Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

The Executive Engineer Seena Kolegaon Medium Project Dist Osmanabad And OthersversusBhaskar S/o Dattu Shinde

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court held that the delay is condoned and the appeal may be filed.

Summary

The Executive Engineer Seena Kolegaon Medium Project District, Osmanabad and others filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 232‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court at Paranda. The Court examined the reasons for the delay, which were attributed to administrative causes and were adequately explained. Relying on the principles of procedural fairness, the Court found the explanation satisfactory. Consequently, the application for condonation was allowed and the delay was formally condoned. The Court directed that the appeals be registered after clearing any office objections and disposed of the civil applications.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 232 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • appeal
  • civil procedure
  • High Court
  • administrative delay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25895
                                                                          966 CA 12976 25.odt

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               966 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12976 OF 2025
                                          IN FAST/33803/2025
                                                 WITH
                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12978 OF 2025
                                          IN FAST/33836/2025

              THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SEENA KOLEGAON MEDIUM PROJECT DIST
                                  OSMANABAD AND OTHERS
                                             VERSUS
                                 BHASKAR S/O DATTU SHINDE
                                                ...
                     Advocate for Applicant : Adv Sunita Dashrathrao Shelke
                                                ...
                                CORAM               : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

                                    DATE                   : 02.07.2026


             PER COURT :

                      Heard.

             2.      The applicant seeks to condone delay of 232 days caused in filing
             appeals against the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court at
             Paranda.

             3.      Perused the reasons stated in the application. Apparently, the delay is
             caused on account of administrative reasons, which are properly explained.
             In the result, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.

             3.      Appeals be registered after removal of the office objections.

             4.      Civil Applications are disposed of.



                                                     ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)

             mkd/-

                                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.