and
there are cross cases registered against both groups. In view of the
aforesaid circumstances, further detention of the applicants is not
warranted. Hence, I am inclined to allow the application by imposing
suitable conditions.
7. Hence, the following order :-
ORDER
i. The Bail Application is allowed.
ii. The applicants, namely, Nilesh Vitthal Wahule and Swatej Vitthal
Dilwale 3 949-BA-904-26.odt
Wahule, be released on regular bail in connection with Crime No.
0062 of 2026 registered with Pachod Police Station, District
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under
Sections 109, 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, on furnishing P.R. Bond of
Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with one solvent
surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
iii. The release of the applicant shall be subject to the following
conditions :-
A) The applicants shall attend the concerned Police Station and
report to the Investigating Officer as and when called for the
purpose of further investigation, if any.
B) The applicants shall attend each and every date before the
Trial Court unless exempted by the Trial Court.
C) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any prosecution witness and
shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
8. Needless to state that breach of any of the above conditions shall
entitle the prosecution to seek cancellation of bail.
9. The observations made herein are prima facie in nature and the
Trial Court shall not be influenced while deciding the case on its own
merits.
10. Bail before the Trial Court.
11. The Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Checking your session…