Bombay High Court
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERSversusSAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the writ petitions stand disposed as the undertaking to add the Wakf Board as a party-defendant was accepted.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief against the respondents. During the hearing, the respondents informed the court that the original plaintiff was prepared to add the Wakf Board as a party-defendant in the related civil suits. The court accepted this statement as a binding undertaking. Consequently, the court found that no further relief could be granted in the writ petitions. The writ petitions were therefore disposed of, and any pending civil applications were also dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions should be dismissed upon the plaintiff's undertaking to add the Wakf Board as a party-defendant
Subjects
- Wakf Board
- civil procedure
- writ petition
- party-defendant
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9119
54 WP No.10959.2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10959 OF 2016
SHAIKH AMIN SHAIKH DIED LRS SHAIKH SALIMABI AMIN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYYAD UMAR SAYYAD USMAN AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar,
Advocate for Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Yunus Basheer Pathan
...
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5489 OF 2020
IN WP/10961/2016
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
….
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 10961 OF 2016
AYUB KHAN MEHABOOB KHAN AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SAYAD LATIF IMAM DIED LRS SAYYAD HAMID LATIF AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
Advocate for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 9 : Mr. Ms. Fatema Kazi h/f Mr.
S. S. Kazi
….
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Date : 4th March, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. After hearing the learned counsel for respondents for some
time, he submits that the original plaintiff is ready to add Wakf Board as
54 WP No.10959.2016
-2-
party-defendant in both the suits.
2. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to this
Court. Considering the same, nothing survives in the petition.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. Resultantly, pending
civil application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…