Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHAVANA ABHIMANYU NAYYARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court ordered the insertion of "plot No. 128‑A" before "plot No. 128‑B" and the addition of the word "each" after "meters" in the order dated 31.07.2026.

Summary

In an appeal arising from Order No. 80 of 2025, the appellant Bhavana Abhimanyu Nayyar filed a motion seeking correction of clerical errors in the order dated 31 July 2026. The specific corrections sought were the insertion of "plot No. 128‑A" before "plot No. 128‑B" and the addition of the word "each" after "meters". The issue before the court was whether such minor textual amendments could be permitted without altering the substantive content of the order. Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh held that the requested changes were purely clerical and did not affect the rights or obligations of the parties. Accordingly, the court directed that the order be corrected as specified and the corrected version be uploaded. The motion was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may correct clerical errors in a previously issued order without revisiting the substantive merits of the appeal

Subjects

  • clerical correction
  • speaking to minutes
  • civil procedure
  • order amendment
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:32766
                This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //


                                                                              ao80.25.speaking
                                                             -1-

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 80 OF 2025
                                                  WITH
                                   CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11659 OF 2025

                                     Bhavana Abhimanyu Nayyar
                                                 versus
                    The State of Maharashtra Through the Collector, Ahmednagar
                                                   ….
                 Advocate for the appellant: Mr. Girish K. Naik Thigle
                 A.G.P. for the respondents: Mr. P.M. Kulkarni
                                                   …..

                                            CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                                            DATED : 13th AUGUST, 2026

                 PER COURT :-


                 1.          This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of the
                 order dated 31.07.2026, passed in this Appeal from Order, as in
                 paragraph No. 2, at line No. 3, before “plot No. 128-B”, “plot No. 128-
                 A” has remained to be added and at line No. 4 of the same
                 paragraph, after the word “meters”, the word “each” is required to be
                 added.

                 2.          In view of the above, before “plot No. 128-B”, the words
                 “plot No. 128-A” be added and at line No. 4 of the same paragraph,
                 after the word “meters”, the word “each” be added. 3.

                 3.          The necessary corrections be carried out in the order dated
                 31.07.2026 and the corrected order be uploaded.

                 4.          The motion stands disposed of.


                                                              (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)

                 rlj/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.