Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORSversusSHAIKH AJMAT SHAIKH AJIJ

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court condoned the 1,037‑day delay in filing the appeal.

Summary

The State of Maharashtra, represented by Collector Jalna, filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,037‑day delay in filing its appeal against Shaikh Ajmat. The court examined the application and the reasons provided, which were administrative in nature. Finding the explanation satisfactory, the bench allowed the application. The delay of 1,037 days was formally condoned, and the first appeal was ordered to be registered, subject to removal of any office objections. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed in this order.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 1,037 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • civil appeal
  • high court
  • administrative delay
  • Civil Procedure Code

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34227
                                                                                960-ca-10727-2025.odt
                                                        (1)


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                  CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10726 OF 2025
                                           IN FAST/22998/2025

                     The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Jalna And Ors
                                              VERSUS
                                      Shaikh Ajmat Shaikh Ajij
                                                  ...
                                AGP for Applicant/State : Mr. S.P. Joshi
                 Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jaysing I. Taur & Mr. Vitthal Dnyanoba
                                                Bhise
                                                    ...
                                            CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                DATED : AUGUST 06, 2026

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.             Heard.

                 2.             The applicants seek to condone delay of 1037 days

                 caused in filing appeal.

                 3.             Perused   application         and   reasons   stated     therein.

                 Apparently, delay is caused on account of administrative reasons

                 which are duly explained. Hence, application is allowed. Delay of

                 1037 days caused in filing appeal stands condoned. First Appeal be

                 registered subject to removal of office objections, if any.




                                                              (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)




                 Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.