Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST. COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERSversusVISHNU DNYANOBA SAGAR

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court condoned the delay of 282 and 287 days and allowed the applications for registration of the appeals.

Summary

The State of Maharashtra, represented by the District Collector of Latur, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals. The applications, numbered 2707 to 2718, alleged delays of 282 and 287 days, which were explained in the accompanying affidavits. The learned Additional Government Pleader, S. P. Sonpawale, argued that the reasons for delay were sufficient to merit condonation. Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar examined the explanations and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court allowed the applications, condoning the delays and directing that the appeals be registered subject to removal of any office objections.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay of 282 days and 287 days in filing the appeals can be condoned under the applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure

Subjects

  • delay condonation
  • civil procedure
  • appeals
  • High Court of Bombay
  • registration of appeals

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:26162
                                                            990 CA 2708 26+.odt

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         990 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2708 OF 2026
                                    IN FAST/5405/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2714 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5414/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2717 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5423/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2712 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5411/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2713 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5414/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2715 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5419/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2716 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5419/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2710 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5408/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2711 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5411/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2709 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5408/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2718 OF 2026
                                     IN FAST/5423/2026
                                           WITH
                           CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2707 OF 2026
                                    IN FAST/5405/2026

             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST. COLLECTOR, LATUR
                                         AND OTHERS
                                            VERSUS
                                  VISHNU DNYANOBA SAGAR
                                               ...
                           A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale
                           Advocate for Respondents : Mr. M. P. Kolpe

                                                                            1/2
                                                             990 CA 2708 26+.odt
                                       ...
                       CORAM                 :   S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

                       DATE                  : 02.07.2026


PER COURT :

         CIVIL APPLICATIONS FOR DELAY CONDONATION

1.      Heard learned A.G.P. appearing for the applicants.

2.      Perused the application and reasons stated therein. Delay of 282 and
287 days in respective applications is duly explained.

3.      In that view of the matter, the applications are allowed. Delay of 282
days and 287 days caused in filing appeals is condoned.

4.      Appeals be registered subject to removal of office objections.



                                        ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)




mkd/-




                                                                             2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.