Bombay High Court
RUKMINIBAI W/O. SAKHARAM MHASKE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeals, subject to an undertaking by the petitioners that they will not claim interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.
Summary
The petitioners, comprising several landowners, sought just compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra and filed applications for condonation of delay in filing their appeals. They argued that financial duress and lack of procedural knowledge prevented timely filing. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and if the petitioners could claim interest or statutory benefits for the period of delay. It held that the delay could be condoned provided the petitioners executed an undertaking not to claim such interest or benefits. Accordingly, the applications were allowed, the delay condoned, and the petitioners were directed to file the undertaking within four weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may condone the delay in filing appeals for compensation under land acquisition statutes.
- Whether petitioners are entitled to claim interest or statutory benefits for the period of delay once the appeals are allowed.
Subjects
- land acquisition
- compensation
- condonation of delay
- interest
- statutory benefits
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24894
984 to 987.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
984 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2351 OF 2026
IN FAST/4701/2026
Rukminibai W/o. Sakharam Mhaske And Ors.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.H. Koralkar
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Sangle
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Sunita D. Shelke
AND
985 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2353 OF 2026
IN FAST/4714/2026
Devidas S/o. Bajirao Mhaske.
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar
AND
986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2357 OF 2026
IN FAST/4791/2026
Dharyabhu @ Darebhau Rambhau Kakade Since Deceased Through
L.rs. Limbabai Dharybhu Kakade
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Jalna And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar
AND
987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2026
IN FAST/4605/2026
Asaram S/o. Bapurao Mhaske
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. R.K. Ingole
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar
984 to 987.odt
(2)
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : JUNE 25, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. Considering submissions advanced and reasons as stated
in applications, it can be observed that applicants are litigating for
getting just compensation towards acquired land. Due to financial
duress and lack of knowledge regarding Court procedure, appeals
could to be filed within time. In this backdrop, considering length of
delay, applications can be allowed by putting certain conditions.
3. In result, applications are allowed. The delay caused in
filing appeals is condoned, subject to condition that applicants shall
furnish an undertaking with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that
they shall not claim interest and statutory benefits for delayed period,
in case first appeals are allowed thereby enhancing compensation.
4. Such undertakings be filed within a period of four weeks
from today.
(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
Mujaheed//
Checking your session…