Bombay High Court
PUNDLIK JAYRAM SURWADE DIED THR LRS CHANDRABHAGABI PUNDLIK SURWADE AND ORSversusTHE COLLECTOR, JALGAON, THR. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, A.T.P.H. AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
The delay is condoned, but the applicants are not entitled to interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.
Summary
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Pundlik Jayram Surwade, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 269‑day delay in preferring their first appeal against the Collector, Jalgaon and other officials. The respondent state authority did not appear despite being served. The court found the reasons for delay uncontroverted and saw no malafide intent. Consequently, the court condoned the delay but imposed a condition that the applicants would not be entitled to interest or statutory benefits for the period of delay and the lapse from 09‑02‑2024 to 14‑07‑2025. The civil application was allowed, granting the condonation with the stated restriction.
Issues considered
- Whether the 269‑day delay in filing the first appeal can be condoned.
- Whether the applicants are entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- first appeal
- interest
- statutory benefits
- land acquisition
- civil procedure
Judgment
1 23-CA.12912-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12912 OF 2024
IN FAST/4703/2024
PUNDLIK JAYRAM SURWADE DIED THR LRS
CHANDRABHAGABI PUNDLIK SURWADE AND ORS
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR, JALGAON, THR. SPECIAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER, A.T.P. H. AND ANR
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Jay R. Raundale h/f Mr. More
Kumar Gaurav M.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. N. Morampalle.
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 13.01.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard both sides.
2. Applicants seek to condone delay of 269 days in
preferring first appeal. Nobody appears for the contesting
respondent though served.
3. The reasons in the application are not controverted.
There is no reason to infer any malafides. The delay stands
condoned on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to
interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period as well as
lapses from 09.02.2024 to 14.07.2025.
4. Civil application is allowed.
2 23-CA.12912-24.odt
First Appeal
5. Admit.
6. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent
No.1/State Authority.
7. Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned
Court.
8. Print is dispensed with.
9. It is clarified that appellants shall not be entitled to
interest and the statutory benefits for the delayed period as
well as for the period of lapses.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
...
vmk/-
Checking your session…