Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LOWR TERNA MEDIUM PROJECT DIVN OSMANABADversusSARUBAI MANIK LOMBHE AND ORS

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court held that the 135‑day delay in filing the First Appeal is condoned as it was neither deliberate nor intentional.

Summary

The Executive Engineer of the Lower Terna Medium Project Division filed an application seeking condonation of a 135‑day delay in filing a First Appeal (Stamp) No. 20768 of 2010. The respondents opposed the condonation, arguing that no sufficient reason existed for the delay. The Court examined the application and found that the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional. In the interest of justice, the Court held that the delay could be condoned. Consequently, the Civil Application was allowed and the delay was formally condoned.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 135 days in filing a First Appeal can be condoned under the principles of civil procedure

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • civil appeal
  • interest of justice
  • first appeal (stamp)
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13413
                                                                            931.CA.13991.2010



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13991 OF 2010
                                                IN
                              FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 20768 OF 2010

          The Executive Engineer
          Lower Terna Medium Project Divn Osmanabad                   ...Applicant

                   Versus

          Sarubai Manik Lombhe and Others                     ...Respondents
                                             ***
          Mr. Pravin S. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant
          Mr. Ashtekar R. K., Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
          Mrs. A. S. Mantri, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                             ***
                                           CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           DATE : MARCH 27, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.                 Heard.


          2.                 This is an application for condonation of delay of 135 days

          caused in filing the First Appeal.


          3.                 The learned counsel for the respondents strongly opposed

          the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to

          condone the delay.


          4.                 Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the

          application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is


          Shrikant Malani                                                        Page 1 of 2
                                                                   931.CA.13991.2010



neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence the following order.

                                      ORDER

      A)          The Civil Application is allowed.

      B)          The delay of 135 days caused in filing the First Appeal

                  is hereby condoned.




                                                ( SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. )




Shrikant Malani                                                         Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.