Bombay High Court
RADHESHAM JAGNATH MITTALversusANNA BABURAO JADHAV (DIED) THR. GANADHAR ANNA JADHAV AND ORS
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The application is allowed; the delay is condoned and the abatement is set aside.
Summary
The applicant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,254‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased respondent, Anna Baburao Jadhav, on record, and also requested that the abatement of the proceeding be set aside. The respondent’s counsel opposed the relief. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found that it was not deliberately caused. In the interest of justice, the court allowed the application, set aside the abatement, and condoned the delay. The applicant was directed to amend the appeal memo to include the legal representatives within a week, and the civil application was thereafter disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the court should condone a delay of 2,254 days in filing the civil application for bringing the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record
- Whether the abatement of the proceeding should be set aside
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- abatement
- legal representatives of deceased
- civil procedure
- interest of justice
Judgment
934 CA NO. 4423 OF 2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4423 OF 2025
IN FA/1942/2024
Radhesham Jagnath Mittal
VERSUS
Anna Baburao Jadhav (died) Thr. Ganadhar Anna Jadhav And Ors
...
Mr. R. F. Totala i/by Mr. Lohiya Swapnil Vijendrakumar, Advocate
for Applicant
Mr. A S Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 17.01.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard.
2. This is an application for condonation of 2254 days
delay caused in filing the Civil Application for bringing the legal
representatives of deceased respondent (Anna Baburao Jadhav)
on record as well as for setting aside abatement.
3. Learned Advocate for the respondent No.2 strongly
opposed the application.
4. Perused the application. Considering the reasons
stated therein, it appears that the delay is not deliberately caused.
Hence, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of
justice. Hence, the following order:
1 of 2
(( 2 )) 934 CA NO. 4423 OF 2025
::ORDER::
a. The application is allowed by setting aside the
abatement.
b. The delay of 2254 caused in filing the Civil
Application for bringing the legal representatives of
deceased respondent (Anna Baburao Jadhav) on
record is condoned.
c. The applicant is directed to amend the appeal
memo by bringing the legal representatives of the
deceased respondent (Anna Baburao Jadhav) on
record within one week.
d. The Civil Application is disposed of.
IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1942 OF 2024
1. After the amendment is carried out, issue notice to the
legal heirs of respondent (Anna Baburao Jadhav), returnable on
18.02.2026.
2. Call Record and Proceedings.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav 2 of 2
Checking your session…