Bombay High Court
SAKHUBAI GOVINDRAO SONTAKKE.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The Court held that the delay of 246 days in filing the appeals was satisfactorily explained and therefore condoned.
Summary
Turab, the applicant, filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 246‑day delay in filing appeals against a judgment and award of the Reference Court. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Collector of Latur and others, was the respondent. Notice was served on a third respondent who failed to appear. The Court examined the explanations provided in paragraphs 4 to 10 of the applications and found the reasons for the delay to be satisfactory. Consequently, the Court allowed the applications, condoned the delay, and ordered that the appeals be registered after removal of the office objection. The civil applications were thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 246 days in filing appeals against the Reference Court's judgment can be condoned.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- appeal filing
- civil procedure
- reference court judgment
- office objection
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:26325
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3860 OF 2026
IN FAST/7925/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3983 OF 2026
IN FAST/7995/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3985 OF 2026
IN FAST/7981/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3986 OF 2026
IN FAST/8004/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3987 OF 2026
IN FAST/7990/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3989 OF 2026
IN FAST/8006/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3979 OF 2026
IN FAST/7993/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3980 OF 2026
IN FAST/7998/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3993 OF 2026
IN FAST/8000/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3970 OF 2026
IN FAST/7984/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3976 OF 2026
IN FAST/7979/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3975 OF 2026
IN FAST/7975/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3992 OF 2026
IN FAST/8009/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3981 OF 2026
IN FAST/7974/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3982 OF 2026
1/3
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt
IN FAST/7986/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3990 OF 2026
IN FAST/8002/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3991 OF 2026
IN FAST/8012/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3971 OF 2026
IN FAST/7965/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3973 OF 2026
IN FAST/7969/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3974 OF 2026
IN FAST/7972/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3977 OF 2026
IN FAST/7988/2026
TURAB S/O. DADAMIYA SAYYAD.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. G. K. Sontakke
AGP for Respondent No. 1,2 : Mr. C. V. Bhadane
...
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 02.07.2026
PER COURT :
Heard learned advocate appearing for the respective parties.
2. Though the notice is served upon respondent no. 3, none appears.
3. The applicants seek to condone delay of 246 days caused in filing
appeals against the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court.
4. Perused the reasons stated in the applications particularly in
paragraph nos. 4 to 10. The delay has been properly explained. In the
2/3
1004 CA 3860 OF 2026+.odt
result, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Applications
are disposed of.
5. Appeals be registered after removal of the office objection.
( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)
mkd/-
3/3
Checking your session…