Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANJAY A DESHMUKH

271 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

KAMALBAI GOVINDRAO PATILversusSTATE OF MAHA and ORS

DISMISSED

The appellant’s agricultural land of 4 ha 65 are in Nilanga was acquired in 1987 for a 132 kV sub‑station and the Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 1,77,863, which the Land Reference Court later enhanced to Rs 3,91,819. The appellant sought a further increase, relying on two sale …

M.S.E.B.THR.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JALGAONversusSONA PIRA SONWANE AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E.B.) filed four separate appeals before the Bombay High Court challenging the compensation awards granted by the Jalgaon Land Reference Court in respect of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appellants contended that the compensation …

MANIK SADASHIV SWAMI DIED L.RS. PRASHANT MANIK SWAMIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Beed district for a percolation tank, awarding Rs.110‑100 per Are, but the Land Reference Court increased compensation to Rs.556 per Are. The claimants cross‑objected, arguing that the reference court improperly ignored the sale exemplar from an adjacent …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVASUDEO TUKARAM PATIL

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in Amalner for three landowners whose properties were acquired for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The claimants were awarded Rs.1,311 per are for non‑irrigated land and …

STATE OF MAHAversusVIMALBAI NIMBA KOLI

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the awards of compensation granted by the Land Reference Court in three land acquisition cases concerning land taken for the Kurwel Distributary of the Hatnur Irrigation Project. The State argued that the reference court had not considered the entire …

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusGANPAT RAMKRISHNA

DISMISSED

The State Government appealed ten first appeals against judgments and awards rendered by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court in land acquisition cases for a minor irrigation tank project at Kalamsara. The State contended that the Reference Court had excessively enhanced …

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusNATHU PANDITRAO BHOITE

DISMISSED

The State Government appealed the awards of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer in several land acquisition references for agricultural land needed for a minor irrigation tank project. The State argued that the Reference Court had unreasonably enhanced compensation to …

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusRAMKRISHNA MAHIPAT

DISMISSED

The State acquired agricultural lands at Kalamsara for a Minor Irrigation Tank project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at rates ranging from Rs.47,000 to Rs.60,000 per hectare. On references, the Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per hectare and also …

STATE OF MAHAversusSHANTABAI KISAN

DISMISSED

The State Government appealed ten separate land acquisition awards where the Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank project. The Reference Court had enhanced the compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per hectare and awarded specific …

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANRversusBHAUSAHEB PANDITRAO BHOITE

DISMISSED

The State Government appealed against the judgments and awards of the Special Land Acquisition Officer in several land acquisition references concerning agricultural land in Kalamsara, Jalgaon. The State contended that the Reference Court had excessively enhanced compensation to Rs.3,70,000 per …

M.S.E.B.THRU EX.ENGG.BHUSAWALversusSHAMRAO MANGO SURALKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …

M.S.E.B.THRU EX.ENGR.BHUSAWAL, DIST.JALGAONversusRAMDAS SHAMRAO PAWAR AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed civil applications (Nos. 2961/1998 and 2955/1998) seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award that had been rendered against them. They contended that the entire amount ordered by the impugned judgment had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …

STATE OF MAHAversusVASANTABAI BUDHA NHAVI and ORS

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for 3.96 hectares of land acquired for the Wadi‑Shewadi Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had fixed Rs 34,787 per hectare under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the Reference Court …

ISHWAR GORAKH PATIL AND ANRversusNOORMOHAMMAD ABDUL KHAN AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Ishwar Gorakh Patil and another, filed a civil application seeking service of notice on respondents Noormohammad Abdul Khan and others by newspaper publication, alleging that regular service could not be effected. The learned counsel for the applicants highlighted the inability to …

SHAHEEN ALTAF SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shaheen Altaf Shaikh filed a criminal application seeking correction of the first paragraph and the second part of the operative order dated 24 June 2025 in Criminal Application No. 160 of 2025. The applicant contended that the order should have included Sections 304‑B, 306 and 498‑A of the Indian …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusHIRKANBAI YASHWANTRAO PAWAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal against a 2002 land acquisition award. The court found the delay neither deliberate nor intentional and allowed the application, condoning the delay. The State, through its A.G.P., relied on a …

UMESH DIGAMBAR POTDARversusTHE STATE OF MAH and ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, Umesh Potdar and Jaymillakarjun Guru, filed a motion before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a clerical mistake in the minutes of an earlier order dated 02.02.2026. The mistake pertained to the description of land acquisition reference numbers and survey details of the …

JAYMILAKARJUN SHIVACHARYA GURUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants Umesh Potdar and Jaymillakarjun Guru sought correction of a clerical mistake in the order dated 02.02.2026 relating to land acquisition references. The original order mistakenly mentioned only "Land Acquisition Reference No.282 of 2004" and omitted reference No.172 and certain survey …

KELYA KALASHYA VALVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, a group of Scheduled Tribe agriculturists and fishermen from villages in Nandurbar, challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired in 1980 for the Sardar Sarowar project. The original award of Rs.5,160 per hectare was enhanced by the Land Reference Court to Rs.6,450 per …

MAROTI S/O. SOPAN HAKE AND ANR.versusHARIBHAU S/O. GANPATRAO DESHMUKH AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 137‑day delay in filing their first appeal. They alleged that a financial crisis prevented them from arranging the necessary funds to prefer the appeal within the prescribed period. The court examined whether the delay was deliberate …

SHUBHAM SHARADRAO KALEversusUNITED INDIA INSURENCE COMPANY LTD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained three civil applications filed by United India Insurance Company Ltd. The first sought condonation of a 95‑day delay in filing a first appeal, the second sought permission to withdraw 60% of the amount deposited under a judgment and award with …

ISHWAR GORAKH PATIL AND ANRversusNOORMOHAMMAD ABDUL KHAN AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants sought condonation of a 1526‑day delay in filing their appeal, citing financial hardship and the COVID‑19 pandemic. The respondents opposed the condonation. The court noted that the applicants belong to a lower socioeconomic stratum and that the delay was not deliberate. Relying on …

THE DIV. CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C, DIV. AHMEDNAGARversusAJINATH MANOHAR MOHITE

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The Divisional Controller of MSRTC appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award that granted the claimant, Ajinath Manohar Mohite, compensation on the basis of a 100% permanent and functional disability arising from a head injury. The High Court observed that the claimant neither examined …

ANANT NAGORAO SALUNKEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants sought correction of clerical mistakes in a judgment dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (typed as “39” instead of “33”) and the enhanced amount (typed as Rs. 80 instead of Rs. 81). The learned counsel for the appellants highlighted these errors and requested the …

VASCHALABAI YESHWANT PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition. The High Court had previously awarded compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land in its judgment dated 08.01.2026. A motion was …

NARAYAN BHILA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and related officials concerning land acquisition compensation. The High Court, in its judgment dated 08.01.2026, inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. A motion was filed to correct this omission. The …

MIRABAI NARAYAN PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, challenged the acquisition of his land by the State of Maharashtra in a series of first appeals. The High Court had earlier delivered a judgment on 8 January 2026 awarding compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. …

BHATU PUNDLIK PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition compensation. The High Court had previously awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land, but the award was inadvertently omitted in the operative part of the judgment. The appellant …

BANDA VISHWANATH JAGTAP.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants challenged the award of compensation for their land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Lower Terna Project. The original award of Rs 4,400 per acre was later enhanced to Rs 8,000 per acre, but the appellants argued that, based on a prior decision (First Appeal No. …

GANPAT JALBAJI KALEversusSTATE OF MAHA and ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants (Balaji, Gyanoba, Osmankhan and Ganpat) challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural lands acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They contended that the Land Reference Court had not properly considered sale exemplars, particularly Exhibit‑33, and …

VITTHAL NARSING PREMALWADversusDILIP BABURAO MUNDHE AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court heard counsel for the applicant and examined the reasons provided for the delay. Finding the explanations satisfactory and in the interest of justice, the court decided to condone the …

SIDDHARTH PRABHAKAR VELDODE.versusTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 102‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found it was neither deliberate nor intentional. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application and condoned the delay. …

LINGUJI MASNAJIversusSTATE OF MAH. and ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant's agricultural land, along with a well, was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a bridge project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded a modest compensation, which the appellant challenged, citing sale exemplars showing higher market …

TAPI IRRIGATION DEV. CORPORATIONversusVASANT NIVRUTTI CHAUDHARI

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard applications filed by Vasant Nivrutti Chaudhari and other claimants seeking to add parties to the proceedings and to withdraw an amount they had deposited in the Court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The counsel for the acquiring body was …

RAMDAS KAUTIK PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, filed a first appeal against the State of Maharashtra and other officials concerning land acquisition. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted the award of enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant moved a motion for the …

RAJDHAR KAUTIK PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR DHULE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Gaidal Lotan Patil, appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition matters. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land but inadvertently omitted this award in the operative part. The appellant …

HARIDAS S/O. AMBADAS WAGHMODE.versusSHIVANI D/O. RAMKISAN DHAKTODE AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Haridas filed an application seeking condonation of a 555‑day delay in filing his first appeal, citing his weak financial position as the reason for the delay. The court examined the applicant’s explanation and found that the delay was not deliberate. Considering the interest of justice and the need …

NILOFAR JAFARKHAN PATHAN AND ORS.versusDIGAMBAR ARJUN SHENDE AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Nilofar Jafarkhan Pathan and others, filed a civil application seeking to serve respondent No.3, Vilas S/o Sopan Pawar, who had not been served by the regular mode of service. The applicants argued that the respondent could be served by publishing a notice in a newspaper. The court …

THE STATE OF MAHversusMUKTABAI SOPAN

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments and compensation awards dated 25 January 1996 rendered by the Land Reference Court, District Latur. The State argued that a policy decision of the State Government, embodied in a …

THE STATE OF MAHversusASHOK SANGAPPA GAOKARE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to various respondents. The State argued that, under a Government Resolution dated 03‑11‑2016 and its corrigendum dated …

THE STATE OF MAHversusMAHESH SUBHASH GAOKARE

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed several first appeals (Nos. 681, 683, 688, 685, 686, 689 of 2008) against judgments of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to various respondents. The State argued that, per a Government Resolution dated 03‑11‑2016 and its 23‑02‑2017 corrigendum, …

THE MANAGER, SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTDversusMANISHA KAILAS BADHE AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Manager of Shriram Transport Finance Co Ltd filed a first appeal (No. 2857 of 2024) against Manisha Kailas Badhe and others. Along with the appeal, the appellant submitted a civil application seeking a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The appellant contended that the entire …

JALINDAR TATYABA DESHMUKH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners in Beed district, appealed against a Land Reference Court judgment that awarded them compensation for lands acquired for the Gunwati Brihat Laghu Sinchan Project. They contended that the compensation was far below market value, especially because …

AJABBAI BHATA PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition compensation. The High Court had previously awarded compensation but inadvertently omitted the enhanced amount for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant’s counsel moved a motion to correct this …

STATE OF MAHversusMRS GANGUBAI SHANKAR PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against judgments and awards dated 12 October 2004 rendered by the Land Reference Court, District Jalgaon, in two separate land acquisition cases. The State Government had issued a policy resolution on 3 November 2016, amended on 23 February 2017, …

STATE OF MAHversusVASANT NIVRUTTI CHAUDHARI

DISPOSED OFF

The Special Land Acquisition Officer appealed against judgments and compensation awards dated 12 October 2004 rendered by the Land Reference Court, Jalgaon, in two land acquisition matters. The State Government had issued a policy resolution on 3 November 2016, amended on 23 February 2017, stating …

M S E BversusLAXMINARAYAN RAGHUNATH KARVA and ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant, Rameshwar Rambilas Somani (deceased) and others, filed applications seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award against the State of Maharashtra. The learned counsel for the appellant asserted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the Court. …

AKSHAY S/O. BHAGWAN GHODAKE.versusJITENDRA S/O. BALKRISHNA KABADI AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Akshay Ghodake filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 69‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, submitted reasons for the delay, which the court found were not deliberate. The bench, after hearing the applicant, decided that justice …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHANKAR LAXMANRAO KULKARNI

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Land Reference Court award that increased compensation for land acquired for a percolation tank from Rs.85 to Rs.500 per Are. The State argued that the Reference Court had not properly evaluated the evidence and had awarded an excessive amount. The …

STATE OF MAHAversusNARAYAN HARI SONWANE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,550‑day delay in filing its first appeal in a civil suit concerning the death of Narayan Hari Sonwane. The application was heard by Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, who examined the reasons provided for the extensive delay. Relying …

SUBHASH ANANDRAO PATILversusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQ. OFFICER AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, heirs of the deceased Subhash Anandrao Patil, challenged the compensation awarded for their agricultural land (2.85 hectares) acquired for the Waghur Project. They relied on a prior decision (First Appeal No.706 of 2007) where similar lands were awarded higher compensation, invoking …

STATE OF MAHAversusBHAGWAT VISHWANATH PATIL DIED LRS and ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award dated 2004 against Bhagwat Vishwanath Patil. The learned Additional Government Pleader (AGP) submitted that the entire amount awarded had already been deposited with the court. Relying on this …

DATTU KISHANRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants appealed the 2009 judgment and award of compensation for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project, seeking a higher rate of Rs.3,212 per R on the principle of parity. The court examined whether the lands in the present appeals were acquired for the same purpose, under the same …

KINWAT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KINWATversusCHAMPATI GANGADHAR KAWALE DIED LRS and ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Kinwat Municipal Council filed an application seeking condonation of a 635‑day delay in filing a petition to set aside an abatement and to bring the legal representatives of respondent No.4 on record. The court noted that the matter originated in 2004, making the application over 22 years old, …

RAM HANMANTA MORE L.RS. SHIVAJI RAM MOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants appealed for enhancement of compensation awarded for lands acquired for the Kolsur Medium Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, since their lands were acquired for the same purpose, under the same notification and by the same reference court as in First Appeal …

TUKARAM GYANABA WAGHMARE AND ORS.versusSHANKAR MALLIKARJUN JANGATE AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the application and noted that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. Considering the interest of justice, the judge held that the delay could be condoned. …

SURYABHAN DHONDIRAM PADREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained several first appeals filed by various appellants against the State of Maharashtra. The matter before the court was a request to correct typographical errors in an order dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (incorrectly …

BAPURAO DADARAO NITUREversusRAKHMAJI NARAYAN SAWALKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of a 384‑day delay in filing a first appeal. The delay was attributed to the applicant being hospitalized and bedridden, and it was asserted that the delay was not deliberate. The court examined the reasons provided and found them sufficient to …

SAYYED MOHASIN ABDUL FAIJSABversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The claimants appealed a 2010 Land Reference Court award concerning acquisition of their lands in Group No.I, arguing that they should receive the same compensation rate of Rs.45 per square foot awarded in First Appeal No.1098 of 2018 for similarly situated lands. The acquiring body conceded the …

SAYYED AKBAR SAYYED JAKIRSABversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged a 2010 judgment and award of the Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that, like claimants in First Appeal No.1098 of 2018, they should receive compensation at Rs.45 per square foot because their lands …

VASANT NIVRUTTI CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

DISPOSED OFF

The claimants, represented by Mr. Krishna G. Narwade, sought to withdraw the sum deposited by the appellant in the High Court pending the resolution of the impugned judgment and award. Applications to add parties were dismissed for default as the acquiring body’s counsel was absent. The claimants …

NARSING CHANDAR YECHWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The claimants filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the remaining amount that the acquiring body had deposited in the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra and other respondents opposed the request. The acquiring body’s counsel submitted that the amount, along with accrued …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusPRAMOD SADASHIV PATIL

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking a two‑week extension to file an enquiry report on how compensation was paid to claimants before filing appeals. The applicant's Additional Government Pleader, Mr. D.J. Patil, submitted that the enquiry report had already been filed, …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRITATION JALGAONversusRAJENDRA VITTHAL PATIL AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Court dealt with several civil applications arising from a land acquisition dispute, including a request for a 12‑week period to deposit 50% of the award, a stay of execution of the judgment, and a petition for condonation of a delay of 866 days in filing an X‑objection. The applicant argued …

RAMRAO ANANDRAO PATIL AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners sought permission to adduce additional evidence concerning a 1997 sale deed of 10 R of land in Nanded district. The respondents argued that the sale deed was illegal under a 2023 State Government notification because the land exceeded 20 R, rendering it non‑sustainable. The court …

MANGALSINGH NATHU PATILversusMAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION JALGAON

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Mangalsingh Nathu Patil, filed an application seeking recall of the Registrar's order that refused registration of his first appeal on the ground of non‑removal of objections, and also sought condonation of delay in filing a restoration application. The Court noted a prior order …

Sajida Nasir Khan.versusArun Haribhau Mhaske and Ors.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Sajida Nasir Khan, filed a civil application seeking the withdrawal of an amount she had deposited with the Court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The application was filed after the insurance company, which had appealed the judgment, withdrew its appeal. The court noted …

BABASAHEB BHAGWANRAO BAGLANEversusDR ASARAM RAOJI NAKALGAONKAR AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner filed a civil revision application under the Civil Revision Act arising from Regular Civil Suit No.143 of 2021 pending before the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Beed. The petitioner’s advocate informed the court that the original suit had been withdrawn. The court examined …

Mangala Shankar Shinde and AnotherversusKailas Soma Koli (Shirsath) and Others

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 97‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the reasons provided and found the delay was not deliberate. Consequently, the court allowed the application and condoned the delay in the interest of justice. An issue …

LATAKANBAI BHILESING GIRASEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and related officials concerning land acquisition. The original judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted the enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land. The appellant’s counsel, K. G. More, sought a correction to include the …

GAIDAL LOTAN PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Gaidal Lotan Patil appealed against the State of Maharashtra and other officials regarding land acquisition. The trial court awarded enhanced compensation for 49 acres of dry land, but the judgment dated 08.01.2026 inadvertently omitted this award. The appellant moved a motion for the court to speak …

STATE OF MAHAversusNALINIBAI NARHAR PATIL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed applications seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing first appeals against a 2001 judgment of the Jalgaon Land Reference Court concerning acquisition of land for a percolation tank. The appeals challenged the compensation awarded to the claimants, alleging that …

THE STATE OF MAH.versusMEHTABBI BASHIRKHAN PATHAN

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,167‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time required to obtain sanction from the Law and Judiciary Department and was not deliberate. The court observed that no documentary …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGOVIND MANIKRAO KALE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment and award dated 10 April 2000 of the Beed District Land Reference Court in favor of Govind Manikrao Kale. The State argued that a Government Resolution dated 3 November 2016, and its corrigendum dated 23 February 2017, directed that the State would not …

M.S.E.B. THR.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JALGAONversusKAMALABAI ANADA PAWAR AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) appealed the compensation awards granted by the Land Reference Court, Jalgaon, in four separate land‑acquisition cases involving individual agriculturist claimants. The appellants contended that the compensation was improperly calculated and excessively …

Manohar Nagnath DudhbhateversusMahesh Virbhadrappa Halge

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The applicant sought permission to withdraw the amount deposited in the court pursuant to an award, after the insurance company was held liable for compensation. The respondents opposed, alleging negligence by the motorcycle rider and disputing the spot panchanama sketch, but the court had already …

Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd.versusArchana W/o Parasram Wadje and Others

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a 19‑day delay in filing its first appeal, arguing the delay was not deliberate. The court, after hearing Mr. R.H. Dahat, accepted this explanation and …

VIJAY NANDKISHORE BHAVEversusSUKHVINDER SINGH KAMAL SINGH KANGE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

In the matter of Vijay Nandkishore Bhave v. Sukhvinder Singh, Kamal Singh Kange and Anr, the applicant sought permission to serve notice on Respondent No.1, who had not been personally served. The applicant requested time to effect service through newspaper publication. The court examined the record …

NIVRUTTI NAMDEO TEKALE AND ANRversusRAJU SURESH RAGDE AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellants Nivrutti Namdeo Tekale and another filed First Appeal No.969 of 2021 against Raju Suresh Ragde and others. Both parties appeared before the Bench and submitted a compromise deed dated 25 June 2026 indicating an amicable settlement of the dispute. The deed was taken on record and …

SHAHADEO KISAN WAGHMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants' lands were acquired in 1997 for a percolation tank under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the award was made in 1999. The appellants contended that the Reference Court had not used the highest comparable sale exemplar, specifically Exh.21, and had failed to adjust for size and …

VISHNU PRABHU KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired for a percolation tank in Beed district, arguing that the Reference Court failed to apply the highest comparable sale exemplar. The lands included irrigated and non‑irrigated parcels, as well as potkharaba (barren) land. The …

BHAGWAN KERBA MORE DIED THR LRS SOPAN AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 3,994‑day delay in filing a separate civil application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant, Shivaji, on record, and also requested that the abatement of the earlier proceeding be set aside. The State opposed …

STATE OF MAHA and ORSversusBASWARAJ VIRAPPA KARBHARI

DISMISSED

The claimants' lands in Murum village were acquired under a notification issued pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.14,000 and Rs.12,000 per hectare. The learned Land Reference Court later increased the award …

VENKAT SAMBHAJI PATILversusSTATE OF MAH THR COLLECTOR LATUR and ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, owners of lands acquired in 1994 for the resettlement of earthquake‑affected villagers, challenged the Land Acquisition Reference Court's award of Rs.400 per rupee and sought enhanced compensation on the principle of parity with similar cases. They argued that their lands possessed …

SHANKAR FAKIRA GAIKWAD AND ORSversusBABAN GOVIND CHOURE AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

Chhaya Shankar Gaikwad died in a motor vehicle accident and her dependents filed a claim for compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but omitted amounts for loss of future prospects and loss of consortium. On appeal, the High Court applied Supreme Court precedents …

MAHADEO SITARAM TEKALE AND ORSversusDEELIP WAKIL MULEKAR AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners Mahadeo Sitaram Tekale and others filed an application seeking condonation of a 907‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason existed and that condoning the delay would preclude payment of interest to the …

The Oriental Insurance Company LtdversusVilas Bhaskar Jadhav and Anr

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …

The Oriental Insurance Company LtdversusVilas Bhaskar Jadhav and Anr

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company filed an application seeking condonation of a 194‑day delay in filing its first appeal and a separate application for a stay of execution of the impugned judgment. The court examined the delay, finding it was caused by administrative exigency and not deliberate, and …

NIVRUTTI VITHOBA MARATHE AND OTHERSversusHARSHAD SHASHIKANT JAIN AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 221‑day delay in filing a petition to restore a cross‑appeal to its original position and to obtain permission to remove office objections. They explained that the delay resulted from an inadvertent failure to upload an order dated …

PANDURANG MARUTI JADHAV (DIED) THR LRS. DEAVAIBAI PANDURANG JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,AND ADDI. COLLECTOR,OSMANABAD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioner sought the court's permission to record the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Pandurang Maruti Jadhav, in a civil suit. The application was filed within the prescribed limitation period. The court examined the application and found no procedural impediment to allowing …

TAPI IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPONversusLAXMAN ZIPARU GAWALI

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, dealt with two civil applications filed in 2006. In Application No. 10101, TAPI Irrigation Development Corporation sought relief against Laxman Ziparu Gawali, but the applicant’s counsel was absent, leading to dismissal for default. In Application No. …

SURYAKANT VITHALRAO CHINCHOLE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants sought enhanced compensation for lands acquired for the Borul Storage/Percolation Tank project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that the Reference Court had wrongly disbelieved a sale exemplar (Exhibit‑21/36) and the valuer's report on trees, resulting in an …

THE STATE OF MAHversusMIRABAI BHIMRAO BAGAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The learned Additional Government Pleader argued that the entire award amount had already been deposited with the …

THE STATE OF MAHversusBHAUSAHEB DNYANDEO BAGAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award against the estate of the deceased Bhalchandra Bhimaji Babal. The applications were filed under multiple civil …

THE STATE OF MAHversusBHAUSAHEB DNYANDEO BAGAL

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of an 820‑day delay in filing first appeals against a judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, in the interest of justice, condoned it, allowing the appeals to proceed. The State also applied …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusJYOTI DATTATRAY SHELAR AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, claiming the entire amount was already deposited with the court. The court allowed the stay as per the prayer clause. A separate application for withdrawal of the amount was listed, and another application sought …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusJYOTI DATTATRAY SHELAR AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, claiming the entire amount was already deposited with the court. The court allowed the stay as per the prayer clause. A separate application for withdrawal of the amount was listed, and another application sought …

MAHADEVRAO DATTATRAY KADAMversusSATISH MADHAVRAO KADAM AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellant Mahadevrao Dattatray Kadam filed a civil application seeking condonation of an 18‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent No.2 opposed the condonation, arguing there was no sufficient reason. The court examined the application and found that the delay was neither …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusGEETA SUBHASH MAVCHI AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a three‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and the Court, finding the delay non‑deliberate, allowed the application and condoned the delay in the …

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusGEETA SUBHASH MAVCHI AND ORS.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd filed two civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a three‑day delay in filing its first appeal, and the Court, finding the delay non‑deliberate, allowed the application. The second application requested a …

GOVIND DHONDIBA GURSADEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The heirs of Govind Dhondiba Gursude appealed against the Land Reference Court’s award of compensation for land acquired for the Hadolti Percolation Tank No.6. They argued that a sale exemplar dated 07‑01‑2002, showing a price of Rs 5,000 per Are for irrigated land, should be considered, with a 10% …

BHIMRAO DHONDIBA GURSUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants, heirs of several deceased landowners, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court for lands acquired in Hadolti, Latur for a percolation tank. They argued that the court failed to consider a comparable sale deed (Exhibit 17) dated 07.01.2002, which established a …

VAIBHAV DADARAO TARALversusSITARAM RAMSHARAN YADAV AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Vaibhav Dadarao Taral filed a civil application seeking to serve notice on Respondent No.1, who could not be served by regular means. The applicant requested that the court order service by publication in a widely circulated newspaper. The learned counsel argued that regular service was ineffective, …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusBASHIRODDIN KARIMODDIN SAYYAD

DISPOSED OFF

The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to Bashiruddin Karimoddin Sayyad. The State argued that a Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016, with a corrigendum on 23.02.2017, directs the government not to file or contest any appeal where …

ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusMONIKA LAXAMN KHADE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Company Ltd appealed a tribunal judgment awarding compensation to Monika Laxman Khade and others. The respondents filed a civil application seeking a stay of the impugned judgment. The court, after hearing both sides, noted the peculiar facts of the case and granted …

RAVINDRA MADHAVRAO AMBAR DIED LRS KESHARBAI DIED LRS HANMANTRAO DIED THROUGH LRS BHAGYASHRI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR OSMANABAD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants' lands in Murum village were acquired under a notification issued pursuant to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.14,000‑12,000 per hectare, which the Land Reference Court increased to Rs.36,000‑35,000 per acre. …

DASA NIVRUTTI SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 91‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The court examined the application and found that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application, condoning the delay. …

BALBHIM KHANDERAO GALANDE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellants, a group of agricultural landowners, appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted modest compensation for their lands and trees acquired for the Gunwati Brihat Laghu Sinchan Project. They argued that the court failed to assess the market value of the irrigated lands and …

SANGITA DNYANESHWAR LONDHE AND ORSversusSUDAM GOVARDHAN JADHAV AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in their appeal. The court examined the office remark which indicated that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. Since the appeal was timely, the court found no basis to entertain a condonation application. …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO.SPL.L.A.O..versusHANSABAI RAMJAN and ANOTHER.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 5,751‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased claimant, Hansabai Tadavi, on record and to set aside the abatement of the suit. The court noted the substantial delay but accepted the State’s …

Amit Rajabhau PanditversusVishal Bhikaji Shinde

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant sought a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and award, claiming the entire amount had been deposited with the court. The court granted a stay pending the appeal. Subsequently, the applicant applied to withdraw part of the deposited amount, while the respondent argued that the …

ATISH SHIVAJI KAMBLEversusDHANANJAY NIVRUTI KARPURE AND ORS

PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED

The appellant, Atish Shivaji Kamble, was injured in a motor accident on 22 May 2018 when an auto‑rickshaw driven by respondent No.1 collided with his motorcycle, resulting in severe injuries and amputation of his left leg. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded him compensation based on a …

AMAR ASHOK KARALEversusDHANESH MANIKCHAND GUGALE AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Amar Ashok Karale, filed an application seeking condonation of a 289‑day delay in filing his first appeal. The respondent argued that the applicant had previously deposited over Rs.12,00,000, which had been withdrawn, and therefore no financial hardship existed to justify the delay. …