Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

YUVRAJ LAXMAN PATILversusTHE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON AND ORS

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The Court ordered the Registry to release the remaining deposited amount with interest to the applicants, as the appeals had already been disposed.

Summary

The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking leave to withdraw the balance of money deposited with the Court during the pendency of their appeals. The appeals had been disposed on 20 April 2026, and the Court had previously allowed withdrawal of 50% of the deposited amount upon an undertaking, while the remaining 50% required a solvency certificate which the applicants could not obtain. Consequently, the balance remained in the Court. The Court considered that, with the appeals already decided, retaining the funds served no purpose. It therefore directed the Registry to disburse the remaining amount, together with accrued interest, to the applicants within four weeks and discharged the securities. All the applications were consequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may order the release of the balance of deposited funds after the disposal of the appeals
  • Whether the requirement of a solvency certificate remains enforceable after the appeals are concluded

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • court deposits
  • withdrawal of funds
  • appeal disposal
  • interest on court money
  • registry order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:26143-DB


                                                                      6189.26ca etc
                                                (1)

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         920-2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6189 OF 2026
                                       IN FA/2315/2020

                                 SITARAM SENU PATIL.
                                        VERSUS
                   THE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON
                                       AND ORS.

                                          WITH
                            CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6186 OF 2026
                                      IN FA/2314/2020

                                BHAURAO KADU BORSE
                                       VERSUS
                   THE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON
                                       AND ORS

                                          WITH
                            CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6185 OF 2026
                                      IN FA/2313/2020

                                YUVRAJ LAXMAN PATIL
                                       VERSUS
                   THE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON
                                       AND ORS

                                          WITH
                            CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6187 OF 2026
                                      IN FA/2312/2020

                               RAJANIBAI SITARAM PATIL.
                                        VERSUS
                   THE EX. ENGINEER, WAGHUR DAM DIVISION, JALGAON
                                       AND ORS.
                                                …..
                Mr Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for Applicants
                Ms S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 to 5/State
                                                 …..
                                                            6189.26ca etc
                                  (2)

                         CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT
                                        AND
                                 AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
                          DATE : 02nd JULY 2026
PER COURT :-


1.          All these applications are filed seeking leave to withdraw

the amount lying in this Court that was deposited by the

appellant/Acquiring Body during the pendency of the appeals.


2.          The Appeals themselves have been disposed of on

20/04/2026. During the pendency of the appeals, the applicants were

permitted to withdraw 50%of the amount on furnishing undertaking to

the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

Remaining 50% of the amount was permitted to be withdrawn upon

furnishing solvency/surety to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar

(Judicial) of this Court. The applicants have stated that, since they

could not produce/obtain a solvency certificate, they could not

withdraw the remaining 50% of the amount. Only amount that was

permitted to be withdrawn on undertaking could be withdrawn by the

applicants. Thus, remaining part of the amount is lying in this Court.


3.          Considering that the appeals have already been disposed

of by the judgment dated 20/04/2026, in our opinion, no purpose

would be served by keeping the amount pending in this Court.
                                                         6189.26ca etc
                                  (3)

4.            In that view of the matter, the Registry is directed to

disburse the remaining amount, alongwith accrued interest, to the

present applicants, within a period of four weeks.         All these

applications stand disposed of accordingly.     The securities stand

discharged.



[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]                 [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
sjk


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.