Bombay High Court
RAMESH S/O VISHWAMBHAR WADIKAR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The court held that the 651‑day delay in filing the appeals is condoned.
Summary
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Manik Wadikar, sought condonation of a 651‑day delay in filing first appeals concerning compensation for land acquisition. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector, opposed the condonation. The court examined the reasons provided in the applications and found them satisfactory. It held that the delay could be excused in the interest of justice. Consequently, the court allowed the applications, condoning the delay and directing that the first appeals be registered subject to removal of any office objections.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 651 days in filing appeals can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- appeal filing
- land acquisition compensation
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34273
974-ca-13384-2025.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13384 OF 2025
IN FAST/32640/2025
Manik S/o Vishwanath Wadikar Deceased Through Lrs Bharatbai And
Ors.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Atur And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Solanke Shrikrashna B.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.B. Bhange
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13377 OF 2025 IN FAST/32658/2025WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13378 OF 2025 IN FAST/32656/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13379 OF 2025 IN FAST/32653/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13383 OF 2025 IN FAST/32664/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13380 OF 2025 IN FAST/32660/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13381 OF 2025 IN FAST/32662/2025
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 06, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. The applicants seek to condone delay of 651 days caused
in filing appeals. Apparently, applicants are litigating for getting just
compensation towards acquired land.
3. In that view of matter and considering reasons as stated
in applications, case is made out to condone delay. Hence,
applications are allowed. Delay of 651 days caused in filing appeals
stands condoned. First Appeals be registered subject to removal of
office objections, if any.
(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
Mujaheed//
Checking your session…