Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, OsmanabadversusDhondiba Maruti Mane and Ors.

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court held that the 289‑day delay in filing the appeal may be condoned on account of the administrative reasons explained.

Summary

The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad filed an application seeking condonation of a 289‑day delay in filing an appeal. The delay was attributed to administrative reasons, which were detailed in the application. The court examined the reasons and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the court allowed the application, condoning the delay. The appeal may now be registered, subject to the removal of any office objections.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 289 days in filing an appeal can be condoned on account of administrative reasons?

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • appeal
  • civil procedure
  • administrative reasons
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34287
                                                                                 983-ca-1630-2026.odt
                                                         (1)


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                   CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2026
                                            IN FAST/3617/2026

                          The Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, Osmanabad
                                                   VERSUS
                                       Dhondiba Maruti Mane And Ors.
                                                        ...
                            Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhage Hemant Uttamrao
                                  AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Patil
                                                          ...
                                                 CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                 DATED : AUGUST 06, 2026

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.             Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties.

                 2.             The applicant seeks to condone delay of 289 days caused

                 in filing appeal.

                 3.             Perused    application         and   reasons   stated    therein.

                 Apparently, delay is caused on account of administrative reasons

                 which are duly explained.

                 4.             Considering reasons as stated in application, case is made

                 out to condone delay. Hence, application is allowed. Delay of 289

                 days caused in filing appeal stands condoned.                 First Appeal be

                 registered subject to removal of office objections, if any.



                                                               (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)



                 Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.