Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
263 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
Nivrutti Rangnath Yadav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate Sanjay A. Wakure, later informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order of transfer dated 9 February 2013. The High Court examined the petition and concluded that there was no surviving cause of action or issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for lack of any remaining substantive …
Chaya Anurath Sanap filed Writ Petition No. 199 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition sought relief through a writ, but the Court examined the prayer and found that the petition had become infructuous. No …
Pralhad Bhagwan Limbekar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner informed the Court that the reliefs sought had become infructuous. The Court considered the petitioner's submission …
The petitioner, Limbejalgaon Grampanchayat, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to the State of Maharashtra to consider a representation dated 16 March 2013 and to ensure that its possession of the writ property is not disturbed. The petition also requested that no third‑party interest be …
Ajit Lakhminchand Bothra sought condonation of delay in filing a review application against the order dated 21‑01‑2015 in Writ Petition No. 740/2015. The review was filed on 06‑01‑2016 after the Supreme Court, on 13‑04‑2015, allowed the withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition. The respondents did not …
Madhukar Ramchandra Palve filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking a court direction that Zilla Parishad Nos. 4 and 5 consider representations he had made. The petitioner argued that the authorities had not acted on his representations. The Court examined whether the Zilla Parishad was obligated to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging a bogus allotment of land (Survey No. 56, Kadiwadgaon village, Beed district) and sought court‑ordered action against the authorities. They relied on a representation dated 29‑01‑2014 submitted by the Tahsildar, which indicated that an inquiry had been …
The Asradevi Majoor Shakari Sanstha, a labour co‑operative society, was black‑listed by the Collector of Beed for alleged irregularities in government contracts. The society challenged the black‑listing in Writ Petition No. 1431 of 2024, but the High Court dismissed the petition. The society filed a …
The petitioners, representing several groups of forest dwellers, sought to withdraw their writ petitions while requesting that the interim relief remain in force. The Court considered the petitioners' request and the role of the Committee constituted to protect their rights. It ordered that all the …
The petitioner, Jalgaon Zilla S. T. Karmachari Sahakari Path Pedhi Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Over the course of the proceedings, a substantial lapse of time occurred. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the …
Petitioners Pramod Madharao Badgujar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was filed under the appropriate writ jurisdiction. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel …
The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Ltd. and Maharashtra State Co‑operative Marketing Federation Ltd., challenged the Government’s resolution dated 04‑08‑2021 which made the 7th Pay Commission benefits applicable from 01‑07‑2021, arguing that their respective …
The petitioners filed several writ petitions (Nos. 2089, 2091, 2096, 3012, 3013 of 2016) seeking a mandatory direction that the State of Maharashtra frame a specific policy within a fixed timeline. They argued that the earlier order in Writ Petition No. 2087 of 2016, which dealt with a similar …
The petitioners, Baburao Vithal Sanap and another, filed a writ petition seeking rental compensation for land that had been acquired, claiming entitlement from the date of possession until the award under the Land Acquisition Act. The High Court examined whether such a claim could be entertained …
The petitioners, Medha Chandrakant Rekhe and another, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. While the case was pending, the Education Officer granted the approval the petitioners were seeking in 2018. The petitioners subsequently wrote to the court on 10 June 2026 …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property, alleging that the statutory requirements under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act – notably publication in two widely‑circulated newspapers and posting of a public notice – were not complied …
The petitioners, Janardhan Nivrutti Panchal and Kalindabai Vishnu Chavan, filed civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, represented by the Collector of Latur, opposed the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition alleging that their grievance under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act had been addressed, the related amount withdrawn, and an appeal pending, but a representation filed on 30.11.2015 with the Chief Administrator of CIDCO remained undecided. They sought a …
Tulshiram Ramchandra filed a writ petition and several related civil applications seeking to vacate an interim relief that had been in force for a long period. The Court noted that the interim relief had been operating for an extended time and ordered that the petition be placed for final disposal …
Gunwant Sharadrao Saraf filed a civil application (No. 3061 of 2019) seeking relief in the context of Writ Petition No. 85 of 2007 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The respondents raised an issue that one of their counsel, Mr. A. S. Bajaj, was no longer on the Municipal Corporation’s …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The petitioner, Kalikadevi Bahuuddeshi... Krida Va Sanskrutika Mandal, filed Writ Petition No. 11667 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through its President S.V. Kshirsagar, sought relief but later instructed its …
The Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Gadkhamb, represented by its President Bapuro Khushal Patil, filed writ petition No. 4621 of 2017 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents seeking relief regarding its pay scale. The petitioner argued that its pay scale had not been fixed …
The Superintendent Engineer, Jalgaon filed a civil application seeking to vacate interim relief granted in a writ petition that challenged a 2023-24 tender for private security guards at the Warangaon Talwel Lift Irrigation Project. The writ petition alleged that the tender violated government …
The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and payment of arrears, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra …
The petitioners, a large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is continuous and the scheme has been renamed but …
Petitioners Chandrakant Babasaheb Garje and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw, disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, and vacated any interim relief …
The petitioners, Kesharbai Ramlal Salambad and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, they applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and permitted the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed …
The petitioner, Ranjana Baba Mane, filed a writ petition challenging her disqualification as a member of the Gram Panchayat on the ground that she had not submitted a caste validity certificate. The High Court examined whether the petition could be entertained given that the term of the Gram …
The case involved two writ petitions concerning the interchange of appointment approvals between Pratibha Darade (petitioner) and Manjusha Mule (respondent no.7) by the School Management and the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Beed. The petitioner was originally appointed to a partially‑aided …
The petitioner, Sunita Rama Khude, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The Court had previously ordered on 27 March 2026 that failure to appear on the next date would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. The petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date of 10 …
The petitioner, a retired lecturer, challenged clauses 3 and 4 of a 1983 Government decision that limited service‑continuity protection to teachers absorbed within the same management, alleging violation of Article 14. He argued that earlier circulars and resolutions (1975, 1976, 1981) entitled him …
The petitioners, Tukaram Dagadu Gaikwad and Pushpalata Manohar Khambete, filed writ petitions (Nos. 11663 and 11666 of 2017) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the substantive issue raised in the petitions had already been decided by a …
The petitioner, Narayandas Shankarlal Agrawal, filed Writ Petition No. 4869 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for …
The petitioner, Shivraj Dnyanoba Ghule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an unspecified action of the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Shri Nagargoje Ankush N., requested permission to withdraw the petition. The …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property by the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO, alleging procedural violations under the Land Acquisition Act, including non‑compliance with the dual‑newspaper publication requirement of Section 6(2) and the …
The applicant, Shankar Ambadas Jadhav, filed a civil application seeking relaxation of a condition imposed by the High Court on 9 January 2009, which required him to furnish a bank guarantee for the withdrawal of a deposited amount. The condition became moot after the first appeal in the same matter …
The petitioner, Vikas Kishanrao Dharurkar, filed a writ petition challenging the Election Commission's notification dated 17 February 2017 that delimited wards for the Parbhani City Municipal Corporation elections. The petition sought to set aside the notification on grounds of its validity. The …
The petitioner, Mhatardeo Bhimaji Pakhare, filed Writ Petition No. 11655 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. Over the years, no substantive progress was made and the petition remained pending. The petitioner’s counsel …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 3232 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over the years, the petition remained pending and, by the efflux of time, became infructuous. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition could no longer be pursued. The Court …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5-2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, arguing the …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for the Katpur minor‑irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court and the acquiring body (the State) contested the same award. The claimants …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the reference court. The claimants argued that the land was …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several stamp duty appeals against multiple respondents, many of whom were deceased. The corporation sought condonation of substantial delays—up to 2832 days—in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased onto the record and in …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench considered several civil applications filed by Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation seeking condonation of delay in bringing legal heirs of deceased respondents and in filing stamp appeals. The court examined a delay of 2,832 days in …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award by the Special Land Acquisition Officer undervalued their land, which they contended was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, arguing that the land was irrigated and the rate of Rs.4,00,000 per acre was inadequate. The State …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging that the lands …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and enhanced by the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were taken from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the reference court, arguing that the land was irrigated and …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur that were acquired for a minor irrigation project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation based on rates of Rs.1.5‑2.4 lakh per hectare, which the claimants challenged as inadequate, seeking Rs.20 …
The Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GMIDC) filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing stamp duty appeals and in bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondents on record. The court examined whether the substantial delays—up to 2832 days—could be …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The applications were filed before the High Court at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. The Court examined the request and noted the …
The petitioners filed three civil applications seeking an early date of hearing for appeals pending since 2013 concerning compensation claims against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court noted that the appeals had been pending for an extended period and required a definitive schedule for final …
The petitioner, Sarika Yuvraj Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 3974 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that, due to the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a group of appeals arising from the acquisition of 104 hectares of land for the Katpur minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing that the …
The case involved a large group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares of agricultural land were acquired. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land in Khopegaon, Kanheri, Wasangaon and Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for a minor irrigation project, alleging the lands were irrigated and the award was too low. The State (acquiring body) …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. The claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was far too low and …
The case involved a group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate, asserting the …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (the owners of 104 ha of agricultural land) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, arguing …
The High Court heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body contested the same award as …
The Bombay High Court heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed …
The claimants owned 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur and challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, warranting a higher rate. The acquiring body appealed, contending the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (landowners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a mass of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the award of Rs 4,00,000 per acre for dry land (and higher rates for irrigated land) was inadequate and that they …
The petitioners, government employees whose tribal validity certificates were pending before the Scrutiny Committee, were super‑annuated. The State Government, by a resolution dated 14‑12‑2022, created supernumerary posts for such employees, granting them pensionary benefits but denying promotion …
The petitioners, government employees whose tribe validity certificates were pending before the Scrutiny Committee, were placed in superannuation. The State of Maharashtra had created supernumerary posts for such employees, granting them pension benefits but denying promotion and compassionate …
The petitioners, a group of farmers, filed a review application under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the earlier order that denied them alternate land after their original land was acquired by the State. The State argued that the land had already been acquired, an …
Petitioner Madhukar Gobra Rathod filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the State of Maharashtra to decide his representation dated 16 January 1990, and alternatively to initiate land acquisition proceedings for a parcel of land. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Ravikumar Sukhdeo Raybhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Over the course of the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due to the passage of time, …
The case involved Vishwanathappa Nagshettiappa Kapse (deceased) represented by his legal heirs against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant's counsel, Shri Ravibhushan P. Adgaonkar, sought an extension of time to deposit a specified amount. The respondent, the State, was represented by Ms. Rashmi …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 4946 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioners’ counsel informed the court that there was nothing left to pursue in the petition. Consequently, the court found the petition to be infructuous. The judges …
Shiva Trusts Rajesh Bhaiyya Tope College of Pharmacy filed writ petition No. 9378 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the Pharmacy Council of India. The petition remained pending for several years. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, by reason of the efflux …
The petitioner, Shiva Trusts Pratibhatai Pawar College of Pharmacy, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petition was filed in 2015 and, due to the passage of time, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court considered whether …
The petitioner, Rajabhau Vyenkati Maske, filed Writ Petition No. 4526 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking appointment in respondent No. 4 institution/Zilla Parishad. The appointment was sought pursuant to a letter dated 05.03.2015. The petition was filed on 26.03.2017. …
The petitioner, Smita Mahadeo Lendave Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012 sought regularisation, permanency benefits and creation of super‑numerary posts, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural …
The petitioners, Tukaram Bhiva Aaglave and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a matter that they claimed was already decided in an earlier order dated 13 January 2026 and in the reported case of Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of …
The petitioner, Maharashtra Association for Canoeing and Kayaking through its member Amrut Madhavrao Mundhe, filed a writ petition. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that due to subsequent developments, the reliefs sought no longer survived. The court, noting this, …
M/s. Namrata Construction Company filed Writ Petition No. 4331 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that they had worked continuously and were entitled to regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary. The State of Maharashtra, the Union of …
The petitioner, Kondappa Sadashiv Kore, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Indian Railways to construct a new railway station at Kallam Road near Kasbe Tadwale and to order all trains to halt there. The High Court examined whether it had the jurisdiction and expertise to entertain such …
The State of Maharashtra filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same land acquisition proceedings. The court, relying on its earlier order in CA No.4670/2012, held that the delay was condonable. It allowed all the pending civil …
The petitioners, teachers appointed in a school managed by respondent No.6, filed writ petitions alleging that internal management disputes prevented their appointment proposals from being forwarded to the Education Officer for approval. The State of Maharashtra issued a Government Resolution on …
Petitioners Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil and Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari Society filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur and the State Co-operative Election Authority respectively. No appearance …
The petitioners filed two writ petitions (Nos. 4311/2016 and 4312/2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that, due to the passage of time, the petitions had become infructuous. The Court examined whether the petitions could still be …
The petitioners, former government employees, claimed that their tribe validity certificates were pending before the Scrutiny Committee, leaving them superannuated without full pensionary benefits. The State of Maharashtra had issued a resolution on 14‑12‑2022 creating supernumerary posts for such …
The petitioner, a qualified Shikshan Sevak, was appointed to a school in 2006 but was discharged in 2008 due to reduction of school divisions. He sought reinstatement and later re‑appointment, invoking Clause 5 of the Government Resolution dated 10‑06‑2005 and the Maharashtra Employees of Private …
The petitioners, teachers appointed in a school managed by respondent No.6, filed writ petitions alleging that internal management disputes prevented their appointment proposals from being forwarded to the Education Officer for approval. The State of Maharashtra issued a Government Resolution on …
Ratan Asaram Wagh, suffering from alcoholic liver cirrhosis, applied to the Education Officer for reimbursement of liver transplant expenses, but was denied because the disease was not listed in the Government's medical reimbursement scheme. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a …
Petitioners Bhaiyasaheb Limbaji Shitole and Sunil Zoting Bhalerao filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court granted them a final opportunity to appear, setting a deadline of 23 January 2026, and warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal. The …
The petitioner, Shakil Abdul Raheman Qureshi, filed a writ petition (30-WP-6574-2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. An order dated 09.01.2026 required the petitioner to appear, but he failed to do so. The court noted the non‑appearance and, under procedural rules, dismissed the …
The applicant, Burzin Jangoo Printer, filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited in the High Court following a judgment (MACP No.133/2018) that awarded Rs.14,00,000 as compensation against The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. The insurer appealed the award on the ground of …
The petitioner, Chandrakant Sakharlal Suratwala, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by a bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court examined whether the petitioner could contest the notice and whether an alternative remedy existed. It held that the petitioner has an …
Ravindra Baliram Chavan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking that the State authorities consider his representation dated 20 March 2014. The petitioner argued that the authorities had failed to act on his representation, causing prejudice. The respondents, the State of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in 2018 seeking directions to decide representation and hold an enquiry against a respondent. The case remained pending for several years and was adjourned at the petitioners' request in July 2018. The court observed that the petitioners had lost interest in …
The petitioner, Sukhdeo Amrut Patil, filed Writ Petition No. 9073 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for an extended period without any substantive developments. The petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007‑2012, claimed that despite continuous service they were denied regularisation and permanency benefits because of artificial technical breaks. The State of Maharashtra, the …
A large group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012 sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development …
Shahik Jalil Shahik Chand filed Writ Petition No. 8160 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the cause of action had become …
The petitioner, Jamir Kueshi Dadamiya Kureshi, filed Writ Petition No. 4703 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Union of India and another party. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due …
The petitioner, Vijaya Pralhad Shimpi, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and other authorities to enforce an order of the District Consumer Forum, Dhule, against Credit Co-operative Society No.4. The petition alleged that the authorities had failed to act on …
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court was inadequate. The claimants …
The case involved a large group of land acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court was too low and that the land was irrigated, seeking a higher rate and interest under Section 34 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
Shri Shaneswar Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Borgaon, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra and other authorities to grant it permission to operate an aided tribal ashram school at Janapuri, Loha, Nanded, which had been previously run by another institution that is …
Petitioners Hanumant Uttamrao Punekar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a direction for the authorities to consider a representation dated 29 January 2016. The petitioners requested that the Collector and the Land Acquisition Officer of …
The case involved a large group of land‑acquisition appeals concerning 104 hectares of land in Latur district acquired for a minor irrigation project. Claimants argued that the lands were irrigated and that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. The claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The claimants, owners of 104 hectares of land acquired for a minor irrigation project in Latur, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, alleging it was too low and that the land was irrigated, not dry. The acquiring body appealed, contending the award was …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a consolidated group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants, who were owners of 104 hectares of agricultural land, challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants alleged that the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and affirmed by the Reference Court …
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a common land‑acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur. Claimants (land owners) challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, arguing that the land was …
The petitioner, Kishor Dinkar Sanap, filed a writ petition (No. 1412 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Over time, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after noting the petition was no longer viable, disposed of it as …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of first appeals arising from a land acquisition for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Reference Court, while the acquiring body …
The High Court considered applications for condonation of delay in several first‑appeal matters where the original orders had been dismissed for default. The court examined a 103‑day delay and other procedural lapses, noting that all parties were served and present before the court. It held that the …
The petitioners sought a court order directing the school authorities to correct their caste entry in school records from "Mala Jangam" to "Hindu‑Nhavi". They relied on the Full Bench judgment in Janabai v State of Maharashtra, which held that under Clause 26.4 of the Maharashtra Secondary School …
The Society for Adoption Knowledge Awareness & Resource (Sakar) filed Writ Petition No. 7459 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was originally filed on grounds that were not detailed in the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 622 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for a considerable period. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court accepted that the …
The petitioner, Chandrakant Suresh Nargulla, was listed as number one on a waiting list for the post of Civil Engineering Assistant. A vacancy arose in 2017, and the petitioner claimed he should be appointed based on his position on the list. The court examined the terms of the waiting list and …
The petitioner, Dnyanoba Sitaram Mundhe, filed writ petition No. 868 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was heard before Justices Kishore C. Sant and Sushil M. Ghodeswar. During the hearing, the parties informed the Court that they …
The petitioner, Idara-e-Behboodi Niswan Education Society, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Shri Kulkarni Girish N. (Mardikar), applied for leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Babasaheb Kashinath Pardhi, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The Court noted that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench in a prior case. It was admitted that the post in question did not receive a grant until 2005, making the …
The petitioner, Pragat Maharashtra Mandal Degloor, filed Writ Petition No. 8458 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through its counsel, submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Syed Khaja Miyan Syed Baba Miyan, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, in both the morning and subsequent sessions of the hearing. The court inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the writ petition. Consequently, the court exercised its …
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking leave to withdraw the balance of money deposited with the Court during the pendency of their appeals. The appeals had been disposed on 20 April 2026, and the Court had previously allowed withdrawal of 50% of the deposited amount upon an …
Petitioners Dattatray Hanmantrao Khandare and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were represented by Smt. Surekha G. Chincholkar, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S. …
The applicants, Ramkisan Balasaheb Patil and others, filed a civil application seeking restoration of a writ petition (WP/676/2020) that had been dismissed in default because they failed to remove office objections within the two‑week period ordered on 24‑03‑2026. The application was filed 60 days …
The petitioners, MANTHAN BEER SHOPEE SELU through proprietor R.M. Lokulwar, filed writ petition No. 11661 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition remained pending for several years. The learned counsel for the petitioner …
The petitioners, Dilip Vinayak Thorat and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. They later approached the Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioners were represented by Advocate S.B. Kakde, while the State was represented by Advocate Saie …
Petitioners Vinayak Tukaram Tekale and another filed a writ petition (14 WRIT PETITION NO. 2774 OF 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the District Social Welfare Officer, Osmanabad and others. The petition sought relief under Article 226 of the Constitution …
The petitioner, Neelvastu Holiday Resorts And Properties, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After filing, the petitioner submitted written instructions to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the written instruction as annexure X. Upon reviewing the …
The petitioner, Ashok Tukaram Phulewad, challenged the invalidation of his claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. The Committee had dismissed his claim on the ground of his repeated …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions and regulatory authority. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) should have supremacy over …
Four writ petitions (Nos. 6687, 6689, 6690, 6691 of 2016) were filed by pharmacy colleges challenging the admission process and the jurisdictional hierarchy between the Pharmacy Council of India and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). The petitioners contended that AICTE's …
Petitioner Atul Subhash Dusane filed a writ petition challenging his appointment. The Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Region issued a communication dated 07.03.2019 confirming his absorption as an Assistant Teacher in Zilla Parishad, Nashik, thereby redressing his grievance. The petitioner …
Four writ petitions filed in 2016 challenged the jurisdiction of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) over pharmacy colleges, seeking relief regarding admissions. The petitioners argued that the Pharmacy Council should have exclusive authority over such matters. The Court observed …
The petitioner, Nakul Suresh Tambe, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the prayers originally sought in the PIL no longer …
Petitioner Sainath Gangadhar Wantekar filed a writ petition alleging that the Scrutiny Committee had not decided his claim for tribal status. The petition sought a direction to the Committee to make a determination. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the Court that the …
The petitioner, Ms. Bharati Ramesh Tayade, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Nashik, to decide her claim dated 01/06/2012 within a stipulated time. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner, while Ms. J. P. Reddy, AGP, …
The petitioner, Sumit Jairam Patil, filed a writ petition seeking the approval of his appointment by the Education Officer (Secondary). The petition alleged that the proposal for his appointment was pending with the respondent. The Court examined whether the Education Officer was obligated to …
The petitioners, Jai Ambika Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a civil application seeking restoration of their writ petition (No. 14909 of 2019) which had been dismissed in default on 27.03.2026 for failing to remove office objections within the prescribed time. They admitted a delay of 46 days in …
Aniket Sunil Raut filed a writ petition seeking the disposal of his pending claim before the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. The petitioner, a student, required the certificate to secure admission to professional courses. The High Court noted the undue …
The applicants filed a civil review application (No. 66 of 2024) seeking reconsideration of a prior order. During the hearing, the applicants, through their counsel, requested leave of the court to withdraw the review application. The respondents opposed the withdrawal. The bench considered whether …
The petitioners, Late Haribai Warpudkar Gramin Mahila Sevabhavi Sanstha and another, filed Writ Petition No. 8325 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education. The petition was presented by Advocate Anshuman …
The petitioner, Archana Magasvargiya Mahila Vikas Pratishthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later informed the Court that its grievance had been redressed. Accordingly, the petitioner sought …
The petitioner, Syed Shahin Sharafat Ali Borikar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief. After the proceedings, the petitioner, through his advocate, requested leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of filing had been achieved. The Court …
The petitioner, Suryabhan Shankar Malunjakar, filed writ petition No. 6275 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner failed to appear for the first hearing and again did not appear when the matter was called for a second time. The Court observed that the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Sardar Patel Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, filed a writ petition seeking certain reliefs against the State of Maharashtra and others. After filing, the Government issued a decision on 7 October 2024 granting the reliefs sought. The petitioner’s chairman communicated to the counsel that, …
The petitioners, junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) from 2007‑2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and arrears of salary, arguing that their work is of a perennial nature and that the Maharashtra Rural Development Agency …
The petitioners, Prakash Kashinath Mande and others, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 357‑day delay in filing first appeals against a judgment and award of the learned Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra, as respondent, opposed the condonation. The court examined …
The State filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 357‑day delay in filing first appeals against a judgment and award of a Reference Court. The petitioners argued that sufficient reasons existed for the delay and requested that the court allow the appeals to be registered. The …
Tulshiram Bandu Patil filed a writ petition under section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, seeking a declaration that the reservation of his land (Survey No. 25/4) as a garden had lapsed because the Jalgaon Municipal Corporation failed to act on his purchase notice for …
The applicant, Samadhan Nana Shinde, filed an application seeking recall of the order dated 24 June 2026 that dismissed his writ petition in default. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rajendra S. Sadaphule, was prepared to argue the matter on the next date. The Court directed that the matter be stood …
The petition challenged the election of Nilesh Dnyandev Lanke to Parliament from Ahmednagar, alleging corrupt practices under Sections 123(4), 123(6) and 100 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, including false statements, excess expenditure and bogus voting. The respondent filed an …
The petitioners, Pravin Motesing Ghoti and another, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State's scrutiny committee to decide their tribe claim, which had been pending since June 2025. They argued urgency because one petitioner had secured admission to IIT Bhubaneswar, conditional on …
The petitioner, Vikas Kishanrao Kamble, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The Court noted that this issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment. It was admitted that the post in question had not received a grant until 2005, rendering the petitioner …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, presumably related to compensation. The petitioners later informed the court that they had already received and accepted the compensation. The court examined whether the petition remained maintainable after the relief had …
The petitioner, Janka Nivruttirao Sherikar, filed a writ petition challenging the recruitment process for the post of Anganwadi Supervisor advertised on 7 April 2015. The respondents informed the court that the recruitment had been completed, an appointment had been made, and the petitioner had now …
The petitioner, a student who has passed the 12th standard with good marks, sought a direction from the High Court for the State's tribal validation committee to decide her Scheduled Tribe claim within a stipulated period so she could obtain a tribe validation certificate required for admission to a …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Shikshan Prasarak and Samajit Vikas Mandal, challenged a communication dated 14‑06‑2017 that permitted the Zilla Parishad to open an 8th‑standard class in the same village where the petitioners already run a school up to 8th standard. They argued that a …
The petitioners, Sandeep Krushnanath Kharad and others, filed a writ petition seeking benefits under the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Shetkari Sanman Yojana-2017 circular dated 28 June 2017. They later requested permission to withdraw the petition and instead approach the appropriate authorities with …
The petitioner, a student, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Schedule Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee to decide her Scheduled Tribe status claim, which has been pending since 2017, so she can secure admission to a professional course reserved for ST candidates. The petitioner …
The petitioner, an independent owner of a residential plot acquired for the Lower Dudhana Project, filed a writ petition after the authorities failed to allot him a rehabilitation plot under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. The respondents argued that the petitioner …
The petitioners, Pralhad Dhansing Rathod and another, filed Writ Petition No. 8938 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Assets Reconstruction Company India Ltd and others. The petition sought relief, but over the years the petition became stale. Counsel for the petitioners …
The petitioner, Jagannath Laxman Gaikwad, filed a writ petition seeking correction of his occupation in the title clause of a land record. He also requested that Respondent No.4 decide pending representations dated 5 April 2018 and 14 June 2018, which had remained unresolved for several years. The …
The petitioner, Arvind Dinkar Bhosale, challenged the Standing Committee of Jalgaon City Municipal Corporation's order dismissing his appeal against a disciplinary order that stopped two salary increments. He alleged that the charges were improperly framed, evidence insufficient, and the enquiry …
The petitioner, Rahul Kishor Patil, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee to decide his claim within a stipulated period. He alleged that while a vigilance cell report concerning his brother's claim had been accepted, the same report for …
The petitioner, Rajendra Baburao Ubale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the respondent corporation asserted that the petitioner had died, a claim the petitioner’s counsel denied having received any instruction about. The court examined …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to restrain the respondents from disturbing their peaceful possession. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court examined whether such a prayer for injunction falls within the jurisdiction of the High …
The petitioners, Laxman Sanjay Mande and Rameshwar Sanjay Mande, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking issuance of a caste certificate that had not been granted by the competent Sub‑Divisional Officer (S.D.O.). Their applications had been pending since 21 April 2026, prompting …
The petitioner, Yash Rajendra Thakur, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State's Scrutiny Committee to decide his tribe status, a claim pending since 25 July 2025. The respondent State, through its AGP, indicated that it would need at least three months to dispose of the claim. The …
The petitioners, a cultural organization, filed a writ petition seeking the authorities' approval of a fresh staffing pattern proposal for a school, contingent on student strength. They requested that the authorities consider the proposal within a reasonable time. The petition was heard by a …
The petitioners challenged a draft development plan published by the President of the Municipal Council, Jamner, arguing that the President lacked authority under the relevant town‑planning Act and that the plan should have been sanctioned by the Director of Town Planning. They also pointed to a …
The petitioners, Pradeep Kesarilal Chaudhary and others, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan v. State of …
The State of Maharashtra filed numerous civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same land acquisition proceedings. Relying on a prior order (CA No.4670/2012) that had condoned delay, the Court examined whether the present delay warranted …
The State of Maharashtra filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a 400‑day delay in filing appeals arising from the same acquisition proceedings. The State relied on a prior order of this Court dated 9 January 2015 in CA No.4670/2012, which had already condoned a similar delay. The Court …
Petitioners Soniya Ramesh Solanke and Aasha Nathu Marathe filed writ petitions challenging the State of Maharashtra. They moved a motion seeking a clerical correction in paragraph 2 of the order dated 23.01.2026, requesting the insertion of the words “and Nandurbar respectively”. The Court examined …
Aditya Education Trust, through its President Subhashchandra Mitthulal Sarda, filed Writ Petition No. 8943 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner sought relief, but during proceedings the petitioner’s …
The case involved a large group of first appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court and the acquiring body sought to overturn it. The Reference Court had fixed …
The petitioner, Sangharatna Narayan Chaudante, filed Writ Petition No. 9713 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate Rahul M. Gaikwad, later moved the Court requesting leave to withdraw the …
Balaji Pandurang Bamne filed Writ Petition No. 8933 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pankaj S. Kokane and Mr. S. T. Veer. The State was represented by Mrs. D. S. Jape …
The petitioner, Abhijeet Jalindar Rajle, was appointed as Electrical Assistant by respondent No.3 on 10 February 2026, subject to submitting a caste validity certificate within six months. The petitioner argued that obtaining the certificate was beyond his control as his claim was pending validation …
