Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMA GAJMAL KOLI (DIED) SHANTARAM RAMA KOLI (DIED) THR THEIR LRS NALINI AND ORS.versusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR JALGAON AND ORS.

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court condoned the 1,353‑day delay in filing the appeal, subject to the petitioners furnishing an undertaking not to claim interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.

Summary

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Rama Gajmal Koli, filed an application seeking condonation of a 1,353‑day delay in filing their appeal against the order of the District Collector, Jalgaon. The Court examined the reasons for the delay as set out in the petition. While acknowledging the substantial length of the delay, the Court considered the submissions and found merit in allowing the condonation. It conditioned the condonation on the petitioners filing an undertaking with the Registrar that they would not claim interest or any statutory benefits for the period of delay. The undertaking must be filed within six weeks from the date of the order. Consequently, the application for condonation was allowed subject to the stipulated condition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 1,353 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • appeal
  • interest
  • statutory benefits
  • undertaking
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24901
                                                                           991-ca-3038-2026.odt
                                                     (1)


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                   CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3038 OF 2026
                                            IN FAST/5247/2026

                     Rama Gajmal Koli (died) Shantaram Rama Koli (died) Thr Their Lrs
                                              Nalini And Ors.
                                                 VERSUS
                                 The District Collector Jalgaon And Ors.
                                                     ...
                             Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Patil Jitendra Vijay
                              AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. C.V. Bhadane
                           Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Ms. Snehal Kulkarni
                                                     ...
                                               CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                 DATED : JUNE 25, 2026
                 PER COURT :-

                 1.             Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties.

                 2.             The applicants seek to condone delay of 1353 days

                 caused in filing appeal.

                 3.             Considering submissions advanced and reasons as stated

                 in application, delay caused in filing appeal is explained. However,

                 considering length of delay, application can be allowed by putting

                 certain conditions.

                 4.             In result, application is allowed. The delay caused in

                 filing appeal is condoned, subject to condition that applicants shall

                 furnish an undertaking with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that

                 they shall not claim interest and statutory benefits for delayed period.

                 5.             Such undertaking to be filed within a period of six weeks

                 from today.

                                                           (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
                 Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.