Bombay High Court
ROBERT BHOLAJI GHODAKE (DIED) THRU. LRS. ARUNA ROBERT GHODAKE AND OTHERSversusJIVAN BHAURAO KAMBLE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
The delay is condoned on condition of payment of costs, and the abatement order is set aside with leave to bring the legal heirs on record.
Summary
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,219‑day delay in setting aside an abatement order and in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased sole applicant, Robert Bolhaji Ghodake, on record. The respondents argued that the delay was inordinate and that no rent had been paid by the deceased or his heirs. The Court adopted a pragmatic approach, noting that the cause of action survived against the legal heirs and that conditions could be imposed. It therefore condoned the delay on the condition that the applicants pay Rs.5,000 costs within four weeks. The abatement order was set aside, and leave was granted to bring the legal heirs on record, with liberty to amend. Both parties were directed to take necessary steps as per the civil revision application.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 2,219 days in setting aside the abatement order can be condoned
- Whether the abatement order should be set aside
- Whether the legal heirs of the deceased applicant can be brought on record
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- abatement
- legal heirs
- civil procedure
- costs
Judgment
(1) 93 CRA NO. 84 OF 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
93 CRA NO. 84 OF 2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2003 OF 2026
IN CRA/84/2018
ROBERT BOLHAJI GHODAKE DIED THROUGH LRS ARUNA W/O ROBERT
GHODAKE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
JIVAN BHAURAO KAMBLE AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Kagne Vinayak M., Advocate for the Applicants
Mr. V. S. Bedre, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 3
…
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 20.02.2026
PER COURT :-
CIVIL APPLICATION FOR DELAY
. Heard both sides.
2. The applicants seek to condone delay of 2219 days in setting
aside abatement and in bringing legal heirs of sole applicant – Robert Bolhaji
Ghodake on record.
3. Mr. V. S. Bedre, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 3
submits that the delay is inordinate and no rent was paid by the deceased
applicant during his lifetime, nor thereafter by his legal heirs.
(2) 93 CRA NO. 84 OF 2018
4. I propose to adopt a pragmatic approach in condoning the delay.
The cause of action survives as against the legal heirs of the applicant. It is a
fit case to impose conditions.
5. The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants pay
the respondents costs of Rs.5,000/- within a period of four (4) weeks from
today. Abatement is set aside. Leave is granted to bring the legal heirs of the
sole applicant on record.
6. Both parties shall be at liberty to carry out amendment.
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION
7. Time is granted to take necessary steps against the deceased
respondent no.1.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…