Bombay High Court
VITHAL RAMJI NARHARE DIED THR HIS LERS SHAKUNTALA AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR LATUR AND AND ANOTHER.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The court held that the delay was not deliberate and therefore condoned it, setting aside the abatement.
Summary
The appellant sought condonation of a 1,099‑day delay in filing a civil application to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record and to set aside an abatement. The State and a second respondent opposed, arguing there were no sufficient reasons for condonation. The court examined the reasons and found the delay was not deliberate, emphasizing that the merits of the case required the representatives to be on record. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application, condoned the delay, set aside the abatement, and granted permission to amend the record within two weeks, subject to costs if not complied. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh on 8 April 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 1,099 days in filing the civil application can be condoned.
- Whether the abatement can be set aside in view of the delay.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- abatement
- legal representatives
- civil procedure
- interest of justice
Judgment
923 FA NO. 977 OF 2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
923 FIRST APPEAL NO. 977 OF 2015
Vithal Ramji Narhare
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Appellant
Ms. Anuradha S. Mantri, AGP for Respondents/State
Mr. Manish N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent No.2
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4094 OF 2026 IN FA/977/2015
….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 08.04.2026
PER COURT :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4094 OF 2026
1. Heard.
2. This is an application for condonation of 1099 days
delay caused in filing the Civil Application for bringing the legal
representatives of deceased appellant Vithal Ramji Narhare on
record as well as for setting aside abatement.
3. Learned AGP for the respondent / State and learned
Advocate for respondent No.2 strongly opposed the application
and submitted that there is no sufficient reasons to condone the
delay. They prayed to reject the application.
1 of 2
(( 2 )) 923 FA NO. 977 OF 2015
4. Perused the application. Considering the reasons stated
therein, it appears that the delay is not deliberately caused. The lis of
the applicants is required to be decided on merits. Accordingly, the
application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence,
the following order:
::ORDER::
a. The application is allowed.
b. The delay of 1099 caused in filing the Civil
Application for bringing the legal representatives of
deceased appellant on record is condoned.
c. The abatement is set aside.
d. Permission to bring the legal representatives of
the deceased appellant/Vithal Ramji Narhare on
record is granted. The amendment be carried out
within a period of two weeks from today. If the
amendment is not carried out within the stipulated
period, the applicants have to pay costs of Rs.2,000/-.
. List the First appeal on 24.04.2026.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav 2 of 2
Checking your session…