Bombay High Court
GUNWANT SHARADRAO SARAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court condoned the delay, allowed the civil application, and restored the writ petition to its original position.
Summary
Gunwant Sharadrao Saraf filed a civil application (No. 3061 of 2019) seeking relief in the context of Writ Petition No. 85 of 2007 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The respondents raised an issue that one of their counsel, Mr. A. S. Bajaj, was no longer on the Municipal Corporation’s panel, necessitating the engagement of a new lawyer. The applicant also sought condonation of delay in filing the application. The Court, after considering the representation issue and the reasons for delay, condoned the delay and allowed the civil application. Consequently, the writ petition was restored to its original position and placed on the board for urgent hearing on 3 September 2026, with a direction that the petitioner must argue the petition on the next date or face dismissal for default. The civil application was thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the civil application can be condoned.
- Whether the absence of a counsel from the Municipal Corporation’s panel affects the proceedings.
Subjects
- delay condonation
- civil application
- writ petition
- legal representation
- urgent hearing
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:32890-DB
1 8-CA 3061-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3061 OF 2019
IN WP/85/2007
Gunwant Sharadrao Saraf .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. S. A. Deshmukh & Mr.Abhijit D. Namde, Advocates for
Applicant.
Smt. J. P. Reddy, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. V. D. Khivesara, Advocate h/f Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
DATE : 31st JULY, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. The learned advocate Mr. Khivesara informs that, now the
learned advocate Mr. Bajaj is not on the panel of Municipal
Corporation. The Municipal Corporation to make arrangement to
engage another lawyer.
2. For the reasons recorded in the application, delay stands
condoned. The civil application is allowed. The writ petition
stands restored to its original position.
2 8-CA 3061-2019.odt
3. Place the writ petition on board dated 03.09.2026 in urgent
category.
4. Petitioner in writ petition to positively argue the petition on
the next date. If the petition is not argued for any reason, the
same shall be dismissed in default.
5. The civil application stands disposed of.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
Checking your session…