Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAHEBRAO S/O. VISHWANATH BORADE.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court condoned the delay, subject to the applicant’s undertaking not to claim interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.

Summary

The applicant, Sahebrao Borade, sought condonation of a 3,745‑day delay in filing an appeal for enhancement of compensation relating to acquired land. The Court examined the reasons provided in the application and considered whether the delay could be excused without prejudice to the State. It concluded that the delay could be condoned provided the applicant undertook not to claim interest or statutory benefits for the period of delay if the appeal succeeded. Accordingly, the application was allowed subject to the stipulated condition. The decision permits the appeal to proceed while safeguarding the respondents' interests.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 3,745 days in filing an appeal for enhancement of compensation can be condoned by the Court

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • compensation enhancement
  • land acquisition
  • interest waiver
  • statutory benefits

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:25632
                                                                           1002-ca-3419-2026.odt
                                                     (1)


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                   CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3419 OF 2026
                                            IN FAST/5075/2026
                                   Sahebrao S/o. Vishwanath Borade.
                                                VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Jalna And Ors.
                                                    ...
                      Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Koralkar A H And S S Kalbande.
                             AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. R.R. Tandale
                   Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Vaishali Swamin h/f Ms. Sarita
                                                Gaikwad
                                                    ...
                                              CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                 DATED : JULY 02, 2026

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.             The applicant seeks to condone delay of 3745 days

                 caused in filing appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

                 2.             Perused application and reasons as stated therein.

                 Apparently, applicant is litigating for getting just compensation

                 towards acquired land. In that view of matter, looking to reasons as

                 incorporated in para 3 to 5 of application, delay can be condoned by

                 putting certain conditions, so as to protect interest of respondents.

                 3.             In result, application is allowed.   Delay of 3745 days

                 caused in filing appeal is condoned, subject to condition that

                 applicant files an undertaking to Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that

                 he shall not claim interest or statutory benefits for delayed period, in

                 case he succeeds in appeal.


                                                           (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
                 Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.