Bombay High Court
SUNIL SHIVAPPA TANWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The appeal was disposed of because the compensation awarded was within four times the SLAO amount, in accordance with the State Government's policy.
Summary
The State of Maharashtra appealed a judgment of the Land Reference Court that awarded compensation to Sunil Shivappa Tanwade. The State argued that a government resolution dated 03‑11‑2016, as amended on 23‑02‑2017, directs the government not to file or contest any appeal where the compensation awarded is within four times the amount fixed by the State Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO). The court examined this policy and the fact that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court fell within the four‑times limit. Relying on the policy, the court disposed of the first appeal without further hearing. Consequently, the related civil application was also dismissed, and the matter was closed pending cross‑objections.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be entertained when the compensation awarded is within four times the SLAO award as per the State Government's policy resolution.
Subjects
- Land Acquisition
- Compensation
- Appeal
- Government Policy
- SLAO
- Reference Court
- Disposition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:3250
fa1023.15
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
953 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1023 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5026 OF 2025
WITH
X-OBJECTION NO. 26 OF 2023
IN FA/1023/2015
The State of Maharashtra and others
VERSUS
Sunil Shivappa Tanwade
...
A.G.P. for Appellant : Mr. S.G. Joshi
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.B. Kale
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 23rd JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award
dated 27.04.2010 passed by the learned Land Reference Court,
Omerga, District Osmanabad in LAR No.573 of 2009.
2. The learned AGP for the State submits that in view of the
policy decision of the State Government as per the Government
Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and the corrigendum dated 23.02.2017
issued thereto, the State Government has resolved not to file or
contest any appeal where the amount of compensation awarded by
the Reference Court is within four times of the amount awarded by
the SLAO. He submits that the present first appeal deserves to be
fa1023.15
-2-
disposed of in view of the aforesaid policy decision of the State
Government, as the amount of compensation awarded by the
Reference Court is within four times of the amount awarded by the
SLAO.
3. Considering the submissions of the learned AGP as well as
the policy decision of the State Government, the appeal deserves to
be disposed of. The First Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
4. In view of disposal of the first appeal, nothing further
survives for consideration in civil application No. 5026 of 2025 and
the same is accordingly disposed of.
5. List the cross objections for hearing on 02.02.2026.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
rlj/
Checking your session…