DISMISSED
The appellant’s agricultural land of 4 ha 65 are in Nilanga was acquired in 1987 for a 132 kV sub‑station and the Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 1,77,863, which the Land Reference Court later enhanced to Rs 3,91,819. The appellant sought a further increase, relying on two sale …
DISMISSED
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E.B.) filed four separate appeals before the Bombay High Court challenging the compensation awards granted by the Jalgaon Land Reference Court in respect of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants contended that the compensation …
DISMISSED
The State acquired 1 ha 20 R of agricultural land in Beed for a 33 kV sub‑station. The claimants sought enhanced compensation, arguing the land had non‑agricultural (N.A.) potentiality, while the acquiring authority argued the award of Rs 5,000 per Are was excessive and sought reduction. The High …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Manager of United India Insurance Company Ltd. filed an application seeking condonation of a 45‑day delay in filing a first appeal against a judgment and award. The applicant also requested a stay of execution of the impugned judgment, stating that the entire amount had been deposited …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Beed district for a percolation tank, awarding Rs.110‑100 per Are, but the Land Reference Court increased compensation to Rs.556 per Are. The claimants cross‑objected, arguing that the reference court improperly ignored the sale exemplar from an adjacent …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,174‑day delay in filing a cross‑objection. The State opposed, arguing no sufficient reason for condonation. The applicant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Rameshwar Sharma (2022) …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in Amalner for three landowners whose properties were acquired for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The claimants were awarded Rs.1,311 per are for non‑irrigated land and …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in three land acquisition cases concerning land taken for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The State argued that the reference court had not considered the entire …
DISMISSED
The State Government appealed ten first appeals against judgments and awards rendered by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court in land acquisition cases for a minor irrigation tank project at Kalamsara. The State contended that the Reference Court had excessively enhanced …
DISMISSED
The State Government appealed the awards of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer in several land acquisition references for agricultural land needed for a minor irrigation tank project. The State argued that the Reference Court had unreasonably enhanced compensation to …
DISMISSED
The State acquired agricultural lands at Kalamsara for a Minor Irrigation Tank project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at rates ranging from Rs.47,000 to Rs.60,000 per hectare. On references, the Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per hectare and also …
DISMISSED
The State Government appealed ten separate land acquisition awards where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank project. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per hectare and awarded specific …
DISMISSED
The State Government appealed against the judgments and awards of the Special Land Acquisition Officer in several land acquisition references concerning agricultural land in Kalamsara, Jalgaon. The State contended that the Reference Court had excessively enhanced compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants filed appeals against orders dated 2017 and 2016 in civil suits pending before the trial court. Both parties asserted that the disputes had been settled by compromise. The petitioners' counsel submitted the compromise deed for the court's record, and the respondents' counsel concurred …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants and respondents in two related civil matters filed appeals against orders dated 2017 and 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Both parties asserted that the disputes had been settled by compromise and sought to have the compromise recorded before the trial court where the …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Krishna Khore Mahamandal filed a motion to correct typographical errors in the minutes of an order dated 08.04.2026. The appellant’s counsel pointed out that the phrase “learned AGP” was mistakenly typed instead of “learned Advocate for the appellant/acquiring body”. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer, Krishna Khore Mahamandal filed a motion to correct typographical errors in the minutes of an order dated 08.04.2026. The appellant’s counsel pointed out that the phrase “learned AGP” was mistakenly typed instead of “learned Advocate for the appellant/acquiring body”. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for 3.96 hectares of land acquired for the Wadi‑Shewadi Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 34,787 per hectare under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the Reference Court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Ishwar Gorakh Patil and another, filed a civil application seeking service of notice on respondents Noormohammad Abdul Khan and others by newspaper publication, alleging that regular service could not be effected. The learned counsel for the applicants highlighted the inability to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Controller Divisional Office MSRTC Latur applied to the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, for a stay of execution of a judgment and award, undertaking to deposit the full amount with interest within twelve weeks. The court conditioned the stay on the applicant’s compliance with the deposit …
APPLICATION ALLOWED
Shaheen Altaf Shaikh filed a criminal application seeking correction of the first paragraph and the second part of the operative order dated 24 June 2025 in Criminal Application No. 160 of 2025. The applicant contended that the order should have included Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A of the Indian …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal against a 2002 land acquisition award. The court found the delay neither deliberate nor intentional and allowed the application, condoning the delay. The State, through its A.G.P., relied on a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, Umesh Potdar and Jaymillakarjun Guru, filed a motion before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a clerical mistake in the minutes of an earlier order dated 02.02.2026. The mistake pertained to the description of land acquisition reference numbers and survey details of the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants Umesh Potdar and Jaymillakarjun Guru sought correction of a clerical mistake in the order dated 02.02.2026 relating to land acquisition references. The original order mistakenly mentioned only "Land Acquisition Reference No.282 of 2004" and omitted reference No.172 and certain survey …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, a group of Scheduled Tribe agriculturists and fishermen from villages in Nandurbar, challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired in 1980 for the Sardar Sarowar project. The original award of Rs.5,160 per hectare was enhanced by the Land Reference Court to Rs.6,450 per …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a 2005 Land Reference Court award concerning compensation for land acquired under a project. They argued that, based on earlier Supreme Court decisions, the principle of parity required uniform compensation rates for irrigated, non‑irrigated, and potkharab lands. The State …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 137‑day delay in filing their first appeal. They alleged that a financial crisis prevented them from arranging the necessary funds to prefer the appeal within the prescribed period. The court examined whether the delay was deliberate …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained three civil applications filed by United India Insurance Company Ltd. The first sought condonation of a 95‑day delay in filing a first appeal, the second sought permission to withdraw 60% of the amount deposited under a judgment and award with …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought condonation of a 1526‑day delay in filing their appeal, citing financial hardship and the COVID‑19 pandemic. The respondents opposed the condonation. The court noted that the applicants belong to a lower socioeconomic stratum and that the delay was not deliberate. Relying on …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner Humera Begum Mohammed Kashif filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the amount she had deposited in the Court under an impugned judgment and award. The respondent Union of India opposed the request. The Court, after hearing both sides, allowed the application …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Kalpana W/o. Dagadu Pansare and others filed Civil Application No. 3043 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 902‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The applicants argued that their weak financial position prevented timely filing. The Court examined the application and the advocate’s submissions. …
DISPOSED OFF
The case concerns land acquisition proceedings where the appellant, Vitthal Damodar Patil, challenged a judgment and award issued by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Several civil applications were filed seeking time to deposit 50% of the award, a stay of execution, and condonation of delay in …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. filed a first appeal against a judgment and award but missed the prescribed time limit by eight days. The company applied for condonation of this delay, arguing it was neither deliberate nor intentional. The court examined the application and, finding the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The Divisional Controller of MSRTC appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that granted the claimant, Ajinath Manohar Mohite, compensation on the basis of a 100% permanent and functional disability arising from a head injury. The High Court observed that the claimant neither examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Special Land Acquisition Officer filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 300‑day delay in filing a first appeal against a 2009 compensation award by the District Jalgaon Land Reference Court. The State Government had issued a policy resolution (03‑Nov‑2016) and a corrigendum …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants sought correction of clerical mistakes in a judgment dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (typed as “39” instead of “33”) and the enhanced amount (typed as Rs. 80 instead of Rs. 81). The learned counsel for the appellants highlighted these errors and requested the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition. The High Court had previously awarded compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land in its judgment dated 08.01.2026. A motion was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and related officials concerning land acquisition compensation. The High Court, in its judgment dated 08.01.2026, inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. A motion was filed to correct this omission. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, challenged the acquisition of his land by the State of Maharashtra in a series of first appeals. The High Court had earlier delivered a judgment on 8 January 2026 awarding compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition compensation. The High Court had previously awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land, but the award was inadvertently omitted in the operative part of the judgment. The appellant …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petition filed by Shaikh Nazim Shaikh Nasir, a minor represented by his natural father and guardian, sought condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing the first appeal against a decree. The application was supported by an affidavit explaining that the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted the award of enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant sought correction of this omission. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking re‑issuance of notices to respondents after earlier notices were returned unserved. The court noted that the notices to respondents 1‑3 (in application 3514) and 1‑4 (in application 3512) had not been served and ordered the Principal …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 42‑day delay in filing its first appeal, alleging administrative exigency. The court examined the application and found the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional, granting condonation in the interest of justice. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Murlidhar D. Deshmukh, filed three civil applications seeking condonation of substantial delays—2466, 275, 1260 and 202 days—in filing applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased claimants on record and to set aside an abatement. The State opposed the condonation, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants challenged the award of compensation for their land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Lower Terna Project. The original award of Rs 4,400 per acre was later enhanced to Rs 8,000 per acre, but the appellants argued that, based on a prior decision (First Appeal No. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants (Balaji, Gyanoba, Osmankhan and Ganpat) challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural lands acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They contended that the Land Reference Court had not properly considered sale exemplars, particularly Exhibit‑33, and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court heard counsel for the applicant and examined the reasons provided for the delay. Finding the explanations satisfactory and in the interest of justice, the court decided to condone the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 102‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found it was neither deliberate nor intentional. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application and condoned the delay. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant's agricultural land, along with a well, was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a bridge project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded a modest compensation, which the appellant challenged, citing sale exemplars showing higher market …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard applications filed by Vasant Nivrutti Chaudhari and other claimants seeking to add parties to the proceedings and to withdraw an amount they had deposited in the Court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The counsel for the acquiring body was …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, challenged the State of Maharashtra and other officials over land acquisition matters. In the original judgment dated 08.01.2026, the court inadvertently omitted the award of enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. A motion was filed to correct this …
Rejected at Admission stage
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 244‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The respondents opposed, arguing that the application lacked sufficient justification under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court examined the record and noted the absence of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, filed several first appeals challenging the acquisition of his land by the State of Maharashtra. In the judgment dated 08.01.2026, the court inadvertently omitted the award of enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant moved a motion seeking …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, filed a first appeal against the State of Maharashtra and other officials concerning land acquisition. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted the award of enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant moved a motion for the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition matters. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land but inadvertently omitted this award in the operative part. The appellant …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Haridas filed an application seeking condonation of a 555‑day delay in filing his first appeal, citing his weak financial position as the reason for the delay. The court examined the applicant’s explanation and found that the delay was not deliberate. Considering the interest of justice and the need …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants, Nilofar Jafarkhan Pathan and others, filed a civil application seeking to serve respondent No.3, Vilas S/o Sopan Pawar, who had not been served by the regular mode of service. The applicants argued that the respondent could be served by publishing a notice in a newspaper. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments and compensation awards dated 25 January 1996 rendered by the Land Reference Court, District Latur. The State argued that a policy decision of the State Government, embodied in a …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to various respondents. The State argued that, under a Government Resolution dated 03‑11‑2016 and its corrigendum dated …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to various respondents. The State argued that, per a Government Resolution dated 03‑11‑2016 and its 23‑02‑2017 corrigendum, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Manager of Shriram Transport Finance Co Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 2857 of 2024) against Manisha Kailas Badhe and others. Along with the appeal, the appellant submitted a civil application seeking a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The appellant contended that the entire …
DISPOSED OFF
The Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., now IndusInd General Insurance Company, filed a first appeal against a judgment concerning a claim by the deceased Anand Vyankatrao Walanke and his heirs. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal, which the court granted, resulting in the appeal …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, Indusland General Insurance Company (formerly Reliance General Insurance), filed a first appeal and a civil application against the deceased Anand Vyankatrao Walanke and others. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal, while the claimants sought to withdraw a remaining …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Murlidhar D. Deshmukh, filed three civil applications seeking condonation of substantial delays—2466, 275, 1260 and 202 days—in filing applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased claimants on record and to set aside an abatement. The State opposed the condonation, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Mukund Hajgude filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 258‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent, MSRTC Vahatuk Bhavan Mumbai, opposed the condonation. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found that it was not deliberate. Relying on the principle that delay may …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Subhash Deochand Ambekar, filed a civil revision application (No. 114 of 2015) along with two related civil applications. The applicant died on 23 December 2024, and a death certificate was produced and marked for identification. The petitioner’s counsel noted that there was no …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a series of civil applications seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, permission to withdraw half of the amount deposited with the court, and condonation of a 133‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court first allowed the stay application as per prayer clause …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners in Beed district, appealed against a Land Reference Court judgment that awarded them compensation for lands acquired for the Gunwati Brihat Laghu Sinchan Project. They contended that the compensation was far below market value, especially because …
DISPOSED OFF
The High Court considered Civil Application No. 3606 of 2008 filed by the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Survey Division, Osmanabad, seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award. The application had remained pending for 18 years without any justification for the delay. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The applicant filed a petition seeking condonation of a 1521‑day delay in filing an application to set aside an abatement, to bring the legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record, and to effect an amendment. The High Court examined the application and heard counsel for both parties. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 46‑day delay in filing its first appeal against a judgment and award. The court examined the application and found the delay was due to administrative exigency, not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition compensation. The High Court had previously awarded compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced amount for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant’s counsel moved a motion to correct this …
DISPOSED OFF
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against judgments and awards dated 12 October 2004 rendered by the Land Reference Court, District Jalgaon, in two separate land acquisition cases. The State Government had issued a policy resolution on 3 November 2016, amended on 23 February 2017, …
DISPOSED OFF
The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against judgments and compensation awards dated 12 October 2004 rendered by the Land Reference Court, Jalgaon, in two land acquisition matters. The State Government had issued a policy resolution on 3 November 2016, amended on 23 February 2017, stating …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Rameshwar Rambilas Somani (deceased) and others, filed applications seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award against the State of Maharashtra. The learned counsel for the appellant asserted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the Court. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought restoration of four first appeals (Nos. 1143, 1144, 1145, and 1146 of 2014) that had been dismissed in default for failure to pay bhatta charges by the deadline of 31 October 2014. The High Court had earlier ordered the appellants to pay the charges, warning that …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed civil applications seeking restoration of four first appeals (Nos. 1143, 1144, 1145, and 1146 of 2014) and condonation of a 3,034‑day delay. The High Court had earlier ordered the appellants to pay bhatta charges by 31 October 2014, failing which the appeals would be dismissed …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, an agriculturist, filed an application seeking condonation of a 5,497‑day delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased claimant, Dattu Madhavrao Shinde, on record and to set aside an abatement. The State opposed the application, arguing that the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a procedural matter arising from its earlier order dated 29 August 2024 directing respondents Nos.5‑7 to deposit 25% of a withdrawn amount. Respondents Nos.2 and 4 complied, but respondent No.3 failed to make the deposit despite several extensions. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Akshay Ghodake filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 69‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, submitted reasons for the delay, which the court found were not deliberate. The bench, after hearing the applicant, decided that justice …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank from Rs.85 to Rs.500 per Are. The State argued that the Reference Court had not properly evaluated the evidence and had awarded an excessive amount. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,550‑day delay in filing its first appeal in a civil suit concerning the death of Narayan Hari Sonwane. The application was heard by Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, who examined the reasons provided for the extensive delay. Relying …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, heirs of the deceased Subhash Anandrao Patil, challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural land (2.85 hectares) acquired for the Waghur Project. They relied on a prior decision (First Appeal No.706 of 2007) where similar lands were awarded higher compensation, invoking …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award dated 2004 against Bhagwat Vishwanath Patil. The learned Additional Government Pleader (AGP) submitted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Manager New India Assurance Company Ltd filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the amount it had deposited in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, pursuant to an award. The insurance company, acting as respondent No.1, opposed the application, alleging that …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants appealed the 2009 judgment and award of compensation for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.3,212 per R on the principle of parity. The court examined whether the lands in the present appeals were acquired for the same purpose, under the same …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Kinwat Municipal Council filed an application seeking condonation of a 635‑day delay in filing a petition to set aside an abatement and to bring the legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record. The court noted that the matter originated in 2004, making the application over 22 years old, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants appealed for enhancement of compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, since their lands were acquired for the same purpose, under the same notification and by the same reference court as in First Appeal …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the application and noted that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. Considering the interest of justice, the judge held that the delay could be condoned. …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained several first appeals filed by various appellants against the State of Maharashtra. The matter before the court was a request to correct typographical errors in an order dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (incorrectly …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 384‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The delay was attributed to the applicant being hospitalized and bedridden, and it was asserted that the delay was not deliberate. The court examined the reasons provided and found them sufficient to …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner, Subhash Deochand Ambekar, filed a civil revision application which was pending when the applicant died on 23-12-2024. The petitioner’s counsel produced a death certificate and noted that there was no response from the deceased’s legal representatives. The court held that the death of …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The claimants appealed a 2010 Land Reference Court award concerning acquisition of their lands in Group No.I, arguing that they should receive the same compensation rate of Rs.45 per square foot awarded in First Appeal No.1098 of 2018 for similarly situated lands. The acquiring body conceded the …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a 2010 judgment and award of the Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, like claimants in First Appeal No.1098 of 2018, they should receive compensation at Rs.45 per square foot because their lands …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,254‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased respondent, Anna Baburao Jadhav, on record, and also requested that the abatement of the proceeding be set aside. The respondent’s counsel opposed the relief. The …
DISPOSED OFF
The claimants, represented by Mr. Krishna G. Narwade, sought to withdraw the sum deposited by the appellant in the High Court pending the resolution of the impugned judgment and award. Applications to add parties were dismissed for default as the acquiring body’s counsel was absent. The claimants …
DISPOSED OFF
The claimants filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the remaining amount that the acquiring body had deposited in the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents opposed the request. The acquiring body’s counsel submitted that the amount, along with accrued …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant sought condonation of a 1,099‑day delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record and to set aside an abatement. The State and a second respondent opposed, arguing there were no sufficient reasons for condonation. The court …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking a two‑week extension to file an enquiry report on how compensation was paid to claimants before filing appeals. The applicant's Additional Government Pleader, Mr. D.J. Patil, submitted that the enquiry report had already been filed, …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dattu Yadavrao Mane (deceased) and Geetabai Eknath Chaugale, filed applications seeking condonation of a 4,765‑day delay in filing cross‑objections in two civil suits against the State of Maharashtra. The State, represented by the Collector, and the acquiring body opposed the …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioners, Dattu Yadavrao Mane (deceased) and Geetabai Eknath Chaugale, filed applications seeking condonation of a 4,765‑day delay in filing cross‑objections in civil proceedings against the State of Maharashtra. The State and the acquiring body opposed the condonation, arguing there was no …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained two civil applications (Nos. 5118/2017 and 5062/2017) seeking condonation of substantial delays—5,027 days and 5,984 days respectively—in filing applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record by setting …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, M.S.E.B. through the Executive Engineer, filed civil applications seeking to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record by setting aside abatement. The applications were filed after delays of 5,027 days and 5,984 days respectively. The court examined the reasons …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
This order arises from Civil Application No. 548 of 2026 in First Appeal (ST) No. 10838 of 2025, along with connected civil applications, before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad. The applicant/appellant, Mayur Ravindra Kamble, sought stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Court dealt with several civil applications arising from a land acquisition dispute, including a request for a 12‑week period to deposit 50% of the award, a stay of execution of the judgment, and a petition for condonation of a delay of 866 days in filing an X‑objection. The applicant argued …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The claimants' houses in village Rui, Latur district were acquired for the Udharva Manyar Project under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer paid Rs.35 per square meter, but the Land Reference Court increased it to Rs.110 per square meter. The claimants appealed, …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought permission to adduce additional evidence concerning a 1997 sale deed of 10 R of land in Nanded district. The respondents argued that the sale deed was illegal under a 2023 State Government notification because the land exceeded 20 R, rendering it non‑sustainable. The court …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, Salubai Bappaji (deceased), appealed against a 2006 judgment and award of the Land Reference Court, Beed (L.A.R. No.91 of 1995). The appellant argued that, as in several similar appeals, the acquiring body (Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation) had not been made a …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to Sunil Shivappa Tanwade. The State argued that a government resolution dated 03‑11‑2016, as amended on 23‑02‑2017, directs the government not to file or contest any appeal where the compensation …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Mangalsingh Nathu Patil, filed an application seeking recall of the Registrar's order that refused registration of his first appeal on the ground of non‑removal of objections, and also sought condonation of delay in filing a restoration application. The Court noted a prior order …
DISMISSED
The appeal filed by New India Insurance Co. Ltd. challenged a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.2,68,800 in favor of the parents, brother and sister of a labourer who died when a tractor‑trolley carrying crushed stones overturned. The insurer argued that the tractor was used for commercial …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Santosh Yadav Awchite filed civil applications seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award against the Manager of SP Golden Transport Pvt Ltd and others. The applicant's counsel submitted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the court. The bench, after …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Sushila Devi filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of a compensation amount awarded against Maharashtra State Regional Transport Corporation. The respondent opposed, claiming no liability to pay. The Court, after considering the facts, allowed the application partially, permitting the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Sajida Nasir Khan, filed a civil application seeking the withdrawal of an amount she had deposited with the Court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The application was filed after the insurance company, which had appealed the judgment, withdrew its appeal. The court noted …
DISPOSED OFF
The petitioner filed a civil revision application under the Civil Revision Act arising from Regular Civil Suit No.143 of 2021 pending before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed. The petitioner’s advocate informed the court that the original suit had been withdrawn. The court examined …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 96‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the reasons provided and found that the delay was not deliberate. Consequently, the court allowed the application, condoning the delay in the interest of justice. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 97‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the reasons provided and found the delay was not deliberate. Consequently, the court allowed the application and condoned the delay in the interest of justice. An issue …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and related officials concerning land acquisition. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant’s counsel, K. G. More, sought a correction to include the …
DISPOSED OFF
Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition. The trial court awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land, but the judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted this award. The appellant moved a motion for the court to speak …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant, United India Insurance Company, appealed against a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award that granted Rs.12,92,400 compensation to the deceased's family, finding the truck driver negligent. The deceased had been riding a motorcycle under the influence of alcohol and died after a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed applications seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing first appeals against a 2001 judgment of the Jalgaon Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of land for a percolation tank. The appeals challenged the compensation awarded to the claimants, alleging that …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,167‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time required to obtain sanction from the Law and Judiciary Department and was not deliberate. The court observed that no documentary …
DISMISSED
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 10 April 2000 of the Beed District Land Reference Court in favor of Govind Manikrao Kale. The State argued that a Government Resolution dated 3 November 2016, and its corrigendum dated 23 February 2017, directed that the State would not …
DISPOSED OFF
The Godavari Khore Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation filed several applications for stay of proceedings in 2010, which remained pending for about fifteen years. No parties appeared for the applicant, and the respondent was represented by Additional Government Pleader S. G. Sangle. The …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged a judgment and award of the Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, like claimants in First Appeal No.1098 of 2018, they belong to Group No.I and should receive compensation at Rs.45 per square foot …
DISPOSED OFF
The Godavari Khore Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation filed several applications for stay of proceedings in 2010, which remained pending for about fifteen years. No parties appeared for the applicant, and the respondent was represented by Additional Government Pleader S. G. Sangle. The …
DISMISSED
The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) appealed the compensation awards granted by the Land Reference Court, Jalgaon, in four separate land‑acquisition cases involving individual agriculturist claimants. The appellants contended that the compensation was improperly calculated and excessively …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The applicant sought permission to withdraw the amount deposited in the court pursuant to an award, after the insurance company was held liable for compensation. The respondents opposed, alleging negligence by the motorcycle rider and disputing the spot panchanama sketch, but the court had already …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed an application seeking condonation of a 24‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found it was neither deliberate nor intentional, thereby …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was not deliberate. The court, after hearing Mr. R.H. Dahat, accepted this explanation and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The plaintiff, Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Application No. 6050 sought condonation of a 630‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was not deliberate. The Court, after hearing the applicant's …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two civil applications filed by Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. The first application (No. 6050 of 2026) sought condonation of a 630‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the Court found the delay was not deliberate and granted condonation …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench dealt with three first appeals (Nos. 1105, 1104, and 1106 of 2005) filed by the Darade family against the State of Maharashtra. In Appeal No. 1105, two of the appellants were reported dead and the remaining appellants failed to appear, leading the court to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
In the matter of Vijay Nandkishore Bhave v. Sukhvinder Singh, Kamal Singh Kange and Anr, the applicant sought permission to serve notice on Respondent No.1, who had not been personally served. The applicant requested time to effect service through newspaper publication. The court examined the record …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications: one seeking condonation of a 48‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and another seeking a stay of the Tribunal's judgment and award. The court, after hearing the applicant's counsel, found the delay was not deliberate …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications: one seeking condonation of a 48‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and another seeking a stay of a Tribunal judgment and award. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, found the delay was not deliberate and …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellants Nivrutti Namdeo Tekale and another filed First Appeal No.969 of 2021 against Raju Suresh Ragde and others. Both parties appeared before the Bench and submitted a compromise deed dated 25 June 2026 indicating an amicable settlement of the dispute. The deed was taken on record and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court considered three civil applications filed by Pawan Ganesh Gaikwad and others. The first application sought withdrawal of a portion of a monetary award and the Court allowed a partial withdrawal of 50% of the amount together with accrued interest upon a satisfactory undertaking. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 225‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The respondent opposed, arguing no sufficient reason for condonation. The court examined the application and found that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional and that condoning it …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants' lands were acquired in 1997 for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the award was made in 1999. The appellants contended that the Reference Court had not used the highest comparable sale exemplar, specifically Exh.21, and had failed to adjust for size and …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired for a percolation tank in Beed district, arguing that the Reference Court failed to apply the highest comparable sale exemplar. The lands included irrigated and non‑irrigated parcels, as well as potkharaba (barren) land. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 3,994‑day delay in filing a separate civil application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant, Shivaji, on record, and also requested that the abatement of the earlier proceeding be set aside. The State opposed …
DISMISSED
The claimants' lands in Murum village were acquired under a notification issued pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.14,000 and Rs.12,000 per hectare. The learned Land Reference Court later increased the award …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, owners of lands acquired in 1994 for the resettlement of earthquake‑affected villagers, challenged the Land Acquisition Reference Court's award of Rs.400 per rupee and sought enhanced compensation on the principle of parity with similar cases. They argued that their lands possessed …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants sought condonation of a 30‑day delay in filing their first appeal, a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and permission to withdraw a portion of the amount they had deposited in the court. The court, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay in the interest of …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a first appeal 30 days late and sought condonation of the delay, a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and permission to withdraw the amount they had deposited with the court. The court, after hearing counsel, condoned the delay, ordered a stay of the judgment …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Chhaya Shankar Gaikwad died in a motor vehicle accident and her dependents filed a claim for compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but omitted amounts for loss of future prospects and loss of consortium. On appeal, the High Court applied Supreme Court precedents …
DISPOSED OFF
The appellant, a 19‑year‑old student, was convicted by a Special Judge under IPC Section 452 and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act for allegedly assaulting a 17‑year‑old girl inside her house and giving her two dollars. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statements, her mother’s testimony, an …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners Mahadeo Sitaram Tekale and others filed an application seeking condonation of a 907‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason existed and that condoning the delay would preclude payment of interest to the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Executive Engineer of the Lower Terna Medium Project Division filed an application seeking condonation of a 135‑day delay in filing a First Appeal (Stamp) No. 20768 of 2010. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason existed for the delay. The Court examined the …
DISMISSED
The deceased Rameshwar, a labourer employed by the tractor owner, was killed when the trolley attached to the tractor carrying crushed stones overturned. The claimants, his parents and siblings, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs.2,68,800. The …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The plaintiff Reliance General Insurance filed two civil applications: one (No. 7181) seeking condonation of a 62‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and another (No. 7182) seeking a stay of the Tribunal's judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding no deliberate …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Reliance General Insurance filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a 62‑day delay in filing its first appeal, while the second sought a stay of the Tribunal's impugned judgment and award. The Court, after hearing counsel, found …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 221‑day delay in filing a petition to restore a cross‑appeal to its original position and to obtain permission to remove office objections. They explained that the delay resulted from an inadvertent failure to upload an order dated …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner sought the court's permission to record the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Pandurang Maruti Jadhav, in a civil suit. The application was filed within the prescribed limitation period. The court examined the application and found no procedural impediment to allowing …
DISMISSED
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, dealt with two civil applications filed in 2006. In Application No. 10101, TAPI Irrigation Development Corporation sought relief against Laxman Ziparu Gawali, but the applicant’s counsel was absent, leading to dismissal for default. In Application No. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants sought enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Borul Storage/Percolation Tank project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that the Reference Court had wrongly disbelieved a sale exemplar (Exhibit‑21/36) and the valuer's report on trees, resulting in an …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The learned Additional Government Pleader argued that the entire award amount had already been deposited with the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award against the estate of the deceased Bhalchandra Bhimaji Babal. The applications were filed under multiple civil …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals against a judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, in the interest of justice, condoned it, allowing the appeals to proceed. The State also applied …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed an application seeking condonation of a 61‑day delay in filing its appeal and also requested a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The Court examined the application and, noting that the delay was not deliberately …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, claiming the entire amount was already deposited with the court. The court allowed the stay as per the prayer clause. A separate application for withdrawal of the amount was listed, and another application sought …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, claiming the entire amount was already deposited with the court. The court allowed the stay as per the prayer clause. A separate application for withdrawal of the amount was listed, and another application sought …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellant Mahadevrao Dattatray Kadam filed a civil application seeking condonation of an 18‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent No.2 opposed the condonation, arguing there was no sufficient reason. The court examined the application and found that the delay was neither …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a three‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and the Court, finding the delay non‑deliberate, allowed the application and condoned the delay in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a three‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and the Court, finding the delay non‑deliberate, allowed the application. The second application requested a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Manager of The New India Assurance Co Ltd filed a first appeal and a civil application seeking a stay of the judgment and award passed by a Tribunal against Laxmibai Raghunath Sagar and others. The court issued a notice to the respondents in the appeal, to be returned on 19 October …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Manager of The New India Assurance Co Ltd filed a first appeal and a civil application seeking a stay of the judgment and award passed by a Tribunal against Santosh Angad Apchunde and others. The court examined the application and, after hearing the appellant’s counsel, considered …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The heirs of Govind Dhondiba Gursude appealed against the Land Reference Court’s award of compensation for land acquired for the Hadolti Percolation Tank No.6. They argued that a sale exemplar dated 07‑01‑2002, showing a price of Rs 5,000 per Are for irrigated land, should be considered, with a 10% …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court for lands acquired in Hadolti, Latur for a percolation tank. They argued that the court failed to consider a comparable sale deed (Exhibit 17) dated 07.01.2002, which established a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Vaibhav Dadarao Taral filed a civil application seeking to serve notice on Respondent No.1, who could not be served by regular means. The applicant requested that the court order service by publication in a widely circulated newspaper. The learned counsel argued that regular service was ineffective, …
DISPOSED OFF
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to Bashiruddin Karimoddin Sayyad. The State argued that a Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016, with a corrigendum on 23.02.2017, directs the government not to file or contest any appeal where …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Ltd appealed a tribunal judgment awarding compensation to Monika Laxman Khade and others. The respondents filed a civil application seeking a stay of the impugned judgment. The court, after hearing both sides, noted the peculiar facts of the case and granted …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The claimants' lands in Murum village were acquired under a notification issued pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.14,000‑12,000 per hectare, which the Land Reference Court increased to Rs.36,000‑35,000 per acre. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co., sought a stay of execution of a judgment and award, undertaking to deposit the full amount with interest within twelve weeks. The court conditioned the stay on such deposit, stating that failure to do so would vacate the stay. The applicant also …
DISPOSED OFF
The Executive Engineer appealed against the State of Maharashtra challenging the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, arguing that the interest clause in the operative order was erroneous. The State Government had a policy, via a resolution dated 03.11.2016 and its corrigendum, not to …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 91‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court examined the application and found that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application, condoning the delay. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications. The first sought condonation of a five‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the court, finding the delay not deliberate, allowed the application. The second sought a stay of the Tribunal's …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first application sought condonation of a six‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the court, finding the delay not deliberate, allowed the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Manager Cholmandalam of General Insurance Co filed a first appeal and a civil application seeking a stay of the Tribunal's award against Usha Ankush Kumbhar and others. The High Court noted the procedural aspects of the appeal and focused on the civil application for a stay. After hearing the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained a civil application seeking a stay of the award passed by a Tribunal in favor of the respondents, Pooza Ankush Kumbhar and others, against the appellant, Manager Cholmandalam Ms General Insurance Co. The court, after hearing the applicant's …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners, appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted modest compensation for their lands and trees acquired for the Gunwati Brihat Laghu Sinchan Project. They argued that the court failed to assess the market value of the irrigated lands and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in their appeal. The court examined the office remark which indicated that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. Since the appeal was timely, the court found no basis to entertain a condonation application. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 5,751‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Hansabai Tadavi, on record and to set aside the abatement of the suit. The court noted the substantial delay but accepted the State’s …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant sought a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award, claiming the entire amount had been deposited with the court. The court granted a stay pending the appeal. Subsequently, the applicant applied to withdraw part of the deposited amount, while the respondent argued that the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1157‑day delay in filing, setting aside an abatement, and permission to record the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Shivaji Venkata Gambhire. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and found them not deliberate …
PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
The appellant, Atish Shivaji Kamble, was injured in a motor accident on 22 May 2018 when an auto‑rickshaw driven by respondent No.1 collided with his motorcycle, resulting in severe injuries and amputation of his left leg. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded him compensation based on a …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed two civil applications. The first sought condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a first appeal, and the court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, found the delay was not deliberate and allowed the condonation in the …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a first appeal against a tribunal award in favor of Suvarna Govind Gonare. The appellant also moved two civil applications: one seeking a stay of the award (Application No. 8581) and another (Application No. 8574) challenging the procedural validity …
DISPOSED OFF
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation filed a first appeal against a tribunal award in favor of Suvarna Govind Gonare. The appellant also moved two civil applications: one seeking a stay of the award (Application No. 8581) and another (Application No. 8574) challenging the procedural validity …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) filed two civil applications before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court. Application 8532 sought condonation of a 97‑day delay in filing its first appeal against a tribunal order. The Court examined the reasons and found the delay was not …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought condonation of delays ranging from 918 to 7,182 days in filing civil applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants on record and to set aside the abatement of their claims. The State opposed the applications. The court examined the submissions and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioners sought condonation of delays ranging from 918 to 7,182 days in filing civil applications to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants on record and to set aside the abatement of their claims. The State opposed the applications. The court examined the submissions and …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The applicant, Amar Ashok Karale, filed an application seeking condonation of a 289‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent argued that the applicant had previously deposited over Rs.12,00,000, which had been withdrawn, and therefore no financial hardship existed to justify the delay. …
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
The petitioner filed Civil Application No. 6404 of 2022 seeking the court's permission to bring the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Bajirao Babu Keskar, on record in the pending appeal. The application was heard before Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh. The court examined the reasons set …