Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
263 judgments · newest first · showing 201–263
The petitioners, Yogita Hanmant Ronte and another, filed a writ petition seeking a Tribe Validity Certificate recognizing them as members of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior order dated 01.08.2023 in Writ Petition No.9144 of 2023, which had quashed a Scrutiny Committee order …
The petitioners, former teachers at a government school, claimed arrears of salary and regularisation of their appointments, alleging they had worked from 2009 to 2018 without payment. They sought the court’s direction to compel the respondents to approve their appointments and pay dues. The court …
The petitioner, Nitin Shivram Limkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed …
The petitioner, a farmer, claimed that 29 R of his land acquired in 2005‑06 was done without proper notice and that no compensation had been paid, seeking compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The …
The petitioner, Sopan GhanShyam Sapkale, filed a civil application seeking permission to submit additional documents, including a certificate of validity granted to a near relative by the Scrutiny Committee and fresh genealogical records, to support his claim for a Scheduled Tribe certificate. The …
The petitioner, a grandson of a land‑acquisition awardee, obtained a Project Affected Person (PAP) certificate after his uncle could not utilise it due to age. The Deputy Collector later cancelled the certificate, alleging that two other persons from the family had already received daily‑wage …
The petitioner, Sambhaji Prakash Suryawanshi, challenged an order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that rejected his claim to belong to the Koli Mahadev (29) Scheduled Tribe on the basis of alleged fabricated documents. He argued that his first cousin, Shrikant Sanjay …
Ashok Girdharlal Khandelwal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court, on 17 April 2026, warned that failure to appear on the next date would result in dismissal for want of prosecution. The petitioner did not appear on the scheduled date of 8 May 2026, …
The petitioner, Aniruddha Eknath Latpate, filed a writ petition seeking a directive that the Superintendent of Police, Parbhani, consider a representation he submitted on 25 November 2016. He relied on a prior judgment of this Court (Writ Petition No.12966/2017) which held that interest at 12% per …
The petitioner, Balasaheb Dagdu Pandit, filed a writ petition challenging a grievance that had been considered by the State of Maharashtra. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was absorbed into service and subsequently retired upon superannuation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the …
The petitioner, Vasant Rambhau Bhadane, was appointed as Mistri Grade‑II in 1983 and was placed on a time‑bound pay scale in 1995, becoming eligible for a higher pay scale from December 2007. Despite this entitlement, he was not paid the benefits of the second time‑bound scale before his retirement …
The petitioners, Anil Yashwant Kardure and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highway Authority and the Collector of Osmanabad to pass a fresh award because their names were omitted from an earlier compensation award. They alleged that compensation had been paid …
The National Education Society sought the High Court’s intervention to compel the State of Maharashtra to approve its proposals for establishing Urdu‑medium schools in villages listed in the master plan. The petitioner alleged that the proposals, recommended by the district‑level committee, had been …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed multiple writ petitions seeking directions for the Government to absorb them into regular service. The Court examined whether any right had accrued to the petitioners to …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. The Court noted that their engagement was limited to a specific scheme and that …
The petitioners, who were working as Gram Rojgar Sevaks under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), filed writ petitions seeking a direction that the Government absorb them into regular service. They contended that their employment under the scheme gave them a …
The petitioner, Raju Banshi Kohok, filed a writ petition seeking a pension under the old pension scheme. The learned Additional Government Pleader informed the Court that the matter had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. …
The petitioner, Arjun Jalaba Morea, was appointed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA). He filed a writ petition seeking direction that he be absorbed into regular government service. The Court examined whether a person appointed solely for a scheme can be …
The petitioner, a part‑time teacher at Asta High School, challenged the Education Officer's refusal to sanction his salary and the subsequent termination of his services. He claimed that his appointment was a permanent part‑time post approved by the authorities and that no inquiry or due‑process was …
Petitioner Vitthal Santram Dahatonde filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioner learned that the matter had already been decided by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Ors. …
The writ petition filed in 2017 by M/s Pranav Omprakash Khake and others against the Union of India remained unattended; no party appeared when the matter was called in both the morning and second sessions. The court observed that the petition appears to have been abandoned by the petitioners. …
The petitioners, a group of junior engineers and other staff appointed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) between 2007 and 2012, sought regularisation, creation of permanent posts and three years’ arrears, contending that they have continuously served and that the Maharashtra Rural …
The petitioner, Vaibhav Prabhakr Kulkarni, sought allotment of a plot that had been purchased by his father in an auction conducted by a bank. The plot is designated for industrial use, but the petitioner submitted a proposal for a restaurant, a commercial activity, which the Maharashtra Industrial …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Dhondiba Baburao Shep, sought condonation of a 282‑day delay in filing a first appeal against an award that enhanced their compensation. The Court examined whether the delay could be justified under the principles of equity and procedural law. Considering the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking recovery of a sum from the respondents. The Government, acting as a respondent, filed an affidavit stating that the amount in question had already been recovered from respondent No. 4. The court examined the affidavit and found that the relief sought by …
The petitioners, Gangabharati Mahila Bachat Gat, filed a writ petition challenging the order of allotment of a fair price shop by the State of Maharashtra. The respondents argued that an alternative remedy existed in the form of an appeal before the Commissioner. The Court examined whether the writ …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench heard a massive group of appeals arising from a common land acquisition proceeding for a minor irrigation project in Latur, where 104 hectares were acquired from several villages. Claimants challenged the compensation awarded by the Special Land Acquisition …
The petitioner, Ramprasad Tulshiram Raut, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The Court had previously ordered on 10 March 2026 that the petition must be argued on the next date, otherwise it would be dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner failed to …
Anitabai Santosh Nikam filed a writ petition seeking direction for the payment of ex-gratia assistance/insurance cover from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner alleged that the payment had not been made. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents informed the Court that the …
Petitioner Ratnamala Pralhad Salve filed a writ petition seeking an appointment as Anganwadi Sevika, invoking two government resolutions dated 12 March 2008 and 13 August 2014. The petitioner asked the court to direct the respondent authority to decide her claim and issue an appointment order. The …
Sharad Kisan Bhumbar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the application and, finding no impediment, …
The petitioner, Santosh Govindrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of the case, the sole petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death, raising the question of the petition’s continuance. The Court …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition proceedings. The Court examined whether the delay could be excused and under what conditions. It held that …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition awards. The High Court examined whether such delay could be condoned and whether the claimants could claim statutory …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands were acquired, filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and under what conditions. It held that condonation …
The original claimants, who were agriculturists whose lands had been acquired, filed several civil applications seeking condonation of delay in filing their first appeals against the acquisition. The Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and whether the claimants could still claim …
The petitioner, Ravindra Rajendra Gite, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, submitted an affidavit stating that the petitioner’s grievance had been …
The petitioner, Ganesh Vishwanath Daud, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The issue before the court was whether it could grant leave to withdraw a pending writ petition. The court …
Petitioners Sanjay Kalyan Kadam and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction restraining Respondent No.3 from proceeding with actions based on a measurement report filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records in a civil suit pending before the Senior Division Civil …
Petitioner Purushottam Sheshrao Neharkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth and others. The petitioner, through his counsel, later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court considered …
The petitioner, Marathwada Gramin Apang Vikas Mandal, filed a writ petition but failed to cooperate with the court despite attempts by counsel to establish contact. The court noted the petitioner's non‑responsiveness and, on that basis, held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the …
Sahebrao Kachru Ghuge filed writ petition No. 27‑WP‑4567‑2018 seeking a direction that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 consider an application he made on 20 June 2016 for information. The petition alleged that the authorities had not yet acted on his request. The High Court examined whether it could compel …
The petitioner, represented by Mr. P.B. Joshi, sought leave to withdraw the writ petition filed against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The …
The petitioner, Ramabai Digambar Kulkarni, filed a writ petition seeking the return of land acquired in 1991 and handed over to the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) for an industrial area, alleging that the land remained unused. The MIDC rejected the request, stating the land …
The petitioner, an engineering student, mistakenly clicked the cancellation button on the Directorate of Technical Education (DTE) website, leading to the cancellation of his admission to Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College. He filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his admission not be …
The petition challenged the reservation of Gram Panchayat seats for the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in villages where no ST persons reside, arguing that such reservation is unwarranted. Respondents contended that reservations are based on census data showing ST population in the area, and the …
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court despite a specific order dated 06.04.2026 directing their presence. The court observed that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No …
The original claimants filed two civil applications seeking a court order directing the respondent to deposit a deficit amount arising from a miscalculation of days in a prior award, together with 12% interest. The court found that the discrepancy in calculation was undisputed and that the award had …
The petitioners claimed that their father, the owner of house No. 238 in Palshi village, was omitted from the list of beneficiaries of an alternative plot under a rehabilitation scheme due to a typographical error, and that plot No. 200 was wrongly allotted to another person. They sought a court …
The petitioners, Vandana Vasantrao Ingale and another, filed a writ petition seeking pension under the old pension scheme. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra, contended that the issue had already been decided by a Full Bench judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan v. State of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Pranita Mangesh Lohare, filed a writ petition (No. 11116 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending for an extended period, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that, due to …
M/s Brite Industries, through its authorized representative, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later moved the Court seeking permission to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to approach the Court again if …
The original claimants filed two civil applications seeking a court order directing the respondent to deposit a deficit amount arising from a miscalculation of days in a prior award, together with 12% interest. The court found that the discrepancy in calculation was undisputed and that the award had …
The plaintiff, R.L. Steels and Energy Ltd., claimed that a storm on 5 July 2016 caused the collapse of its steel‑melting shed and damage to stock, invoking a Standard Fire and Special Perils policy issued by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. The insurer denied the claim, asserting that no storm occurred …
The petitioner, Sindhubai Vilas Adsul, filed a writ petition seeking reinstatement as a Peon/Saphai Kamgar in the Rural Hospital, Paithan. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain a service reinstatement claim and considered the applicability of the limitation period. The …
The petitioners, Jai Hind Education Trust, sought a writ directing the State not to force their second school to absorb eight surplus teachers as ordered by the Education Officer. The Education Officer had issued a directive on 10 November 2017 for the school to take in the eight teachers. During …
The petitioners, whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, received compensation but alleged that the statutory solatium and interest components were not paid. They sought the payment of solatium and interest, contending that interest should accrue from the date of claim. The High …
The applicant, Ravikiran Budha Ahire, filed Civil Application No. 216 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent, Central Bank of India, was represented by Advocate Dr. S. G. Nandedkar. The respondent's counsel appeared before the Court, indicating that the matter could …
The petitioners, Gopal Pitambar Patil and another, filed Writ Petition No. 5012 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that they had already filed an appeal before the appropriate …
The petitioners, whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, had received compensation but alleged that the statutory solatium and interest components were not paid. They filed writ petitions seeking the unpaid amounts. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in National …
The petitioners, whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, received compensation but alleged that the statutory solatium and interest components were not paid. They sought the outstanding amounts, arguing that interest should accrue from the date of receipt of compensation. The …
The petitioners challenged the non-payment of solatium and interest on compensation already received for land acquired under the National Highways Act. Their properties had been acquired, compensation paid, but the additional components were denied. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioners, whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, had received compensation but alleged that the statutory solatium and interest components were not paid. They sought the payment of these amounts and interest thereon. The Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in …
