Bombay High Court
SANGITA DNYANESHWAR LONDHE AND ORSversusSUDAM GOVARDHAN JADHAV AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The appeal was filed within time, so condonation of delay was not warranted and the application was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in their appeal. The court examined the office remark which indicated that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed period. Since the appeal was timely, the court found no basis to entertain a condonation application. Consequently, the civil application for condonation of delay was dismissed. The court also ordered that notice be issued to the respondents in the first appeal, with a return date fixed for 27 February 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether condonation of delay is required when the appeal has been filed within the prescribed time limit
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- appeal
- timeliness
- court order
Judgment
915-fa-3562-2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 3562 OF 2025
Sangita Dnyaneshwar Londhe And Ors
VERSUS
Sudam Govardhan Jadhav And Anr
...
Mr. Dodiya Ramankumar Gopal, Advocate for Appellants
...
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14196 OF 2025
IN FA/3562/2025
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 08th JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14196 OF 2025
1. This is an application for condonation of delay.
2. The office remark shows that the appeal is filed within time,
therefore, the present application does not survive. Hence, the Civil
Application is disposed of.
FIRST APPEAL
1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 27.02.2026.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
Rushikesh/2025
Checking your session…