Bombay High Court
BABRUWAN S/O MADHAV WADIKAR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND OTHERS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The court condoned the 651‑day delay in filing the appeals.
Summary
The petitioners, representing the estate of the deceased Manik Wadikar, sought condonation of a 651‑day delay in filing their appeals against the State of Maharashtra concerning compensation for acquired land. The court examined the reasons provided in the applications and found them satisfactory. It held that the delay could be condoned under the principles of equity and procedural law. Consequently, the applications were allowed, the delay was condoned, and the first appeals were ordered to be registered, subject to removal of any office objections. The judgment thus permits the petitioners to proceed with their appeals after the extended period.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 651 days in filing appeals can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- appeal filing
- land acquisition compensation
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34275
974-ca-13384-2025.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13384 OF 2025
IN FAST/32640/2025
Manik S/o Vishwanath Wadikar Deceased Through Lrs Bharatbai And
Ors.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Atur And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Solanke Shrikrashna B.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.B. Bhange
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13377 OF 2025 IN FAST/32658/2025WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13378 OF 2025 IN FAST/32656/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13379 OF 2025 IN FAST/32653/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13383 OF 2025 IN FAST/32664/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13380 OF 2025 IN FAST/32660/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13381 OF 2025 IN FAST/32662/2025
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 06, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. The applicants seek to condone delay of 651 days caused
in filing appeals. Apparently, applicants are litigating for getting just
compensation towards acquired land.
3. In that view of matter and considering reasons as stated
in applications, case is made out to condone delay. Hence,
applications are allowed. Delay of 651 days caused in filing appeals
stands condoned. First Appeals be registered subject to removal of
office objections, if any.
(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
Mujaheed//
Checking your session…