Bombay High Court
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusPRAMOD SADASHIV PATIL
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
Since the enquiry report had already been filed, the applications seeking a two‑week extension were held to be infructuous and were dismissed.
Summary
The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking a two‑week extension to file an enquiry report on how compensation was paid to claimants before filing appeals. The applicant's Additional Government Pleader, Mr. D.J. Patil, submitted that the enquiry report had already been filed, rendering the applications unnecessary. The court examined whether any justification existed to grant the requested extension. Relying on the submission that the report was already on record, the court found no basis to allow further time. Consequently, the applications were declared infructuous and disposed of. No substantive merits of the compensation dispute were addressed, as the procedural request was denied.
Issues considered
- Whether the court should grant a two‑week extension for filing the enquiry report on compensation.
Subjects
- extension of time
- civil application
- enquiry report
- compensation
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
ca349.04
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1123 OF 2002
State of Maharashtra And Anr
VERSUS
Pramod Sadashiv Patil
...
A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. D.J. Patil
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.G.Talhar
…..
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10735 OF 2005
IN FA/1123/2002
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2004
IN FA/1123/2002
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2004
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 2004
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10736 OF 2005
IN FA/1123/2002
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 311 OF 2004
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 2004
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 310 OF 2004
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 318 OF 2004
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2004
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The civil application Nos. 349 of 2004, 10735 of 2005 and
ca349.04
-2-
10736 of 2005 are filed seeking grant of time of two weeks for
submitting the enquiry report to this Court as to how the amount of
compensation was paid to the claimants, even before filing of the
appeals. Learned A.G.P. submitted that the enquiry report has
already been filed and, therefore, the applications have become
infructuous and deserve to be disposed of.
2. In view of the submission of learned A.G.P., the
applications are disposed of as infructuous.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
rlj/
Checking your session…