Bombay High Court
Smt Aruna Prabhakar Bhalerao (Bhavsar) and OthersversusRahul Bhanudas Kulkarni and Another
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The court held that the 96‑day delay was not deliberate and could be condoned in the interest of justice.
Summary
The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 96‑day delay in filing their first appeal. The court examined the reasons provided and found that the delay was not deliberate. Consequently, the court allowed the application, condoning the delay in the interest of justice. The court also issued a notice to the respondents in the related first appeal, to be returned by 1 July 2026. The matter was listed for further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 96 days in filing a first appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- first appeal
- civil procedure
- interest of justice
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5094 OF 2026
IN FAST/11731/2026
SMT ARUNA PRABHAKAR BHALERAO (BHAVSAR) AND OTHERS
VERSUS
RAHUL BHANUDAS KULKARNI AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. M. M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for Applicants
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 30th APRIL, 2026
P. C. :-
1. The present Civil Application is filed for condonation of delay of
96 days caused in filing the first appeal.
2. Perused the application and heard learned advocate for the
applicants. Considering the reasons stated in the application, it appears that
the delay caused is not deliberate. Therefore, the application is allowed. The
delay in filing the appeal is condoned in the interest of justice.
3. In FA(ST) No. 11731 of 2026, issue notice to the Respondents,
returnable on 1st July, 2026.
4. Call R and P.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
ssp
917 CA 5094.2026.odt 1 of 1
Checking your session…