Created by Fuzzy Cloud

SANJAY A DESHMUKH

271 judgments · newest first · showing 201–271

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANRversusDHONDIRAM RAMRAO SURYAWANSHI

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants' lands were acquired for the construction of a Gurnal Storage Tank under a notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra filed appeals seeking to reduce the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court, while the claimants appealed …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusKAMALBAI MANIK KUMBHAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The lands of several claimants were acquired for the Gurnal Storage Tank project in Latur under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra appealed to reduce the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court, while the claimants appealed alleging inadequate …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ORSversusVISHVAMBHAR PARVATRAO BIRADAR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra and the Acquiring Authority appealed to reduce compensation awarded to several claimants whose lands were acquired for a Gurnal Storage Tank project under a single notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The claimants appealed, contending that the compensation was …

JAMILABI SHAIKH CHAND AND ORSversusNITIN BHIMRAO PATIL AND ORS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants filed an application seeking the court's permission to produce additional documentary evidence in the pending appeal. The court noted that jurisprudence allows such applications to be considered at the time of the final hearing of the appeal. Consequently, the application was not …

CHOLA MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusCHAYA RAMESH ZINZADE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained two civil applications filed alongside a first appeal. The first application sought condonation of a nine‑day delay in filing the first appeal; the Court, finding no deliberate delay, allowed the application and condoned the delay. The second …

FILIP RAMKISHAN CHOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The appellants challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court for land acquired for a storage tank, arguing that the court had unjustifiably deducted 70-80% of the sale consideration based on a prior sale exemplar. They contended that the land was not for residential development and …

PANDURANG MUKTIRAM KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Seven appellants challenged a common judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation of Rs.585 per Are for land acquired for a Yestar Storage Tank, based on a sale exemplar of Rs.5,000 per Are but after a 70‑80% deduction. The appellants argued the deduction was unjust and …

CHOLA MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusGULAB SOMA SHINDE AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, invoking the principle of interest of justice, condoned the delay and allowed the …

CHOLA MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusGULAB SOMA SHINDE AND ANR.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The plaintiff, Chola MS General Insurance Company Ltd, filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing its first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding them satisfactory, condoned the …

CHOLA MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTDversusSUNITA SUNIL PAWAR AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The plaintiff, Chola MS General Insurance Company Ltd, filed multiple applications seeking condonation of a 71‑day delay in filing its first appeals and a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, finding them satisfactory, condoned the …

RAMJI MANIKRAO PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, a poor agriculturist, filed an application seeking condonation of a 2,294‑day delay in filing his first appeal against a judgment dated 12 April 2007. He argued that the delay was not deliberate, arising from his illiteracy, lack of legal knowledge, and communication gaps with his …

DHONDIRAM RAMRAO SURYAWANSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

These cross-appeals arose from a common judgment and award dated 17 April 2008 of the Land Reference Court, Latur, in LAR Nos. 86, 88, 89, 92 and 252 of 2007. The claimants' lands in Gurnal, Taluka Deoni, District Latur, were acquired for construction of the Gurnal Storage Tank under a Section 4 …

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANRversusVINAYAK SHANKARRAO MANE

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The State of Maharashtra filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay—209 and 208 days respectively—for filing first appeals, citing the time taken to obtain directions from the Law and Judiciary Department. The learned Advocate General for the State argued that the delay was not …

Kavita Suresh SonawaneversusTHE NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by The New India Insurance Company in the court pursuant to an earlier judgment and award. The respondent opposed, arguing that the tribunal had not properly considered the deceased's contributory negligence in the …

THE STAE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusKISHAN RAMRAO BIRADAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Land Reference Court award that granted compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank at Sukni village. The State contended that the compensation rates of Rs.3100 per R for non‑irrigated land and Rs.4650 per R for irrigated land …

THE STATE OF MAH THR. COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANRversusASHOK HIRAJI DEOKARE

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Land Reference Court's award of compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank at Sukni, Latur. The claimants argued that the court correctly applied a 10% escalation based on sale exemplars predating the acquisition …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusHANSRAJ PANDURANG BIRADAR AND ANR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to a group of agricultural claimants whose lands were acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The claimants had been awarded Rs.3100 per R for non‑irrigated land and Rs.4650 per R for …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANRversusSAIDURAM BAPURAO BIRADAR

DISMISSED

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a 2007 judgment of the Latur Land Reference Court that awarded compensation for agricultural lands acquired for a minor irrigation tank. The claimants argued that the compensation, based on sale exemplars, was correctly increased by 10% for escalation …

NANDABAI SHATRUGHN BHISAD AND ANRversusMaharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The Maharashtra State Road Transportation Corporation (MSRTC) filed several applications before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court seeking relief in a civil dispute with Nandabai Shatrughn Bhisad and another. The first application requested a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and …

Reliance General Insurance Co LtdversusKamalbai Ramesh Tribhuvan and others

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The plaintiff, Kamalbai Ramesh Tribhuvan, filed three civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking (i) condonation of a 44‑day delay in filing a first appeal, (ii) a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and (iii) permission to withdraw half of the …

DATTA RAMCHANDRA KENDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The claimants appealed the awards of the Land Reference Court concerning the acquisition of their lands for two percolation tanks in Latur district. They argued that the court had incorrectly applied an aggregate method for compensation despite the existence of sale exemplars, and that the lands …

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AURANGABADversusSHUBHAM SHARADRA KALE AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay entertained three civil applications arising from a dispute between United India Insurance Company Ltd and Shubham Sharadra Kale et al. The first application sought condonation of a 95‑day delay in filing a first appeal, which the court allowed in the interest of justice. …

Vandana Sugriv GadhaveversusShriram General Insurance Co Ltd Jaipur Rajasthan

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Vandana Sugriv Gadhave, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount she had deposited in the High Court as security following an impugned judgment and award. The respondent, Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd, opposed the withdrawal, arguing that the deceased’s risk was …

RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusEKNATH BALKISAN BHANDARI

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench heard three first appeals filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against various respondents. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw all the appeals on instructions, and the court granted the leave, disposing the appeals as withdrawn. …

BALAJI NIVRATTI TOREversusTHE STATE OF MAH, THR. COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANOTHER.

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections in land acquisition matters involving poor agriculturist petitioners. The petitioners argued that they were unaware of procedural requirements and could not meet …

DATTU VITHALRAO SHINDE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAH, THR. COLLECTOR, LATUR

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners, a group of poor agriculturists whose lands had been acquired, filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing cross‑objections. The respondents opposed, arguing no sufficient cause was shown. The court examined the applications and, relying on the precedent set in …

MEENABAI DEORAO BHISE PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court considered two civil applications filed after a delay of 2,799 days, seeking condonation of that delay, setting aside the abatement of proceedings, and permission to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellants, Deorao Shankarrao Bhise and Subhadrabai Shankarrao Bhise, …

MEENABAI DEORAO BHISE PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The High Court considered two civil applications filed after a delay of 2,799 days, seeking to bring the legal representatives of deceased appellants, Deorao Shankarrao Bhise and Subhadrabai Shankarrao Bhise, on record and to set aside the abatement of the proceedings. The Court examined the reasons …

SHEHNAZ BEGUM AKBARKHAN AND ORSversusKHALEDA BEGUM GULAM AHMED KHAN ORS

DISMISSED

The applicants filed a civil revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting their application to dismiss a suit on grounds of limitation and improper valuation. They argued that the suit seeking cancellation of a 1997 relinquishment deed was filed within the three‑year period prescribed by …

MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTDversusJAYSHRI LAHU BHAD AND OTHERS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd filed Civil Application No.13046 of 2025 seeking condonation of a 37‑day delay in filing its first appeal. The court examined the reasons for the delay and concluded that it was not deliberate. Accordingly, the application for condonation was allowed, and the delay …

M.S.R.T.C. LTD. T/R DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NANDEDversusSAGUNA SITARAM PAWAR AND ORS

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioners sought condonation of a 94‑day delay in filing a first appeal, which the court allowed in the interest of justice. They also applied for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the appellant pursuant to the impugned judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), alleging the …

Shakilabi wo Husain Husainali MasuldarversusThe National Insurance Company Ltd

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicants, Shakilabi Wo Husain Husainali Masuldar and others, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the sum deposited by The National Insurance Company Ltd in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The application arose from the earlier First Appeal No. 91 of 2025, in …

REKHA SHANKAR LANDGE AND OTEHRSversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPNAY LTD

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The respondents filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw half of the amount deposited by the insurance company in the court following a motor accident judgment. The insurance company opposed, arguing that the report was lodged 22 days late and that there was no evidence linking the …

Kamalbai Ramesh TribhuvanversusReliance General Insurance Co Ltd

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The plaintiff, Kamalbai Ramesh Tribhuvan, filed three civil applications before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The first sought condonation of a 44‑day delay in filing a First Appeal, the second requested a stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award, and the third asked …

VINOD BANWARILAL JANGIDversusThe Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The applicant, Vinod Banwarilal Jangid, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by The Oriental Insurance Company Limited following a judgment and award. The respondent opposed, alleging contributory negligence by the claimant and asserting that no …

Humera Begum Mohammed KashifversusUnion of India

Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

The petitioner, Humera Begum Mohammed Kashif, filed a civil application seeking permission to withdraw the amount she had deposited in the court under an impugned judgment and award. The respondent, Union of India, opposed the request. The court, after hearing both sides, allowed the application in …