Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DINESH BHAUSAHEB GALHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Dinesh Bhausaheb Galhate, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, claiming custody since 13 January 2022. The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed reluctance to grant bail and the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, which the Court permitted. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The applicant then requested the trial court to expedite the pending trial. The High Court directed the trial court to make every effort to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail application should be granted to the applicant.
  • Whether the applicant may withdraw the bail application after the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief.
  • Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trial pending against the applicant.

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • trial expeditious
  • custodial detention
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23710
                                                  1 of 1                     952-BA.983.2026



                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               952 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 983 OF 2026

                                     DINESH BHAUSAHEB GALHATE
                                                VERSUS
                                     THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                    ...
                Mr. Sunil B. Surse, Advocate for Applicant.
                Mr. D. J. Patil, APP for Respondent-State.
                                                    ...
                                           CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                          DATE     :       17th JUNE, 2026

                P.C.:-

                1.        Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.

                2.        After hearing the matter for some time, when this Court

                expressed its disinclination to grant the relief sought, the learned

                Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions, sought permission to

                withdraw the application. Permission is granted.

                3.        Accordingly, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

                4.        At this stage, Mr. Surse, learned Advocate for the Applicant

                submits that the Applicant has been in custody since 13.01.2022 and,

                therefore, prays for a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial.

                5.        Considering the aforesaid submission, the Trial Court is

                directed to make an endeavour to expedite the trial and conclude the

                same as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.


                                                    (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)

      Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.